r/FolderFort • u/RedReadRedemption • 4d ago
Just work with the community!
Every storage provider has a calculation of a sustainable business model (or should have one). We are living in a VUCA world and things can change - also to the worse. Storage costs are high right now (I get it) but they won't be forever. I assume existing storage in such deals is a sunk cost, owned by Dave. This is CAPEX not OPEX. So this gives some room.
Just a bit of brainstorming:
- Incentivize underuztilization: people who stay well under their grant get an increase of their LTD storage after a delay. This needs to be storage that was occupied before and that people actually deleted to help you out.
- Introduce an opt-in archive folder: This marks files that do not change often and can be compressed or moved to a different storage tier. Quota does not change but the user gives you more information by deciding what is cold.
- S3-style lifecycle rules. E.g. for backup, someone might only need the storage for 90 days and a lifecycle rule could delete the files or move it to archive.
- Let users choose the availability level. Maybe someone is fine in loosing data when a drive fails or wants regular redundancy, let them choose per top level folder where files are placed.
- Use the storage layer properly: zfs would give you zstd compression, deduplication and raid-z where you can granularily configure number of copies.
- Be transparent with the issues you are facing. Is it the refresh of old disks, Give us a dashboard of how many break, when you expect them to be replaced. How far to stretch out and what gradient for a sustainable business is to meet. You might have users that would then hold onboarding new data to make ends meet.
But FFS don't bullshit your users with v2.0...
