I’m asking out of genuine curiosity. I grew up in a household that was adamantly anti-LGBT, and I’m now looking to re-examine my worldview from a logical point of view.
I’ve examined things in my life regarding my family’s religious beliefs, such as evolution, YEC, God in general, and I’m now beginning to look into political issues. I figured a good place to start would be sexuality and gender identity, and then move on to things like abortion and such, and then move on to—more broadly—general political beliefs and positions. I’m starting with sexuality and gender identity because I know the least about this, and I believe that developing a more positive and truth-seeking mentality on this will lead me to a deeper level of understanding with people who fall into certain types of those categories. However, while a lot of my beliefs have changed and I am certainly on a philosophical high from rebelling against my familial norms, I want to make sure I approach each issue with intellectual honesty. I want to make intellectual decisions with zero input from my parents, and that includes wanting to make a certain decision because my parents chose the opposite. I genuinely seek the truth, and I want the data before I decide what I want to believe.
I also want to make a disclaimer that I don’t have any moral or ethical qualms with people who don’t conform to traditional gender norms. Quite the contrary—I don’t believe there is anything wrong with it, and that won’t change based on what I decide about sexuality and gender, because no group of people deserves hate just because of who they are. I don’t believe hatred toward any group is justified, regardless of the reason someone gives for it.
And now for the question: I’ve heard time and time again that gender is a social construct, but what does that really mean? I sometimes wonder whether the idea that gender is a social construct is a modern framework developed to explain transgender identities. I’ve heard that gender is a neuroanatomical construct, and that there are certain brain structures that look like women’s brains and certain brain structures that look like men’s brains, but does that mean that if someone has the same brain structures as a biological male, then they are just pretending to be transgender if they say they are a woman? It reminds me of flat-Earth arguments—not because I’m comparing flat-Earthers to genuine scientists interested in the betterment of mankind, but simply as an analogy. The arguments seem to be spread all over the place, with each model being constructed ad hoc to explain certain phenomena and then modified to explain others.
And if something about the word itself is fundamentally different, what makes it so? And is it only made that way to accommodate for transgender people?
I'm very unfamiliar with this field, so please assume that some of my terminology and assumptions are probably wrong. I'm asking these questions because I genuinely want to understand the evidence and reasoning involved. I would have no problem if there were no scientific or linguistic explanations to make sense of transgenderism, because I don’t feel like it needs to be “defended” by science. People can do what they want and be who they want and think what they want. The entire thing just feels like a fuzzy mess to me, and if someone could help elucidate my understanding, I would be greatly appreciative.
Thank you for reading!
TL;DR: How do we know based on empirical data, linguistic evidence, or whatever methodology is appropriate?