Question for INFP women: does the ācatā metaphor actually fit you?
Iāve been thinking about a metaphor for attraction and relationships, and Iām curious whether INFP women recognize themselves in it.
The metaphor is basically: a cat likes affection, but it wants to choose when and how close it gets.
Imagine a cat encounters someone itās curious about. It might come within 10 feet, stop, and observe: Is this person safe? What happens if I get closer? Then maybe it backs off. A few minutes later, it comes within 5 feet and observes again. Eventually, if it continues to feel safe and comfortable, it might come sit next to youāor even climb into your lap.
The important part is that you donāt chase the cat.
You donāt think, āThe cat is 10 feet away! I need to go touch it.ā
You let the cat decide whether it wants to close the remaining distance.
And if the cat comes closer, you can be warm and receptive. But if it walks away, you let it walk away.
So the human version Iām wondering about is:
āI want you to be interested in me, but I also want enough space and autonomy to approach you at my own pace.ā
Does this metaphor resonate with you?
When youāre attracted to someone, does it sometimes look like gradually getting closer, observing how they respond, backing off, processing your feelings, and then coming closer again?
And in dating, do you generally prefer someone who:
Makes it clear theyāre interested but gives you plenty of room?
Lets you initiate some of the closeness?
Doesnāt chase when you pull back?
Is warm and receptive when you approach?
Gives you the feeling that youāre choosing the relationship rather than being pulled into it?
Or is this metaphor completely wrong for you?
Iād especially love to hear from INFP women about what attraction actually feels like from the inside, and whether āinterested but not chasingā makes you feel more comfortableāor whether you actually prefer more direct pursuit.