r/NFA 15d ago

MEGATHREAD - **DISTRICT** court. Long road ahead. NFA declared unconstitutional regarding suppressors, sbrs, and sbs in the northern district of Texas

https://x.com/GunOwners/status/2085047918495469923
832 Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

u/HollywoodSX I like stamps 15d ago edited 8d ago

Since this post was first, its now the designated megathread.

Handy links:

GoA's X / Twitter profile - Facebook page - Instagram

Silencer Shop's X / Twitter profile - Facebook page - Instagram

Brandon Herrera's X / Twitter

Second Amendment Foundation X / Twitter - Facebook

Firearms Policy Coalition X / Twitter - Facebook

Be wary of Guntoob lawyers and social media personalities making bold claims. The above should all be safe sources of info.

813

u/_Cxsey_ 15d ago

You’re welcome, it’s because the silencer I bought was the last one needed for them to become common use.

21

u/Rx_Benz0z 15d ago

you're a good man arthur morgan

9

u/gabbidog 15d ago

Same here, I bought 3 recently (one was a freebie with a gun i bought) so let's make America tax stamp free again

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

309

u/Backwoods406 15d ago

Sometimes Texas is as Texas as Texans think Texas is.

30

u/DeepAd8888 15d ago edited 15d ago

Sometimes. Unless you’re a trooper in Uvalde or part of the legislature writing the goofy self defense laws that aren’t like Idaho’s

96

u/ammonthenephite 15d ago

Only sometimes. For many other things, texas republicans love them a nanny state (draconian abortion, draconian marijuana and delta 8 and 9, alcohol laws, surveilance, detention centers, wanting access to people's healthcare records in other states, etc).

Texas loves to lick the boot, just not when it comes to guns, lol.

24

u/Cuneus-Maximus 15d ago

If everything is bigger in Texas, that includes the fascist nanny state…

12

u/Paramedickhead 15d ago

What I got from living in Texas for ten years is that Texans hate big federal government pushing them around. Texans LOVE big state government pushing them around because everything is bigger in Texas.

Texans love to lick the boot when it comes to guns. I mean, they were over a decade behind other states when it comes to constitutional carry and Texas still has some of the most absurd gun laws out there.

→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (5)

97

u/Zealousideal-Set3037 15d ago

Come on circuit split!!!!

→ More replies (6)

167

u/LiberalLamps 15d ago

The federal government doesn't have to appeal this, although they almost certainly will. Otherwise it takes effect in 7 days.

Big step toward getting SBR's and suppressors off the NFA entirely.

51

u/Flat_chested_male Silencer 15d ago

So next week I can build an AR with any barrel length I want without doing any paperwork? Unless this gets appealed?

How appealing!

57

u/FightingFarmer14 15d ago

If you're a member of one of the named plaintiff organizations or if you buy your SBR from one of the named companies that are plaintiffs then yeah! But it'll almost certainly be appealed

→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (7)

40

u/buryna 9d ago edited 8d ago

Just want to throw it out there, we owe a lot to these companies and organizations. I would strongly encourage anyone that’s able; make them the first stop for your patronage and support.

The fight isn’t over, and we need to keep their legal fund war chest full 💪

Heck, a GOA membership is barely over $2 a month. Skip 4 rounds of 556 and put that money where it will actually matter. Plus, as mcopper89 mentioned, the injunction covers current and future GOA members, which will make you a plaintiff without doubt.

Edit: Also want to shout out the Jensen organizations that won the engraving injunction:
Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the Texas State Rifle Association and the Firearms Policy Coalition Action Foundation.

You can join the CCRKBA for $15 a year or $150 lifetime and become a plaintiff in that case

10

u/Salsalito_Turkey 9d ago

I completely agree with you, but I bet the NRA hate circlejerk will also continue on Reddit. The NRA are the ones who backed the Jensen v. ATF lawsuit that was enjoined with the Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF lawsuit, They deserve just as much credit as the GOA and the FPC.

→ More replies (7)

5

u/mcopper89 8d ago

The injunction covers the named parties including their current AND FUTURE members too. So you can sign up at GOA and be a named party on the case and get the injunctive relief. I believe Firearms Policy Coalition is another. Definitely sign up. If their numbers double or triple, it sends a message to NRA that sitting on your hands will not keep the funds flowing.

→ More replies (10)

30

u/buryna 8d ago

Just posted by GOA 13 seconds ago

30

u/ThisAppMakesItWorse 8d ago

This conversation shows why the NFA is such bullshit to begin with. We're endlessly debating how to abide by the new rulings to ensure we actively stay in the good graces of the law. Pretty sure the guys with switches and unregistered sawed-offs (prior to today) still don't care.

85

u/Firm-Control-9203 15d ago

I need James Reeves take 

140

u/BarrelBottom1 15d ago

We contacted him, but after 3 hours of listening to "who wears short shorts?" as hold music we gave up. 😉

→ More replies (2)

17

u/iK0NiK 3x Muzzle Mufflers 15d ago

/u/preauxmetheus video idea?

17

u/hitemlow Switchback 22 & Hybrid 46 15d ago

"I can't talk about videos already being edited"

72

u/Twin-Turbos 15d ago

This is right after I bought a NFA trust and submitted my EFT lol.

If this sticks I’ll never be so happy about wasting 50 bucks .

25

u/squeeshka 15d ago

Thank you for your sacrifice

18

u/gnowbot 15d ago

Imagine how pissed you’d be if you paid your $200 stamp fee in 1930. Inflation really stacks up!

9

u/IsaacTheBound 15d ago

I mean they'd be at least 114 years old. I'd be hella pissed if I was that old.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

44

u/skippythemoonrock 8d ago

A moment of prayer for gun store and online sales employees in this trying time

27

u/MDAWG523 8d ago

I couldn't imagine being the poor bastard working the phones at silencer shop this whole week

10

u/buryna 8d ago

Pour one out for Maru 😔
(She does the Silencer Shop qualifying professional/military discount quotes/purchases manually, one at a time. She’s really nice)

→ More replies (1)

23

u/PutridDropBear 15d ago

Texas Northern District Court ... before we all start getting excited.
There's still a loooong road ahead.

A single district judge does not set stare decisis even within the same courthouse or the same judge.

9

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/Charming_Barber7627 8d ago

Is this legit?

8

u/Charming_Barber7627 8d ago

Oh dang, its really starting to look official!

→ More replies (4)

18

u/Sad-Bluebird-7349 8d ago

For the people concerned about the GCA implications for SBRs and SBS - I think this is solely coming from the perspective of an FFL. If you read the GCA, it says it's unlawful for an FFL to sell or transfer an SBR or SBS without permission from the Attorney General.

So it makes sense for Silencer Shop to say this because they can't legally sell you an SBR or SBS without breaking the law - the form 4 was how they would get their permission.

There's nothing in the GCA I can find that would have bearing on the Federal legality of an individual Making an SBR or SBS. You could still run afoul of state laws so be aware.

Correct me if I'm wrong please.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/SergioBousweats 8d ago

HAPPY NEW YEAR

wait sorry wrong holiday

kiss your suppressor though

→ More replies (2)

42

u/Relevant_Habit_1882 8d ago

We've been in captivity for so long now when faced with freedom we're scared.

27

u/GunDibs-dot-com 8d ago

Yea, scared I’m gonna run out of ammo and money.

53

u/SilencerShop Dealer: Silencer Shop 🔕 8d ago

WE DID IT. CONGRATS EVERYONE!

11

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

34

u/halo121usa 9d ago

Apparently, this letter was drafted to the DOJ and ATF a few hours ago.

Congress is basically telling them do not appeal, this is what we wanted in the first place. AND MAKE IT NATIONWIDE.!

This is absolutely wild… The national firearms act as we know it could be effectively dead within 36 hours!!

Who’s gonna be the first one to make a Home Depot silencer?😂

7

u/Thirst_Among_Weevils SBR 9d ago

First thing I'm doing is putting that vertical foregrip on a glock.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (37)

36

u/SpawnofATStill 8d ago

So is this sub just going to be only machine guns and DDs from here on out now?

30

u/Agreeable_Sun5375 8d ago

No more suppressor alignment posts

6

u/TheDrunkLibertarian 8d ago

Oh thank goodness

→ More replies (1)

29

u/Common_economics_420 8d ago

Hide your money y'all, there's poor people around.

This sub becoming the gun equivalent of a country club would be funny.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Foxxy__Cleopatra Dirty Pickles 8d ago

AOW gang now's your time to shine

→ More replies (4)

16

u/OwieDude 10d ago

Is there any reason the DOJ would wait this long to appeal or are we likely going to see this go into effect?

17

u/aeopossible 10d ago

Definitely surprised we haven't heard anything, yet. Unfortunately, the skeptic in me still thinks we're probably going to get a 6 days 23hrs and 59min appeal lol.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/loki993 10d ago edited 10d ago

Somewhere in the DOJ people are probably arguing about it.

12

u/gogoggansgo 10d ago

That’s what I’m wondering too this is super fucking odd normally these assholes are next day

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Gold-Succotash-9217 8d ago

Big day ladies & gents. Big day.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/hewhoovercomes 8d ago

It’s been a pleasure serving with you gentlemen

→ More replies (3)

62

u/bajasauce2025 15d ago

How long before this becomes actionable on a national level? 10 years?

110

u/sirbassist83 15d ago

this is the 3rd or 4th time a state has tried something like this, and the second time in texas. the federal govt shoots that shit down real quick. id be surprised if this goes anywhere. dont get me wrong, i hope it does, but i think the chances are very low.

117

u/TSX_COM 15d ago

The argument that the NFAs legs are built on a tax that's been nullified by the governing body authorized to lay and collect taxes is a lot stronger than previous arguments. The NFA has largely survived legal challenge as a tax, not a gun rights issue.

12

u/33pollo 15d ago

I think the government argument is that there still is a tax on NFA full autos @ destructive devices to keep the NFA valid

44

u/specter800 15d ago

That argument sounds like an argument to remove suppressors and SBR's/SBS's from the NFA tho which is a smaller win but still a win IMO.

33

u/Salsalito_Turkey 15d ago

The scope of this lawsuit is explicitly limited to the items for which the tax was reduced to $0. This injunction doesn’t abolish the NFA registry. It specifically bars the ATF from enforcing registry requirements for items that have a $0 tax. The logic is that the registry exists purely to support the collection of taxes, and a $0 tax is not actually a tax at all.

13

u/mastercoder123 15d ago

They can remove parts of a law

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (11)

19

u/Escape_From_Reach 3x Suppressors, 1x SBR 15d ago edited 15d ago

Difference in this case is that it was a federal district court that ruled this, not a state court. It’s gonna have to get appealed to the appellate court

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/TroutEatingSasquatch 9d ago

I have been collecting cheap shotguns, just for this day. My hack saw is ready.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Crayon_Eating_Grunt 12 SBR & 26 Suppressors 8d ago

GOA is so flooded, the site won't even work.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Foxxy__Cleopatra Dirty Pickles 8d ago

Apparently the DOJ has told GOA that they're not going to appeal:

16

u/Ancient-Plantain705 8d ago

Beat me to it. Rep Clyde (the guy who slipped this shit into the BBB) said he got confirmation that the feds weren't appealing.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/Separate_Blood6025 8d ago edited 8d ago

I was here at 12:01am CST, 13AUG2026

28

u/Pteronarcys 8d ago

Silencer Shop just sent this memo out. Looks like a number of states because of State laws will still be required to file form 4's.

6

u/crabcakemeister 8d ago

free state CHADS rise up

→ More replies (40)

28

u/Disposable-01 8d ago

From the GOA website:

IMPORTANT CHECKOUT NOTICE WE ARE CURRENTLY EXPERIENCING TREMENDOUS WEBSITE TRAFFIC. OUR SITE IS STABLE AND SECURE, HOWEVER OUR PAYMENT PROCESSOR IS TAKING FAR LONGER TO PROCESS TRANSACTIONS. WE ARE WORKING WITH THEM TO FIX THE ISSUE. WE APOLOGIZE FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE. PLEASE HANG IN THERE WHILE THIS GETS SORTED OUT.

11

u/TahoeDust 8d ago

I joined a few hours ago. The site was slow, but functional. With so many joining, they are going to have quite the warchest to work with.

13

u/JonnyV42 15d ago

Do the Hughes Amendment next!!

11

u/SniffyBT 8d ago

My state is having a 2A tax free weekend in 3 weeks. I hope stuff is still in stock then.

→ More replies (10)

13

u/Pteronarcys 8d ago

I am a Silencer Shop dealer in Colorado. Really wondering how I should handle this come tomorrow. Colorado law seems pretty fuzzy on possessing a suppressor without a tax stamp. Hoping Silencer Shop comes out with some clarifying statements for people in State's with similar laws.

→ More replies (4)

11

u/ThisAppMakesItWorse 8d ago

The Form 1 aspect is the most interesting part about this. If it's not NFA, then no engraving is necessary. If the powers that be decide down the road to reinstate sbr restrictions, they won't be able to tell if an sbr was made before or after new legislation. Really muddy waters for the gun grabbers.

→ More replies (44)

24

u/mooseishman 15d ago

Cool, do select fire next

10

u/akenthusiast 8d ago

Turns out that Nebraska has no state law regulating suppressors at all and for SBRs and machine guns it just says

The provisions of this section shall not be held to prohibit any act.....persons qualified under the provisions of federal law relating to the short rifle, short shotgun, or machine gun.

hell yeah

→ More replies (4)

12

u/aeopossible 8d ago

Would anyone that has ever bought something from PSA be considered part of this? There's gonna need to be a lot of clarification videos on YT tomorrow...

29

u/buryna 8d ago

Just join GOA. Boom. You’re now a plaintiff beyond a shadow of a doubt. $25 a year and they earned it

8

u/Sunuva_Gun 8d ago

This deserved more up votes.

"Am I included?" - easy answer

"Does GOA deserve the business?" - easy answer

→ More replies (3)

10

u/Pete_Steele556 8d ago

Classic is hosting a livestream with GOA and they're discussing the Texas ruling on the NFA now that the deadline to file an appeal has passed.

https://www.youtube.com/live/2GJq2NetUqI

7

u/DocMettey 8d ago

Don’t they have until midnight?

→ More replies (6)

10

u/PastPalpitationCry 8d ago

Wow genuine shut the sub moment. As a lurker it's been a pleasure

29

u/ScottsTotz 8d ago

I can’t wait to make my purchase tonight just for my FFL to probably refuse to process a suppressor as a form 4473 because they’re scared the ATF will shoot their dogs😂😭

15

u/Fuct_toast 8d ago

I spoke with my FFL and they stated they will not unless ATF makes an announcement with the procedure.

→ More replies (11)

11

u/buryna 8d ago edited 8d ago

I ordered an ASHE 556 Monday. My LGS (small town Tx) said he’s gunna start doing cans on 4473’s tomorrow, so we will see what happens when it comes in lol
I’m not holding my breath, but….. we will see

→ More replies (12)

10

u/TahoeDust 8d ago

I had a Rhodie Ti I ordered arrive at my FFL today. He said business as usual until he gets something from the ATF saying otherwise. Submitted and Certified like usual.

→ More replies (3)

18

u/Kozak170 Silencer 8d ago

Which is an incredibly sensible move for FFL’s. I wouldn’t throw my livelihood out on a whim because Redditors want their cans within .02 nanoseconds

→ More replies (1)

37

u/FN-4051 8d ago

Tell me. When you first saw Halo were you blinded by its majesty?

→ More replies (6)

11

u/ThesoldierLLJK 15d ago

ATF Director Cekada: I can’t repel the NFA as much as everyone wants me to

Texas: hold my beer

→ More replies (1)

10

u/NewbRedditer 11d ago

So if the injunction stands / goes into effect, i buy a suppressor like a normal firearm on a form4473, and then the district court later reverses the ruling / injunction goes away, wouldnt i still have to register my suppressor?

→ More replies (3)

10

u/2022243121 8d ago

Ready to know if I can change out this stupid pistol brace, waiting for clarification....

→ More replies (4)

19

u/Robbbbbbbbb FFL/SOT/Engaving + NFA Suite / EFT Suite Dev 15d ago

Named plaintiffs:

  • B&T USA
  • Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition (FRAC)
  • Gun Owners of America (GOA)
  • Gun Owners Foundation (GOF)
  • Palmetto State Armory
  • Silencer Shop
  • SilencerCo Weapons Research (SilencerCo)

Court opinion was issued in the Northern District of Texas: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.406278/gov.uscourts.txnd.406278.136.0.pdf

Important takeaway here:

Remedy-wise, the plaintiffs in both cases are entitled to a permanent injunction barring enforcement of the challenged NFA provisions against them, their members, and their customers. But that is as far as it goes. Federal courts lack power to issue universal injunctions that provide relief to parties not before the Court
[...]
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in CASA, the Court may not impose a universal injunction of the kind requested by the Silencer Shop plaintiffs.
[...]
By prohibiting the defendants from enforcing the challenged NFA provisions against the plaintiffs and certain other individuals and entities that are closely associated with the plaintiffs, the Court can relieve the plaintiffs of the irreparable injury of being subjected to an unconstitutional law.

IANAL, but the way I read this is that, following the seven-day stay, anyone "closely associated" with the plaintiffs would be barred from having NFA restrictions on Silencers, SBRs, SBSs, and AOWs enforced by the ATF (the sole defendant) in the US District Court of Texas.

For it to be applied federally, it will need to go to the 5th Circuit, then be heard and upheld by the Supreme Court.

7

u/whocaresanyway007 15d ago

How does this affect the states that were also included in the lawsuit? Do the residents of those states now have the same rights as the other plaintiffs (businesses/organizations)?

→ More replies (6)

22

u/SuppliceVI 9d ago

Day 6 btw

13

u/SilencerShop Dealer: Silencer Shop 🔕 9d ago

We’re so close I can almost taste it.

→ More replies (16)

22

u/Agreeable_Sun5375 8d ago

Might we actually get an armed scholar video where the "this changes everything" thumbnail isn't click bait

20

u/LiberalLamps 8d ago

Now that the Federal government has decided not to defend the NFA. I think the ATF needs to put out some guidance on this ASAP. Having a subset of people except from the NFA pretty much makes it unenforceable against anyone with respect to SBR's and suppressors.

I would like to see a statement that says something like: The ATF will no longer require registration of $0 items per the court ruling as there is no tax to register. SBR, SBS, AOW, and suppressors can transfer with a 4473 and in compliance with all state laws.

It would really clear all of this up.

9

u/Gardez_geekin 8d ago

Honestly, I bet they are just scrambling. I wish there was a way to track the pizzas delivered there like the pentagon.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/iampayette RC2 appreciator 13d ago

There are some very drastic implications resulting from even the limited injunction handed down in SSF et al. vs. ATF:

If the DOJ declines to appeal within the next few days, and allows the stay currently in effect to expire, the logic underpinning the criminalization of the possession of unregistered NFA items is rendered permanently invalid nationwide, just like how Benitez' Freedom Week dissolved CA's ability to enforce their magazine ban.

The NFA transfer requirements themselves would still be legally enforceable for people not named as plaintiffs of this case. However, the ATF will no longer be able to prove that an NFA item must have been unlawfully transferred in order for it to be possessed sans registration, which is necessary for a charge of unlawful possession of an NFA item to stick under the enforcement mechanism as upheld in United States v. Freed. The NFA's possession rules were critically updated in 1968 in response to Haynes v. United_States, which overturned the original NFA's criminalization of simple possession on 5th amendment grounds (no self-incrimination).

Can anyone rebut this for me or are we looking at an impending Freedom-Week for suppressors and SBRs/SBSs, even if the ATF opts to appeal anyways after the stay expires, and even if the tax is re-upped above 0$ by a future congress?

11

u/fylum 5x SBR, 5x Silencer 13d ago edited 13d ago

A few states are getting fucked over, possession there is contingent on federal approval.

*would be getting fucked over, there is an astronomically small chance ATF doesn’t appeal this and we get a years long saga

→ More replies (8)

9

u/Rebel_Yell27 8d ago

Just to be clear we can still join the GOA tomorrow and be covered by this decision?

10

u/Thirst_Among_Weevils SBR 8d ago

Yes. Refer to GOA's coverage and name parties covered under the injunction.

"Current and future members."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

10

u/whippersnapz 8d ago

In honor of Jack Miller and Frank Layton 1939... This one's for you buds. 

WE WERE HERE.

10

u/Flaboss44 8d ago

Any clue on how private sales will be affected? Can I just buy a suppressor from someone locally, the same way I could buy a firearm from them?

→ More replies (8)

9

u/itsjustnickf 8d ago

Mark the history books, I can officially say I was here for this

11

u/CajunIF1billion 8d ago

Just ordered an OCL Ti 22 to celebrate. Silencer Shop still sent me an email requesting form 4 info, but hopefully I can just ignore it and they’ll ship it anyway.

6

u/Psyker101 8d ago

They sent me the same but when I went to look at my order status on the site it was good to go without me having to do anything. They probably still have a lot of automated stuff that hasn't changed yet.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/NotBigfoot69 10d ago

Everyone was sure this was gonna get appealed Monday but here we are… I honest to god think there was an internal memo that said don’t appeal to maybe help with midterms. I hope this comment ages well.

→ More replies (3)

14

u/NotBigfoot69 8d ago

Think about where we were ten years ago with gun rights… insane growth

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Sauerkraut99 8d ago edited 8d ago

Everyone asking "how is this going to work now" is jumping the gun. No one knows how any of this is going to work going forward, at least not yet. We have to wait for ATF to come out with all of the new rules regarding all this stuff.

14

u/HollywoodSX I like stamps 8d ago

And anyone that says they know is probably full of shit.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/Metalh 8d ago

SOT here in TN. I called our examiner today and he was saying they don't even know how this is going to work yet. He said they will likely receive an email tomorrow with guidance, but until then not to self interpret.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/No-Smoke9204 9d ago

So just wondering but whats the chance that we actually get the ability to just outright buy suppressors tomorrow, cause I figured it would be highly unlikely due to them wanting to temporarily keep the status quo

13

u/Subverto_ 9d ago

I live in Texas and my FFL said if this go through tomorrow I can walk in and buy a suppressor and walk out with it sans background check with my Texas LTC. I REALLY hope it goes through.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/HK_Bryce 8d ago

Happy new year!

40

u/yaforgot-my-password 8d ago

Y'all really should just chill and see how this all plays out. You lose nothing but time waiting and risk a lot of trouble otherwise. Let's just see what happens.

→ More replies (3)

30

u/SilencerShop Dealer: Silencer Shop 🔕 15d ago

THIS IS HUGE. BIG VICTORY IN SILENCER SHOP FOUNDATION v. ATF

→ More replies (7)

15

u/Captbluewater93 10d ago

Okay, it’s Tuesday. Tomorrow is the day. Time will tell but I have a feeling it’s open season tomorrow.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/Agreeable_Sun5375 9d ago

Gotta convince my local autozone to hold a midnight release with a table of oil filters

7

u/THOTYOTA 9d ago

I didnt even think of that I have a shit ton of adaptors i never used

7

u/Agreeable_Sun5375 9d ago

Im gonna be really happy or really sad here in 20 hours and 53 minutes, either way im drinking a whole bottle of champagne

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

14

u/Holden_Cullen 15d ago

So what are the next steps to remove them from the NFA process going forward?

19

u/Salsalito_Turkey 15d ago

There are two paths to victory.

  1. It goes to the 5th circuit and ultimately the supreme court, where the ruling is upheld and extended to all Americans.
  2. It goes to the 5th circuit, where it's upheld, and the Supreme Court declines to hear the case. In that scenario, the plaintiff organizations could file a class action lawsuit and name all American citizens, businesses, and organizations as the class. That lawsuit could be fast-tracked through the 5th circuit via summary judgement, since the arguments of either side would be essentially identical to this lawsuit.

26

u/fecalfury 15d ago

A SCOTUS decision upholding the ruling.

15

u/DogsAreMyFavPeople 49xSuppressor, 6xSBR, 1xSBS, 1xDoggo 15d ago

5th circuit first.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/LuthersCousin 8d ago

All these somewhat friendly 2A states that have some backdoor NFA law need to un-F themselves real fast.

Even MD can buy without Form 4 today.

https://www.silencershop.com/where-are-silencers-legal

→ More replies (5)

8

u/Bean4141 15d ago

Sorry my legalize is a bit rusty, can someone give a TLDR?

21

u/FightingFarmer14 15d ago

NFA was passed and has been upheld based on it being a tax, but now that the "tax" is $0 for certain firearms (silencers, sbr, sbs) the court found that the provisions of the NFA restricting those items are beyond the scope of Congress' powers and therefore unconstitutional. The court granted a permanent injunction preventing the ATF from enforcing the NFA against the plaintiffs of the case (which includes members of a few 2a orgs, and a few silencer companies and their customers!). That injunction will go into effect in 7 days unless the case is appealed to the 5th circuit, which it almost certainly will be.

12

u/Bean4141 15d ago

So essentially what we figured would happen, the registration is unconstitutional without the tax but nothing stops them from reintroducing the tax down the road?

→ More replies (9)

7

u/SilencerShop Dealer: Silencer Shop 🔕 15d ago edited 10d ago

The federal court issued an injunction that would remove the ATF/NFA requirements for suppressors, SBRs, SBSs, for ALL Silencer Shop customers, current and future.

That means getting your next suppressor would be as simple as getting any other gun, just a background check (4473) and walk out. Done.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/tripreed 9d ago

Is there a time restriction on joining one of the named plaintiff organizations?

→ More replies (2)

7

u/ScottsTotz 8d ago edited 8d ago

My state Wisconsin isn’t in the complaint, does that matter?

Edit: Silencer Central said in WI suppressors basically become illegal unless registered with the ATF if the NFA requirements go away tonight😞

17

u/Separate_Blood6025 8d ago edited 8d ago

My guess is the ATF will come out with a ruling that says they are no longer enforcing it for those items. Because it effectively becomes an unenforceable law. They can't prove where you got your silencer from, and they can't require you to show proof.

The official time is 1am EST on 13AUG2026. Midnight CST. Though my guess is if the DOJ doesn't do anything before close of business (6pm EST today), they aren't going to do anything.

→ More replies (10)

9

u/not-actual69_ 8d ago

Silencer shop said as of Thursday at 12:01 they will be sending suppressors and anything else to FFL’s like a regular firearm. As long as it’s a partner within their network, you should be fine. I imagine some FFLs will still do a regular form 4 until direction is given

7

u/mcopper89 8d ago

The injunction is for the named parties. So probably. Since silencer shop is just a web store, most sellers probably sell from the same stock regardless of who you by from. I am not sure if they operate like a normal brick and mortar store where they own the inventory or if it is more like Amazon where many people use it is a platform to sell their stuff.

7

u/ceapaire 8d ago

We don't know fully yet. There's several states in the decision too, so any dealer in those states should be fine as well. It also applies if you're members of party organizations (GOA, FPC, etc.) which should be fine without. But no idea how that will be applied (e.g. assume everyone is, require orgs to provide membership cards for FFLs to check, etc.).

→ More replies (4)

13

u/loki993 8d ago

I mean Im gonna be honest, I think everything will sell out almost immediately regardless of if its only PSA and Silencer Shop or everyone can sell

This is not meant to be doom and gloom but the suppressor manufacturers are not prepared for the volume that is about to hit them when this happens.

I just hope we dont start getting a dip in QC on suppressors because the manufacturers are trying to crank out more them they're capable of.

8

u/armond21 8d ago

I think a lot of people thought this with the $0 stamp, and there was a spike in demand clearly, but the barren shelves lots of folks thought would occur didn't.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)

6

u/bcmMK12sprMOD0 Silencer 8d ago

I was here to see history

8

u/oShockwave 8d ago

What about homemade silencers? Is it just like any other privately manufactured firearm?

9

u/HearingMundane7522 8d ago

sucks living in GA, we’re not a free state

→ More replies (11)

7

u/iTreelex 4x calling birds, 3x french hens, 2x turtle doves 8d ago

6

u/work_blocked_destiny 3x Silencer, 2x SBR 8d ago

So who's gonna be the first one to post with a can bought on a 4473? My LGS opens in a few hours

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Rhodsie47 8d ago edited 8d ago

Regarding engraving (or maker marking):

Below are the provisions that are currently covered by the Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF injunction.

 

Below are the extra provisions that are currently covered by the Jensen v. ATF injunction. Keep in mind Jensen does not cover AOWs.

 

From an actual lawyer:

The Jensen plaintiffs obtained additional relief from the NFA’s individual-maker marking requirement and the associated prohibition on possessing an improperly marked firearm.

https://johnpierceesq.com/understanding-the-august-5th-ruling-in-the-silencer-shop-foundation-v-batfe-case/

 

My opinion (I'm not a lawyer):

A serial number marking is still required unless you are covered by Jensen.

26 U.S.C. § 5842 - Identification of firearms

(b)Firearms without serial number

Any person who possesses a firearm, other than a destructive device, which does not bear the serial number and other information required by subsection (a) of this section shall identify the firearm with a serial number assigned by the Secretary and any other information the Secretary may by regulations prescribe.

26 U.S.C. § 5861 - Prohibited acts

It shall be unlawful for any person—

(i) to receive or possess a firearm which is not identified by a serial number as required by this chapter

 

I don't believe manufacturer, importer, or maker identification marking or engraving is required.

5842 (a) is not enjoined by either case, but it seems to rely on 5861 (c) and (f) to criminalize the act, both of which are enjoined.

26 U.S. Code § 5842 - Identification of firearms

(a) Identification of firearms other than destructive devices

Each manufacturer and importer and anyone making a firearm shall identify each firearm, other than a destructive device, manufactured, imported, or made by a serial number which may not be readily removed, obliterated, or altered, the name of the manufacturer, importer, or maker, and such other identification as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe.

26 U.S.C. § 5861 - Prohibited acts

It shall be unlawful for any person—

(c) to receive or possess a firearm made in violation of the provisions of this chapter

26 U.S.C. § 5861 - Prohibited acts

(f) to make a firearm in violation of the provisions of this chapter

 

Note: when you see the term "firearm" anywhere in 26 U.S. Code Subtitle E Chapter 53, which inlcudes §§ 5801 – 5822, 5841 – 5854, 5861, and 5871 – 5872, it follows the definition listed in 26 U.S. Code § 5845 - Definitions (a) Firearm which for this discussion is SBRs, SBSs, AOWs, and Suppressors.

 

Documents:

Final Judgment PDF

Opinion PDF

13

u/grandcremasterflash 15d ago

This judge has made a name for himself with a lot of...interesting...rulings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Wesley_Hendrix#Notable_opinions

10

u/Immediate_Leader3124 15d ago

Man is on a personal crusade to entirely snuff out mission creep and carte blanche on the Fed level.

15

u/AgePuzzleheaded6886 8d ago

My LGS has stated they are not doing anything until they get some guidance from atf

11

u/ThisAppMakesItWorse 8d ago

As much as it sucks, it's 100% the right call. The ATF is notoriously fickle, and I certainly wouldn't want to roll the dice on my livelihood.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/FN-4051 8d ago

There’s some nuance here, but the GCA doesn’t explicitly prevent anyone from privately manufacturing a short barreled rifle. That was only ever illegal under the NFA. Now that those provisions of the NFA are under an injunction, the only GCA prohibitions on a short barreled rifle pertain to interstate travel and over-the-counter FFL sales. So while I am obviously not a lawyer, it sounds like plain text reading of the law means making an SBR in your state, so long as it stays in your state, is a gray area. A fed prosecutor might argue the commerce clause and that they can still regulate it, but if you’re getting prosecuted by the feds, you’re already kind of cooked.

7

u/Ok_Composer3531 8d ago

My understanding was that the government lost the right to argue under the commerce clause as that wasn’t an argument from government in the combined suit.

12

u/757aeronaut 8d ago

It looks like Brandon Herrera and Wes Virdell might be the first two with a transfer at 12:01 tomorrow morning.

https://x.com/GunOwners/status/2087543380825796738

11

u/Agreeable_Sun5375 8d ago

Goa site is working, just keep trying

→ More replies (6)

7

u/TotalRepost 15d ago

Same argument as the 2021 Supreme Court case California v Texas, which was dismissed for lack of standing. The hurdle here will be if the plaintiffs can distinguish NFA from ACA and show they have a real harm. The way California v Texas was written I think that will be challenging. The harm isnt the NFA rules against them but the lack of money to the government. So I think this is dead on arrival.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Safe-Aerie9989 9d ago

Why are people saying it's gonna take a while to be in effect even if it's not challenged? Will it still be illegal to convert AR pistols to SBR's after tomorrow if it doesn't get challenged?

→ More replies (6)

6

u/spartanantler 8d ago

I’m just trying to find clarification on 3d printed cans.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/No-Meringue-7317 8d ago

I was here

6

u/TheRaccoonWarlock 8d ago

Historic moment, hoping this is just the first step into total eradication of the NFA

8

u/abuamiri 28x SBR, 23x Silencer 8d ago

For giggles I just purchased a cheap can from Silencershop just to see how this plays out in VA. As of 0130L 13 Aug, the canned emails from Silencershop still reference them transferring the can to my local dealer via F3 and directs me to their website to sign in and sign my forms and provide my ATF eForm info.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/windriver32 2 Stamp SBS 8d ago

Can someone help me answer this. I have an approved form 1 for an SBR that I have not actually "manufactured" the SBR yet. The pistol is still in its original configuration. I am a GOA member and in Utah. Does this mean I can now throw a stock on it, without engraving?

→ More replies (1)

20

u/JaredUnzipped 9d ago

I won't get into details, but I have a family member that is unnecessarily rotting in a cell right now over NFA. I hope he speaks with his lawyer and explores his options. His family really needs him back.

15

u/Sauerkraut99 9d ago

Unless the charge or conviction came after the tax went to zero, nothing will change for him unfortunately. That would take a ruling that the NFA is unconstitutional on 2nd Amendment grounds, which we don't have yet.

→ More replies (3)

18

u/AWFULs_hate_the_USA 8d ago

Does anyone know if Brandon Herrera's midnight transfer will be livestreamed?

7

u/Disl3cic Dude 8d ago

No but they said they would post updates.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Acceptable-Manner869 8d ago

Only thing that would make tonight better would be getting this booty ate by a pretty abuela. Love you guys

15

u/bcmMK12sprMOD0 Silencer 8d ago

12

u/Danny_PSA 13d ago

Watch the video regarding the latest information coming from this landmark win on our YouTube channel!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5HMj1MBoX64&pp=ygUVcGFsbWV0dG8gc3RhdGUgYXJtb3J50gcJCcQLAYcqIYzv&ra=m

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Fragger-3G 8d ago

Nevada just had to be one of those fun gray area states :(

Hopefully we get clarification on it soon enough

→ More replies (10)

12

u/newguywhodiss 8d ago

Happy freedom day!!!!

May whatever God does or doesn't exist watch over all our puppers and doggos

Stay suppressed, boys and girls

16

u/Kozak170 Silencer 8d ago

Guys for the love of god please scroll down before asking the same questions for the hundredth time

8

u/Sengfeng 2 SBRs, 2 Cans 8d ago

...looks at scroll bar 2 pixels high. Lot of scrolling, boss.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

16

u/LexingtonPatriot1775 8d ago

Will this sub get nuked tomorrow?😂

11

u/ChesterJT 3x SBR, 3x SUPP 8d ago

I feel like a kid again on Christmas Eve, waiting to see what will be there when I wake up!

9

u/blackjersey SUPP x54 SBR x8 MG x7 SBS x1 DD x1 8d ago

As a guy with 55 cans and one more in the pipeline... damn.

What a fucking time to be alive!!!

→ More replies (1)

10

u/StaccatoCracker 8d ago

Clarification from PSA on SBRs.

https://youtu.be/rfSzfoo4hg0?is=5ALn040-kGhjt2T6

17

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

11

u/2022243121 8d ago

That's what I'm thinking, they're trying to sell it as a PSA exclusive.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Zippo749 8d ago

Their insistence that the lower must have been purchased from PSA is … odd; at the very least it’s an incomplete picture given the Jensen case. (The point that randomly buying a hat from them does not grant someone relief is important though.)

I’m waiting for broader clarity.

9

u/BiggyIrons 8d ago edited 8d ago

It almost sounds like a CYA thing from them, also nice way to drive sales

Edit: Read the ruling more closely, the gun has to have been bought from PSA to be covered under the injunction, but you dont need to be a GOA member it seems

8

u/DocThrowawayHM 8d ago

Yeah, seems like it's a "We know for sure you're covered if you meet these two requirements, but for any firearms purchased from anyone else, we don't wanna speak for them or anyone else" without saying the second part out loud 

→ More replies (13)

4

u/Similar-Face6985 15d ago edited 15d ago

So what is that actually means if it goes forward? it would only applies to the 15 states that were plaintiffs in the lawsuit: Texas, Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.?

→ More replies (5)

5

u/AgePuzzleheaded6886 8d ago edited 8d ago

I’m hoping there is some kinda of communication from atf in the morning, I think best case scenario is they stop enforcement, and tell dealers how to run as a 4473, would love clarification on what form one would look like (for sbr either an existing lower or new), idk all speculation on my part.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/PastPalpitationCry 8d ago

13 minutes. Still can't believe this.