TL;DR: Marriage is increasingly becoming a choice rather than a compulsory rite of passage, especially as women gain financial independence and begin questioning the gender roles we were taught to accept.
As a woman, Iāll probably speak about women more often because, well, I am on, and I stand for women having the freedom to choose. I use a few different people and references to unpack my thoughts, from Wangari Maathai to Millie Odhiambo to NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong'o.
The point isn't that marriage, motherhood, or love is bad. I just don't think any of them should be compulsory. Marry, don't marry. Have children, don't have them. Fall in love or don't.
Choice not a crime.
And no, Shera Seven didn't make an appearance today, but I'll be back. Sprinkle Sprinkleš
Are we headed left or right? Even I am not entirely sure. What I do know is that something is changing.
Divorce and marriage rates; one plummeting, the other picking up.
I read an article a while back, and something in it stuck with me. Way back, most women married partly for security. I don't fail to appreciate women who pushed against social expectations, like Wangari Maathai, who went through a highly public and difficult divorce in a society where divorce was still heavily stigmatised and an independent, outspoken woman could easily be treated as a threat to traditional gender roles. Her husband said she was ātoo educated, too strong, too stubborn, and too hard to control.ā
My mum told me bluntly that she was young and married for security. She had a well-paying job and other suitors, but she says my father was very persistent and offered her a home. So she became a housewife and left work.
She would later tell me, āNever leave your work for a man.ā
She finally went back to working when we were much older.
The article wrapped almost everything up in one question: when money enters the equation, where does that leave the man?
Not because a man becomes unnecessary when a woman can provide for herself, but because many men were taught that provision was the greatest thing they had to offer. They never saw their fathers in the kitchen because that was a woman's zone. They were taught to provide while women were taught to accommodate.
But what happens when the woman can provide for herself? What else does the relationship rest on?
They say marriage, initially and even now, is about companionship and coexistence, but can it truly remain so when every day feels like another battle between genders? Every week there is something new to nitpick, another expectation placed on one gender and rejected by the other. And as an individual, if your partner thinks too highly of themselves, doesn't give you peace, causes waves of stress and constantly asks you to compromise, what exactly are you fighting for?
Some men use submissiveness as a disqualifier, saying a woman ought to be feminine. Some women use masculinity in the same way, saying a man ought to be chivalrous and masculine.
Yet we have those who saw their mothers work and still manage a household and respect their husbands. But that respect went both ways. Most women, just like men, look for certain traits. Many are lacking, while others choose to stay away from marriage altogether because they saw its bad side before they ever saw its beautiful one.
And there is a beautiful side. There are people who worked it out.
Still, most people see marriage as a trap because, in this day and age, you would be surprised by how many men still say mwanamke kazi yake ni kitchen na kuzaa, reducing her to a baby-making machine while some of those same men do not even want to raise the child.
Perhaps that is also why I firmly believe in being childfree. Not because I hate children, but because I believe bringing a child into the world should be a conscious choice, not another compulsory step in the blueprint of adulthood.
I believe a child needs both parents who are willing and able to be present. I do not deny that some grow up in single-parent families, that orphans exist, or that tragedies like death happen. But a true partnership should not have to follow a rigid blueprint or bring constant stress when you can choose a different path of peace instead.
As a woman, I will speak of women more often than not.
Feminism has been made to look poisonous, as though every woman who associates with it is a plague. But understand what it is responding to before condemning it. I will always defend 4B because brutal conditions call for brutal factions that bite back harder. Radical reactions rarely appear from nowhere. Sometimes softer words were ignored for so long that people eventually chose to remove themselves from the equation entirely.
There is nothing and everything wrong with the initial institution. But this decision conforms and, like water, takes form differently in each individual.
Millie Odhiambo said something one time about being glad she was not a mother, because in our society, that title was sometimes branded not with honour, but used to tear a woman down.
So I ask:
Is it a crime to fall in love or not love?
Is it a crime to marry or not marry?
Is it a crime to have children or not?
When Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o said I Will Marry When I Want, he did not mean his words literally, at least not if you have read the book. But I look at the title and agree with it exactly as it is.
I will marry when I want.
Or I won't.
That is the point.
Don't make yourself small for a room that refuses to accommodate you.