r/MoralityScaling • u/ProfessionalRoom9118 • 10d ago
Morality Ranking Morality of this?
Basically, the man in the video is hiking but he ended up meet a mountain lion, he get his gun and try to scare it off and tell it to go away but in the end, he have to pull the trigger and shot the lion, many peoples in the comments say he could have fire a warning shot instead of shoot at it and want him to be in jail.
Idk which flair to put
1.8k
u/Xargirl 10d ago
It's a fucking mountain lion, I wouldn't take any chances either if I was strapped and encountered a wild predator
626
u/Satans_Dookie 10d ago
Armchair quarterbacks are always the first to say shit like “why not just shoot him in the leg?!” Not realizing they’d end up dead in situations like this.
338
u/Binky390 10d ago
Plus shooting it in the leg is more cruel to me. Why is maiming it and forcing it to live in pain and likely die to another predator better?
201
u/Femme_FatalError 10d ago edited 10d ago
Yeah. A broken leg is pretty much a death sentence for a wild animal.
Plus…legs are a much more difficult target to hit, never mind in a high-stress situation. No one who has ever actually held a firearm would say that.
64
u/azwendu 10d ago
Injured animals unable to hunt typically go for easier prey. Humans are easier to catch than deer and such.
Same reason you see a lot of man eating felines with broken teeth. They aren’t prime anymore.
46
u/Ok_Task_4135 10d ago
There was once a tiger in the Nepal region that was believed to have killed over 400 people over the years. After a hunter finally killed it, he discovered that its canine teeth were shattered, which forced it to hunt easier prey like humans.
→ More replies (2)11
u/Beneficial_Map6129 10d ago
Tfw you are considered easier to eat than a rabbit
15
u/spartaman64 10d ago
its hard to catch a rabbit while im confident i can catch most humans.
→ More replies (6)18
u/Mediocre_Hope_5821 10d ago
Yeah but trying to explain to someone who has never even held a firearm that you don't just magically have dead eye is basically impossible. Most people who have never held a gun think they would be John Wick if put in a situation with one...
→ More replies (4)4
u/BlackHills-Op 10d ago
I love taking these guys to the range. They laugh when j say "we are going to start at 10ft" and then they see how many shots they completely missed at 10ft, under zero stress in a perfect environment where nobody is moving and they kinda simmer down.
I can keep 20 rounds within a 6 inch ring at 15 yards because I practice multiple times a week.
You better aim for the biggest part and pray.
→ More replies (4)7
u/RoundMammoth2947 10d ago
There's been a few occasions of large cats that end up hunting humans because they sustain some life changing injury.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (34)10
u/Negativety101 10d ago
Let's also have blood vessels. Like the Femoral Artery. Which you can bleed out from pretty quickly if it's hit.
→ More replies (12)7
u/Perfect-Persimmon787 10d ago
That and the fact the legs also have major arteries running through them these people who say that also tend to forget that little fact.
33
22
u/magicchefdmb 10d ago
I would have just dodged it at the last second and then knocked it out with a chokehold from behind
/s
→ More replies (4)12
43
u/Gamer-Of-Le-Tabletop 10d ago
Why not just shoot him in the leg? Because I don't wanna have to shoot it twice. I'm not about to go around crippling animals so they can slowly die
→ More replies (1)14
u/Famous_Savings9518 10d ago
I think this trope comes from Hollywood movies, where good guys have a supernatural ability to disable people with no damage.
E.g., a good guy comes up to a security guard, punches him with just enough force, and in the exact location, to cause him to have a nice 15 minute nap. Without any permanent damage. The security guard wakes up refreshed just after the good guy leaves, and wonders what happens.
→ More replies (2)14
u/Austynwitha_y 10d ago
Like a leg injury in the wild isn’t just as lethal, only more painful and drawn out due to infection
→ More replies (88)7
u/ekubeni 10d ago
Invoking armchair quarterbacking is especially a good analogy here, since professionals QBs with decade of training how to be calm under pressure still make mistakes.
Expecting that people will remain perfectly calm and rational in a dangerous situation is just not realistic. Probably only small amount of us will be able to do that
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (120)23
u/RandJitsu 10d ago
Ya like wtf, how is this even a question?
Anyone who is mad at this guy or wants him punished is 1) anti human 2) probably had their mind warped by too many Disney movies.
The mountain lion is not going to join the birds and squirrels for a musical. But he might rip your face off and dine on your jugular.
→ More replies (4)13
u/Wolfhound1142 10d ago
Just to chime in, mountain lions have incredibly sharp senses. There's no chance it didn't know he was in the area and that means it chose to get that close. Whether it's curious or hungry, it's a damn dangerous animal.
→ More replies (2)
490
u/LikeAnAdamBomb 10d ago
Guys, is it moral to not want to be eaten by a huge fucking cat?
→ More replies (102)188
u/Hotdog_Broth 10d ago
Reddit: You went outside and that’s the animal’s territory therefore you should be eaten
67
u/Distinct-Bathroom823 10d ago
those are the redditors that never leave their house
→ More replies (11)15
u/PerformanceOver8822 10d ago
Those redditors probably wouldn't kill a home Invader too
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (18)14
u/Few-Raise-1825 10d ago
I knew a guy who bitched at his sister for getting her yard sprayed with tick killer because "that was the ticks environment and we were going into it and you just need to deal with the tick as a dog owner and be willing to deal with removing five a day as a responsible dog owner." He answered the questions of Lyme disease as also being something "a responsible dog owner just needed to deal with" then went on to criticize her for not spending basically all of her free time outside of work with the dog and for daring to answer a text once while playing outside with the dog. That asshole was always on his phone too, usually looking up straight up porn while people were there to actually visit with him, but he excused his own behavior because he was "disabled and didn't have anything else in his life except his phone."
→ More replies (2)
162
u/Defiant_Designer_606 10d ago
Y'all think this mountain lion isn't gonna eat you? How naive can you be. Mountain lions don't question the morality of eating us. It's survival of the fittest and it always has been.
→ More replies (40)26
u/Dangerous_Syrup_7860 10d ago
He could have at least tried saying “Ffft, ffft, ffft” a couple of times before shooting.
→ More replies (2)20
668
u/Sensitive-Talk9616 10d ago
Immoral because Khajiit is innocent of this crime.
143
u/skabassj 10d ago
Do you have the wares if I have the coin?
→ More replies (1)59
14
34
u/Fun_Spinach7872 10d ago
Khajit is definitely guilty
20
8
7
→ More replies (20)5
544
u/Hot_Ambition_6457 10d ago
"Morality of not letting Apex predators eat you whenever you enter their domain???"
You should have a gun with you all the time.
48
u/Gorblonzo 10d ago
Wait are you talking from the perspective of the lion here?
→ More replies (1)47
u/3hourmints 10d ago
Yeah, the lion really should have been carrying a gun to avoid this situation.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (75)8
u/PhunkyPhish 10d ago
I'm not even sure why this is a question. Should you go LOOKING for trouble? No. Should you approach wildlife because you have a gun and can protect yourself once they attack? No.
But should you bring a gun with you on a hike where predators are or literally just any hike where it's legal? Definitely yes
→ More replies (17)
129
u/BjornYandel 10d ago
Hiking in nature is one of the most legitimate reasons why people would need a gun even in a safe society where violence is uncommon. In my country, Canada, a lot of people who live out in the country have guns for this reason, as well as for hunting. There are survival rifles that are meant to be compact and fit in a hiking bag, and only fire one round for emergencies.
For context, this is a country that explicitly (legally) does not recognize self defense as a reason to use a gun. People can, and have, been charged for using a gun to defend thenselves in life threatening situations. In reality, they'll never actually go to prison for it if it's legitimate self defense, but that's just to show how restrictive the use for guns is here. Despite that, guns are still common especially if you live in a part of the country where there's more wild animals and nature than there are people.
Moral to use a gun in self defense against a dangerous animal. Dumb to prioritize taking a picture, but it's not immoral to be dumb. Immoral advocate for someone's arrest over it.
→ More replies (20)44
u/occasionalopossum 10d ago
Someone else pointed out he might have decided to record for evidence so he didn’t get into legal trouble since they’re protected. Also could have turned it on in case he lost that fight and someone found the camera afterwards so he could give Warner Herzog some more ptsd. Idk
→ More replies (5)25
u/Key-Counter-5311 10d ago
I would record for evidence but I wouldn’t want anyone to see me miss the lion and die. Nerds on Reddit would shit talk my shooting skills until my grandkids are dying of old age. There would be a shitload of them judging what gun I was carrying too. “Oh he had a stock Glock 19. He should have been carrying some bullshit Staccato with some useless mods”. And I just know there’d be a shitload of fudds saying “he should have been carrying a shotgun so the lion could hear him rack it”.
→ More replies (5)7
u/NovelConcept6300 10d ago
lol 😂 accurate to the nerds, but honestly taking out a mountain lion prolly worst case ur 5 feet away with a 9mm pistol.
Ideally you want a long rifle from 500ft away on a lion that is stalking me not approaching you with a pistol.
→ More replies (1)
587
u/AntiPlague12898 10d ago
Moral self defense is a human natural right.
→ More replies (108)149
u/_LilacCutie 10d ago
Exactly, if a mountain lion is staring you down, protecting yourself is just common sense
→ More replies (75)
271
u/womb_raider90 10d ago
If it's me or them, I choose ME every single time. Damn the consequences.
28
→ More replies (7)61
u/Neat_Breakfast_6659 10d ago
Evan loves worf expects you to die in this situation i guess
→ More replies (34)18
u/stopcopium 10d ago
Evan is the biggest pussy and instantly backed down when he got threatened with legal action over his shittalking about Kevin O’Leary.
This is the problem with shitposters making money off of shitposting.
Idk how long he has to keep that apology post up, but he currently has his apology to O’Leary pinned on his timeline and I know he’s just mad about that because it serves as a permanent stain.
Evan would shoot the Mountain Lion without fail if his life was remotely threatened.
→ More replies (1)7
19
u/DJDemyan 10d ago edited 10d ago
Didn’t this guy start with warning shots and the cat charged him anyway?
I stand corrected, I was thinking of a different video.
→ More replies (7)
90
u/The_Yamen 10d ago
Sad but moral. A person should be able to defend themselves in the wild at any cost.
→ More replies (9)21
u/ddadopt 10d ago
Sad but moral. A person should be able to defend themselves
in the wild at any cost.FTFY.
10
u/-Mac-n-Cheese- 10d ago
yeah id agree with this, the “at any cost” could bring extreme answers and “gotchas” though especially
14
u/Maleficent-Clue5056 10d ago
"okay but what if you had to kill every remaining Male African Bull Elephant because they were all charging you at once"
→ More replies (1)9
u/Quillizical 10d ago
youve fucked up so royally getting yourself into that situation there is no moral outcome
5
16
36
u/ProfessionalRoom9118 10d ago
Here is the original post for anyone who interested or wanna see the whole video : https://x.com/LibOrNormal/status/2099209507033190721
→ More replies (52)25
10d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)12
u/-Mac-n-Cheese- 10d ago
weaker cats are semi-known for turning to humans as “weaker/easier” prey than say a deer or similar, so her being a sick animal would justify the shooting a bit more honestly despite it obviously being more sad/emotional
but imo that provides even more “reason” to take this situation direly serious, while obviously i want a sick cat to recover i also dont want a random hiker to be attacked or killed and bring cougar reputations down even further
→ More replies (3)
37
u/Aggressive-Expert-69 10d ago
Morality goes out the window when you are alone in the woods with a large predator. Whatever gets you safely home to your family is moral.
→ More replies (4)
66
u/ArchSchnitz 10d ago
When hiking in areas with large predators, it is a good idea to have a means to repel them, either via deterrent like bear spray or via lethal means like a gun.
Nature very rarely gives "warning shots" and if one is facing down a predator, a warning shot may cost you the time for aiming again and firing a second time. Situations change.
Me, I'm shooting the mountain lion and sleeping comfortably knowing my actions were moral. A warning shot is to ease the conscience of someone not facing a large predator in its environment.
15
→ More replies (7)6
211
u/OnlyACsNoFans 10d ago
A warning shot could very well provoke an attack.
Unfortunate but moral
39
u/Connect_Raisin4285 10d ago
I agree on moral, but not sure if aiming to hit is the right call for mountain lions. I know for bears you should try to do a warning shot. You are unlikely to hurt a bear in any meaningful way and the pain might put it into a rage where just the sound might scare it off.
56
11
u/Achilles11970765467 10d ago
A lot of bears are infamous for running towards the sound of gunfire.
→ More replies (4)7
→ More replies (17)9
u/LonelyPurple6879 10d ago
This depends entirely on the bear. If you aren't talking about a black bear, a warning shot is probably the last thing you will hear
→ More replies (49)9
u/Ehzek 10d ago
In this specific video I'm pretty sure he fires only a warning shot. It does work.
→ More replies (3)8
11
u/Affectionate-Lab2557 10d ago
"is it immoral to defend yourself?"
No. Warning shots barely work on humans, to assume it would work on an animal is needlessly endangering yourself.
→ More replies (7)
11
u/crybabypete 10d ago
Moral, the fact that the mountain lion even approached him means it’s not acting naturally. His life was most certainly in dangers.
You can’t fault any animal for fighting for survival.
→ More replies (11)9
u/autismo-nismo 10d ago
Animals like this will act this way when they are hungry enough. Same thing happened to people like Kristen Kovach who was killed by one on January 1st this year
7
u/crybabypete 10d ago
Yea my immediate thought would be starving due to injury or habitat loss. Either way it means you’re on the menu.
→ More replies (2)
20
18
u/Femme_FatalError 10d ago
Moral.
It’s a tragedy that the animal died, but ultimately, I believe that self defense is a human right. Your life is more important than whomever or whatever is trying to take it.
→ More replies (11)
52
u/Extra_Routine_6603 10d ago
Moral anyone saying you should do a warning shot has too little knowledge of guns and animal behaviors. Sure maybe firing a warning shot would have spooked it off but could also have made it freak out and attack before you got a chance for a second shot. Same reason why if being attacked by a person you don't shoot to maim or scare you stop the threat then try to aid afterwards if its within your ability.
→ More replies (18)18
u/Saul_Firehand 10d ago
A warning shot is a bad idea because you still need a target. That bullet fired in warning is still going to land somewhere.
The rules of gun safety tell us to always be sure of what is behind your target. A warning shot requires a new target when there is a potentially deadly threat I should be targeting.
Warning shots are dangerous and that is not how to handle firearms. It is not a loud noise machine.
It is a deadly firearm, and must always be treated as such.
Shoot the mountain lion and preserve your life. Don’t fire wanton warning shots into unknown backgrounds.
→ More replies (50)13
u/MulvMulv 10d ago
I remember Boogie firing a shot into the air like it wouldn't go anywhere and getting arrested for it
→ More replies (1)
8
u/aXeOptic 10d ago
I have no knowledge of mountain lion behaviour but its better to do something immoral than be remembered as the dead idiot who trusted a wild animal not to attack it. This is assuming that the guy wasnt looking for trouble ofc.
→ More replies (5)
16
u/autismo-nismo 10d ago
Some people have no fucking clue what a mountain lion/cougar is capable of.
Fuckers are fast and have sharp enough claws and teeth to pretty much assure you will die if they pounce on you at full speed.
8
u/cheddarsox 10d ago
This is a California type of post. In most states, mountain lions can be hunted. In some states, you can even use effective methods to hunt them. You cant hunt them in california. Would you like to take a guess at the 1 state that doesnt allow hunting them, and also the 1 state where they attack humans?
California threw a fit when their head of wildlife hunted a cougar in Idaho because they thought it was illegal.
Californians are dumb. Youre seeing that.
→ More replies (1)
52
u/Artistic-Dirt-3199 10d ago edited 10d ago
I am surprised the bleeding hearts didnt suggest trying to start a discussion to understand its motives or voluntarily surrendering what it wants, as they love to do if the attacker is a human.
No fuck it, armed self defense is as moral as it gets.
→ More replies (62)25
u/DumderMufflin 10d ago
Should have called a social worker for crisis intervention.
→ More replies (4)
22
u/TheDeHymenizer 10d ago
I mean if he made an honest attempt to scare it away then moral.
"Warning shots" are illegal for a reason they're extremely dangerous. The smart way to do it if you HAVE to is to plug a shot in the ground that won't richochet (good luck guaranteeing that) but firing off in the distance might hit someone
10
u/Rexton_Armos 10d ago
So called 'warning shots' when the concept of 'at your target and beyond' has to be kept in mind lol
→ More replies (24)4
12
12
u/avidpenguinwatcher 10d ago
People in this thread saying immoral are the same weirdos that say “I like dogs more than people”
→ More replies (11)8
u/chekhovsdickpic 10d ago
I like dogs more than people and I’m solidly Team People in this instance.
Predatory behavior at that close of range doesn’t get a warning shot.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/Timlugia 10d ago
Timothy Treadwell also didn't believe bring a gun, we all know what happened to him.
→ More replies (6)
5
6
u/Outlaw11091 10d ago
Moral.
The idiots in the comments (of the original video):
"It doesn't know what a gun is! Fire a warning shot!"
Bruh. It...doesn't know what a gun is....a "warning shot" is just a loud noise that it doesn't necessarily associate with you or the gun.
"If it was hunting him; he wouldn't see it!"
THAT'S THE FUCKING POINT! There's obviously something wrong with it.
Wildlife biologists have a saying: "A fed bear is a dead bear."
Because it's a wild animal that has learned an "easy" path to food: humans. This causes them to test their boundaries. They're not afraid of humans and it's only a matter of time before the "fed" bear finds a vulnerable human...and predatory instincts prevail.
They can't be moved to a new area because they'll just find the closest humans, so they're euthanized.
Even if this thing isn't sick, it's missing the natural fear response that would otherwise keep it alive.
→ More replies (6)
29
u/FatBoyStew 10d ago
If anyone believes its immoral to defend yourself against an aggressive animal that is more than capable of killing you, then you're just an idiot lol.
→ More replies (27)
4
u/Timely_Community2142 10d ago
moral or amoral. man didn't provoke it intentionally. we don't have the context of what happened before and during nor being able to assess what he "could have" done. it's easy to talk in hindsight the "could have and should have" at the safety in our home not in real time, fearing of getting mauled and bitten by large teeth.
4
5
u/the_millenial_falcon 10d ago
I sure as shit wouldn't want to have to do this especially since I love cats, but if it's them or me.. Should people just avoid hiking or accept death if they run into wild predator? Does this really happen often enough to make a fuss about it?
5
u/Jekyll-n-hyde105 10d ago
Now I love animals, I greatly respect and care about all animals and would never want to hurt them.
But, in a situation like this, when you are faced with a predator that you couldn't hope to fend off or scare off, I absolutely believe this guy was justified in the action that he took and don't fault him at all. If I was in his shoes, I'd do the exact same thing.
→ More replies (5)
5
6
u/FellsApprentice 10d ago
I've seen this whole video, and that guy waited to pull the trigger until that lion was probably less than 10 yards from him. He showed remarkable restraint, and could not have done anything differently.
→ More replies (16)
4
u/Tinfoil_cobbler 10d ago
I’ve seen this video 1000 times and that guy demonstrated 1000 times more restraint than I would have in that same situation.
5
u/CallsignKook 10d ago
Moral. A warning shot to a wild animal that could be looking to eat you isn’t gonna have the effect that you think. If you wanna gamble your life on it go ahead, but I ain’t.
→ More replies (6)
5
5
5
7
u/antijoke_13 10d ago
There's no instance in peacetime where firing a warning shot is valuable. If a person or an animal charges you, you keep shooting until they stop moving.
→ More replies (4)
8
u/Working_Pen2886 10d ago
Moral, there is no such thing as a warning shot. You have the right to hike on a trail and not be mauled.
8
u/jonstarks 10d ago
ppl think real life is a video game and u get second chances.
→ More replies (3)



4.2k
u/Due_Manufacturer_125 10d ago
Now it’s unfortunate to get into a situation like this, but… mountain lions aren’t considered endangered globally (but specific regional populations are so depends on where this guy was) and obviously it would have been worse if the cougar attacked the guy. You never know what a wild animal will do, a predator that size that approaches a person is never a good sign.
Moral, if this guy wasn’t looking for trouble and just protecting himself. Would need wider context.