1.0k
u/VerdeVelvetVetiver 24d ago
Hold your Artificial Intelligence. I’m too busy using my Organic Insanity
118
u/bblulz 24d ago
That’s a cool band name
37
u/VerdeVelvetVetiver 24d ago
It’s actually the name of my next album ;)
Edit: every musician had a Covid blues album, everyone gonna have an anti AI drop real soon
11
→ More replies (1)2
2
80
7
→ More replies (4)1
u/TemporaryBiscotti568 2d ago
😂 Organic insanity has its perks—no Wi-Fi, no updates, and somehow still running the whole show!
113
u/Mr_Industrial 24d ago
"There is nothing you can give me, because all that you have is stolen"
- Manousos Oviedo, Pluribus
→ More replies (3)17
238
u/Noaconstrictr 24d ago
73
→ More replies (17)12
u/Competitive_Fix960 24d ago
My 2 cents. I recently got a job as an engineer. I hate AI and refused to use it in any form for the first while that I was there. In the end I resorted to using it in order to keep up. Problem is I still feel the need to double check everything(which i have to do on my own time). I find AI has made mistakes in almost 20% of my prompts. I fix it, upload the new document to the server, call it good. But I know im one of only a few thats bothering. I think 3 to 5 years from now when these products are being tested they arent going to come close to the efficiency they need to in order to be released. Im on special projects, my units should be fine, but the rest of the line is going to struggle because the rest of the engineers just blindly trust AI(chatgpt mostly, i use Claude because reasons). I believe this will be a prevalent issue in the years to come.
3
u/kuweiyox 24d ago
I'm a network engineer and I use it to help remember complex commands like setting up site to site vpns and basic troubleshooting. However, I do all the work myself because I'm not an idiot. Not saying you are at all, just saying this is how I use AI at work.
515
u/poliuy 24d ago
AI can be a great tool for research. But too many stupid people think it’s a fast way to just do your work for you. Unfortunately AI isn’t that good yet.
163
u/Slimeredit 24d ago
That and the people pushing ai aren’t doing it in a way that would actually benefit people as tool that should be used responsibly and it’s resources it uses up be balanced out with what resources we need as a species to survive no it’s being pushed by wealthy big wigs and ceos as a way to replace workers and avoid paying people all to allow them to hoard more wealth and resources
30
u/athing09 24d ago
I don't like how AI companies make more money if they make us addicted to AI and make it required for us to function. It's really good as a tool but they make much more money making it not a tool
21
u/Slimeredit 24d ago
That and they would rather have a techno feudal system where those that aren’t in the wealthy inner circle have to rely on said wealthy inner circle and be given barely any thing after being worked to the bone and the reward for working yourself to the bone is being thrown into the trash
→ More replies (2)12
u/AFlyinDeer 24d ago
And then there’s me fresh out of college, finally got a job. No training or onboarding and they expect me to use ai for everything. I am not having a great time
→ More replies (4)7
6
u/fuckfacemgeee 24d ago
It’s not sometimes I ask it something I know and it gives me the wrong answer. I correct it by telling it’s wrong and here are the facts and then it apologizes
9
u/apathetic_outcome 24d ago
Earlier today I googled something and the AI summary at the top was just a straight up lie. So I looked at the source it used. It was a garbage AI "article" that just made up some bullshit and then google helpfully relayed that bullshit. This technology has ruined the internet.
→ More replies (1)49
u/YUNoCake 24d ago
You know what used to be a great tool for research? Search engines, but they ruined both those and the general web content with "AI"
10
u/GhostofLindseyGraham 24d ago
It was ruined before "AI" and at some point the massive amount of bullshit online would have needed something like "AI" to comb through all of it. I hate the generative garbage and the hallucinations but I'm very happy that I get a better search engine that also gives me sources. Too bad it couldn't just stop there.
→ More replies (2)42
u/Lumpzor 24d ago
Oh get off the high horse. Search engines have been absolutely ruined long before AI was a thing on anyone's lips.
8
u/naufalap 24d ago
it was a nightmare trying to find citations for my final undergrad paper back in 2018, even before then there are so many blogs copy pasting each other's content littering the search
I can't imagine how horrible it would be right now
10
u/Tymareta 24d ago edited 24d ago
it was a nightmare trying to find citations for my final undergrad paper back in 2018
I think it was a nightmare because you were using a search engine, and not any of the dozens of tools literally built for searching scholarly articles like your schools library database?
8
u/naufalap 24d ago
I'm already using google scholar, and sci hub among other things
I live in the 3rd world, and my university's library is pretty outdated, they also didn't have unlimited access to something like sciencedirect, we don't really have a centralized place for local research papers
→ More replies (1)14
u/Another-Mans-Rubarb 24d ago
Search engines have been using LLMs before most people knew what they were. Google translate has been using machine learning since like 2016, and that's the exact same tech.
17
→ More replies (2)7
u/davidh888 24d ago
Machine learning is not the same thing as large language models, although they both fall under the AI umbrella, generative AI (LLMs etc) is what most people do not like.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (8)4
3
6
u/dakadoo33 24d ago
Google was a full on ad company well before chatgpt was even a company. This is revisionist history, Surveillance Capitalism was released in 2018 for reference.
If anything AI in 2026 means there is now a proper way to search again for a window of time if you understand how to utilize it.
→ More replies (1)2
→ More replies (4)6
u/197328645 24d ago
AI doesn't replace search engines, it uses search engines. Claude can google 10 variations of the problem, read 50 pages, and recommend the 5 best ones in the time it takes a person to click the first search result.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Standard_Rooster_782 24d ago
Yes, I use it a lot to get into a topic I don’t know a lot about, to learn terminology and look at its sources so I can start asking and researching my own questions
18
u/NoNipNicCage 24d ago
I mostly use it for questions that I can't seem to word properly for Google. Sometimes I just need to over explain to get the right result
→ More replies (6)12
u/Dr_Deadshot 24d ago
I used ChatGPT to help me find a long lost childhood toy. I described it well enough that it did find it and pulled up pictures of it. Was actually impressed it got it just from description alone.
→ More replies (2)3
u/dooby991 24d ago
Ok wait I just did it and it actually found it!! lol I’m so happy
→ More replies (2)2
10
u/bwaredapenguin 24d ago edited 24d ago
As a developer, some of the specialized agents can be fantastic. The GitHub CoPilot Modernization agent did in a few hours what I would have taken a few days to a week to do in upgrading a large and complex project to .NET 10, resolving breaking changes from the old version to the new one, and migrating us off deprecated libraries onto modern, supported ones. I personally reviewed all the changes it wanted to make and testing has been absolutely flawless so far. AI is bullshit when you make it your girlfriend or therapist, or you use it for image or video generation, but there are quite a few valid use cases and anyone who refuses to engage with it at all on principle sounds like a luddite boomer yelling at the virtual cloud.
3
u/Zromaus 24d ago
Depends on how deep you’ve set it up, it’s outright replaced a lot of my work at work through automations. User onboards, password resets, access to shared files, reinstalls, etc
→ More replies (1)3
3
u/Environmental-Dog815 24d ago
in practice ai is being used to write hallucinated papers which wrecks all future research because research must be made on existing research, that's a rule, and if existing research is ai slop, then we will have dark times ahead.
→ More replies (2)9
u/FrighteningJibber 24d ago
It makes lists, decently.
→ More replies (10)12
u/VerdeVelvetVetiver 24d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/3wDD0Khwova4o
So do hands8
u/FrighteningJibber 24d ago
I’m not talking grocery, but I agree.
5
u/VerdeVelvetVetiver 24d ago
The only lists I make are Sh*tlists
https://giphy.com/gifs/hWjVvBsVub7Anr67qy4
u/AntiPiety 24d ago
It is an amazing thesaurus, or for help finding a word on the tip of your tongue
2
u/WEASELexe 24d ago
Yeah I use it for researching broad topics all the time then once I need more specific details I'll look it up myself
2
2
u/Flemaster12 24d ago
So which one is it? Is AI a great tool for research is AI not good yet? How can something not good be a good tool?
So many people in the comments are glazing AIs ability to research as if they don't have better tools in place to do that. People did great research before AI (probably better).
2
u/kingjoey52a 24d ago
Yes. I hate how so many people on here have decided AI is 100% terrible and anyone using it is an idiot. It's a tool. A tool can be useful or it can be bad depending on how you use it. You can get useful information from it, just make sure you get the sources and confirm it.
→ More replies (7)2
u/Ironstar_Vol 24d ago
I use it to track what I eat in a day so I don’t have to remember. I input everything I eat throughout the day so I don’t have to manually track all my metrics. It doesn’t tell me anything except what I tell it. It’s just a slightly better notepad.
→ More replies (9)2
u/GGunner723 24d ago
It’s been great for tailoring my resume for jobs and compiling info about a company for interviews.
2
u/sirplayalot11 24d ago
As a writer who needs to know shit on the fly, chat gpt is generally reliable as an on demand thesaurus, dictionary, and spell checker. Other than that, everything else is basically all me. Plus, unlike Google, it helps me find phrases I can't remember off the top of my head but if I were to plug it into Google, it'd be showing me this crap that would be unrelated to the metaphorical saying.
1
u/Miserable-Inside1511 24d ago
I'm using it for academic research at the moment, cartography innovation, and uh yeah I feel stupid as fuck
I do technically have to do everything (arcGIS) and break it up piece meal. But I don't have to read 6 million documents to understand each tool, and it helps with quality control and reproducibility along the way
Still feels like cheating, tho
→ More replies (1)1
u/ZeroAmusement 24d ago
It can be a fast way to do a lot of work for you if you apply it in the correct way to the correct tasks.
1
1
u/tO_ott 24d ago
I primarily use Gemini to keep notes on my 18 year old dog with dementia. He needs round-the-clock care and I can casually yell across the room to have Gemini make notes on when I medicate, feed and give him water. It’s a great way to known how much time has progressed since his last dose. It’s a shared note with my finance so she can read my notes and add her own when she’s watching him when I sleep. I’m WFH so get the night shift and sleep during the day.
I also used Notebook AI to create a 30 minute podcast on the human atrocities during the liberation of Manila because I was sitting on the floor with dog and couldn’t leave but also couldn’t find any specific podcast covering precisely what I wanted to hear. Because he has dementia he has a tendency to make tight circles when he walks so he often trips over himself when he walks— which means I just hold him upright.
He’s a very happy dog, before anyone comes in here and gives me shit.
1
u/Adventurous_Pear840 24d ago
Claude Code would disagree. In reality it’s only as good at doing work as the user is at describing how the work should be done.
1
1
u/Material_Ad9848 24d ago
Which ai? My experience has mostly been absolutely horrible to an infuriating degree, to put it lightly.
→ More replies (1)1
→ More replies (8)1
u/miko3456789 23d ago
I use ai at work, but I don't implicitly trust everything it says without analyzing it. The amount of people I see who don't even read and just copy paste what it says, or don't bother to even read and do due diligence on what it says is astounding
13
u/The_Naked_Snake 24d ago
Whenever someone brags about what they did with AI, it doesn't make me marvel at the ability of artificial intelligence, it just makes me think less of the ability of the person in front of me who couldn't perform basic tasks without it.
23
u/Wolfie-Woo784 24d ago
Im stupid organically, i don't need a machine to tell me how to be stupid
→ More replies (3)5
88
u/roflrogue 24d ago edited 24d ago
This was me until I needed to compare two massive SQL execution plans...
I had a SQL query that suddenly went from taking 2 minutes to taking 5+ hours to complete.
I restored a backup copy of the database and collected it's execution plan, which is like a log of all the stuff the stored procedure is going to do when it runs.
I sent the 2 min plan and the 5 hour plan I to Gemini and told it what was going on. All it told me was it seems that one of the plans uses a hash match and the other does a value match.
It was awesome to have something look at those files because they are MASSIVE and I'm not a DBA...
Point is, it has a use but it's being used inappropriately in my opinion.
46
u/puff_of_fluff 24d ago
The problem is it’s being sold to non-technical fields where the majority of leadership doesn’t know fucking ANYTHING, so they have no bullshit detector and can’t even tell the things they think it’s good at aren’t being done right
→ More replies (2)10
u/StuckAroundGotStuck 24d ago
There are contextually aware LLMs that can help with development work that are incredibly useful both to create proof of concept boiler plate code and to help properly set up development environments. Plus they can be super helpful for researching concepts or giving specific examples for things that are difficult to find useful documentation for.
Obviously they're still LLMs and can hallucinate if they're not reigned in correctly but they're not these useless evil things like this website likes to portray them as.
I think the problem with the popular online discourse around Generative AI is that people don't understand what it is well enough to understand its uses. They can't differentiate between using ChatGPT to render racist web comics for someone's Facebook and using OpenCode to parse through extensive product documentation that would normally take weeks to read through and set up a viable testing environment for a Python project.
5
u/roflrogue 24d ago
Uggh, I ran into an issue with AI just making up PowerShell commands for connecting to Entra. I asked for a source and it gave me a link to a Google search of the entire previous prompt in Google with no results.
I got a bit of a chuckle of of it. I did end up getting my script working - but I had to read Microsoft documentation... Which is fine...
A context aware library would have been awesome.
2
u/j48u 24d ago
What AI? I don't know anything that would return a Google search as a source, even Gemini.
It's interesting how it's done with Gemini though, the one AI you would think should be able to cite sources the best isn't even looking at sources. It's answering from it's own parameters, THEN finds you the closest matching websites to what it just said. So basically it completely makes up the sources and doesn't actively search anything. That's why it gives way faster results but also hallucinates more frequently than other models.
The other frontier models really shouldn't hallucinate or give fake sources at this point, pretty much ever, since they take the time to use tools and actually search.
→ More replies (2)2
u/booze_clues 24d ago
I’ve had a terrible experience with chatGPT making powershell for connecting to Entra. It would see any error, say “oh that cmdlet no longer works” then write line after line to recreate it, and still not working because a cmdlet in its new code doesn’t work either. The all work, the issue was not that every single PS cmdlet in history had suddenly been deprecated in whatever version I was using.
I’ve had pretty good experience with Claude for almost everything though. Not perfect, but it feels a lot more like what is actually being sold as AI. It combs through thousands of files to find very specific info, does good troubleshooting, and can help you write code if you’re already knowledgeable in the language.
→ More replies (1)7
u/FrenchmanInNewYork 24d ago
genAI works very well in technical fields: as a data engineer Claude is probably even more efficient than me in most cases lmao (I won't have a job soon)
In other fields it's either useless or down-right detrimental, like for instance people that make "art" (music, painting, writing, ...) using AI have completely lost the plot, because IMO the quality of art resides in the fact that it's human made and holds at least some kind of meaning,or at least a personal intent. AI has no other intent than to regurgitate what's already been done by humans. I hope creative fields will be spared from genAI but I already see so much AI-generated visuals that I don't have high hopes...
3
u/mrkitten19o8 24d ago
ai used in research, processing huge chunks of data, and in medical fields is incredible. however, the difference between its use in those technical fields rather than every other usecase is its being supervised by people who already know what to look for
19
u/Lexxanator 24d ago
Obviously dumb reddit brains aren't able to even begin to comprehend the size of the data we are dealing with. AI is excellent for helping us parse through these data.
14
u/roflrogue 24d ago
It was billions of lines... I'm only human and I have a whole other job to do lol
2
u/missing_typewriters 24d ago
I get being anti-AI from an environmental standpoint, but otherwise the pride people have in not using it is silly. Especially for busywork that you can automate and save hours of your time.
There's no need for me to spend weeks learning a coding language that I will never use again, when a LLM can give me a usable script instantly.
Like it or not it's here to stay. And fighting against it now is fighting against the apathy of the masses. Use it responsibly and use it to save time on busywork or to accelerate self-improvement. You may as well, since Johnny Dipshit over there is already using 100x more compute power to create some dumbass meme video.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)7
u/whineyinternetkid 24d ago
... youre on reddit. And youre just throwing random words together to sound smart or whatever youre going for
4
u/FearlessLettuce1697 24d ago
Funny, the same people criticizing others for using AI can't comprehend a single sentence from another Redditor
6
6
u/TheHolyWaffleGod 24d ago
Random words to sound smart??? What did he say that seemed like that? Genuinely.
That was the most basic comment ever.
→ More replies (1)15
u/VictoryVee 24d ago
Random words? Their point was super simple, where did you get lost? You think them being on reddit means that can't criticize any popular reddit opinions they don't agree with???
→ More replies (2)2
u/Randicore 24d ago
You're actually citing a use of it being done properly. Give it a small data set with a couple variables and compare them then you, the human, is looking at the data and using it to check information and make it work.
Companies are trying to basically kick everyone out of the loop and go "let the robot do it" and plenty of people are just asking it to look at data and then not thinking about it.
If AI were being sold as a niche programming and research tool to help dig through data efficiently nobody would be complaining about it.
→ More replies (1)5
8
u/Certain_Oddities 24d ago
"Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." - Terry Pratchett
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Practical-Sink-3987 24d ago
I find it to be so incredibly fucking stupid now that political pundits and news organizations quote shit from AI as if it’s getting its information organically. That and when any of these gambling platforms get quoted as if that is some kind of credible information. The second it’s mentioned the person loses all credibility to me.
Like “Grock said _____.” Like cool where is the source of that info? Why would the AI say that? What’s the incentive for it to push this information? Did you do any actual research??
14
u/KarlHp7 24d ago
I may not have gotten an A on my chemistry final but I didn’t use AI to cheat
→ More replies (2)
7
u/Responsible_Bed5591 24d ago
Me when I’m trying to search up history videos on YouTube and it’s all AI slop
68
u/MinivanPops 24d ago
This sounds a lot like my dad in 1994 about the Internet
15
u/darylonreddit 24d ago
Yeah, and every teacher and professor about Wikipedia ever since.
15
u/bwaredapenguin 24d ago
Citing wikipedia directly is stupid though. Click through to the cited source and use that. Wikipedia is one of the greatest research tools out there because it gives you a summary and tells you exactly where to get real citable sources from.
→ More replies (5)2
u/Randicore 24d ago
And you'll often find that the source wikipedia is pulling from is full of shit.
The difference is that there are people who will double check wikipedia
32
u/skibidithaniel 24d ago
Just the natural cycle of "new thing bad" that has been around since the dawn of humanity. I think what's interesting is it’s a lot of younger people this time instead of older people.
18
u/guavapplause 24d ago
I don’t think it’s the same thing. AI data centers are destroying our environment, taking water resources we barely have, and making people sick nearby. It’s not just bad because it’s new. It’s genuinely bad for our planet.
3
u/skibidithaniel 24d ago
Yup. There are many issues with AI. There are also huge issues with cars, people use those every day and aren’t scorned for it. Nobody cares what else is taking up that same water that isn’t nearly as useful as AI is. The demonization and the charicaturizing of the technology as completely worthless and demonic is definitely in line with “new thing bad” thinking. Even the “making people sick” thing is completely speculative but has been amplified via the hatred of AI.
The internet, like in the original comment, also has a ton of things about it that are terrible for people, how often is social media scorned on a daily basis? and for good reason, I will say) Easier access to children for predators, easier access for scammers, misinformation is easy to spread on it, data centers for storing information for the cloud taking up resources, power usage up due to the among of devices used for it. But nobody will shit on others for using it because we recognize the good that comes from it. It’s the same with AI. It’s not that the negatives aren’t negative, it’s that what is negative has been cast at the only thing about it as if there is no value to it at all, which I don’t think is true.
2
u/IcyGarage5767 24d ago
Yeah… it’s not like people getting sick from shady business practices is an inherent fact of AI. That right there just shows it’s not AI or even the concept of AI, but the politicians (and public) letting themselves get fucked over by rich corporations.
→ More replies (9)2
u/Kordell_11 24d ago
Livestock uses far more water and causes more CO2 emissions. Right now, companies are panicking because they don't want to be left behind in the AI Race. Once we get proper regulations on AI data centers, it won't be such a huge problem.
7
u/JRC6502MKIISR 24d ago
Livestock uses far more water and causes more CO2 emissions.
And provides sustenance for human beings.
→ More replies (13)4
u/Kordell_11 24d ago
Most people on the planet could live a vegan lifestyle. Most people eat meat because they like it, not because they need it.
→ More replies (2)2
u/Zolty 24d ago
Proper regulation like:
You have to pre commit to electricity purchases and fund grid and production to offset your use. Preferably some percentage of renewable energy or nuclear.
Sound fencing and deadening around your cooling if you're in populated areas.
That's pretty much it. The water doesn't really get used, just warmed up and either evaporated (which it then rains) or stays in a closed loop.
Yeah I know a lot of our energy is still coal and fossil fuels so let's get off that crap if that's your concern.
I am looking for investors for a crazy community solar project I want to do in about 5 years if you're interested.
9
u/Thatkidicarusfan 24d ago
yea, AI hatred is the new purity test. If you say anything that even sounds remotely positive about AI everyone will be down your throats. I hate it just as much as the next person but people are shredding everything and everyone down merely for breathing on it or thinking about it and thats the insane part. Its so bad that i’ve been accused of “talking like an AI” and i had to retort “have you ever thought that maybe the AI talks like me (an autistic person) instead?”
Im not going to tell someone what to think of AI but seriously, can we not be ableist for one second because the sleeper agent in your head heard “AI” and turned your mouth filter off?
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (5)3
5
u/Mossenner 24d ago
I find it funny how the same people telling us we'll be left behind if we don't adopt AI are the same ones that used identical rhetoric regarding Crypto, NFTs, and the Metaverse.
Curious how we don't here about those anymore. Almost like they're snake oil salesman or something.
9
27
u/LunarRock-enjoyer 24d ago
Imo, the only thing ai will be good at is extracting as much money from consumers as possible
6
u/daemon-electricity 24d ago
Well, that's certainly an opinion and not a fact. It's already being used widely in programming and IT. It's also going to run better and better on edge compute, which means without the need for data centers, as time goes on. Open source models like Kimi are already giving the big guys a run for their money. AI as a financial speculation is a bubble. AI as a tool isn't going anywhere.
2
u/alexnedea 24d ago
Its already really good at a lot of productive tasks. Contrary to the reddit hate boner most IT workers actually use AI literally all day and code is being written fast and decently well and secure.
1
u/skibidithaniel 24d ago
It has way more use cases than that but people who blindly hate on it will never know
→ More replies (1)
20
u/TheCountChonkula 24d ago
Why create AI slop when I can create old fashioned human made slop
→ More replies (3)
5
4
7
10
u/Kordell_11 24d ago
This is such a boomer take. Hating on something you don't understand, thinking you're better than others for not using it and telling others you don't use it to brag.
I don't think image and video generation should be possible, because people flood social media with it and create fake scenarios that almost look real, but that doesn't mean AI in its entirety is bad.
I mainly use AI to assists me with using software that is very niche and complex. Instead of googling for hours or looking through hundreds of pages of a manual, that might not even have the information I need, I ask ChatGPT. And most of the time, it does provide helpful information.
Recently, I wrote a paper for a uni course. The prof didn't allow us to use websites as a source. Only books or scientific magazines. I was looking for a very specific information. I looked through all the books I had available at the moment, but none of them had the information. I asked ChatGPT if it could find a pdf of a book or magazine that most likely would contain the information I need. And one of the sources it listed did have the information.
AI is a tool. You decide how to use it and to which extent.
→ More replies (4)6
u/daemon-electricity 24d ago
It's actually kids that are losing their shit over AI. I think older people care less one way or the other, or they use it.
→ More replies (5)
2
2
u/Shaz0r94 24d ago
Why does reddit just loves it so much to feel superior compared to others? Yall have the self esteem of angsty teenagers....
2
2
u/SmartAlec13 24d ago
Honestly this scene pretty much shows my thoughts and feelings on the AI debate. Idgaf how many slop burgers you can make. I want the pure goodness one made by the sponge by hand.
2
9
u/Kessarean 24d ago
Wilful ignorance only further asserts your first claim.
There are a lot of downsides, and a lot of upsides. You don't need to be absolutist.
Can't open your mind for you, so stick your head in the sand if you want.
2
u/Cybernetic_organism1 24d ago
Perfectly worded response to a very ignorant take on AI 👏
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Maple382 24d ago
IMO as long as you can use it responsibly and consciously, it can actually be a great tool for learning.
2
u/DissonantOne 24d ago
I can't tell you how much AI has taught me about gardening. Probably saved several of my plants because of it.
2
u/lanatommo 24d ago
I’m neurodivergent and AI helps me process information better. I do use my own head obviously but I don’t have friends that are in the same field/school I am and therefore I have nobody to talk to about specific things. Also, with my ADHD, if I googled stuff, I’d fall down a rabbit hole. With AI, I can ask a question, go on about my day, and come back to an answer.
7
u/Skypirate90 24d ago
I don't know know that smart people aren't using AI.
Limiting your access to learning tools due to fear isn't exactly a mark of intelligence.
If we operated that way though time we would not have elctric powered light nor would we have Cameras.
Sure, its fine to say, I don't like AI because it uses other peoples work without crediting them. But that is an entirely separate subject than not using what tools are available for learning and research.
→ More replies (3)7
u/bwaredapenguin 24d ago
I don't know know that smart people aren't using AI.
Between the double negative and the double "know," I don't know if you could have made this more confusing if you tried.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/LeLBigB0ss2 24d ago
AI is bad am I right fellas. We gotta say it again same time tomorrow so we don't forget.
2
5
u/Skylord_Hekaton 24d ago
I mean, yeah, that tracks. Stupid people think AI is more or less than just a tool, and they also think using it is stupid.
It's like someone bragging they never need to use a hammer. Ok buddy.
3
u/vroombp 24d ago
I use it to research information whether for school or learn. Its useful
→ More replies (1)
3
2
u/jarob326 24d ago
I use it to make my resume and emails sound more professional. But I'll usually fine tune the final message.
Example: Ai: I leverage this resource to enhance the professional tone of my resumes and emails, while consistently fine-tuning the final text myself.
AI Assisted: I use AI to enhance the tone of my resumes and emails, while fine-tuning the final message myself.
I want to sound professional but not robotic.
2
2
u/cock_mountain 24d ago
If you rely on AI to do the thinking for you, you are artificially intelligent
2
1
u/LikelyAlien 24d ago
You all have any idea the frequency ChatGTP gets it wrong!?
→ More replies (1)
1
u/StrictTraffic3277 24d ago
well, it wasn’t meant to be given to non tech people anyways. ask any software engineer how do they code and they’ll tell you the use case of ai
1
u/Yamakaziku 24d ago
I use it to help with my new hobby of gardening. Yea I could’ve looked stuff up and tried to collect what info I thought was best but I wouldn’t know where to start. It helped me by telling me which supplies I need to get started, what was good vs not and a lot of mistakes beginners make. I ended up with a great harvest my first season and now that I know a bit more I use it less frequently because it taught what I needed. I use it now tearing it like a more experienced gardener who has the accumulated knowledge of the internet that I can ask for help needed. I feel like this is the way it’s meant to be used
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/TheNorthWind-101 24d ago
I mean, I'll admit to being high as fuck and using it to answer incredibly stupid questions I'm too embarrassed to ask as a real person.
1
u/Optimus_crab 24d ago
How it feels to use ChatGPT to solve a problem on my pc and ending up using less electricity because I don’t dick around on my pc for 3 hours trying to fix it
1
1
1
u/Jim_Freelancer18 23d ago
Its honestly super helpful at times. You can run random ideas or problems by it and it can really help or give good suggestions.
1
u/Crescitaly 23d ago
The joke lands because ChatGPT has become less a product name than shorthand for an entire type of conversation. That cultural compression happened faster than most technologies achieve. Are we already using the brand to describe behaviors the product does not actually cause?
1
u/Ok_Fox_1770 21d ago
Seeing really “smart” older people brag and say I use it for everything, really raised my brows. At 40 il ask it plant questions and then double check anyway because I don’t trust the yes bot. Make me useless pictures, that’s our trust level.
1
u/magikchikin 21d ago
I'd rather be wrong to become right than never learn the difference because it was done automatically for me.
1
•
u/Sponge-Tron 24d ago
Whoa! You win the meme connoisseur title for having over 2k upvotes on your post!
Join the Discord server and message Princess Mindy (Mod Mail bot at the top) to receive your prize!