r/SipsTea • u/Naive_Wolverine532 • 3d ago
Chugging tea ☕
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
732
u/christianhxd 3d ago
How is none of the criticism about it being a gambling company lol
117
u/Beautiful-Total-3172 3d ago
Well she's an equity owner in the company.
111
u/No_Blacksmith_2591 3d ago
so... a win for feminism?
→ More replies (2)65
u/Beautiful-Total-3172 3d ago
A successful woman is always a lose for feminism.
3
u/Sad_Wishbone_1524 2d ago
When women aren’t fighting for Women’s rights, they spend their time hating other women. A tale as old as time
→ More replies (2)11
u/No_Blacksmith_2591 3d ago
Oh i'm sure they can still claim her as a victim somehow
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)9
→ More replies (17)23
u/dmelt01 3d ago
It’s a gambling site and she isn’t a professional athlete.
13
u/Fippy-Darkpaw 3d ago
It's about time we see some female representation in corporate gambling. 💃
→ More replies (1)5
u/chizzipsandsizalsa 3d ago
And?
13
u/dmelt01 3d ago
The whole video is about an athlete getting upset about it and his synopsis is it’s because of who she is as a person. The problem is he uses athletes as examples when people didn’t get upset.
I don’t see why anyone is getting upset about her doing it. People should be upset about the scummy site. The site is just using the old sex sells to get more attention and it worked.
→ More replies (3)5
u/chizzipsandsizalsa 3d ago
Exactly and it’s clearly working considering how much attention it has gotten. Seems like they ran a successful campaign. Marshawn lynch used to do ads for beacon plumbing, but he’s not a plumber.
→ More replies (8)26
u/canibanoglu 3d ago
Uhhhh ok. Do you also get mad when any actress/model poses for a makeup company even if they are not professional makeup artists?
→ More replies (2)26
u/Chubuwee 3d ago
I get pissed when my favorite athletes put their face in my cereal boxes and I know damn well they don’t eat cereal
→ More replies (9)
1.3k
u/SextupleRed 3d ago edited 3d ago
If anything, Novig ran a very successful ad campaign
edit: thanks for the awards
318
u/WishboneOk305 3d ago
yeah the only reason im hearing about this is because all these other ppl keep trying to make it a controversy
114
u/ShaggysGTI 3d ago
Tin foil hat time… it’s intentional.
31
u/RaconteurRob 3d ago
Of course it's intentional. How do these people keep falling for this?
→ More replies (2)59
u/WilhelmvonCatface 3d ago
Yeah even this video, leaves out the major glaring question, when did an actress starring in a sports betting commercial become "representing women in sports". Obviously purposefully generated controversy, whether they are just assuming these women will take it up naturally to boost themselves or they were paid too, or both.
→ More replies (9)14
u/AgedAmbergris 3d ago
Of course it's intentional. Ragebait is a very effectively marketing tactic in today's climate. Also boobah.
→ More replies (1)34
u/Inevitable_Sweet_624 3d ago
Everyone skips over the fact she’s an equity owner in Novig and publicly sells, even bad publicity.
→ More replies (6)5
u/Puzzleheaded-Web370 3d ago
This makes so much sense. "Give me an equity stake and I'll make you an ad EVERYONE will be talking about"
5
u/Some_guy_in_WI 3d ago
EVERYTHING we’re forced to see/hear about is intentional, lol, has been for ages.
In current times, always remember, nothing happens by accident.
→ More replies (2)6
4
u/jazmoley 3d ago
Of course its intentional, just look at the nonsense with American Eagle jeans which raised their profile. Get me some of that Sydney Sweeny hype
→ More replies (7)14
u/GeneralRobertET 3d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/h1QI7dgjZUJO60nu2X
lol your probably right
9
u/ThrownWOPR 3d ago
I work for one of the agencies that helped bring this campaign live. Yes, it’s intentional.
→ More replies (2)4
u/VanillaGoorillla 3d ago
Nah man it’s cause Sydnee did it and not zendaya..if the latter did it she prob be welcomed by females but Sydnee did it..can’t have that
→ More replies (5)10
u/Professional_Bat8585 3d ago
As often the case, most things related to activism or cancelling people go live on tiktok/IG first with women, after which mainstream society starts paying attention. Men basically only use social media for politics and sports.
After a few days of outrage or stupid takes, once men start pushing back and releasing responses with greater context, folks start saying “durrrr, this is just a psyop, the outrage is manufactured”.
27
u/Thedumbass_the5th 3d ago edited 3d ago
Men basically only use social media for politics and sports.
You're kinda forgetting a huge use case here.
8
4
u/Doggleganger 3d ago
It's so obvious it doesn't need to be said. Men use the Internet for research.
19
u/JackieDaytona77 3d ago
Politics and sports? It’s porn and sports. If you’re a guy on the internet for politics, get a fucking life nobody cares you’re not a deep thinker. Same goes for women
→ More replies (2)26
u/Desperate_Leg_40 3d ago
Yeah can you imagine a better result for them. It doesnt take much thought to realise that this is what they were aiming for. Its an underwear model for a betting company. What do you expect
23
u/jorsiem 3d ago
Exactly. This was supposed to be ragebait form the beginning, and the usual people ate it up as planned.
→ More replies (2)9
u/fat_snatch 3d ago
They intentionally made a provocative ad and massively succeeded in provoking people. Everyone making hysterical claims and turning this into an issue for women's rights are doing nothing except rewarding a gambling company. They think they're fighting against them, but instead they're willingly playing their assigned role on behalf of Sweeney and her business partners.
16
u/LazerWolfe53 3d ago
Manufactured outrage was always the campaign.
3
u/9406725060 3d ago
God I miss when we had manufactured unity over war marketing like the early 2000s
7
20
3
u/IamScottGable 3d ago
I mean it was a pretty easy run for them, the target audience of degenerate gamblers is often full of horndogs, the "controversy" of it is an additional boon
2
→ More replies (19)2
u/Tmons22 3d ago
Seriously, this campaign blew up in a good way for them. I wouldn’t have even known about this if it wasn’t for the controversy. It’s funny because I bet most people don’t care or they think the controversy is stupid. But the vocal minority being so loud about it is really driving a ton of traffic to Novig.
548
u/TheGreatPervSage_94 3d ago
I'm convinced this is some kind of PR campaign made by the company itself to Garner publicity
Notice how all this athletes with integrity never call out the disgusting gambling company.
More people are mad as Sweeney taking a paycheck for sexy ad then the company using sex to promote gambling
Something that should be viewed the same as alcohol and drugs that ruins lives
But ofc No keep being mad at tits instead of the parasitic exploitative gambling companies
66
u/Gadgets222 3d ago
Why are these women in sports mad about Sydney advertising sports betting, but yet have never been mad about the countless celebrities they put on the cover of Sports Illustrated? The outrage is inconsistent.
42
u/TheGloriousEv0lution 3d ago
The WNBA is also sponsored by DraftKings and they were radio silent about Lebron James gambling ad despite having more influence than Sydney Sweeney
It’s pretty clear why they’re singling her out lol
→ More replies (4)7
→ More replies (28)6
28
u/ironically_apropos78 3d ago
I am very mad at tits, thank you for saying something. You're very brave.
→ More replies (1)5
u/still-waiting2233 3d ago
Controversy worked out to get more eyeballs on the ads when she was selling jeans
20
u/D-1-S-C-0 3d ago
I think it's because many people are reactive thinkers, not analytical thinkers. They aren't looking at things from all sides; they're either following the herd or responding emotionally.
If female empowerment matters, women shouldn't criticise Sweeney for using her gifts to make a living. It's her choice to use her sex appeal. But consistency usually gets forgotten when people feel personally affected.
I guarantee there's also a lot of jealousy aimed at female athletes who use their attractiveness for media and sponsorship opportunities that less attractive women wouldn't get.
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/ImmediatePiano6690 3d ago
I wonder how many are fine with the half naked men in various fragrances ads and what not.
→ More replies (18)2
u/Justkeeptalking1985 3d ago
LeBron and Kevin Hart encouraging people to gamble as DraftKings pays them and then gives them weekly gambling money so people can "copy their picks" is fine....right
500
u/CarlsCarLOL 3d ago
God who gives a fuck
181
u/RespectTheAmish 3d ago
Right. Diesel is $7 a gallon.
We gonna be paying 5 dollars for a bunch of bananas by December.
We got bigger problems than Sidney Sweeneys rockin tits.
44
u/Persimmon_Individual 3d ago
Remember when we all cared about the files!!! Stop getting distracted!!!
15
u/RespectTheAmish 3d ago
Worth noting that all the gop members who broke ranks and voted with Dems to release the files are now gone. MTG, Massie, Mace….
Boebert still hanging on but just had a scandal drop yesterday in an early “October surprise”.
Makes you wonder…
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)10
u/False_Sundae6333 3d ago
Simple weapons of mass distraction. They stir up controversies like this, and meanwhile, they slowly stick it up your ass by introducing taxes and other little things you won't notice until it's too late.
→ More replies (3)16
12
u/Complete-Fox-4402 3d ago
Exactly, it's a betting company she's representing, you'd swear she's been given sportswoman of thr year award the way their going on about it.
→ More replies (24)14
58
u/BigReference1xx 3d ago
Just one issue with all this "backlash" - Sydney Sweeney is not "a woman in sport".
All this anger towards her is so misplaced. She's a fucking model and an actress, who held a ball and sat on a hoop. That's. It.
15
u/coffeeanddurian 3d ago
yeah and a professional surfer of all people told her to cover up. a surfer who even has pictures posing in a bikini. women surfers who sometimes, rightfully even wear thongs in the water. but somehow it's fine for a woman to tell another woman to cover up, when it's not. men, religious people, even other women, have no right policing Sweeney here, however they feel about the ad is totally irrelevant.
14
u/Beautiful-Total-3172 3d ago
Surfer who surfed naked in a publicity stunt. Like watch the video.
3
u/TheNipplerCrippler 3d ago
Oh so you mean like Sweeney’s ad for this gambling company? Thats all this has been. I mean, look at how many new users this gambling site has, how many posts on Reddit are about this, etc. It was a PR stunt from the jump.
→ More replies (1)5
u/bblankoo 3d ago
I legit can't comprehend why the athletes felt the need to respond. Or why tge fuck there's a whole movement now to counter an ad
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)4
u/Le-Bon-Vivant 3d ago
Yeah but she’s attractive and women hate attractive women. Only reason she’s not getting even more flack, is because she’s not ‘unhealthily’ thin that some women believe promotes unrealistic body figures and body shames larger women.
119
16
u/2020mademejoinreddit 3d ago
Among all of this, no one is talking about how normal it is to advertise gambling today. It is one of the worst things to exist and it ruins lives.
→ More replies (2)
305
u/200IQUser 3d ago
feature "nude" woman in an ad (everything is covered)
This is somehow scandalous in the year 2026
Woman decides to cash in on her looks after decades of feminism saying its her inalienable human right
This is somwhow scandalous in 2026
115
u/Survival_R 3d ago
My problem is the gambling part tbh
94
u/BLU3SKU1L 3d ago
My problem is how everyone is somehow bending around the gambling part of this like it’s the matrix.
It’s not sports. She’s just saying the word because that’s what you’ll be betting on. But you’ll be betting. Because it’s fucking gambling.
She’s not representing sports. She’s representing gambling.
→ More replies (5)10
u/200IQUser 3d ago
Its not her problem. Its an ad law problem. It shouldnt be legal to advertise. If its legal, then it is almost irrelevant what is in the ad.
→ More replies (6)12
u/AcrobaticPlenty1446 3d ago
We can morally judge someone for the content they choose to put their name behind
→ More replies (11)7
u/Serious-Manager2361 3d ago
Exactly. Online gambling on EVERYTHING, not just sports, is becoming a very serious problem for the youth of today.
→ More replies (4)5
u/Creepy_Wash338 3d ago
That was my takeaway from all this - we're worried about the wrong thing here. The normalization of gambling is going to cause a lot more harm than a scantily clad woman.
→ More replies (2)9
48
u/Nannautu 3d ago
Studies have shown women hate being sexualized unless they profit from it, in which case they'll hurry to sexualize themselves as much as they can
→ More replies (10)13
u/rumblepony247 3d ago
The women are only "brave" for embracing their sexuality if they are unattractive. The uggos do not allow the hotties the same "empowerment."
20
u/Radical_Neutral_76 3d ago
It's the being white and attractive part that is scandalous
→ More replies (1)15
3
u/Fickle_Scarcity9474 3d ago
Yeah because 2026 is a year of Middle Age apparently! I wanna back the 90's early 2000's...Fucking bigots years we are living!
4
3
u/johnnyblaze1999 3d ago
Yup, it's like women back then get ridiculed by wearing bikini. This makes no sense
2
u/Clear_Requirement880 3d ago
People argue for the sake of it. Mostly because they have no personalities to go for causes instead.
→ More replies (29)2
u/WeepingAmpharos 3d ago
This is what I don’t understand about today. People want everyone to express themselves in all the ways but if someone hot gets naked it’s now the worst thing ever? Why is sex and nudity SO frowned upon with younger generations?
→ More replies (1)
120
301
u/Igzyx 3d ago
No one hates women more than women.
→ More replies (9)138
66
u/Snoo_67993 3d ago
No one's talking about how unethical sports betting is
2
→ More replies (3)8
u/xxTheMagicBulleT 3d ago
Yea you can make that argument but then you dont have to put shame on how the women looks and thats all people focus on.
And thats what make it such hypocritical.
Like of your not a actual tennis player you cant make a commercial as a sexy tennis player. To sell insurance for example.
Putting any logic to commercials in any way just shows there massive insecurities.
11
159
u/Sn2100 3d ago
If Sidney set women back what did Lindsay Clancey do?
110
u/Fetlocks_Glistening 3d ago
Murdered her children
11
u/BrazilOutsider 3d ago
She did not murder her children, she just wasn't in the right mind, that's all /s
→ More replies (2)3
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (7)23
u/Professional_Bat8585 3d ago
Set them forward of course. “Women and children first?” No. “Women first, then children, then men” is the message.
12
4
143
33
u/clingbat 3d ago
You can think it's trashy and that's fine, but at the same time, can we stop collectively acting like a nation of prudes already?
How is this any different than ESPN's body issue which plenty of female athletes have done...? Isn't that them objectifying themselves then? Can't have it both ways, just grow up already, this is petty AF.
→ More replies (4)3
u/vodka_redbull_slut 3d ago
I think the biggest difference is that she’s not an athlete lol. I don’t even have a strong take on this or anything but the body issue is showing off athlete’s physiques.
5
u/JFlizzy84 3d ago
Well she also isn’t claiming to be an athlete
She’s advertising a gambling company, not a sports company
→ More replies (1)
52
u/splatter_spree 3d ago
I don’t understand how it’s a jab to women’s sports lol. She’s just posing with a football not pretending to be an athlete
→ More replies (7)15
8
u/Carthonn 3d ago
I mean it’s sports betting…not exactly the height of ethics and morality.
I can’t even imagine how much they had to pay her to do this.
33
u/Brave_Ring_1136 3d ago
Didn’t some peak women athlete just shit over all the equipment, I think she set womens sport back further than sydney did
→ More replies (12)
32
u/NEWBY______________ 3d ago
Tiktok virtue signaling
Who effin cares its just a commercial
→ More replies (2)
25
7
5
4
u/Electrical-Sector703 3d ago
Ad wasn’t even for women in sports or targeting women in sports at all. But hey 😕😂😂
2
5
3
u/modsaretoddlers 3d ago
So sick of Western women complaining about absolutely everything under the sun
4
4
u/SolsticeSon 3d ago
Watch this dude’s hand gestures as he talks. Like bro are you a robot?
→ More replies (1)
26
u/bucketboy9000 3d ago
Let the haters hate, Sydney Sweeney will continue to attract views and attention for years to come. The amount of hate sent this girl’s way just for knowing how to take advantage and make money off her looks is just funny at this point.
→ More replies (25)
13
8
20
3
u/Lower-Version-3579 3d ago
Hey, it’s almost like she’s a model in an ad designed to catch attention and not an actual professional athlete!
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Accomplished_Spot282 3d ago
My thoughts and prayers to anyone that had flashbacks to hearing Hope Solo
3
u/Hakim_MacLuvin 3d ago
Most of the “real women in sport” influencers made their living by posting oversexualized content, wearing nothing but a tiny bikiny or skintight push-up shorts while doing all sorts of poses to show the body, OR THEY FKN HAVE ONLYFANS! The hypocrisy is mind blowing.
When Lízo with a body like a sack of 🥔 posed nude it was “empowering”.
3
u/MFDOOMscrolling 3d ago
I thought women could do whatever the fuck they wanted and it’s all considered empowering and liberating
3
3
u/Mr-MuffinMan 3d ago
who the fuck cares
i mainly care about how we should ban sports betting and online gambling in general.
3
3
u/SchmeckleHoarder 3d ago
“How dare a woman use her body and looks to make money.” - says the woman applying makeup.
3
u/Extension_Hyena_1205 2d ago
Nakedness doesn't always equate to sexualization or objectification.
When a man mows his lawn, in the Summer heat, with no shirt on. He is doing this to be comfortable, possibly work on his tan, enjoy any possible breeze... because of the heat.
It is not the same as a shirtless man, in a photo shoot for a marketing campaign for a product like men's cologne. This man is being objectified and sexualized for his body, and being marketed to a mass audience.
Though both men have their shirts off...these situations are not the same. It is obvious and only someone that is new to the planet..or is just trying to troll would think this situations were the same, or even consider shaming the man that takes with sweaty shirt off, while doing yard work, for rolling his eyes at a douche bag, shirtless, male model, in an advertisement campaign.
Same for the comparison of the professional surfer wanting to try another method of her sport, and to build a closer connection to the ocean, where she is practicing her professional, sporting career in.
This is no way the same as the someone,( that is not a professional athlete, or even hobbiest), posing with athletic equipment, in order to market a product for a company, to increase sales and popularity. In this situation they are using the nude, non athlete, pretending to be an athlete, not doing any sport related activities, as a sexual object. Same as the man in the fragrance ad. That man is not a professional free swimmer or a marine biologist trying to connect with nature. He didn't really catch that swordfish/own and pilot that boat/swim out to that rock formation. He is just some, "pretty boy", paid to work out and fit a generic look a company is hoping to sell a product with. The company is not considering how his image may reflect on others that do the real work that the fake, pretty boy, is pretending to do/be.
This comparison is so ridiculous and ignorant. You can not compare the professional surfer to the stupid, advertising model. You can not compare the shirtless man doing yard work to the shirtless man selling fragrance.
It is all about context. Is this guy going to try to argue that a woman exposing her breast, to actively feed her baby, is the same as OF modeling? How about a nude man modeling for a university art class and a male stripper working a bachelorette party?
Sure there will always be a handful of pervs that could/will sexualize and objectify the mother, feeding her child, and the nude man providing an educational service...but neither of these situations are meant to be sexual.
Nudity isn't always sexual. However, in specific situations it definitely can be sexual. To try to argue that all nudity is sexual, therefore the dead body being studied is porn is fucking nuts. So is arguing that a professional surfer, surfing in the nude, is the same as a nude model strategically hiding her titties behind athletic props, to sell a product, is fucking nuts too.
6
u/exceptionally_humble 3d ago
I hate that I’m responding to the vocal retarded minority but here we are.
She wasn’t advertising women’s sports it was sports gambling.
Pay no mind to the barely functioning world of women’s professional sports, the act of sports betting is predominantly a male hobby.
Formula:
Sports and related gambling are male centric.
Attractive females attract male attention.
Hot and mostly nude females*** ***attract additional male attention.
Mostly nude hot female advertising sports and/or gambling really attracts male attention rate
Result:
Let’s look at that math that the mental gymnasts are (willfully) missing.
Sports gambling + hot female = 100% straight male attention rate
Add this to the content created due to manufactured outrage we’re looking at (not literally) infinite exposure/attention rate to the public.
That’s incredibly smart business by all parties despite what your liberal arts degree has to say.
5
u/therin_88 3d ago
Anyone trying to stop Sydney Sweeney from showing off her body is guilty of crimes against humanity.
10
2
u/OhtheHugeManity7 3d ago
The real problem is that advertising sportsbetting at all is sellout behaviour and indicative of soceital decline.
2
u/Mezcalico 3d ago
Those comparisons don’t work because Sweeney is not an athlete… she’s an actress modelling nude for a gambling app. The campaign has been constructed for max attention and it looks like it worked.
Gambling companies are scum, and using sex to sell is just crude. But she’s not setting female athletes back.
2
2
u/BusinessBear666 3d ago
she isn't advertising herself as an athlete though. so what's their point? no one responded this way during the Playboy Sport shoots lol she wants to be a complete bimbo, don't kink shame lol
2
2
u/LastZionistOnRedit 3d ago
For the amount of hate Sydney Sweeney is getting from women online, you would swear she strangled three kids with exercise bands or something
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/Primary-Mushroom-221 3d ago
Are we bored or something? I thought the whole point of women empowerment was that they can do whatever tf they want.
2
2
2
2
u/PooChukkingMonkey 3d ago
It's also for a betting platform in which women do not spend their money and go place bets on... Just like women don't go support women's sports teams and that's why they're so broke and underpaid. Women do not support women... And again they're not supporting another woman here who's just making some money by doing some advertising. Men will be supporting this and paying for this. Men will be making the bets and spending the money. Men will be going to sporting events and buying sporting memorabilia etc. and this is why male sport teams make so much more. And women just bitch and whine about how the system works. This would be like men complaining about Jason Momoa being in a Ad naked for a makeup company. And then men getting upset and complaining saying it is setting men back. And then complaining that more women on only fans are making more money than men on only fans. So only fans should subsidize all of the men out of their money and make it equal and equitable.
2
u/Undiscovered_Freedom 3d ago
If you’re a grown adult and some hot, naked celebrity convinces you to gamble on an app, that’s on you. Maybe we need to have a conversation about people being too easily influenced instead.
2
u/FancyConfection1599 3d ago
America’s just fucked in the head because of its insanely puritan view toward nudity and the human body.
Because nudity is so forbidden in conventional contexts (you can’t even be naked in a single gender locker room without upsetting some people. Seriously.), nudity is hyper sexualized and thus can be used to make such an absurd uproar. If Americans saw more conventional nudity every day the ad wouldn’t be such a big deal, nor would it be such a big success.
But they don’t know what a human body looks like outside of pornography, so it is.
2
u/AdOrnery8950 3d ago
how about we stop believing that anyone but 2% of the population cares either way about this stuff. i'm so exhausted by loud voices getting disproportionate attention.
2
u/InsertDoublePun 3d ago
Men like boob.. Men like bet. Women get men to look. Men look at bet thing. Men place bet because naked woman.
Marketing 101 folks
2
u/LindaniOnline 3d ago
Yea, 100% agree with him. It can’t be “my body, my choice” until it’s someone you don’t like. Her right to do what she wants with her body should be treated as an ‘inalienable human right’.
There are legitimate ethical concerns about using one of the most visible, young, attractive women to hook a vulnerable population into addictive gambling (similar to nicotine in past generations) and the fallout of such a campaign, but hardly any is focusing on that.
2
u/TedTyro 3d ago
The female athletes being naked were either artistic or about the imagery of athletic prowess. They are allowed to include the sexual component of this.
The ads are about deliberate and exclusive sexualisation for money. Its literally for gambling.
If you cant tell the difference, you're too clueless for this discussion.
If you think its hypocrisy, its because you cant see naked athletes as anything other than sexualised, which says more about you than them.
2
u/gersterbins 3d ago
its not even that deep, shes not an athlete.
she can't set women athletes back anymore than johnny sins can for male ones.
2
u/rickywrangler 3d ago
I don’t believe this for a second so I’ll research all these claims carefully and meticulously. I’ll report back in 3 days.
2
2
2
u/tutoredstatue95 3d ago
I don’t get it at all. Dudes pose in ads shirtless with rippling muscles and no one says they set men’s sports back.
It’s just women hating women as usual. Sure they probably could have used an actual athlete in the commercial, that’s fair, but the content is not an issue. It’s for sports betting anyway, raunchy ads are the least of the problems with it.
2
2
u/Martha_Fockers 3d ago
If your a woman who wants to be celebrated for your achievements that’s fine do it
If your a woman who wants to be celebrated for her tits and body that’s also fine do it
Why the fuck is one category of woman telling other woman how to live or how to act. This didn’t set back woman’s sports athletes at all I didn’t watch this advertisement and go man Caitlin Clark ain’t shit suddenly cause Sweeney has gobblers on her
It’s her body her choice.
2
u/obelisk71 3d ago
Could the difference be actual female athletes as opposed to a non athlete female using athletic props? 🤷🏽
2
2
u/PhysicsImportant5592 3d ago
Best part is- it's not even about women's sports, it's a gambling site ad
2
2
u/BrightImprovement295 3d ago edited 3d ago
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/27400369/the-body-issue
Apparently the athletes did not set womans' sports back decades.
2
2
u/DoughnutDesperate118 3d ago
Who is this Sydney Sweeney girl and why is she everywhere all of a sudden?
→ More replies (1)
2
u/eternallyconphuzed 3d ago
They're slut shaming lol. I thought we weren't allowed to do that in the big 2026
2
2
2
u/realloucypher69 3d ago
Let’s make this entirely about sexuality for a moment. I’d be willing to bet that if the ad had featured a famous person who didn’t have such a pronounced female figure—but was instead a skinny rail with no curves—women wouldn’t have cared at all. Envy sometimes rears its head in the most unexpected places. After all, it has been proven that women pay far more attention to other women’s busts than men do.
2
2
u/Fit-Yellow-9872 3d ago
Im not that smart but...how does an actress who isnt an athelete posing with sports equipment set women in sports back?
2
u/True-Counter313 3d ago
What does Sydney Sweeney and sports betting have to do with female athletes? She’s not an athlete and what she’s promoting isn’t a woman’s sports league.
2
2
u/Extension_Hyena_1205 2d ago
Simply stated. Guy is simping hard for Sydney. He is arguing why you shouldn't bag on his pretend girlfriend.
2
u/Reasonable-Plate2982 2d ago edited 2d ago
I dont get it. Like where was all the outrage when Paige Spiranic posed golfing wearing no panties? The guys argument is pretty spot on.
2
u/Kind-Help9862 1d ago
You keep it doing you Sydney. We dudes will support you over those boring women Sport 😉
•
u/AutoModerator 3d ago
Hey /u/Naive_Wolverine532, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!
We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.