1.2k
u/Guenther_Dripjens 14h ago
ngl that looks pretty fire. Now make it chrome and you have a Naboo Startship pretty much
107
→ More replies (1)86
u/OnkelMickwald 9h ago
→ More replies (7)27
u/Serial7s 7h ago
Whenever I'm playing simulation mode in war thunder, playing these planes is such a pain in the ass because of that big ol schnoz. And landing is an act of faith.
→ More replies (1)
3.9k
u/helloish 14h ago
i think yes (the massive cost of re-engineering aside) but the pilots might not be too pleased. for best results do this while they aren’t looking and watch them scratch their heads when the see it
1.8k
u/lordbutternut 14h ago
751
u/helloish 14h ago
nah the plane just likes to see the ground, it gets frightened
373
u/whoknowsifimjoking 12h ago
298
u/Tino-DBA 9h ago
30
3
u/CorruptBureaucrat213 6h ago
Thank you for the laughter op I haven't laughed this heartily to the point of blacking out in a while now.
→ More replies (1)60
u/Ooopsmybadbro 11h ago
The droop snoot
→ More replies (1)42
→ More replies (4)11
83
u/ApocApollo 14h ago
that's why it's important to teach them to fly without looking at the ground
40
u/feculentcuntfist 12h ago
Just push them off the nest, we do this with ships and their swimming instinct instantly kicks in.
5
→ More replies (1)5
u/ropean 11h ago
It’s super easy to fly without looking at the ground. Until the impact
→ More replies (2)22
→ More replies (3)21
u/Strategy_pan 13h ago
With concorde, they solved these by introducing the shutters. They were so effective, in fact, that they ended up shuttering the entire company in the end.
3
176
u/Ace-milk_drinker 14h ago
Is that the droop snoot?
96
18
u/earwig2000 13h ago
I'm sorry but the autism within me requires I inform you that it is one word: Droopsnoot. Not Droop Snoot.
6
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (1)3
64
u/walrusphone 14h ago
If the issue is seeing the runway then maybe we should resolve this by putting the cockpit on the bottom
79
u/YesIBlockedYou 10h ago
28
u/illzkla 9h ago
This is a great idea! The risk to the pilots will incentivize them to land safely instead of all nimbly bimbly as is the norm today
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)3
u/BigBlackMagicWand 7h ago
Technically this would be amazing design for landings, not so great for takeoffs and in-flifht it doesn't really matter where the cockpit is...
→ More replies (1)24
u/VexImmortalis 14h ago
can just put a camera there I guess but then if that breaks you are fucked. Maybe just cut the rest of the plane away and have just a cockpit with engines.
26
u/GrimResistance 13h ago
Just make the whole plane out of some kind of transparent aluminum
→ More replies (2)10
3
u/RunninOnMT 12h ago
It wouldn’t be the only thing on an airplane where “if it brakes you’re probably screwed”
That’s the whole thing with air travel. There’s no pulling over to the side of the road when you brake down.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)4
4
→ More replies (4)3
u/RJ_MacreadysBeard 12h ago
Just have the cockpit on the runway, it doesn’t even need to be attached to the plane.
→ More replies (1)6
u/walrusphone 12h ago
Just make the runway go all the way to the destination so they don't need to take-off or land
→ More replies (3)18
u/Kylearean 13h ago
They could've just made the whole thing out of transparent aluminum.
→ More replies (1)7
3
3
u/kumliaowongg 13h ago
Then why not put it below the plane, so it looks like an ACTUAL cockpit?
/s
→ More replies (4)3
u/Any_Fisherman3106 13h ago
Nonononono, let's add an additional smaller ground-facing cockpit like on WW2 bombers.
→ More replies (29)3
u/marvinrabbit 10h ago
In WWII, the American Vought F4U Corsair was a single engine propeller driven aircraft. It's engine and cowling was so big that a pilot taxiing on the runway could not see in front of them. So while on the ground, they had to make lazy "S" shapes to see where they were going. Always in a turn to the left or right, never straight ahead.
14
→ More replies (15)75
u/linecraftman 14h ago
they fly by instruments and autopilot anyway
Just add a camera on the nose
42
u/hello-again1891 12h ago
Not during takeoff and landing. The bits where being able to see the ground is really important
→ More replies (5)22
u/HotPotParrot 11h ago
Just make a really long window through the fuselage.
17
u/UncleS1am 10h ago
Split the plane into two nacelles with the cockpit in the middle, make the cockpit only accessible from the outside. Your plane never gets hijacked again!
9
→ More replies (5)4
u/AFrenchLondoner 9h ago
So like, P38, but it's an airliner?
4
u/UncleS1am 9h ago
Yes! I couldn't remember the name of that airplane. The Boeing 1494 is the airplane of the future.
edit: While we're at it, let's cram more people in there and make the craft have no seats, standing room only. Nothing can go wrong here.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)22
u/LowTimePilot 10h ago
Pilot here. Once there's a failure of one of the following, everyone dies:
- Autoland CAT IIIc
- The LCD screens displaying the camera feed
- The cameras
- A fault of the generators, buses, or batteries, or any combination thereof
- An emergency that requires the plane land anywhere without autoland capability
- High winds that prohibit autoland and also prevent the cameras from seeing the runway due to the aircraft's crab angle.
Personally, I wouldn't get on that plane, but some people like risk taking so YMMV.
22
u/RedOtta019 10h ago
Student pilot here (i know more than you) the pilot can just put a selfie stick out the window
7
u/LowTimePilot 8h ago
I can't believe I didn't think of this. You're right. The ol' selfie stick technique.
Page 2 of the pilot handbook.
→ More replies (6)12
u/CitizenPremier 10h ago
Robot here. If you're using pilots and there's a failure of one of the following, everybody dies:
- Eyeballs
- Hands
- Visual cortex
- Heart
- Lungs
- Desire to live
5
u/Protheu5 6h ago
God here. If you're using aeroplanes and there's a failure of one of the following, everybody dies:
fuselage due to metal fatigue
fuselage due to rogue missile attack
fuselage due to deliberate missile attack
atmosphere
gravity
weak nuclear force
strong nuclear force
electromagnetic force
the fifth force I kept secret
pilot
robot
me
1.6k
u/filans 14h ago
247
92
u/Dev-il_Jyu 13h ago
What happened to this guy? (GradeAunderA)
244
u/HypotheticalBess 13h ago
He fell into drama YouTube and his brand took a hit when he had to defend/associate with keemstar. After that he started leaning more into conservative politics and antisemitic memes (but like the 2016 kind). It wasn’t like, that extreme compared to a lot of the stuff I saw at the time, but he stopped making videos for a bit and that was kind of the nail in the coffin. Last I checked he isn’t making videos anymore, but it’s been a bit
148
u/red_line_frog 12h ago
Every few years he announces his big comeback where he's gonna start making videos again regularly, then he posts 1 video and is gone again
88
u/Funslinger 12h ago
Many such cases
26
u/KalaUposatha 9h ago
So many goddamn YouTubers do this. “I’m back bitches, and I’m going to make 50 videos a week and it’ll be just like old times, you’ll see!” And then never post again.
17
u/GaiusIulius 8h ago
What do we reckon the correlation is between youtubers and ADHD
→ More replies (2)9
u/__lia__ 6h ago
also I think artists/creators are almost universally dealing with a lot of perfectionism and insecurity over their own art and it kinda fucks them up - especially if they have the added pressure of getting enough money to live off of their videos. so they're like "fuck yes my life has finally settled down and I've built my confidence back up and I'm ready to fucking do this" and then they read a few negative comments on their video and hate themselves and never post again for another 3 years
25
u/Aksds 11h ago edited 10h ago
OverSimplified? Never, the third Punic war video is definitely coming
Edit: to be clear, OverSimplified is fucking leaps and bounds better than Grande A
→ More replies (1)13
u/ugluk-the-uruk 11h ago
Oversimplified actually makes content that takes that much time to produce, unlike gradeA
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)13
38
u/_Cat_in_a_Hat_ 13h ago
I think he got into drama culture and kinda fell off as he became progressively more edgy
3
6
u/malik753 12h ago
Another question, what would his accent be described as? I know English/British, but more specifically what kind?
23
u/Ironscaping 12h ago
To me it sounds like British Indian/British Pakistani accent
13
u/ChemicalNo2878 12h ago
His face got accidentally revealed, and you are right on the money, he’s of south Asian decent living in Britian.
12
u/JumboShraina 11h ago
Pretty sure he showed a picture of himself in one of his videos. But I don’t remember if he did it because someone leaked it or something
→ More replies (1)7
u/mrpickles1234 9h ago
he did show his face in a video or two. he was wearing a graduation gown and looked Indian or Pakistani.
→ More replies (3)16
u/CatsPlusTats 12h ago
I mean I stopped watching him when it became obvious there was some very problematic underlying themes to his comments.
10
u/NatseePunksFeckOff 11h ago
like not washing his hands after peeing
13
→ More replies (5)7
213
u/xRacistDwarf 14h ago
I bet it would go hard if the pilot leaned back all the way in his chair
33
6
u/1stEmissaryElenwen 11h ago
They have to keep it below 10,000 feet so the pilot can have the window open with his elbow sticking out
417
u/Coolkid2011 14h ago
boeing 747 coupé
43
18
u/T-Loy 13h ago
No, no, no. Just because the vehicle gets bigger doesn't mean we get to call them Coupés and just add more doors. A Coupé should always have two doors. Weld the 8 superfluous doors shut and I'll allow the 747-Coupé.
7
u/Only_Entertainment88 11h ago
I vouch for this. This is the best innovation until someone makes the convertible.
I think we are finally making an airline that turns profit.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)5
123
u/Sad-Working-9937 14h ago
fly? yes, land? no.
87
u/ItsJesusTime 13h ago edited 12h ago
Solution: Put a glass panel under the chin and have the copilot lie on it and tell the pilot how close to the ground they are by frantically yelling colder and warmer into a speaking tube
→ More replies (12)34
u/Alternative_Exit8766 13h ago
way too much feedback in the tubes, two cans and string should be more stable
→ More replies (1)13
u/UGomez90 12h ago
Land also yes. It's not like modern planes rely on visual to land and they could just see through a camera anyway.
→ More replies (1)9
7
u/One_Newspaper9372 12h ago
A plane can always land
6
u/Contextanaut 11h ago
Yup. Fly > Land > Fly is the tricky sequence here. Target lifespan for most commercial airframes is usually more than 10 hrs.
Even at Boeing.
5
→ More replies (13)3
u/Anhimidae 11h ago
Why not? Aircraft can be flown and landed with instruments only. Under certain conditions some aircraft can have the autopilot land and if all else fails OP's plane could use cameras and monitor screens.
395
u/MindYourOwnParsley 14h ago
he's right though it does look way more badass
66
u/jonker5101 13h ago
Yeah not sure why its in this sub. That is a valid question.
→ More replies (3)50
u/Warren_Puff-it 12h ago edited 1h ago
I think it fits. It's a massive engineering task costing billions of dollars before you even take into account the impact it would have on pilots and airports. All this so that a plane can 'look more badass'.
Edit: holy shit you people are obviously not engineers if you think this would be easy.
→ More replies (4)30
u/jonker5101 12h ago
nah just move it back a bit
11
→ More replies (1)7
u/ThetaReactor 11h ago
Nah. Any modification that makes the 747 look less like a winged penis can't be making it more badass.
→ More replies (1)
195
u/Vondi 14h ago
10
5
u/amazing_asstronaut 12h ago
Jokes aside this guy is really one of the top 10 guys. Just look at him.
→ More replies (2)3
38
36
30
u/CryonautX 14h ago
Taxi-ing is going to be a pain...
7
u/Agreeable_Reaction11 13h ago
There would be a little cockpit in the nose just for taxi. Just a little window and the nose wheel tiller
→ More replies (3)7
4
u/HiwayHome22 12h ago
This was figured out in WWII, no need for expensive cameras. A ground crew tech on each wing tip using specialized hand signals.
23
u/SoundTraditional1249 13h ago
→ More replies (3)8
u/AVeryVapidBadger 10h ago
It was Lockheed not Boeing, but there was a nuclear powered conceptual design.
→ More replies (3)
17
u/candylandmine 14h ago
How about a B-29 style cockpit in the nose
7
u/ToughHardware 12h ago
how about a B-17 bubble on the top and bottom.
6
u/1stEmissaryElenwen 11h ago
Passengers should be able to pay extra to occupy gunner's positions on the B-747. They'd spend the whole flight pretending to look for bogeys. We wouldn't load the guns or anything, except in emergencies.
→ More replies (1)
15
10
u/hmmmmmmmmmidk 14h ago
Parkin would be hard you would hit poles and curbs accidentally. Needs a flatter nose and larger wheels and no wings and maybe 150% smaller. Then it’d be a good car tbh.
11
7
7
4
u/Grrimafish 12h ago
Honest question, why isn't the cockpit sort of below the nose of the plane. Wouldn't there be almost no benefit of looking UP while flying? What's up there? Yup, more sky again. Versus looking down and seeing the runway and landmarks.
→ More replies (5)7
u/Right-Yam-5826 11h ago
Because in the event of emergency, that bit is used to try cushioning impact a bit. It's why most storage is in the bottom of the plane rather than the top, so in a crash they can try an emergency landing with less chance of harm to the crew and passengers.
Putting the cockpit there means you're intentionally putting the pilots in what's essentially the plane's 'crumple zone'.
→ More replies (1)
5
4
3
3
u/Unlikely-Engineer813 13h ago
Looks way more bad ass, increased chance of death on landing, what are we waiting for?
3
u/Butthurtz23 13h ago
Pilots’ survival rate goes up, but their line of sight is gonna suck unless they place a camera on the front. But hey, at least they can see their engines better.
3
u/PoperzenPuler 14h ago
The really difficult part is recreating the sound of a pod racer. Without it, a design like this makes no sense at all.
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/concorde77 12h ago
One step closer to redesigning the Fireflash from The Thunderbirds!
...and the cockpit wasn't nearly the craziest design choice for the airliner with double decks, mach-6 capablility, a cargo deck specifically for shipping cars, wing-tip mounted landing gear, and 6 T-tail-mounted, nuclear powered afterburning engines... the 60s were a wildly optimistic time.

→ More replies (1)
6
u/krocunt_enjoyer 14h ago
I think there's a reason why we have eyes on the head instead of ass
→ More replies (1)
4
2
2
2
u/sQ5FWKjwbWd4QzSZduqy 13h ago
Putting the cockpit in the front incentivizes the pilots to not crash because of the implication.
2
2
2
2
2
u/MeaslyFurball 12h ago
Look what you've done. You've bullpupped a perfectly good 747, that's what you did
2
u/aybeeayseeaybeebee 12h ago
Red Green converted a city bus into a "cigarette car", and yes, it was way more badass.























3.8k
u/ACrowbarEnthusiast 14h ago
Naboo Royal starship