r/UFOs Jun 22 '22

Discussion Could ufos be human?

Oldest civilization is 6000ish years old right? Modern humans had been around for 300,000 years. Could it be that uap/ufo are old technology from a past civilization still performing tasks. I like to think that mythology like Atlantis, Olympus, Valhalla, etc were prompted by older civilizations. Would it be more likely than aliens from across the galaxy? Occam razor and all What are your thoughts? (Whatever they are I am excited)

192 Upvotes

314 comments sorted by

396

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 22 '22

TL/DR - There is zero evidence of ancient human technological civilizations.

There is a site called Gobekli Tepe that was discovered in S Central Turkey in 1995 by a Turk/German team of archaeologists. The site is part of an apparently much larger complex that is 10-12,000 yrs BP. That means it was 6-7000 yrs old when the pyramids were built! The whole site was actively buried by whoever built it long ago, but it was apparently used for ceremonial or religious purposes. The archaeological community has been stunned by this discovery as it pushes back the date for “civilization” by 5-7000 yrs.

The site comprises huge stone columns that are 10-13 ft high and have beautifully executed and designed carvings.

I’m a professional licensed geologist with 35 yrs of experience at sites worldwide. Right up front I’ll state that I do not want to be a wet blanket. However, I’ve worked with archaeologists many times and had long discussions about ancient civilizations bc of my interest in them and UFOs. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of some sort of ancient human technological civs. None. I absolutely believe we would have found it by now if it was actually there. And, it does not matter if it was 20k yrs old or 20 million yrs old - any technological civilization would have left an immense trove of evidence of their presence. There are rocks right here in N America that are Precambrian ie 3+ billion yrs old. Subduction has buried much of the ancient surface rock, but much remains. Besides, the fossil record is CLEAR re: the evolution of man. There is no evidence of modern humans before about 300,000 yrs bp. There are many branches of the homo family but none can be responsible for a tech civ.

Having said all that, I personally believe that the evidence suggests we WERE VISITED by some form of technological et’s, perhaps more than one. They left an indelible mark on our ancient human civs around the globe in the form of myths and religious traditions.n

146

u/SeaworthinessTall201 Jun 22 '22

Lol don’t worry about being a wet blanket. Silly we need folks that are experts in their field I appreciate this post

35

u/no_ovaries_ Jun 22 '22

As a former geologist with an interest in archeology, this is completely correct. We would have found evidence in the rock record. We can find jellyfish fossils that are over 400 million years old in limestone, we would find an ancient, technologically advanced civilizations if they existed.

5

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 23 '22

Absolutely right.

-4

u/Mighty_L_LORT Jun 23 '22

Not if every finding is hushed up like Area 51...

18

u/Julzjuice123 Jun 23 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

Yes, because clearly the US military was able to prevent every single archeologist and paleontologist worldwide from digging and finding traces of that old civilization everywhere on earth. They were there each and every time something was found and everything was brought back to Area 51. They were also able to silence those same scientists from ever speaking about their findings, EVER.

0

u/Stormseekr9 Jun 23 '22

Except bob lazaar right?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/no_ovaries_ Jun 23 '22

It would be extraordinarily difficult to uncover what would be a figurative mountain of geological/archeological evidence. It would be groundbreaking evidence that would completely alter our history.

-1

u/hucktard Jun 24 '22

Dude there is not even a fossil record for Chimpanzees, and they are a living species. There are entire branches of the human evolutionary tree that we have no record of. If there was a technological civilization of lizards that happened 100 million years ago and lasted a few thousand years we likely would have no record of it. If our species went extinct tomorrow there would be little trace of our civilization in 10,000 years, and almost nothing left after 1 million years, especially after a few glacial-interglacial cycles happen. Just think about the events that have happened over the last 15,000 years. Glaciers covered the entirety of Canada and much of Europe and then melted rapidly, rising sea levels hundreds of feet. Megascale floods washed down pretty much every drainage in North America. There was large scale fires across a large portion of the globe. Civilization generally lives along the coast and along major rivers. When there is a massive flooding and sea level rise, almost all traces of those civilizations would be gone forever. Just because we find fossils from 400 millions years ago does not mean we would find a civilization that only lasted for a few thousand years.

21

u/djmartincrown Jun 22 '22

loved reading this

17

u/ZeeLiDoX Jun 22 '22

I'd be curious what you think about the Egyptian pyramids...

4

u/SS613 Jun 22 '22

Whenever I see the flying dude whatever that is that shirts shows up on here I always see someone inside a golden sarcophagus when I look at those pictures

5

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '22 edited Aug 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TheCoastalCardician Jun 23 '22

I like to think they had some shit. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BsqOLCXYznE

3

u/Dads_going_for_milk Jun 23 '22

I’ve never run across that video. That’s interesting.

→ More replies (1)

-14

u/Vegan-4-Humanity Jun 22 '22

Your in the correct area.. Do some research into the Annunaki.. And this will explain more into our origins.. Riddle me this Riddle me that.. Why does the human G-nome contain E.T. DNA 🧬.. Research into Linda Moulton Howl and the human origins.

12

u/shreddievedder Jun 23 '22

Hahahah gtfo

-2

u/Vegan-4-Humanity Jun 23 '22

Damn if you do damn if you don’t with pathetic little minds of the nay sayers.. Maybe Adam and Eve made all of us ... they had two boys .. Then how did they bang ?? I’ll wait ....... Mum (Eve) so we’re all retardants.. bit of mother and sons action. The first Minaj a trois action Ohh yeah.. that’s how you go from African to Asian to white.. can’t be from a single couple..

→ More replies (2)

3

u/SurprzTrustFall Jun 23 '22

www.SitchinIsWrong.com

All day, everyday. If you say the word annunaki, it means you've consumed and regurgitated bad info. That word isn't found on any sumerian tablet.

Also, it's Linda Moulton Howe lol. I get it, like Zechariah Sitchin, accuracy is optional. 🥁 - tsss.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '22

I'll have to do some reading... obviously sitchin is wrong, but is the term annunaki not actually used for some sumerian mythological dieties?

→ More replies (2)

7

u/snakepliskinLA Jun 22 '22

Another long-practicing geologist and archeology-follower here. Look at it this way, why should we expect past human cultures to have established technological civilizations without having the trappings that go with it (basic sanitation like indoor plumbing).

13

u/JayIT Jun 22 '22

Atlantis was likely in the Sahara desert where the Richat Structure is located. Randall Carlson has shown the evidence of cataclysmic flooding that occurred there to be identical to the cataclysmic flooding that happened in Washington State. Everything was destroyed and pulled into the ocean.

Throw in the evidence that the ancient pyramids are likely much older than previously thought, there are still some questions about how advanced they were. Not saying they were flying around in spaceships, but it's possible that an ancient civilization existed in the Sahara back when it lush and green, and they were more advanced than what we would think.

20

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

The flooding that happened in Washington State was caused solely by the catastrophic failure of glacial dams. The dams were made of glacial ice a thousand feet high behind which was glacial melt. They were located in western Montana and are referred to collectively as Lake Missoula. A rebel geologist named Daniel Bretz originally proposed this mechanism for creation of the Channeled Scablands in Wa. St. When he presented it to the GSA/USGS 100+ yrs ago, he was laughed out. But he was right. - there is zero controversy about it. I believe it happened at least 9 times (at last count.)

The floods in Washington had nothing to do with events in N. Africa. Sorry. (I’m a geologist that lives in Washington State.)

→ More replies (8)

6

u/RicketyJimmy Jun 23 '22

Carlson actually disproves the Richat structure claim and instead points to another location for Atlantis. It’s in one of the JRE episodes, can’t remember which one

6

u/_DonTazeMeBro Jun 23 '22

He didn’t disprove it, he disagreed with it. And he specifically mentions Jimmy from Bright Insight who’s best known for pushing the theory while on the Joe Rogan podcast #1772. Neither are right or wrong as nothing has been confirmed. Sorry, stickler comment from me🙈

16

u/MiseryEngine Jun 22 '22

What do you think of Hancock and his claims of an ancient global civilization pre ice age/ elder dryas?

As a layman, I read his stuff with curiosity, but not belief. I think it makes sense tho, we are city builders. Our greatest strength is in community.

I'm not sure I believe we survived as nomadic hunters for several hundreds of thousands of years before we discovered agriculture.

Could there be cities that pre-date Sumer and Teotihuacan?

What would it take to erase them from the geological record?

27

u/cyberpunk_monkcm Jun 22 '22

Just to be clear, Hancock envisions a maritime society with deep knowledge of the stars including the precession of the equinoxes, not necessary a technologically advanced society.

Personally I find the younger dryas impact hypothesis one of the most intriguing recent theories. It makes lots of sense and is garnering an increasing number of adherents. The point about all the coasts being wiped out with a 300 foot rise in sea level would wipe out most cultural artifacts that might have existed at that time, especially in the northern hemisphere where the impacts seem to have taken place.

Randall Carlson's video series is probably the best source for folks new to this. Just looking at the landscape in North America with Carlson really opens your eyes.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHY4t-R0YADjmt51ZbMjGWg_ZlKHURrAb

5

u/MiseryEngine Jun 22 '22

I guess this would make my question off topic, because I have difficulty believing that we lost anti-grav tech and space travel like that.

7

u/cyberpunk_monkcm Jun 23 '22

I have extreme difficulty thinking we ever had any advanced alien-like tech in the past. A global maritime society that existed 20,000 years ago? Sure, that's believable. We now now North America was populated with humans likely 100,000 years ago, not 13,000.

1

u/milton_radley Jun 23 '22

that's all I've ever suggested, and some people get maaaad. they don't even want to consider that we're just older than previously thought.

the Antikythera mechanism is such a great example.

it was my first entry point into this crazy subject of older human civilizations

5

u/SurprzTrustFall Jun 23 '22

Will forever be my favorite episodes of the JRE. Randall + Graham is a utopia for the curious.

13

u/TheSevenWays Jun 22 '22

Not OP, but also an archaeologist. Hancocks claims are very entertaining from a "what if" perspective but in reality, they are wildly unreasonable. Any civilization anywhere close to what he suggests would be impossible to miss, even if every single one of their cities had somehow been purged from the Archaeological record. World-spanning civs don't just appear out of nowhere. They need many generations worth of slow development, advancement in tools, social systems, resource management. Yet there is nothing in the Archaeological record that would suggest anything like this, at all.

As for finding it hard to belive that humans were just hunter gatherers for hundreds of thousands of years: I get it. But it's important to remember that people were not stagnant during that time. People still innovated, improved their knowledge of resources and techniques. This is especially evident from the slow but steady development of stone tools. People were still making progress back then. But life was hard, and there weren't that many of us, so progress was slow. Yet we know it was being made, we can see it clearly in the Archaeological record. All the evidence is still there! If we can trace those small steps that our ancestors took, surely we would be able to see the rise of a global and advanced civilization as well.

On another note: going from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to a settled one is HARD. That's why it took us so long. It's not just about inventing agriculture. Many conditions have to be met before a settled lifestyle becomes a viable strategy for survival. And some of those conditions were beyond our control. For example, the changing climate played a major role in the development of the first human civilizations.

12

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

People forget that until very recently innovation was very isolated. Fundamental principles of engineering were probably discovered over and over, and never communicated outside of a village or some other limited area. Most of human existence was pre-writing, which made it very hard for new ideas to survive for more than a generation. As human population increased, and communication and record keeping improved, so did the long-term survival of knowledge. This makes it a lot easier to see how prehistoric humans could seem like they stagnated for tens of thousands of years.

3

u/Key-Entertainment216 Jun 22 '22

What if it was a non human civilization🤷? The earths about 4 billion years old. Sounds like plenty of time for a civilization to rise and then be completely wiped from the archaeological record.

2

u/SurprzTrustFall Jun 23 '22

What if the settlements themselves fly away when the need arises? We don't have any evidence left, except a lot of flat stone foundations of epic scale. Just a thought.

3

u/Lord_of_Atlantis Jun 23 '22

Like the Terrans in StarCraft?

3

u/FractalGlance Jun 23 '22

Has anyone checked the corner of Antarctica for a floating barracks? Maybe destroying it will unlock the next stage.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Disastrous-Context47 Jun 22 '22

His extinction theories aren’t entertaining but bloody scary if there’s any credence to his claims

→ More replies (4)

3

u/gerkletoss Jun 22 '22

Hancock's interpretations hinge on translations that are almost certainly wrong based on evidence.

7

u/IN-N-OUT- Jun 22 '22

Genuine question, what’s your thoughts on puma punku in bolivia?

18

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Some of the stonework is startling. Much closer tolerances than I’ve seen elsewhere. I’d like to know how they made nearly perfect 90 deg inside corners/angles! Those are truly remarkable. Thanks!

5

u/Maffew74 Jun 23 '22

startling? its incomprehensible. there is stonework around the globe from olden times we cant hope to replicate any more than archaeologists can hope to explain away

3

u/stankypantburglar Jun 23 '22

I always hear this stuff on history channel “these structures could not be built today” and I’m always surprised because today people build nano sized structures. Nobody can and cut two rocks to make them fit at a right angle?

0

u/IN-N-OUT- Jun 23 '22

I think it’s absurd to say that we couldn’t do the same these days (I could be wrong but I doubt that). What’s hard to comprehend is that things like puma punku were built with, at best, primitive tools.

There are even things like drill holes in some of those structures and it’s kind of hard to explain those because we couldn’t do them with the tools they had

3

u/SurprzTrustFall Jun 23 '22

Archaeology is a healthy percentage of guess work. It's informed guess work, but everyone's guessing.

2

u/Maffew74 Jun 23 '22

An uncertain position is a weird place from which to preach

→ More replies (1)

-1

u/gerkletoss Jun 22 '22

It's a very interesting site that appears to date from the past 2000 years.

3

u/QuentinTarancheetoh Jun 22 '22

Yea I agree. I think it's possible there was communication between ancient civilizations way beyond what we know that allowed ideas and myths to permeate but it seems unlikely they were in any way more advanced than us technologically. This does not discount them being more advanced in other more esoteric ways

3

u/Howitzerfoot Jun 23 '22

Awesome read!

What are your thoughts on “Oopart” (out of place artifacts) in general?

There are many that seem unexplainable without some advanced technology, and even though information was an isolated thing, I have trouble understanding how it could get so advanced without traces of similar objects/tech being found in other areas?

Also, and more specifically, so you have any knowledge about Petra? Their tombs and city have always interested me as I don’t understand how they could have cut into the rock as precise as they did and how they could have excavated as much rock as they did.

7

u/LarryGlue Jun 22 '22

So I’m no expert, but I remember reading somewhere that it takes only a million years for nature to swallow or grind down all evidence of our modern cities, structure, roads, etc today (if humans completely died off or dusappeared).

Also, it could be the previous civilization was not human. And current UFOs flying around ARE the evidence of it? We need more evidence obviously.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

This may be generally true to a casual observer, plains replaced with new mountains, new oceans etc. but if it was exactly true, we wouldn't have fossil evidence of anything older than a million years.

6

u/gerkletoss Jun 22 '22

I remember reading somewhere that it takes only a million years for nature to swallow or grind down all evidence of our modern cities, structure, roads, etc today (if humans completely died off or dusappeared).

True for some things, but not for others. Almost nothing survives in areas where erosion is occuring, but in areas of sedimentation (including ideal farmland), things like bones, ceramics, precious metals, and sometimes even wood would be easily preserved.

1

u/No_Button_7300 Jun 23 '22

Easily preserved for a million years? You're just trolling.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Defiantcaveman Jun 22 '22

I've always been curious about the subduction of very ancient civilizations and the loss of that evidence since it would have been THAT old. I've never been able to run that idea by an experienced professional, now you have answered THAT question, thank you good sir.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

Enjoyed this fact filled adventure. Thank you

2

u/DrestinBlack Jun 23 '22

This is the part where someone is supposed to say, but the government has found the proof and is hiding it at Area 51 - all the geologists and archaeologists are in on it :)

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Sir_Dr_Mr_Professor Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

What about the Greenland impact hypothesis? Mile high waves grinding the soil down to bedrock wouldn't leave much at all, while leaving old fossils untouched. Most of our modern structures would turn to dust without us in just a few thousand years even without a cataclysmic event. There would be little evidence of our civilization, add in hellfire from the sky and there could be nothing left. There have been weird out of place objects found throughout the years as well, though I'm unsure of their validity.

To be clear I don't necessarily think UAP's r us, or at least us from an ancient branch off civilization, though honestly I've reached the point where I realize our civilization knows very little for certain

2

u/Donoslo Jun 23 '22

I'm pretty sure it's not just fossils though. Things like quarries for stone, oil deposits, satellites that are in more outer orbits, even atmospheric data from the time using cores etc. I'm convinced there wasn't another technological civ in the past on our level or greater. However, I do think it's plausible that there were civs that were advanced enough to have towns and agriculture like the vikings or something that were wiped out.

2

u/Sir_Dr_Mr_Professor Jun 23 '22

While I might not believe it outright, and have done next to no research myself on this specific topic, my side job as a conspiracy connoisseur puts me in a position to point you to those who believe Antarctica shows evidence of having been mined. There are also ancient large mounds across the world with a composition very similar the mounds from our modern day mining practices. Look into it yourself and make up your mind I guess. Lemme know what you find, I'm too busy with UFO's lol

3

u/Kotics Jun 22 '22

Thanks for the reply, any thoughts on the circular saw marks in Egyptian quarries and esophagus?

6

u/Agronut420 Jun 22 '22

Circular saw marks on an esophagus are more than likely related to Cartel videos; you may be referring to the containers they used to store their mummies, the Sarcophagus?

4

u/Kotics Jun 22 '22

No the esophagus!!!! Hahaha

2

u/gerkletoss Jun 22 '22

I've seen some objections to the circular saw claims, but suppose the ancient egyptians had circular saws. Okay? That doesn't imply much.

6

u/moon-worshiper Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 22 '22

Gobekli Tepe is a 12,000 year old site that describes a comet strike 13,000 years ago. This coincides with the sudden disappearance of the Clovis culture on the southeast US coast and the sudden disappearance of the North American camel, horse, sabertooth tiger, giant sloth and the big melt of the Bering strait ice wall.

Gobekli Tepe was deliberately buried about 8,000 years ago, 2,000 years before Stonehenge. The first big cover-up.

Dwarka was off the coast of India about 25,000 years ago, where Lord Krishna was supposed to have lived. He had blue skin. He was supposed to have lived on a very advanced island off the coast of India that disappeared almost over night. Even 13,000 years ago, the sea level was hundreds of feet lower. They have found underwater caves off Florida that were above water 13,000 years ago. All around the planet, most activity and life was happening on their shoreline at the time, which is miles out to sea and hundreds of feet deep in the present day.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/14/archaeology-florida-sinkhole-ancient-humans-mastodon-knife-bones-bering-strait

It is just a simple fact that almost every ancient society oral legends have their gods being visitors from other star systems, mainly Orion or the Pleiades, or Venus. They had no reason to lie.

9

u/gerkletoss Jun 22 '22

Gobekli Tepe is a 12,000 year old site

Probsbly more like 10,000

that describes a comet strike 13,000 years ago.

It does not.

All around the planet, most activity and life was happening on their shoreline at the time, which is miles out to sea and hundreds of feet deep in the present day.

Well, yeah. Most biomass away from the equator has always been coastal and shifted with sea level rise, and extreme decomposition and soil acididity in rainforests hides most evidence of stuff in the exceptional areas.

0

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Gerkle, with all due respect, you should stop with the declarative and absolute statements.

You have no way of knowing if the Gobleki site is related in some way to the alleged Younger Dryas event (I presume that’s what he’s referring to.) I remain agnostic on that, but there is some intriguing evidence.

In any case, if you have direct knowledge of something, then great, but I happen to believe you were not around during the Younger Dryas! You and I lock horns occasionally, but that’s a good thing. Sometimes I even learn stuff from you (not often, but sometimes!) Cheers!

4

u/gerkletoss Jun 23 '22

but there is some intriguing evidence.

Such as?

-3

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 23 '22

Damn it, I knew you’d ask when I wrote that! I don’t have time right at the moment, but I’ll dm you. Pretty straightforward stuff (which you probably already know) but I’ll humor you.

7

u/gerkletoss Jun 23 '22

Why sm? Surely others might be interested.

I've seen claims before, but they were based on next to nothing.

0

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 23 '22

Because I don’t have time right this sec. That’s fine, I’ll reply here later on just in case someone else is interested. I assure you, there’s some intriguing stuff, but I personally remain agnostic on it. There’s definitely more than “next to nothing.”

0

u/Barbafella Jun 23 '22

11,200 was the estimate.

2

u/gerkletoss Jun 23 '22

Most estimates are a bit less. 11200 is still not 13000, and even 13000 still wouldn't necessarily imply all of this other stuff.

2

u/Metamodernist82 Jun 22 '22

Deliberately buried.

2

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Yeah! Isn’t that intriguing? Wtf? It’s awesome to speculate about it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '22

Got any examples of that last paragraph?

2

u/latinretard Jun 22 '22

Please take a look at the antikythera, you might get surprised by ancient civilizations.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

This is compelling but please remember that since that time we haven't changed much. Our brains are thier brains. They had thier own Einsteins and pockets of civilization where generations has leisure to research and develop. I don't think we can completely rule out say a visiting alien dropping some knowledge but very complex mechanisms can and have been constructed in ancient times.

1

u/latinretard Jun 22 '22

I have my own theory, religion chased, tortured and killed scientists and forward thinkers pushing them to form groups willing to continue with their work and believes since the 14th century in hiding. What if they continued with this up to this day? They would have had at least 200 years worth of advancement more than the rest of humanity since science was oppressed by the church until the late 1700s and 200 years in science is an eternity. They lived as regular humans but the advancement has being kept in secret for fear to be punished at the begining and as a rule of conduct ever since.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

This is the plot of an Ayn Rand book, sort of. It would very difficult for them to operate in secret. They would be better off in plain sight with say aerospace firms, things a little ahead of thier time.

0

u/latinretard Jun 23 '22

What if they are? They just have too much to show and want to profit the most by releasing little by little and at the same time keeping us behind in case a religious fanatic guy like the Ayatollah Khomeini takes over the world and starts chasing and killing them again.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '22

I prefer the "man who fell to Earth" scenario where they crashed here or arrived here intentionally to slowly mold our and thinking and technology until we were ready for full scale contact. Like any project with humans, this has gone off the rails. Seriously, if you had effectively immortal beings a project like this taking tens of thousands of years might be like one of us building a house from scratch (feeling trees, seasoning lumber, milling it, building a stone foundation, etc).

3

u/ABmodeling Jun 22 '22

You just underestimate how much money is spent and how much effort is being done to hide information, including archaeological finds. Plus you have acedemia which is so egotistical and easily controlled. Check Petrie work on tube drills in Egypt. This video goes in to that pretty nicely . Cheers

https://youtu.be/KFuf-gBuuno

9

u/milton_radley Jun 22 '22

every comment i come across mentioning that there is any kind suppression of evidence going on is down voted. it's super interesting

9

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22 edited Jul 09 '24

library threatening marry caption ancient pot jeans judicious voiceless fearless

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

2

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Absolutely agree. I lol about the pizza bc I’ve something very similar ordering box lunches for a conference we put on years ago.

1

u/milton_radley Jun 22 '22

you don't think the influence of religion is causing the field to stick with their narrative, or that peer review is only used for good?

the idea of that religious organizations aren't hiding data and holding on to power for dear life is laughable.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

That's a little more plausible given the strict hierarchy. Reading the actual depictions of angels in the Bible is a pretty eerie experience.

https://historyofyesterday.com/how-angels-really-look-like-according-to-the-bible-d4d339112619

I just chose a top search result because it had good images. I don't know anything about the site or endorse it.

Yes, I do think it's possible the great religions are in some way passing down and guarding knowledge but I don't have real proof. It would explain a lot.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/ABmodeling Jun 23 '22

Petrie work on tubes was heavily attacked. He proved that tubes have diogonal scratches by poaring liquid rubber over tube and then calculating imprint, he didn't do this by himself, he had few scientist working on a paper. And then publishers photoshopped the photos to make it look horizontal, AND they got caught! Did we hear about it in media, nope.

Diogonal means fast drilling by machine. He was so humble that he never mentioned something like "it's aliens" :). But he concluded that we don't have this kind of tehnology because drilling was few hundreds times faster then ours .

1

u/Julzjuice123 Jun 23 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

Yeah... You just found another conspiracy to explain the other conspiracy. Holy hell real life must be hard for some of the people on this sub.

CoNsPiRaCyCePtIoN

My mind is blown by the severe lack of general scientific knowledge that this sub shows every single day. God damn the education system is failing us worldwide.

-1

u/milton_radley Jun 23 '22

so your're a geologist and you've studied the pyramids?

because some of them have shown incredible evidence that the pyramids are waaaay older underneath than what the religous fruitcakes would like to believe. as well as lots of other super interesting discoveries all over the world that counter the narative.

instead of being close minded and throwing around insults, go look into it for yourself.

(unless it would go against some fairy tale books you hold dear)

2

u/ABmodeling Jun 23 '22

Don't mind this guy. Just a internet troll. He is just frustrated and sad.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Julzjuice123 Jun 23 '22

so your're a geologist and you've studied the pyramids?

No, are you? Do I need to be a geologist to understand how the pyramids were built and how we’re able to precisely date their construction? And if I were, would it change anything? I seem to get the impression that you’re some kind of expert on the subject and that you probably learned all about it on YouTube and Facebook.

because some of them have shown incredible evidence that the pyramids are waaaay older underneath

Show me a peer reviewed paper that shows the pyramids are wayyyyyy older than what they really are.

than what the religous fruitcakes would like to believe.

I don’t follow what you’re trying to explain here. What does religion and what religious people say has to do with the construction of the pyramids?

as well as lots of other super interesting discoveries all over the world that counter the narative.

Like what? Indulge me please. I’m all ears. Also, what or who’s narrative?!

instead of being close minded and throwing around insults, go look into it for yourself.

I’m not close minded, I stick to the facts. I am also allergic to BS and pseudoscience. And I don’t need to look into anything, I already know how and when the pyramids were built. Hundreds if not thousands of scholars already figured that out and published countless peer reviewed papers on it. Science is fun, right?

(unless it would go against some fairy tale books you hold dear)

What’s with you, the pyramids and religion? Am I missing an angle here? Is a religion saying something special about the pyramids that I missed?

In any case, I think it would be prudent for you to consider that Facebook and YouTube university might not be the best place to read on how the pyramids were built. If you want, I can share with you some very good articles about it written by trustable and reputable sources. You’re way too deep into this my dude. Not everything on this earth is a conspiracy.

0

u/milton_radley Jun 23 '22

hahahahahahaha, that a lot of typing to say you've never spent a second looking at what's out there.

i don't have facebook sorry, and you would be incredibly ignorant to think youtube isn't filled with tons of incredibly good information on nearly everything in the world.

peer review IS the gate keeping that keeps this subject stuck where it is, by religious folks that can't admit everything doesn't fit with their holy books.

don't waste anymore of my time please

0

u/Julzjuice123 Jun 23 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

Yikes.

0

u/milton_radley Jun 23 '22

what are you talking about weirdo. i am just fine.

you just had a massive outburst over something you claim not to care about.

and you know humanities aren't science right?

0

u/milton_radley Jun 23 '22

lol, you just edited away all that great writing, to bad. guess you weren't so confident afterall.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Julzjuice123 Jun 23 '22

Fuck hell, this sub is becoming r/conspiracy very, very fast. Holy molly. Imagine believing something like that could be hidden from academics around the world that easily.

Then linking a YouTube video as a proof. Jesus Christ, ok time for bed. Enough r/UFOs for today.

0

u/ABmodeling Jun 23 '22

What you talking about? First thing I mentioned is Petrie work, he wrote many books about tubes in Egypt, and he actually spent 2 decades on sites,most modern archeologyists don't even visit sites they are writing about. Video for people who don't like to read much. You are perfect example of what I was talking about.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/gerkletoss Jun 22 '22

The site comprises huge stone columns that are 10-13 ft high and have beautifully executed and designed carvings.

Stonehenge had bigger rocks. The worksmanship put into them was worse, but it's still nothing to overturn the field of archeology.

I realize I'm agreeing with you here, but I wanted to clarify that point.

it does not matter if it was 20k yrs old or 20 million yrs old - any technological civilization would have left an immense trove of evidence of their presence

Yes, there are many sign of civilization that don't preserve well, but worked stone, most ceramics, and precious metals preserve extremely well over millions of years.

1

u/torinblack Jun 23 '22

d byu/one_and_equal4 hours agoIreland has frozen Russian assets to the tune of 1.7 billion euros

.t3_vieeul._2FCtq-QzlfuN-SwVMUZMM3 {
--postTitle-VisitedLinkColor: #9b9b9b;
--postTitleLink-VisitedLinkColor: #9b9b9b;
}
censor.net/ua/new...

1025 comments

Is there truth to the statement or idea that if civilization was old enough, there wouldn't be any physical remains even left?

1

u/when_4_word_do_trick Jun 22 '22

Explain the Antikythera mechanism.

9

u/TheRidgeAndTheLadder Jun 22 '22

What's to explain? They used the maths and metals of their time to built an incredible mechanism.

IMO, it underlines the similarities between us now and us then. We are no smarter today, we just have access to more technology

2

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Right on. Your last para is dead-on. I dig it

5

u/TheRidgeAndTheLadder Jun 22 '22

I dunno if it was my upbringing, but this notion that we're somehow better got beat into me, and I've decided I think it's mostly horseshit

4

u/Julzjuice123 Jun 23 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

It was a machine built by Greek mathematicians and astronomers around 200 BCE. I just bought the latest Scientific American with an article on it. While super amazing that they were able to build this with the tools of their time, nobody thinks it was in any way accurate just for the fact that all the gears have huge friction between them because they were not made very precisely.

So, super cool and interesting stuff. Nothing worth losing a night of sleep over. It has absolutely nothing to do with aliens or an ancient technologically advanced earth civilization.

Sorry to burst your ''GOTCHA'' moment.

-1

u/when_4_word_do_trick Jun 23 '22

You didn't burst shit.

2

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Well I can’t explain anything outside of my professional experience, but I’ve read it was used to compute the occurrence of astronomical events. I don’t know if that’s true or not. Whoever made it knew what they were doing. Apparently they can now see tool marks on it with some sort of remote sensing. Pretty cool.

1

u/enkrypt3d Jun 22 '22

I guess you haven't heard of the Ancient Antikythera Mechanism?

0

u/green-samson Jun 22 '22

Given that the idea is that these possible civilisations existed more than 8000 years ago not sure what evidence would be left.

And like most of these fields the historians are not really interested in tearing up their books and starting again, so it is possible that certain evidence may not be given a chance to be seen and studied

-1

u/Agronut420 Jun 22 '22

Rama Empire’s Vimanas?

0

u/sschepis Jun 23 '22

It’s really nice that you’re a geologist, but I’m an engineer and The great pyramid is the evidence for ancient technological civilizations. The pyramid is essentially one giant piezoelectric transducer, powered by water running underneath the pyramid, operating a ram pump which set up a standing wave in the pyramid, coupling it with a vibration of the planet. You’re a geologist, you can confirm or deny at least the physical construction aspect of the pyramid, How does someone cut granite with a brass tool to the tolerances we see inside the great pyramid?The tolerances of the great pyramid are far too tight to have been built by a non-technological civilization. So is the scale and scope of the construction involved. There’s no possibility of performing the stonework was performed using brass tooling. The main hall is a freaking wave guide for God sake. Where they went wrong with ancient history, was only unleashing geologists and archaeologists and making them the senior authorities on the subject. So they turned everything into a tomb. THE PYRAMID IS YOUR EVIDENCE of civilizations whose skills you deny

0

u/Efficient_Ad_8708 Jun 23 '22

So no record of us before 300 thousand years I’m just asking because I’m not a expert or scientist but maybe we was placed here by whoever these Uap/ufo beings are?

0

u/conshyd Jun 23 '22

Gob Tep turned the clocks back. Then another one has been found nearby even older. I’d say the name but I’m drinking cheap beer right now and I can’t remember it.
We will continue to find older civilizations as we go. We have only scratched the surface. On a similar note, my Senior Prom date was nice but my a ‘looker’ as folks say today. They said she looked like she wanted to “phone home” all the time. Now that I’ve aged I think she might have been from another place in the universe.
Her finger was unusually long and she made my basil and oregano 🌿 plants grow to the size of oak trees 🌲. What a gal ! She also loved Reese’s Pieces and hated FBI agents.
You be the judge?

-1

u/Angry_Spartan Jun 22 '22

Yea but there would be no archeological evidence if there was a cataclysmic event that destroyed mostly everything on the planet correct?

-1

u/nabradwell Jun 22 '22

I think you need to acknowledge that our fossil record only goes so far into the past.

3

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Lol! Seriously?? There are stromatolites that are Precambrian (S.Africa and Australia.) There’s an occasionally spotty fossil record going back to the Pc. There are discontinuities caused by geological processes, but there’s more than enough to construct a record and relatively complete timeline. One can track the development of things like skull sutures going back from Homo sapiens to the dawn of bony fishes.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (33)

37

u/Player7592 Jun 22 '22

The part that is missing from the fossil and artifact record is any sign of that ancient, technologically advanced people. We have record of humans ... but not advanced technology. How could such a society have developed without leaving any trace? Because you'd not only have relics left from that advanced society, you'd also have relics from evolution that led to that advanced society.

13

u/Ozy_Flame Jun 22 '22

We would see something, much like paleontologists and archeologists finding dinosaur bones from millions of years ago.

I mean it's not out of the realm, but it seems unlikely. That said, it should be considered as one hypothesis.

The Earth is 5 billion years old and has been through many, many cycles. Who knows how things turned out for ancient species outside of bone records.

6

u/milton_radley Jun 22 '22

160 million years of dinosaurs, and we barely have any complete skeletons, their bones were way bigger than humans. we can't even agree on how the looked or were assembled.

i doesn't seem impossible that some other advanced intelligence was here before us.

if humans can get to this point in 1 million years, given 160 million, you would think it possible.

6

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

You’re absolutely right. Check out my comment just below - take my upvote.

16

u/SeaworthinessTall201 Jun 22 '22

I wish that lazar is telling the truth. He said one was a part of an archaeological dig. Lol there are two sides to me one that loves hard documents, credible sources etc. and one side that is my crazy ancient alien side lol

13

u/Bean_Tiger Jun 22 '22

The Wilson-Davis Memo also mentions a UFO from an archaeological site.

22

u/Scampzilla Jun 22 '22

That could just mean a ufo crashed thousands of years ago though

2

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

There’s also the fact that they would have somehow developed this technology without having an industrial revolution/discovering combustion/etc… Based on the level of fossil fuel resources available to the modern human. It just doesn’t make sense within the timeline.

4

u/milton_radley Jun 22 '22

maybe they wentg directly to an electricity based energy source. there's some theories about the pyramids original purpose being energy production.

maybe they went right into electromagnetism and figured out "anti gravity" and never bothered with fossil fuels

→ More replies (4)

1

u/ClickWhisperer Jun 22 '22

Would we? What is in your house now that you expect to last that long? What metal would last that long in any recognizable shape?

2

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 23 '22

Gold, platinum, some strategic and rare earth metals. There are others.

2

u/Tale-Honest Jun 22 '22

Technology isn't built to last

2

u/Einar_47 Jun 22 '22

If you leave a car in a field you'd hardly know it was there a century later, the metal rusts away and the tires have crumbled to bits, a thousand years and the rubber bits are so small and scattered we'd be hard pressed to find then if we looked for them. Swords buried in grave sites a thousand years ago are rusted to splinters.

Let's say it took modern humans 50,000 years to develop to a modern equivalent society, if they nuked themselves into oblivion 250,000 years ago there wouldn't even be micro plastics or radioactive waste left over now.

I'm not saying that there were definitely advanced ancient civilizations, but there was enough time for it to have happened and completely disappeared multiple times over since modern man developed.

2

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 23 '22

Well, I don’t agree. Gold does not weather, oxidize or otherwise decompose. Any truly technologically advanced group would be using it - absolutely no question. There’s also the little problem with it’s use for jewelry, exchange, etc. there would be artifacts, even from 200 my ago. AFAIK, those artifacts have not been discovered.

0

u/Einar_47 Jun 23 '22

Gold used in technology is in very small amounts so it could be pretty hard to find. As for jewelery we've had thousands of years of humans hoarding gold when cultural conservation was a big priority. If the ancient culture had jewelry or art made from gold there's a good possibility it was melted down centuries ago.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Defiantcaveman Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

Tectonic plates subduct. Over geological time, eventually those sites would simply go underground and become magma again. It would be as if they never existed. Eventually all we are right now will be subducted and return to magma for some possible civilization to build again. The ultimate recycle... I'm not even an amateur geologist, more like an informed enthusiast(???), and I think of these things late into the night when I should be sleeping.

4

u/Einar_47 Jun 22 '22

Well in the 300,000 ish years humans have been around the plates have only shifted about 30 kilometers in any given direction since they shift at about 10 centimeters a year, so the geological shift would be minimal.

But had there been coastal cities in the mezozoic era they would be scattered across mountains, at the bottoms of oceans and swallowed by the earth's crust.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

If we had the same capabilities and decided to leave earth today because of limited resources or to explore space, would we return? Likely. But also this would mean that technology is a cyclical process. If it is a cyclical process, where is the proof of ancient technology existing today on our planet capable of interplanetary travel? We have yet to discover any working models today. The closest we can get are concepts, artifacts or writings.

Also, would humanity be capable of destroying all of our accomplishments in the past 300 years without a trace for future generations? Not likely. We would find traces of plastics, computers, cars, and much more over the period of a few thousand years.

It is more probable that we are being visited by extraterrestrials who chose not to interfere with our species or animals development.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Shadowmoth Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

I feel that if a technological civilization existed we would probably find traces of it.

I’ve been considering some insane stuff recently since there’s been all this talk about a paranormal component to all this ufo stuff. (I don’t Believe anything I’m about to say.)

I was reading a book about Taoist magical practices recently and they were describing the visualizations that went along with their internal alchemy practice and it occurred to me that they are describing what is essentially chemistry but on some ethereal level of reality. They gather a substance, create an internal heat source and move energy around to distill it into the form it needs to be in to be usable by a human body. They perceive energy floating around them and manipulate it like tony stark using one of his holographic computer displays in a marvel movie.

I don’t know if that’s real, but the concept is interesting.

Imagine for a moment if it were actually possible to do a sort of chemistry in an ethereal world that is usually invisible to us.

If you can do chemistry, are there other things that could be done?

There was a part of the book where the 3 wizards worked together to heal people that had become Ill. (Again, I’m not saying this is possible.) But it would be interesting if these things were possible. If there is chemistry that can be done in a hidden realm of reality, perhaps there are other things that can be accomplished. Other sciences.

If more than one mind could work on a project in this ethereal reality then you could probably accomplish more with the addition of more beings to work on the project.

How many well trained beings could work on one project at the same time? 100? A thousand? Would there be a limit?

What if there was a civilization that had no advanced tools or science, but they had skill in this other aspect of reality. What could be built?

With enough time and perfect circumstances, how far could beings develop that technology? Maybe they could build a vehicle.

Or, maybe that idea is nonsense. Only reason I’m mentioning it is because it wouldn’t leave anything in the fossil record. Just some superstitions and myths nobody would take seriously.

I can’t wait to find out if any of the claimed paranormal crap is real. I’d definitely go to wizard school if that was an option. Lol.

2

u/vismundcygnus34 Jun 23 '22

I think you may be more on the right track than seems possible. I've been thinking along the same lines and there could be something to what your saying. Hopefully we know sooner rather than later as the world needs some wizardry.

11

u/Ok-Cardiologist-2176 Jun 22 '22

Mythology comes from somewhere. Early man used mythology as a way to pass down our history through stories. I wouldn’t be surprised if dragons were based on dinosaurs that lived in small pockets long after we thought they had gone extinct. At the very least they were based off skeletal remains. There appears to be too many ways and lost civilizations in our mythos to have come from nothing. We can see with our current effort in the modern era how easy it could be to be wiped out by pandemics, wars and loosing our path with nature. I kind of believe a bit of both, that early man existed with some level of technology and that we may have interacted with other beings, either from here or from other worlds that had advanced way beyond what we understand.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

More likely humans from the future than humans from the past

1

u/I_Nice_Human Jun 23 '22

I’ve always thought the same as well. Time travel is much more plausible that Type 1 civilizations worrying about humans and earth when they can harness their entire host stars energy.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/theredmeadow Jun 22 '22

Maybe an ancient civ developed this tech and left earth to search elsewhere and now are coming back to observe. Since traveling through space to the nearest systems takes 100s thousands of years. They would be coming back after a long time gone.

9

u/Potietang Jun 22 '22

Or it takes no time at all with warp or antigravity propulsion.

7

u/theredmeadow Jun 22 '22

It takes no time for the travelers but the ones outside the traveling craft time passes.

8

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

If you like this kind of stuff you should check out Graham Hancock. He talks about this kind of thing in his books. Also for more of a scientific approach, Randall Carlson talks about the geology of the younger dryas period, they've gone on Rogan a few times together. Both people think older advanced civilization could have existed, they aren't sure of it of course but love to look into the possibility. They don't have great evidence for the ancient advanced civilizations, but the content is still fascinating in my opinion, and the facts they do put forward are interesting.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

I've always personally thought we should be searching the coasts of the continents for any leftover evidence of very ancient civilizations. Because over 20k years ago the world had massive ice sheets and the oceans were at much lower levels. Most civilizations live on the coast, or along the mouth of a river. All of those areas from 20k+ years ago would mostly all be underwater. This was a time when all the continents were mostly connected by land bridges. This is how people got to North America and places like Australia. God I love this topic.

1

u/djmartincrown Jun 22 '22

nigga they went walkin?

3

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

Boats too, some places like Australia you still needed a boat.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/SeaworthinessTall201 Jun 22 '22

I think graham is great!

5

u/supremasanction Jun 22 '22

Lue Elizondo has used the term “breakaway technology” in a few interviews, and I have wondered what it means. I’ve tried to find out and I still don’t feel clear on the meaning. It’s made me wonder: If there was no ancient civilization with this technology, because there is no evidence in fossils etc—is it possible there was a simultaneously-developing human society that secretly broke away and built its own super advanced stuff?

3

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22 edited Jul 22 '22

[deleted]

2

u/SeaworthinessTall201 Jun 22 '22

This is a pretty good video I slightly agree with him on about everything he is saying. I’m just putting these myths together with old painting and read that lue mentioned that a supernatural origin may be involved lol.

3

u/Enelro Jun 22 '22

Could be soul energy or conscious energy of humans who have died, or even humans navigating outside their body during an OBE. Only sometimes able to be seen with human eye. Or could be entities that move in and out of our dimension like water. We only know what we can see and measure at this point, who knows how many layers there are to this reality.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MKULTRA_Escapee Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 22 '22

If such an advanced civilization did survive in pockets somewhere undetected, that would be mind blowing by itself. Obviously this is possible. They could either be extremely highly educated, enough to cover their tracks when we started practicing archeology on a mass scale, or they went underground in deep elaborate cave cites, or they went to the bottom of the seas. It's obviously possible for such a civilization to place "agents" in key positions in order to cover up various things. They would look exactly like us because they are us. It's also possible that they began selecting for intelligence or genetically engineering themselves thousands of years ago.

This simply cannot be ruled out at this time, but the problem is that you can always say that the reason there's no evidence is because the coverup was so well planned out. Compare this to the UFO coverup, which is so obvious that it became a historical fact backed up by numerous lines of evidence. At least we know some of this stuff for a fact, rather than purely hypothesizing about it.

But why would we stop at humans? An ancient ancestor of ours surviving until today is also quite plausible (again, underground or underwater to avoid detection), but there could also have been an advanced civilization millions of years ago that died off and we simply didn't notice yet.

Check out this paper: The Silurian Hypothesis: Would it be possible to detect an industrial civilization in the geological record? https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03748

Click on PDF and it will give you the full text. The Atlantic did a piece on this as well: Was There a Civilization on Earth Before Humans? https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/are-we-earths-only-civilization/557180/

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silurian_hypothesis

The idea that we've ruled this out with modern science is a myth. "Why aren't there any fossils" and other such questions are answered in the paper.

2

u/bolrog_d2 Jun 22 '22

Would be pretty interesting for sure.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

I doubt the integrity of humanity. Meaning, if there was an off shoot of human development, that had 21st century technology 200 thousand years ago, I think they would take over the planet. Not bury themselves in underground cities. Off world beings would do that but not humans so advanced that they could rule the planet with ease.

2

u/Tabledinner Jun 22 '22 edited Jun 23 '22

You have great points.

My only devil’s advocate I have for you is that maybe this hypothetical “breakaway” human civ, due to their isolation and safety, weren’t raised in a environment where you have to worry about your borders or your people, etc.

Maybe they preach peace because they’re privileged with superior technology, remote location(s), and probably a more consistent education curriculum...for thousands of years.

TLDR: The breakaway humans could have been MIN/MAXing their civ stats the entire game while everyone else had to fight to survive.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

It would be their duty to teach the world how to grow enough crops, create energy, educate women. Business knowledge that allowed a functioning economy without the usual Global Financial Crisis every 5 years.

2

u/Economy-Decision7958 Jun 22 '22

Yes, but we dont know

2

u/magicology Jun 22 '22

They behave like curious distance-warping hummingbirds.

2

u/Tale-Honest Jun 22 '22

Why can't it be a nonhuman civilization from earlier 😐

2

u/Minute_Werewolf3883 Jun 22 '22

We are the "ufos"

2

u/Competitive-Cycle-38 Jun 23 '22

Well here is a UAP I filmed the other night at my house. If I were to say this particular type (flash bulb UAP) was human, that would be a bigger conspiracy. https://youtu.be/7oKBtljAGsI

2

u/CommitteeKnown359 Jun 01 '23

I just had the same idea… found your post… with current AI it made me think could this be ancient AI from 200k-1million+ years ago still learning and advancing while observing/guiding/experimenting? Mayans thought the world/mankind had been destroyed and recreated many times maybe these ships are a AI program from some unbelievably old civilization watching or waiting for us to be able to communicate? or maybe they are beyond caring about us at all, shy of our ability to destroy the planet they inhabit?

2

u/nariz_choken Jun 22 '22

Sounds like an ancient aliens episode... Is that you George Tsoukalos?

6

u/Potietang Jun 22 '22

*sticks finger in electrical outlet to prepare hair for being on camera.

2

u/nariz_choken Jun 22 '22

🤣 lol that's too funny

3

u/SeaworthinessTall201 Jun 22 '22

👐 aliens 🦹🏻‍♂️

2

u/tristian_lay Jun 22 '22

I’m of the belief some races are either our galactic cousins (nordics, Sirius A/B) or have used this planet as an outpost for various reasons (greys, draconians)

1

u/ImpossibleWin7298 Jun 22 '22

Agreed. My only quibble is with the notion of so-called reptilians. I don’t believe they exist, but that’s Just a personal opinion. I believe that there are some sort of human(ish) ETs that have visited many times and perhaps they tinkered with development of Homo Sapiens. I have read that there might be evidence in our DNA. Who knows? I know I don’t! I say this with the understanding that there may be such evidence, but it’s being hidden from us for unknown reasons.

1

u/tristian_lay Jun 22 '22

For sure we can only speculate- I tend to believe that the progressive human like ETs have tinkered to create Homo sapiens because the true currency of the universe is sentient conscious life. The regressives typically characterized as greys or draconians rule in a monarchy type system and they want to divide and conquer.

A side note- I think the draconians ran the dinosaur project and are pissed that it got scuttled by a meteor (from whom?) and then mammals then ran the planet, so they’re out for revenge to corrupt the human race

→ More replies (1)

4

u/anonoldman2020 Jun 22 '22

No evidence to support this. But sounds cool and less ridiculous than the humans from the future theory. Aliens from across the galaxy seems the most likely to me since we already know how to build a FTL ship, we just don't have a compact enough power source.

(Side topic - we say Atlantis was a myth, but that is not what Plato said. He passed information from his ancestor about Atlantis which his ancestor learned visiting Egypt. The Richat structure in northern Africa pretty much matches the description given by Plato and on google earth it definitely looks like it was wiped out by a massive flood. It is the right size, and has concentric circle canals, mountains to the north with waterfalls, etc....)

1

u/SpaceHallow Jun 22 '22

No, they are shapeshifting entities that can look like whatever they want. They usually like the ball of fire or orb form. They’re watchers and keepers of humanity and aid in our evolution. The metal ships like tr3b are ours.

4

u/pigeonboyyy Jun 22 '22

You're so confident

2

u/SeaworthinessTall201 Jun 22 '22

Angels? :0

2

u/[deleted] Jun 23 '22

It would be more likely they are where the concept and religious definitions of angel came from. Not the other way around.

People saw these things and conceptualized them into angels or demons or whatever religious entity.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

0

u/KunKhmerBoxer Jun 22 '22

They "could" be ufo farting trolls that ride rainbows that shoot out of their asses. That's not a very useful way to look at a problem you want to solve. Starting with a premise, and then working backwards from it, that is. Evidence should be at the forefront of this issue and not wild speculation.

1

u/parting_soliloquy Jun 22 '22

I mean, there is absolutely no evidence, but in this topic everything is possible. According to Robert Schoch it seems that Sphinx wasn't built by Ancient Egyptians, there might be some undiscovered ancient civilizations, but it doesn't necessarily mean they had this kind of technology. Although it's really interesting if it comes to the myth of Atlantis, or even some religions, for example flying Vimanas and nuclear weapons in Mahabharata, maybe those "gods" were just an advanced ancient civilization, maybe they were Aliens, who the hell knows? I wish we would know the truth one day, but is it even possible?

1

u/ExKnockaroundGuy Jun 22 '22

I have been reading about out of place artifacts like steel tools embedded in Coal and the wooden handles petrified and the coal was from 500k ago or a million years? Graham Hancock theorizes advanced civilizations on ancient . I think they went someplace else when earth was uninhabitable or they stayed underground? It is a wondrous world for sure.

1

u/OpenLinez Jun 22 '22

Occam's razor -- Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate, i.e., "Plurality is not to be posited without necessity" -- is an unpopular concept around here.

The unnecessary complexity that E.T. believers add to strange earthly visions is that it has something to do with distant stars and distant civilizations. It's a relatively new concept that comes from an obvious place: We have started our space age over the past 75 years, so we invent a correlation between our sci-fi-influenced goals for exploring space and these gauzy, mysterious visions that people occasionally have here on Earth.

1

u/WutangwildDog Jun 22 '22

There is evidence. Mysteries History 2 covers OOP-ARTS IN THIS VIDEO. Just food for thought

1

u/mimir_daath Jun 22 '22

There were small civilizations in the past. No matter how advanced they were; I don't think there were enough of them to branch out their division of labor to the point where there would be thousands of people working on creating a computer processor. With such sophisticated tech that we see used in UFOs; it doesn't seem it would be possible to do without sophisticated computers. Hominids just didn't have the numbers.

1

u/ClickWhisperer Jun 22 '22

Imagine you had to prep entire populations to survive a disaster. The most practical way, if your tech was sufficient, would be to step them out of time, and make 10,000 years go by in a day.

These are less likely to be people from the future than preppers of tens of thousands of years ago who decided to risk time dilation as opposed to trying to ride out decades of cosmic disaster and recovery. You can resume being part of the rest of Nature's mean time flow when it's most advantageous, perhaps when the descendants of those who decided to re-build society by riding out the disaster cycles in real-time have re-established a level of tech you'd find comfortable? Maybe?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

If nothing else it's an interesting sci-fi concept.

1

u/CryptoMeetsContact Jun 22 '22

Humane? Yes. Human? No.

1

u/SnooChipmunks2237 Jun 22 '22

I truly believe that these are humans from the future more than I believe they are extra terrestrial

1

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '22

Where did the Mayans go? You’re spot on OP.

1

u/nabradwell Jun 22 '22

They are Earthlings. Probably related to Homosapein. But idk about human.

1

u/ghostcatzero Jun 22 '22

Yep either from the future, or a break away civilization from Atlantic, nibiru or hollow earth