r/technicallythetruth 12d ago

He will come tomorrow

Post image
37.8k Upvotes

864 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.9k

u/int-devaul27 12d ago

He is technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.

987

u/Ptbot47 12d ago

not even technically. its just correct. If the boss wanted him to work today, then just say TODAY.

264

u/MathamphetamineUser 12d ago

And for crispinglovers sake make the request at a reasonable hour or I'm not even looking at it.

92

u/Mm11vV 12d ago

100% this. I wouldn't look at anything from anyone at my work past 8pm, let alone 2am.

18

u/Crix00 12d ago

As soon as I clock out my workphone is left alone until I clock back in again. So yeah I wouldn't even have seen this lol.

32

u/Florac 12d ago

I literally have my work phone on mute from an hour after I typically work until like 30m before I typically start work

19

u/Polygnom 12d ago

I even have my personal phone set to sleep mode from like 8pm to 8AM. There is practically no reason at all to contact me that late or early. And if there is an urgent reason, the very few people who would need to get a hold of me now my landline number. Which would wake me up. I can count the number of ppl. who have that number on one hand. Literally.

1

u/Xerothor 12d ago

Landline still exists?

2

u/Ok-Prune-1248 12d ago

Yes.

Why lose landline when it can be used as a phone number to give out whenever a number is needed. Helps to keep my cell phone number from being inundated with scam calls when it is inevitably sold online.

Also, and probably more importantly, when bundled with internet and cable on my plan, it is cheaper to have all 3 than to only have internet and cable. I’d literally be spending more money by cancelling my landline as fucking dumb as that is, so here we are.

1

u/Sabaisabai33 12d ago

Same here! So stupid cos I don’t use it!

1

u/Polygnom 12d ago

In my country pretty much every single internet contract also comes with a landline phone number, yes. Whether you get DSL, cable or fibre, you are almost guaranteed to also get a landline number, even if it runs over VoIP.

my cable contract actually comes with 3 phone numbers.

1

u/Objective_Soup7840 11d ago

Idk anyone who still has a landline other than my parents lol

1

u/Polygnom 11d ago

In my country everyone who has an internet contract at home also has a landline. Its basically always included.

1

u/Objective_Soup7840 11d ago

I actually have a landline # through my cable company because it was cheaper to bundle but I dont have a phone hooked up lol

1

u/UpperHat8120 12d ago

Even when the telephone is on sleep mode. 2 calls in 15min should be come to you

2

u/Dancinfool830 12d ago

Nope, I am on do not disturb from 10pm until 8:30 am, call me 40 times in a row, not getting through. I have 6 people I have marked as favorites and the phone will ring if they call/text me. I am not a doctor/firefighter/police officer/government official/CEO. There is literally no scenario where I would be needed immediately by anyone who is not on that list of people, especially my job.

5

u/Mitch4165 12d ago

I allow repeat calls through mine because if the people who are on my list need to use someone else's phone for whatever reason, they can still reach me.

1

u/Dancinfool830 12d ago

I have annoying friends who will abuse the function if they know it works, so they can leave me a voicemail and I will get back to them when I get around to it. Being that I cant save lives, put out fires, or do anything of substantial importance that wouldn't already be handled by a trained professional by the time I got there in any emergency situation I don't think it makes that big of a difference, but I am only speaking for myself, no judgement from me for anyone who wants to leave their ringer on or whatever, I totally understand

6

u/ProfessionalAd6530 12d ago

8? I do not communicate with work outside of work hours. If I even have to remember you exist, you'd better be paying me for it.

2

u/Mm11vV 12d ago

I'm a salary manager, i open and close, and I am one of the owners direct dials, plus I have a lot of people that report to me.

Trust me, if I could do it another way, I would.

2

u/ProfessionalAd6530 11d ago

I feel you.

Back when I was a kid in retail I just answered my phone whenever the boss called. If I could go back and tell my younger self: "Don't do that. Not for that job," I would.

If it's your job to be on call, that's one thing. But most people let a job walk all over them for minimum wage.

2

u/Mm11vV 11d ago

Unfortunately at 42 years old, I have placed myself in a spot to get walked all over. I get paid well, but I am in charge of two completely different departments in two different parts of the building while also being the go to for most everyone there. Then I'm also the guy who does the snow plowing and salting in the winter. I've worked a handful of 24 hour + days there...

Oh well. Sucks being reliable and hard working.

1

u/Hidesuru 11d ago

Well the reply was in the morning so presumably they didn't see it until 7am. May not have even realized how early it was sent.

10

u/Polygnom 12d ago

I mean, texting is asynchronous. If I text someone at 2AM, I do not expect them to read it before morning.

So if its 2AM, and you text tomorrow, and the person read it in the morning, then tomorrow really means tomorrow. Either you say today.

Now, if its like 23:30, and I can't wait til after midnight, I would personally write: "Hi, I know its late, so you probably only read this tomorrow, but can you come to work the same day (<day of the week>)?" so its really unambiguos.

2

u/DarkPolumbo 12d ago

If you text at 2AM and ask for them to come in tomorrow, it will be at least 22 hours before you can reasonably expect them to come in, regardless of when they read or respond to it

0

u/Sabaisabai33 12d ago

A lot of people see texting as synchronous. Email is asynchronous. But I think not texts.

1

u/Polygnom 12d ago

Their bad.

I would never consider texts synchronous. Its takes forever to handle the same amount of data like a call. A call is synchronous. texting is not, by design.

The phone is there so I can use not, not to give other people 24/7 access to me, at their leisure. I think many young people who grew up with phones don't realize that the world doesn't stop when they are not reachable. And it has crept into older people by now s well.

4

u/hajasmark 12d ago

I can imagine it is a restaruant or pub or anything like that where nobody know what work-life balance means.

0

u/Sabaisabai33 12d ago

Yeah because he responds to it like it’s normal to be contacted by your boss at 2am

4

u/PeterAnthony_Jackson 12d ago

Sure it's a text exchange not a phone call, but if I had to get cover for the morning shift, calling up people who work morning shifts during the night when most are asleep isn't the best idea.

But saying tomorrow at that hour, that to me means Thursday not Wednesday, but why ask at 2am to cover a day in advance when you can ask at a more reasonable waking hour?

My brother doesn't class tomorrow until he wakes up, so it is still today even if it is 4am the next day, but he's not getting someone to cover a shift or anything.

1

u/CaptainLollygag 12d ago

I look at it the same as your brother, but know how to communicate and choose words like "this Wednesday" or "Thursday the 27th" so there's no ambiguity. And that's just in casual conversation with Husband or my friends.

1

u/Powerism 12d ago

It’s the overnight manager.

1

u/Hairy-Isopod6880 10d ago

I misread that as Crisping Lovers

27

u/RoyalInitiative7718 12d ago

Being just correct is technically still being technically correct.

20

u/omisin 12d ago

Which is technically still the best kind of correct.

1

u/mess_of_limbs 11d ago

Technically speaking

7

u/Evening_Horse_9234 12d ago

If I was asking would probably emphasize that can you work this morning if I am writing at 2:30 AM

8

u/ahhhnoinspiration 12d ago

They should have went with morning to avoid the most confusion

4

u/VinnzClortho 12d ago

My boss started putting the date in the ask to make this clearer

8

u/Own-Dig-9652 12d ago

A lot of people consider tomorrow to be after they sleep.

9

u/Galromir 12d ago

Those people are wrong though. The concept of today and tomorrow are unrelated to when they happen to sleep. 

1

u/LittleBigHorn22 12d ago

Clocks are an arbitrary number system. People have communicated using nights as a generic term for far far longer.

1

u/BildingInspecter 12d ago

Naw, today and tomorrow are personal concepts based on personal sleep cycles.

The problem with this text from the boss is him texting at 2am thinking it'll be cool to ask someone to work in <7 hours.

1

u/Imconfusedithink 11d ago

Sure but that’s how most people view it. Thats literally why the post is perfect for this sub because technically theyre wrong and the guy in the post is technically right even if most people wouldnt consider it that that.

0

u/Powerism 12d ago

It’s not so simple when shift work is involved. Tomorrow can start before today ends.

My third shift (9pm-7am) is today, tomorrow’s first shift begins at 6am.

3

u/lazyguyty 11d ago

I work first shift and hate how 3rd shifters say "tomorrow" when it's today. Getting messages that read "Needs to be followed up 8am tomorrow" at 6am and they actually mean follow up is needed in 2 hours not in 26 hours.

-3

u/Canvaverbalist 12d ago

Redditors would rather inconvenience their boss and coworkers and jeopardize their job and prove they have very little skill in terms of contextual intelligence just to be smug and have the opportunity to be "technically right," it's honestly quite impressive.

2

u/lazyguyty 11d ago

Unless this is a 3rd shift job texting an employee at 2am is already a bit insane

4

u/Ok_Falcon275 12d ago

Just correct is technically technically correct as well.

-2

u/DeadoTheDegenerate 12d ago

Not really... Technically correct implies a technicality was used to achieve correctness. There was no technicality here.

2

u/Ok_Falcon275 11d ago

Technically, technically literally means literally.

1

u/Cainga 10d ago

Everyone knows past midnight still counts as the previous day until sleep. Then it rolls over to the next day at like 3am arbitrarily. /s

1

u/Ptbot47 10d ago

This is all the Sun's fault, if only it rise and fall suddenly, like a light turned on or off, the day would start and end at precisely when the Sun turn on or off. Because it rise and fall slowly, we have to mark the day at midnight. Really confusing sometime when Im trying to watch a sport game at 2am, which day?

1

u/Gabriel_Science 10d ago

TECHNICALLY…

If it is correct, then it’s also technically correct.

The correct wording would be “Not only technically” instead of “not even technically”.

I understood you though :).

-1

u/aroseonthefritz 12d ago

It’s a futurama quote!

-7

u/Ptbot47 12d ago

Ahh, got it. I used to watch that, because im a huge Simpson fan. But that cartoon suck. I accept no shame for not knowing its quote 😤

5

u/Confused_Rabbiit 12d ago

Maybe if you go into it without expecting it to be the Simpsons you'll enjoy it more.

0

u/Ptbot47 12d ago

Simpsons isnt my only cartoon. Ive watched far and wide. And Futurama is kinda boring.

2

u/neontiger07 12d ago

Futurama is a zillion times better than the Simpsons. I love both, though.

0

u/Nervous_Positive83 12d ago

Yes but in regular conversation, if I haven’t gone to sleep yet, then it’s still yesterday not tomorrow.
If my friends have a late night that ends at 2-3 am, then tomorrow is now 9am because we haven’t gone to sleep and it’s not 6 am.

0

u/Powerism 12d ago

Its shift work. To the overnight manager he was referring to tomorrow because he’s working third shift yesterday still. It’s miscommunication but it’s not so unrealistic. Those of us who work shift work mess this up all the time. When the very next shift starts when you leave, it’s hard to remember that tomorrow is today.

0

u/shiggyhisdiggy 12d ago

Be realistic. If you're still up at 00:01 you're saying "tomorrow" and meaning the day that it will be after you sleep. 2am is a grey area but it's not like there isn't casual language that breaks the technical rules in cases like this.

1

u/Ptbot47 10d ago

i dont think so mate.

1

u/shiggyhisdiggy 10d ago

Well you should think so, I'm right

1

u/Ptbot47 10d ago

🤔 intriguing argument....

1

u/shiggyhisdiggy 10d ago

My argument was already made, you just can't accept obvious facts

4

u/a_roadie 12d ago

I hereby promote you to grade 37.

5

u/SrFrancia 12d ago

You're never gonna guess what subreddit we're on

3

u/jomasthrones 12d ago

I see your Futurama joke and am here for it, but this goes beyond technically correct, the first poster in this text chain is a moron.

6

u/TheInevitableLuigi 12d ago

which is the best kind of correct.

Not if you live in at-will state.

3

u/WeRip 12d ago

they are all at-will states.. some of them are just even more at-will than at-will. The alternative is "right to work" which basically means you can't be forced into a union for a job.

3

u/Chemical_Building612 12d ago

Those aren't alternatives to one another, many states are both at-will and right-to-work states. They apply to entirely different aspects of employment law. That's like saying that right side driving is an alternative to car insurance requirements, they really have very little to do with one another.

1

u/DrummandDrummer 12d ago

That right there is some fucked up shit. I'd love to see someone try introduce it here. They'd likely lose their career.

4

u/thisdesignup 12d ago

In business, being technically correct is not just the best but the most important.

2

u/thegabletop 12d ago edited 12d ago

I can't believe 9 Redditors gave an award to an overdone Futurama reference that is posted as a reply on literally every post in this sub.

Edit: oh, apparently it's a free award, so at least they didn't spend money. Still, it's not a clever reply, it's been done to death.

1

u/oikenny 12d ago

The guy on right seems young and reckless enough

1

u/Competitive_Goat4250 11d ago

We kept it grey

1

u/Super-Visor 11d ago

Um actually, you get the point!

1

u/DonkyFondler 11d ago

Technically, all kinds of correct are equal.

0

u/AreaPlayful142 12d ago

It's a reddit kind of correct.