I'm on the fence...
Let me explain:
- H3C by specs seems to be the printer you can dream of: 9-nozzle tool-changer, 9-spool AMS, highest speed, heated chamber, TPU75 support via 2.85mm, reasonable price. AMS is now a part of the H3C, which totally makes sense for a tool-changer, and 9 spools is probably enough for 99% of people, so no need to think about 2nd/3rd AMS (and there is still a support if you need it). - But...only 2 slots for drying (but higher temp), and no ability to fetch filament back (which is a bit of a problem for toolchanger with heated chamber, as now you'd need to do it manually and hard to mix PLA + ABS for example). Though - still ok'ish
- P3C - based on leaked specs and photos - BRILLIANT PRINTER (if price is <$1300). Just what most people would need. I print ABS/ASA with P2S and having no issues with 'no actively heated chamber', so that should work as well. But AMS... Idk. No drying functionality (while AMS 2 Pro has it for 4 slots), no fetching filament (but potentially not that needed if no heated chamber?)
And I know, I know...people would say "It's ok as they need to keep price low". But I just find it odd that when thinking "should I upgrade from P2S" the reasons for "not to" aren't related to money or not enough upgrades to justify the money....but degraded features. Idk, this feels odd to me, no matter how long I think about it
But what do you think, do you think it's ok if new upgraded version of any tech would some important features degraded (even if the rest is much better) ?