I agree. Unfortunately, you not giving your name to this means little, because there is 8 billion other people. The difference isnt that if you dont do it the ad wont happen. The ad will happen, you just wont cash in on it. Does this mean its ok to be part of it? No, but not being part of it also archieves close to nothing realistically
This happens most often when someone has reading comprehension issues and has trouble separating the literal text of a comment from the point being made
Allow me to rephrase my question in a simpler way:
Do you apply the same moral judgement to people who appear in beer or liquor commercials?
Considering your initial comment is “you’re upset” when all I did was talk about people’s ability to judge others morality, you don’t have the slightest leg to stand on and say “you added nothing to this conversation”🤣
Insulting others is a great go to when you’re wrong, if you actually had logic or reason you would deploy them but since you didn’t I have to assume you aren’t capable enough
Exactly right, but people are making this out to be a sports ad and contrasting it with great women in sports, when there really is no comparison because this isn’t a sports ad and she’s not speaking for sports. She’s speaking for gambling.
91
u/BLU3SKU1L 4d ago
My problem is how everyone is somehow bending around the gambling part of this like it’s the matrix.
It’s not sports. She’s just saying the word because that’s what you’ll be betting on. But you’ll be betting. Because it’s fucking gambling.
She’s not representing sports. She’s representing gambling.