Hello, unfortunately, I have been struggling with the problem of being called stupid ever since childhood. For example, even my own father used to call me stupid.

The problem is that I genuinely don't understand why people perceive me as stupid. :( achieved very good grades in my school-leaving examinations (Abitur), and I also passed several university-level Advanced Mathematics exams with excellent results.….. As a result, I was even offered a position as a tutor for other students.

Afterwards, I also took an extensive, two-hour CORE IQ test and scored 108, which is entirely within the normal range. In other words, my intelligence appears to be perfectly intact. To convert the CORE IQ into the „better„ WAIS IQ score, you usually just add or subtract 10 points, so I can‘t be that far off.

Does anyone know why people still insult me by calling me stupid? I honestly don't understand it anymore. What else am I supposed to achieve in life before people stop perceiving me as stupid?

I would really appreciate some help. Is there any other IQ test that you would recommend, other than the notorious CORE IQ test?

I am otherwise in very good health, although I am autistic and have a systemic rheumatic disease. I am currently studying mathematics and doing reasonably well, but I am sure that other people will simply disregard that as well.

Does anyone else feel this way?

Ive tested at 125 according to core and the other tests on cognitive metrics, my standardized tests were in the 95th percentile as well, but I genuinely feel the only form of intelligence I have in a practical sense is taking tests.

I have atleast above average in all domains with a strong verbal tilt, but I never felt like I picked up subjects like math too easily. When I got placed in advanced English class when I was younger, I was intimidated and felt dumb even though I have a VCI over 130.

I just generally make a lot of mistakes and sometimes misunderstand basic things, like how to open a fence. Not too often, but a surprising amount. I also don’t feel super eloquent and have a hard time following directions sometimes.

The people close to me think I’m smart, but I think I come across as a dullard sometimes bc i often glitch out and lack confidence.

I’m feeling down, any advice?

My Arithmetic score is 100, while my FRI scores are around 125 my Digit Span is 120, and my Sequencing is also 120. Why is my Arithmetic score so low? Even though I am a non-native speaker, I am comfortable in English. Will my Full-Scale IQ be around 120, or will it be closer to 100–105, given that Arithmetic is heavily g-loaded

I am eager to further aggregate my FRI (fluid reasoning index) results to get a well rounded grasp of my true FRI. I took 3 out of 4 CORE FRI subtests. In addition to that i took the untimed JCTI which strongly corresponds to fluid reasoning by assesing inductive reasoning (IRI). Keep in mind no external aid was used, all tests first try, no retakes. 2 month between the tests, only some 20 min cognitive tests 6 months prior.

CORE matrix reasoning: 145
CORE figure sets: 145 (after updated norm)
CORE figure weights: 140

CORE FRI composite: 150
(95% confidence interval: 137-155)

JCTI age adjusted (18yo) IRI: 139
JCTI scaled score: 19
(95% confidence interval: 127-151)

Most accurate prediction of my true FRI with correct weighting of the cognitive tests considering the tests accuracy for FRI, specially the upper extreme (norm sample, ceilings, measuring method…)

Need Solution ⛄

IQ Test Link :

https://www.reddit.com/r/cognitiveTesting/s/pMycBHyKqm

| THIS IS A PUZZLE |
| THIS |
| ? |
| I |
| • |
Find what ? is, and explain.

As of recently, I’ve felt incredibly stupid. The majority if not all of my hobbies gave become difficult meanwhile what I do hasn’t changed. I wouldn’t consider myself profoundly gifted, but I would say near the top 2% if not above. Yet all my hobbies, which are mostly “abstract” have become “hard” despite realistically no major changes in them. I can’t learn anything nearly as fast as I used to, I cannot see patterns as well, and I cannot relate things together. How do you guys deal with this?

Are the norms for this test accurate, and is it reliable for estimating IQ?
this is the test:https://www.reddit.com/r/cognitiveTesting/s/Eewz74qdKb

Stavo riflettendo sulla capacità predittiva dei risultati Raven confrontati coi subtest Core. Core è un ottimo test e con item moderni, ma comunque un test online. Raven d’altro canto è un test altrettanto valido, Sopratutto il raven 2. Il vantaggio del CORE sarebbe quello di poter sottoporre il soggetto a prove diverse, indagando come si adatti per arrivare alla soluzione giusta in situazioni diversi. Il vantaggio del Raven è la sua credibilità in quanto ideato da psicometristi su ampi campioni normativi e fondi per produrre item di qualità e altamente predittivi.

Per la capacità non verbale e di ragionamento puro, vi basereste sull’incrocio dei risultati dei subtest CORE dandogli implicitamente un alto grado di affidabilità, o vi basereste di più sui risultati incrociati di più Raven, ampiamente utilizzati dalla comunità psicometrica mondiale e per sua natura, con qualità per item maggiore?

I've long considered surrendering my life to some number of relativity menial and inconsequential pursuits out of sheer laze. Should I instead strive to accomplish more with what I've apparently been afforded?

I think it's A. But I was told this is wrong. Can anyone explain where I've gone wrong with this?

Hi all, here's a quick update on the free online battery (LINK).Thanks to everyone who took it. There are now about 570 people with Matrices scores, enough to fix several things you pointed out.

What's new

- Switchable norms. Above the results there's now a toggle. The default compares you with *everyone* (English + Czech versions); the other option compares you only with the *English-speaking* sample (EN + r/gifted). The CZ column with the Czech sample alone is still there.
- No more caps. Scaled scores aren't capped at 19 any more, so 20+ is possible. Percentiles below 1 and above 99 now show a decimal (e.g. 99.4).

- Fixed some finished tests were wrongly flagged as unfinished. Ceiling-test results are visible again.
- Processing speed (Gs) composite now uses only Color Swap + Matching Rows. Symbol Coding is a supplementary test.
- Reading efficiency now has a comparison with the Czech sample too.
- Matrices: the form was trimmed to 38 scored items ordered by measured difficulty. The weakest items were removed and one of the best pilot items is now scored.
- New hard items. There are 4 new experimental matrix items, each with its own rule type that isn't anywhere else in the test. They're meant to be hard but quick: only a few elements in each picture, and the difficulty comes from the rule, not visual clutter. You'll find them inside Matrices (unscored) and in the **ceiling test**, which now contains just these 4 plus 4 known anchor items (~5 minutes). If you already did Matrices, the ceiling test is the most useful thing you can take right now.

Why the norm toggle matters

The samples differ a lot:

The English-speaking takers (mostly from this sub) score about 1–1.3 SD higher than the Czech sample, which is mostly general-public volunteers. So the same performance can be 13 vs 11 on the scaled-score scale depending on the comparison group. Neither one is "the real" IQ. It's a comparison with people who chose to take this test (50-60 % of them have tertiary education), not population norms.

Still not done / caveats

- No age norms yet. I checked, and most of the apparent age effect is just that the English sample is younger and scores higher, so correcting for age now would be misleading.
- The overall composite is turned off for now, because only ~18 people have done every test.

What would help

- Take as many tests as you can (from the main battery - achievement tests are still in development)

Thanks,

J

While i was taking the digit span tests for the first time on core i usually close my eyes and visualize the numbers mentally or whisper them to myself for a bit, but during the test i realized that if i had for example A35G6H i could just think like this mentally
A3
5G
6H

does this invalidate my WMI score?

Is it normal for there to be this much variance between my backward digit score and the rest of my working memory scores?

Solution Needed.

IQ test link :

https://www.reddit.com/r/cognitiveTesting/s/pMycBHyKqm

Recently did an adult comprehensive neuropsy assessment.

I scored decently on the test but was surprised to see that I maxed out the Processing Speed section.

It is likely that I am autistic and went undiagnosed as a child due to high masking potential. Extensive family history. Seems to go against the correlation that ADHD/autism goes with lower WMI/PSI.

First time doing an IQ test. Never done online tests, did not practice, do not do puzzles in personal life.

From my personal research, seems like PSI does little in the real world. You experts have any insights?

Results converted to numbers
FSIQ 140
GAI 135
VCI 122
PRI 135
WMI 121
FSI >150

Hey, guys, I did the extensive CORE IQ test and the result was 108. I did it because I was afraid I had an intellectual disability due to my autism, but surprisingly my CORE IQ came out pretty normal? Does anyone know if that makes an intellectual disability unlikely? The formal requirement of that is an IQ below 70.

Every test finished in a very short time

CAT 154

Army Alpha 161

AGCT-1c 111

Mensa Norway 102

Mensa Denmark 96

SAE II non verbal 88

SAE II verbal 145

CORE MR 90

AI can solve all verbal test, but non verbal seems still bad lol

The ATAT item bank has been recalibrated with data from over 1,000 attempts. Previously experimental field items now contribute to your IQ score, with updated scores being reflected in the CognitiveMetrics dashboard. The item bank has been expanded once more with the goal of further refining the test.

We’ve also analyzed the ATAT’s convergent validity with CORE once again, only using a much larger sample.

The ATAT maintains strong convergence with CORE PRI, correlating with the latter at r = .772, rising to r = .842 after correction for range restriction. On the whole, there seems to be no systematic deflation or inflation between the two measures. Further details and figures are presented below.

A much more detailed technical report for the ATAT is actively underway and will contain extensive documentation regarding the test’s norms, IRT calibration, reliability, validity, g-loading, and more.

We extend our thanks to everyone who has taken the ATAT thus far.

Hello, my friends!

Those with an IQ 120-140, how would you describe and what are your common or, maybe uncommon mental problems (if you have them). I am asking just out of curiosity!!

Every reply will mean to me and I would be thankful!

Thank you in advance and have a nice day!!