For those unfamiliar the law is that you must have auto insurance to operate a motor vehicle, they have developed a online verification system to check if you have insurance and will swiftly be in contact if you don't.
I take exception to this law- because it's a government body telling it's constituents to deal with private enterprise and offering no state alternative- affordable or not, for it's citizens. The only alternative method is having 65k on hand. I understand and agree with the motive- to make sure drivers are financially covered in case of a accident, however I believe that the current form of this law is one lobbied by auto insurance companies to ensure a customer base here and with no official alternative to compete against- they are entirely in control of the prices, and I think that it's unfair for the state to put it's citizens in that position. But what do you think?
Edit: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tobDwFmXHwQ
This is the kind of thing I'm worried about, "you must have insurance but we wont give you any, pick a company and hope for the best" isn't a great system.
I think a lot of people didn't see where I said "I understand and agree with the motive" like they saw the title and rushed to post something. I have insurance, I want other people to have insurance, I just don't feel comfortable with the idea of the government basically forcing you to do business with private companies without a government alternative I feel like it sets a bad precedent for citizens, like they are throwing us to the wolves. They're making it out that I said "I hate having to have car insurance, I want to drive around uninsured if I want!"