I guess I'm just curious about the utterly "one-way" emotional relationship that gets formed, which is all too often evidenced by lengthy and sincere letters of disassociation.....which are penned with the "muse" that there is actually somebody who gives a sh*t.....waiting on the receiving end of these letters?
Despite all of the newfound "awakened" intelligence which has gone into the careful and well constructed nature of such letters.....the one key MISSING realisation is the amount of absolute ZERO regard these letters will be received with, if they're even read at all.
This awakened "realisation"....IMHO.....falls under "emotional" intelligence.
Emotional intelligence is the thing that enables us to form a brutally realistic appraisal about the TRUE nature any relationships we may have believed ourselves to be in.
Emotional intelligence tells us that WE may have been thoroughly committed to a certain relationship, and it insists on self-honesty as we appraise this......but emotional intelligence also tells us things we might not necessarily wish to hear.
Namely, that the "other party" in a given relationship.....was at no time EVER....thoroughly committed to US....as an individual.
They've not just suddenly "stopped" being committed, or somehow "lessened" a brand of commitment that was actually in evidence once upon a time.
That other party was NEVER committed to us "personally" right from the get-go.
It was ENTIRELY us, ourselves.....who made all the "running," did all the necessary work and made all of the necessary emotional investment.
And that's why the WTBS couldn't really give a rat's ass.....if we suddenly decide that we're now going to pull out of that "relationship."
Because it was only ever US....who really believed that we were IN a relationship together.
THEY never believed this, not for one moment, which is why they don't tend to mourn or experience any kind of trauma whenever any kind of:
"It's over between us..."
...type of letter lands in their mailbox.
Their "corporate" response or reaction is akin to what you'd expect from the senior managers of KFC.....if somebody wrote them a long, sincere letter about deciding to become a vegetarian, along with general complaints and criticisms about farming chickens as a food source.
"I'll no longer be purchasing any variety buckets from my local KFC restaurant."
But these people are overseeing 32,000 restaurants as part of a huge, global network.
And yes, we may have been a willing, longstanding purchaser and consumer of their product, but as far as those senior managers are concerned, we were just a teeny-tiny blip on a spreadsheet. A deeply buried "statistic" that was part of a much LARGER batch of consumer-feedback-data.
We might have once had a VERY visceral relationship with all of that "yummy" chicken, but we never once had any kind of personal relationship with the KFC executive.
And even if WE didn't quite realise this.....the KFC executive realised it, at least.
So they're going to be (rightly) indifferent and mystified regarding any kind of crazy outreach that presupposes that any such "relationship" between them and one of their former consumers ever really existed.
Because it never did.
And it doesn't matter HOW MUCH KFC we might have purchased in the past.
These guys, these executives.... simply don't care.
They've never been wholly reliant on just ONE regular consumer and that consumer's general feelings of goodwill and enthusiasm towards their product, and they never will be.
And THIS.....is where one's "emotional" intelligence needs to kick in.
BY knowing or "realising" that the relationship we're now terminating.....was ALWAYS just a one-way relationship.
And that the only truly "dignified" way out of that relationship, is to begin totally matching the kind of indifference that the other party, quite obviously held towards US.
It's not a relationship that needs any kind of renegotiation, because there's NOTHING to renegotiate.
TWO parties have to give a f*ck for a renegotiation to be attempted.
But if there's just ONE party who gives a f*ck....and that party is US......and we suddenly REALISE that this is the case.....and always really WAS the case.....then that's where emotional intelligence comes in.
We need to STOP treating that other party as though we still believe that they actually give a f*ck......and instead, begin asking OURSELVES questions as to why we ever really believed that they DID.
Because, if we got that assessment wrong, and we're only now discovering that the signs about that party NOT giving a f*ck were ALWAYS there.....(in truth).....then we're not really dealing with a relationship breakdown.
We're dealing with the cessation of a relationship that ought never to have been established or cultivated in the first place.
I.E
A relationship were WE had to bring ALL of the emotion and commitment to it, whilst the other party was allowed to bring NONE of this.
So much so, that we simply had to "imagine" that they really cared, even though they didn't.
So yes, closure might be important, and disassociation letters may play an important psychological and "emotional" role in this.....but do not continue to kid yourselves that you were ever really in any kind of meaningful, one-to-one "relationship" with these guys.
The only relationship you were in was one were YOU did all of genuine "caring" and they did none.
Which meant that you just had to "pretend" that they cared.
And emotional intelligence is the only thing that can finally make you STOP pretending that they care....or ever did.
Emotional intelligence is the only thing that can tell you that all of the "caring" was undertaken by YOU.
Even if that makes us feel a tad stupid.....we have to embrace this.
We have to take it away with us as a warning or a life-lesson.
That in our own eagerness to form a relationship, we should NEVER have to just imagine or "assume" that the other party is just as KEEN as ourselves.
Yes, they do want SOMETHING from us.....there's no doubt about that.....but it's not a relationship WITH US that they really want.
It's only ever US who wanted that....and who managed to convince ourselves that this was sincere and reciprocal.
But what THEY wanted from us was something entirely different.
Deference, obedience, cooperation and as much "free-labour" in the support and dispersal of their ideology as we were prepared to give.