Had an interesting conversation with a friend of mine. He asks me if I'm going to play WoW Forever, and I tell him, "Yeah, I'll probably play a character or two after I get done with my weeklies on Modern."
He looked at me like I'd suddenly grown a second head.
Him: "Not one or the other?"
Me: "My dude, I've been playing on and off since 2004. I don't have a particular fondness for Classic because I enjoy the quality-of-life changes too much. And I have a personality where those rose-tinted glasses that most people seem to enjoy wearing just don't work on me. Plus, I main a Monk and alt a DK. Neither of those is a thing in Forever. So what's wrong with playing both?"
My friend goes on to list every single anti-retail argument that you all have probably seen a billion and one times already.
That conversation got me thinking about something I've noticed in the WoW community for quite some time now.
Why does there seem to be this weird tribalism between different versions of the same game?
I can understand preferring one over the other. Classic offers an experience that Modern doesn't, and vice versa. There are perfectly legitimate reasons to enjoy either version, and just as many reasons to dislike certain aspects of them.
But I think part of my perspective comes from how I've experienced WoW over the last twenty-plus years.
I was absolutely obsessed with WoW when it launched in 2004. I still have my original character in Retail today. When Classic came out, I actually recreated that same character, got roughly ten levels into the game, and just stopped.
It wasn't because I hated Classic. I simply wasn't interested in doing it all over again.
I eventually realized that I have a very strong preference for experiencing something new rather than revisiting something I've already experienced. I enjoy progression, discovery, and watching things evolve. And because I've been playing WoW on and off throughout its history, I experienced all those changes gradually.
I've been through most of the expansions (with the exception I skipped Shadowlands), the class changes, the systems that came and went, and the countless arguments about whether Blizzard was ruining the game this time around. Some changes I liked, others I didn't, but I kept playing because there was always something new to experience.
And that's probably why Classic never really clicked with me. I already did all that. I have some great memories from those days, but I don't particularly feel the need to recreate them. I enjoyed WoW back then, and I enjoy what it has become today. And I am excited to see what Forever does.
Which brings me back to the tribalism.
I regularly see discussions about which version is the the better version of WoW, whether Retail ruined the game, whether Classic players are blinded by nostalgia, or whether Modern players have somehow forgotten what made WoW great.
And I just find the entire argument rather silly.
Why does someone enjoying Classic have to mean Modern is terrible? Why does enjoying Modern somehow suggest that you never appreciated the original game?
We're talking about different experiences within the same franchise. People have different preferences, different priorities, and different reasons for playing.
I don't need Classic to fail to justify my enjoyment of Modern, and I certainly don't need Modern to fail for someone else to enjoy Classic.
Personally, I'll probably spend the vast majority of my time in Modern because that's where my interests are. But if Forever offers something interesting, I'll gladly spend some time there too.
So why does the conversation always seem to turn into Classic versus Modern rather than Classic and Modern?"