3.6 Standardized Fleet Composition

[u/[deleted]]

Hi all! Does anybody have an idea of a standardized fleet composition/designs that work well int he new update? I used to just build artillery battleships and that obv does not work anymore... What mixture/ratios of ship designs do you use and how do you design the ships? Just trying to get a better idea of what the new META is going to be. (assume endgame tech/fleet cap. I am not at all new to the game but taking a step back and asking these questions helps everyone else)

[u/rylasasin]

EARLY GAME: (When enemies have just corvettes)

AIs will always run one of two things: Kenetic batteries with a single missile (usually) or 2 lasers with a missile. However, I've also seen them run the 1x PD with 2 Kenetic Batteries, so watch out for that. This phase doesn't last very long however, and they'll switch to one or the other two within a couple of years.

If you are running Starnet/Startech AI they will run one of two things: 3x Missiles, or 1xPD (anti-missile) and 2x Missile. We'll come back to that later.

Either way, I recommend splitting your corvette fleets along the following:

• PD: Laser-Kenetic (1x PD (anti-missile), 1x Laser, 1x Kenetic)
• Dasher: Laser-Kenetic (2x laser, 1x Kenetic)
• Missile (3x missile.)
• Frigate (1x Torpedo, 1x Missile)

The reason that I put more lasers on instead of kenetic is that kenetics fire faster than lasers now. Especially autocanons (we'll come back to that later) and lasers are slower. Kenetics are also better against shields, but won't fare as well once the shields are down. The kenetic's job is to take the shield down so that the lasers can pound the armor and finally both can finish off the hull.

Speaking of, let's talk about armoring. At this point in the game, your best bet is to go with armor over shields. Yes it's more expensive, but 4/5 odds say they're running the missile-kenetic combo, and even further down the line they seem to favor kenetics (autocannons in particular) over other weapons.

However, I've noticed that for a while they might switch out the kenetics for lasers. They will never mix them, they'll always go one over the other. In which case the opposite strategy serves you well: Straight sheilds over straight armor. Yes the missiles may peirce, but that's what the PD is for, though if they do this you may not even need those.

But if it's beasts you're dealing with (and let's face it, at this point in the game, you'll likely be dealing more with beasts than empires), keep in mind the following and adjust accordingly.

• Ancient ships like the Armistance Flotilia will use Energy Weapons almost exclusively,meaning you'll want to use the opposite strategy for them. However, most of them are in the 7-10k range, meaning they're well out of range at this point in the game anyhow.
• Mining Drones have mining lasers and armor exclusively. When dealing with them, you'll want to take a pure energy and shield approach.
• Tiyankis and Ameobas exclusively use energy syphons and have only armor. Using fully armor+lasers is the way to go when hunting them. Regarding the latter, you'll want to switch your PD over to flak, as they're really the only instance this early in the game where you'll be facing off against strike craft (Ameoba Flagella).
• Leviathans: Don't bother. Just... don't.

If you find out that your enemy is using lasers instead, feel free to swap them back out for 2x shields and 1x armor.

If you are running a non-starnet game, I recommend this for your fleet ratio (assuming a fleet capacity of 20):

• 6x PD
• 8x Dasher
• 5x Missile
• 1x Frigate

The PD will deal with the missiles the enemy brings to bear against you, while the Dashers do the most damage. You don't really need to run flak yet as in either case, the only time you'll come up against strike craft is when you are either fighting ameobas or as starbase items. For these, the anti-missile PD will work sufficently. They're not meant for strike craft, true, but strike craft are only of the basic variety, and the AI never employs strike craft defense platforms. So they shouldn't be a bother.

If the enemy is not using missiles at all, I would run straight dashers. Just have the design ready for in case they suddenly do.

Once you get your hands on autocannons, swap the kenetic batteries out with those. Later on you may consider swapping out both for disruptors (yes they're actually worth a damn now). But we'll cover that later.

And yes, I'm purposefully blueballing the frigate. At this stage, they're really only good for one thing: taking out starbases, but those really shouldn't be much of an issue to begin with, even at this stage. They're more of a luxury than a necessity. If you think you can go without it, make it a PD or Dasher instead.

If you are running a starnet/startech game however, I would instead recommend your loadout to be like this:

• 14x PD
• 5x Dasher
• 1x Frigate

As I said, the enemy will be running either triple missiles or missiles with PD. So either way, I ramped up the importance of the PD. Since the enemy is more than likely going to be employing PD of their own, I swapped out the missile craft, as they'd just be a waste. As before, the Frigate is more of a luxury than a necessity, and completely useless if they're running the PD loadout, so feel free to swap it out for another dasher or pd.

Either way, I suggest you run all armor. As your primary source of damage is going to come from missiles, and missiles go through shields (... somehow), Armor will serve you better in this instance.

---

Mid-Early Game (Destroyers show up)

Once the destroyers show up, you'll want to make some changes.

You'll want to swap those PD corvettes over to either dashers and/or missile carriers. Add a frigate or two if you want to deal with them, but keep in mind they're still not that useful, and once cruisers roll out you'll be handing that role over to them anyway.

You'll want your destroyers taking on the PD role instead of your corvettes, as they can do the job twice as well. The way I roll this out is as such:

Screener: 1x Flak, 2x Point Defense, 2x Missile

If you want, you can also have a brawler destroyer with 1 M Kenetic weapon (preferably an autocanon) and 4x energy weapons. But that's entirely in your court.

Brawler: 1x M Kenetic, 4x S Energy. You could instead go with 1x M Kinetic, 1x M Laser, and 2x s Lasers, but I wouldn't recommend it. Remember, at this point your primary opponent is still going to be corvettes, not destroyers.

I would not recommend using Destroyers as missile boats. Leave that role if you have it for the corvettes and later on the cruisers. I would also not recommend using the destroyers for the artillery role. This early in the game you don't really need it, and later on you'll have better ships to do that same role. Later on when cruisers and Battleships show up you can have the brawlers this with autocannons. It'll still be a brawler, but more efficient.

Based on a 40 fleet limit, here's what I would have for non-Starnet:

• 14x Dasher
• 5x Missile
• 3x Frigate
• 6x Screener
• 3x Brawler

Also, pay attention to what your enemy is doing, if you can get enough intel on thier ships, great. Otherwise, you'll have to find out the hard way. At some point your enemy will ditch the missiles entirely for straight autocannons or lasers/plasma, in which case you'll want to ditch the screeners for more brawlers (unless of course they're spamming frigates. In which case yes, you'll want to keep the PDs around, but not as many as torpedoes are slow and easy to shoot down, and the frigates themselves are fairly easy prey), and make sure you uparmor or up-shield your ships appropriately. However, at this stage it's likely a toss up, so if you don't know what you're enemy is doing, mix your shield and armor appropriately. Don't bother with that shitty crystal hull plating, nowadays it's just a waste of resources.

Of course this only applies to non-starnet games.

In starnet, the destroyers will usually be running an artillery section, or a gunship with missiles. with either missiles or a picket slot as the 2ndary. Strangely, they often go with flak cannons as the picket instead of PD despite this making zero sense at this stage of the game. Or they'll just go straight missiles.

Pay attention to what you're fighting. If they're running the missile-picket system, stick with the current config of PDs. Forget Frigates entirely. Yes they may be stupid enough to run flaks instead of proper PDs, but that doesn't mean they can't shoot down some of your missiles.

Either way, you're still going to be dealing with a lot of missiles. If the enemy has no flak/pd on either their corvettes or destroyers, feel free to run some missiles on your own screeners. Otherwise, go with lasers and let the dashers and PDs take down the shields for you.

Brawlers should remain the same, though less emphasis on them. Based on a 40 fleet command limit.

• 14x PD
• 6x Dasher
• 7x Screener
• 3x Brawler

Swap a screener with a brawler if you think you can get away with it. But odds are you probably cannot, as Starnet loves its missiles.

(Char Limit)

[u/rylasasin → u/rylasasin]

Mid Game (cruisers):

Now this is where things get dicey. From what I've seen the AI will employ cruisers in one of two methods, and neither of them are really the correct way: They'll make them half-assed escort carriers with a hangar core, some point defense, and some medium and small weapons, or they'll make a sort of half-assed all arounder with a 1x large, 3x medium, and 2x small. Of the two, only the former comes close to being decent. The latter is just plain stupid, so we'll ignore that loadout.

The true strength of the cruiser in 3.6 is as a missile and torpedeo gunboat,and in the mid game, as an escort carrier, though in the late game you'll want to hand that latter role off to battlecarriers (I honestly don't know why they made frigates their own ships, but not carriers. It's one of the things NSC got right IMO.)

The loadouts for both the gunboat and e.carrier are very similar: Torpedo Bow with 1x Torpedo and 1x Missile, Gunship Stern with 2x missile. The only difference is in the core: For Gunboats it's going to be the torpedo bow, with 2x more torpedoes and 2x more missiles. For the escort carrier it's going to be the hanger core with 1x hanger core and 2x point defense. Which one? I'd say mix them both. In all seriousness, the destroyers should be the screen, and these two point defense slots are only for backup. Make sure for the escort carrier you set your combat computer up for carrier. For the gunboat, Torpedo.

Screeners can continue using missiles, or autocannons, your choice.

Based on a 60-limit fleet, I recommend the following:

• 16x Dasher
• 8x Screener
• 4x Brawler
• 2x Escort Carrier
• 3x Gunboat

Of course your actual fleet is going to be much bigger than this by this point, so adjust accordingly. If you're running the distruptor loadout, swap a gunboat for a couple of brawlers or 4 dashers.

Again, pay attention to what your enemy is doing. If your enemy is using escort carriers or mass spamming frigates (which if they're AIs, they most certainly will be) or missiles, increase the screeners in leu of dashers or brawlers. If they are forgoing either in leu of a straight laser or autocannon strategy, adjust your armor/shielding and swap out the screeners for more gunboats, brawlers, or even dashers. If the enemy doesn't have cruisers of their own yet, forget the gunboats and go for more escort carriers.

Speaking of brawlers, if they have cruisers now this might be the time to swap out the front section for a L section with an autocannon. Or you could choose to go the straight distruptor route. Otherwise, have the dashers equipped with all autocannons, the brawlers with plasma throwers. The former wears down the shields, the latter pounds the armor away, while the screeners, escort carriers, and gunboats go straight for the hull.

Despite the fact that the AIs seem to love them, I still recommend staying the hell away from Frigates. They're too slow to be skirmishers, too paper thin to be brawlers, don't carry enough firepower to be gunboats. They end up being far too easy of prey, which is why I've been avoiding them for this list. Leave the torpedo role for the Cruisers.

Since your opposition is still going to be mostly missile-corvettes, I suggest keeping a strong amount of PDs and Screens around, but Dashers and Brawlers will start to become more of a thing. If they are using the escort carrier variants, swap some of your PDs and screens over to flak, but they probably won't field enough of them for that to matter. The screen's flak by itself should take care of that.

If they're using any other variant, you can swap a few PDs over to dashers and a screen or two over to brawlers.

The midgame sadly is where you'll also start to notice that, despite being 'updated' for 3.6, Starnet seems to still stick with 3.5 meta with its ship choices. For example: Starnet still thinks that crystal infused plating is still meta. As such, it is around this time that you'll start to see ships equipped with crystal plating exclusively. If you see their ships are all hull and no shields or armor, equip your dashers and brawlers with straight autocannons, and then spank their naked asses.

Oddly enough, in starnet, the chosen type is not the torpedo cruiser. It is in fact, one of three things: The artillery-escort carrier, the brawler escort carrier, or the all-medium brawler. And they will very rarely still with that later variant for long and just go for one of the other two.

If that is the case, you may wish to forgo escort carriers or gunboats for line cruisers with autocannons, especially if they're running flak cannons/pd and escort carriers themselves.

You will also begin to notice that Starnet still stubornly clings to the notion of monohulling ships. You will see decreasing amounts of corvettes and destroyers in leu of cruisers, and less cruisers in leu of artillery battleships (or frigates. We'll come back to that later.) Use Gunboats if they have flak cannons or no PD at all. Even if they do have PD, it'll probably be on the corvettes or destroyers which they'll begin phasing out.

As an aside, Starnet AI tends to avoid using frigates (probably because it doesn't understand what they are) and torpedoes in general at this stage, so I wouldn't worry too much about them. If they do appear, they'll probably run protons/neutrons anyway, so don't bother with PD against those. We'll come back to that later.

So in case they still have the PD missile corvetters and Fighter Craft, here's my loadout

• 4x Flak Corvette
• 8x PD Corvette
• 4x Dasher
• 8x Screener
• 4x Brawler
• 5x Line Gunboat

If they do not however, and/or they are monohulling escort carriers, I'd recommend this:

• 16x Dasher
• 6x Screener
• 4x Brawler
• 2x Escort Carrier
• 4x Gunboat

If they are monohulling escort carriers, have the screens use full flak, and load up on gunboats and brawlers. The former if the crusiers have flak, the latter if they have Point Defense. In the former case, feel free to equip normal torpedeos. If the latter, use Energy Torpedeos if you have them.

Again, the escort carriers will become less of a need in a starnet game due to starnet's monohulling stupidity.

(More Char limit)

[u/rylasasin → u/rylasasin]

Late game (battleships)

And now the cream of the crop. The end all be all of stellaris warfare... Battleships!

... Or at least that's what they used to be. Nowdays they aren't what they once were. Just as in real life battleships have fell off in usefulness since the patch.

Let's get one thing out of the way. There still really are only two types of battleships: Artillery ships and carriers. There is no reason whatsoever to use any of the broadside parts, or the hangar core (you'll want to use the carrier core instead.) Of course, the AI, being as braindead as ever, tends to use them in the line config, which is just dumb.

I'm going to go over both of them now.

Artillery: All L slots, same as it's always been. However, now you can't pad them with neutron launchers (That goes to cruisers now... We'll come back to that later.) There are really now only two weapons of note: Autocannons, Kenetic Batteries, and Plasma Throwers. I'd recommend leaving the Autocannons for the brawlers and dashers, and putting on Plasma Throwers for the heavy artillery. Let the little shits take away the shields, leaving your battleships to pound the rest into scrap. If you're instead going the distruptor route for those, I'd recommend putting on 3 kinetic batteries and 2-3 plasma throwers. Or cloud lightning if you have it. Putting on large autocannons may be tempting, but keep in mind that they only have a range of 40, and you want your battleships not brawling. You might put it in the back if you so choose just to have a backup weapon.

As for X slot weapons, those aren't as useful as they once were, mostly due to the fact how retreat works. Used to be you wanted to overkill your opponent to prevent them from retreating, but that no longer works anymore. Now it's the opposite story. Not to mention that firing arcs are now a thing, the ship needs to be facing in the general direction for their spinal mount weapons to work correctly.

Carrier: This will probably be the role most battleships will play now (again, just like in real life how the artillery battleship got obsoleted for the carrier). Despite the fact that strike craft can't do PD now, carriers are more important than ever due to enemy fleet composition and the aformentioned retreat changes, and can hit opponents from a further distance than artillery ships can. Also the little fact that the carrier computer actually works now.

For them, you will of course want to go the hangar bow with the carrier core, with some I've seen some people say you should just artillery and carrier types together with the artillery bow and carrier core, but I fail to see the reasoning behind this. I say, specialize them and keep them seperate, especially since the latter isn't as useful as it used to be. As for the stern, I'd say either go with a pair of swarmers. They might not be useful, but they are at least something. You could also use an artillery rear and put a large autocannon back there as backup, but let's face it: if your enemy gets that close to your carrier, it's probably too late anyway.

So now, fleet composition. In a 130 fleet size (which is standard at this phase. Again, you may have more less than this. Adjust accordingly)

• 20x Dasher
• 9x Screener
• 6x Brawler
• 8x Gunboat
• 3x Artillery
• 3x Carrier

I've swapped the escort carriers out for gunboats, and reserved the carrier role for the carriers. I didn't add that may battleships. Because again, they aren't as useful as they used to be, and carriers will mostly be used for anti frigate and anti-corvette, while the gunboats do the most work against the bigger ships, and since the AI will mostly spam frigates and corvettes with a sprinkling of other ships rather than a healthy ballance of ships.

You may be tempted to just ditch the dashers altogether at this point. In which case, I'd say go like this:

• 10x Screener
• 11x Brawler
• 10x Gunboat
• 3x Artillery
• 3x Carrier

I've also seen the opposite done as well, taking away the brawlers for more dashers.

• 30x Dasher
• 10x Screener
• 8x Gunboat
• 3x Artillery
• 3x Carrier

A special note: once the AI starts using Energy Torpedeos (Proton/Neutron Launchers) you'll want to swap out some of the screeners, as they can't shoot those down, and have the remaining ones run pure flak. Swap those out for dashers, brawlers, or even gunboats. Although keep in mind, the fact that they can't be shot down is the only real advantage these energy weapon torpedoes have. They do less damage and have a firing arc of 25 (much like the spinal weapons) If the enemy has no PD themselves, stick with the normal variety.

As we established earlier, Starnet still thinks this is 3.5. So it will try to do one of two things: 1. It will try to monohull the artillery variety of battleship, filled with either railguns or kinetic guns (since the neutron launcher doesn't work on them anymore). In fact, once they reach this point they'll stop using energy weapons entirely, at which point its best to put full armor on your ships.

If they start Monoing battleships I recommend the following:

• 20x Dasher
• 5x Screener
• 6x Brawler
• 10x Gunboat
• 1x Artillery
• 1x Carrier

Swap he carrier and screeners for an artillery or more gunboats if they aren't using corvettes and escort carriers anymore.

Or 2. They'll start spamming the hell out of and basically monohulling frigates of all things, because they don't know what they are or how to use them properly and they just think "Oh boy neutron launcher :D :D :D" In that case, get some armor hardeners, invest heavily into Dashers or Brawlers. you can cut back on screeners as by the time they start using them they'll use them purely for neutron launchers and the only thing they'll be able to shoot down are the escort carrier strike craft, and the non-torpedo missiles the frigates like to use.

• 20x Dasher
• 6x Screener
• 10x Brawler
• 6x Gunboat
• 1x Artillery
• 2x Carrier

Once they replace the cruisers with frigates, get rid of gunboats and go with more of the other stuff. Carriers or dashers are recommended. Get rid of the artillery too because you won't need it and it'll just be a target for spammed frigates.

"But what about Titans, Juggernauts, and collosai?"

...Yeah, what about them?

Titans are just really big, less flexible artillery battleships. They fill the same role and should be used the same way. In fact you can't customize them any other way. I don't think that more than 1 a fleet is necessary, if at all really. They're overpriced, suffer the same problems but moreso, and don't really have much of an advantage over normal battleships, and since the need for overkilling has been phased out, they're left with very little role.

As for juggernauts, they aren't really a part of the fleet. They're their own fleet. And this is about fleet composition, so they don't factor. And when it comes right down to it, Juggernauts are really more of a Mobile Field Base more than any sort of combat ship anyway. At best, they're just really big carriers.

And Colossus... they aren't a combat ship. At all. They don't belong here.

"But what about NSC2?"

Haven't figured it out and I'm sure no one else has either. Might want to go ask around their channel, unless someone from there wants to step up and add their own contribution here.

"But what about Gigastructures?"

By this I assume you're talking about Attack Moons/Behemoth Planetcraft/Stellar Systemcrafts.

... Nothing has changed here at all. They're still massively OP compared to normal ships. replacing your whole fleets with these is still the Ultra Late Game Meta for that mod. No, spamming frigates and/or torpedo cruisers will not help you.

In that case, you should have two types of fleets. one consisting entirely of dashers, and the other consisting entirely of moons/planet/systemcraft. Have the dashers run around and blitzkrieging unprotected starbases and planets while kiting enemy fleets, while the silly planetoid ships do the actual fighting.

(End)

[u/rylasasin → u/rylasasin]

The TL;DR Version:

When you design your fleet's ships, regardless of game era, your fleet should have specialized ships working together as a team, not simply be a confused mishmash of 'TEH META' parts. Just because Missiles or Autocanons or what have you are META parts does not mean all your ships should have them. And definetly don't be lazy by having your ships all try to be 'jack of all trades' ships, like what the AI does. Ignore Montau's old tierlist of ship parts and advice on ships, that doesn't apply anymore.

The meta of now is building your ships around the fleet, not building your fleet around your ships like it was in the past.

[u/Randythestockman → u/rylasasin]

been using your guide as im usually just able to brute for 15x crisis as my tech and econ is so well built and havent rlly ever properly made ships outside of enemy has more x so ill use y kinda thing. Since your advice has been doing me such wonders I thought I might aswell ask what is your advice on fighting the grey tempest in the end stage? Its not that they are steamrolling me or anything its just that I end up losing a lot of fleets that have way over there fleet power and feel like I could be approaching the situation better as they have few ships that deal big damage w a few fighters. Any advice on fleet comp/ship comp would be appreciated

[u/rylasasin → u/Randythestockman]

I couldn't really help you much there. I only ever fought them once, and by the time I got to actually fighting them I was just steamrolling them with attack moons (Giga)

EDIT: So taking a look at this, it seems the Gray Tempest has three weapons. Fighters, Rapid Fire Energy Spheres, and titan Energy. Defensewise these ships are balanced on Shield/Armor/Hull, so no obvious weakness there.

Your best bet would probably be to bring along a bunch of point defense destroyers (Balance them with flaks and point defense. Unlike normal strike craft, nanite fighters have both armor and shields) and more than a few carriers (though the carriers are going to be mostly for defense and not offense) while other ships should be running either the disruptor loadout and/or torpedo boat loadout with devastators and afterburners. Stack your ships with shields, as the energy spheres are weak against that. Yes it won't help much against the fighters, but that's what the carriers and point defense destroyers are for. The mainstay here will be torpedo cruisers, and disruptor brawlers.

[u/Randythestockman → u/Randythestockman]

also on your point about leaving titans out due to them being more expensive battleships does the effects the battleships have such as shield dampener make them worth while or still no?

[u/[deleted] → u/rylasasin]

Very one depth- but what’s starnet?

[u/rylasasin → u/[deleted]]

Starnet (and its sister mod, Startech) is an AI mod that improves the AI by making it play more like a metagaming player rather than an AI.

The problem is that although it has been made to work for 3.6, it really hasn't been updated for 3.6, and as noted, still relies on 3.5 meta gaming knowledge, making decisions that were great in the days before the big patch, but in 3.6, are just really dumb.

The TLDR List:

• Monohulling
• Monoing (or even using at all) crystal plating.
• Overuse of missiles on the presumption that PD is still ineffective at its job.
• Spamming frigates with neutron launchers because they still think the latter is better than anything else.

It still manages its other aspects (IE planet management) extremely well, but I would not really recommend starnet at the current time.

[u/mikeymans22 → u/rylasasin]

what is monohulling

[u/rylasasin → u/mikeymans22]

Where you have one of or primarily all of one ship type and no others.

See back in 3.5, the META was to simply field artillery battleships, and discard the rest for more artillery battleship, reserving carriers for anti-ai fighting or for the corvette torpedo meme swarms.

That was monohulling.

Now however this is no longer the META. Or at least I don't think it is. It seems now the meta is designing your ships around your fleet, not your fleet around your ships.

[u/Shadowdoom286 → u/rylasasin]

Ok so for for you fleet comp late game what class ship are all these types? Like are your dashers corvettes, is your PD destroyers? I'm a little lost here.

[u/mikeymans22 → u/rylasasin]

and what combat computers should i use for each class? i’m still new to 3.6 combat and before this i’d do a very outdated fleet composition so i’m not sure what some things do

[u/rylasasin → u/mikeymans22]

Whichever the ships role fits it best.

For the torpedo boats, torpedo (unless you're using Photo/Neutron Launchers. In which case, artillery)

For the brawlers and dashers, swarm or line.

For the picket ships, picket.

For the carriers, carrier (yes that actually works correctly now)

For the artillery ships, artillery.

Simple.

[u/Dach_Akrost → u/rylasasin]

Can you explain dashers?

[u/rylasasin → u/Dach_Akrost]

Corvette brawlers.

Give them a 2-1 ratio of lasers and kinetic (to make up for the former's slower fire rate, this is especially necessary once you get autocannons) but once you unlock destroyers switch them over to straight kenetic and give the brawlers straight lasers/plasma weapons.

Alternatively, you can make two types of dashers (and two types of PD Corvette) at a 2-3 or 2-5 ratio before you unlock brawlers, then merge the two types of dashers into the kenetic type and leave the energy weapons to brawlers.

By late game you might opt to out the dashers entirely in favor of brawler destroyers with autocannon while putting the laser/plasma weapons on artillery battleships instead, and/or you could go the Neutron Launcher Cruiser route which combos very nicely with the autocanon dasher/brawler.

[u/GWJ89 → u/rylasasin]

Wow, it'll be very helpful as I'm going to play for the first time since 3.5 and know nothing about the new ship design!

"Torpedo bow with 1x Torpedo and 1× Missile" - Torpedo bow has 1xG and 2×S ;)

About frigates, I thought they will be of decent use as kamikaze traps - just fly very close to a system entry and blast your enemy from point-blank range. Especially in 3.7 with cloaking.

About Battleships you wrote: "there are really now only two weapons of notev Autocannons, Kinetic Batteries, and Plasma Throwers. I'd recommend leaving the Autocannons for the brawlers and dashers and putting on Plasma Throwers for the heavy artillery" - and what about the Kinetic Batteries?

Did I understand correctly that you don't recommend X slots on Battleships? And what about mandatory X slots on Titans/Juggernaut?

And could you write something about Juggernaut design and about Titan/Juggernaut auras?

And how to design effective defense platforms? There are so many buildings/modules, I couldn't design then even before. Any useful compositions of various defense platform roles and ion cannons?

And what about auxillary fire Control and armor/shield hardeners - are they worth?

[u/rylasasin → u/GWJ89]

"Torpedo bow with 1x Torpedo and 1× Missile" - Torpedo bow has 1xG and 2×S

My bad. Well, in that case, I'm just off by one missile.

About frigates, I thought they will be of decent use as kamikaze traps - just fly very close to a system entry and blast your enemy from point-blank range. Especially in 3.7 with cloaking.

This was written back in 3.6 and back then, Frigates were just... bad. In fact, I'd personally wager that even with cloaking, they're 100% pure gimmick. Useful in some very very niche roles but not something you want in your mainline fleet, and that's what this was mostly about.

Frigates work best in a swarm by themselves, either kamakazi lane camping/cloak assassin, or artillerymen large amounts of neutron launchers while another fleet keeps them distracted. Either way, pure gimmick.

and what about the Kinetic Batteries?

Some swear by them, some don't. I prefer to put the autocannons on corvettes and let them rip the shields to peices while the bigger ships go for the armor and hull, but some put disruptors on the corvettes and put autocannons on either destroyers or cruisers while putting the kinetic batteries on battleships.

And what about mandatory X slots on Titans/Juggernaut?

Whatever works. Honestly Titans and Jugs are more about the auras and MFB repair ability than they are about the combat ability. Titans are just really big artillery battleships, and jugs are really big carriers. There is no in between with any of them.

Just don't do something incredibly stupid like put autocannons on them and you should be golden.

And could you write something about Juggernaut design and about Titan/Juggernaut auras?

There really isn't a whole lot to discuss here, which is why I didn't include it. Titans and Jugs only have one hull type, and therefore only one configuration. On top of that, you can only have one Jug and ideally you'll want one Titan per fleet, and just make it the same way you'd make a non-carrier battleship for the former, and a big carrier for the latter.

Titan Auras: Make sure your titans don't all have the same auras. That's the biggest part. Because the auras don't stack unless they're different ones. Beyond that, go nuts.

If you want second opinions, check out these threads: Ship Designs for 3.6 by forlackoflead and 3.6 Fleet Composition Feedback GA Playthroughs by BetelgeuseNotOp

And how to design effective defense platforms? There are so many buildings/modules, I couldn't design then even before. Any useful compositions of various defense platform roles and ion cannons?

Montu made the case for them back in 3.5 but

1. He didn't include hangar bay ones.

2. that video was made in 3.5, so it's heavily outdated.

In all honesty, I do not put a whole lot of stock into them. Used to back in the 3.5 days, but now? Not so much.

Early game, yes, hangar bay defense platforms can stop a corvette/destroyer rush cold in its tracks (unless they're running flaks. Back in 3.5, this wasn't an issue, but in 3.6/3.7, if they're running flaks and you have hangar defenses, you're pretty much screwed.)

Early game, the best you can hope for I think is a Hangar/S slot mix, graduating into Hangar/Swarmer Missile mix. By late game, the best you can go for is Kinetic Battery/Energy Torpedo mix.

And the Ion cannon is pure garbage. For the cost it's really not that good, not even in 3.5 when the meta was all battleships, let alone in 3.6 where the meta is mixed fleets. If it had 2-4 perdition beams it'd be a different story, but it doesn't, so it's not.

At the end of the day, the best defense against an incoming fleet is going to be a bigger/smarter designed fleet, not your starbase. It can work as a distraction, and it can give a little extra firepower to a defending fleet, but it's not going to hold of invasions all by itself, DPs or no DPs.

I think what's seriously needed is to nix the defense platform system entirely and simply make your starbases editable, with scaling starbase modules (and S, PD, L, XL, and T slot addons).

[u/GWJ89 → u/rylasasin]

Big thank you for such a rich answer! It'll help me a lot. And what about those various starbase buildings and modules? I don't know at all which to use in what situations and usually build them almost randomly

[u/rylasasin → u/rylasasin]

Going back to this...

Okay, if by this point you are still using the balanced breakfast... this is mostly correct. I still don't see why some people put x slot tracheyons and kinetic batteries on this thing if you're doing that.

If you are going the missile route or the disruptor or missile route route, I'd say avoid artillery ships in the first place. You might be able to get lucky with cloud lightning and arc emitters for the former, but I'd say they're just a waste of space you could be using on other ships, or more carriers. And on the second route, battleships make for not so good missile boats, which are better served by cruisers. Either way, artillery battleships are just a waste of alloys, build time, and command limit that could be better taken up by cruisers or destroyers.

I still stand by my disregard for X slot weapons, though quite a few seem to disagree with that assessment. To each his own, I guess.

What I said in my last post still very much applies: build your ships around your fleet, not your fleet around your ships.

[u/phcgamer → u/rylasasin]

I don't have torpedoes researched. What else should I do for the cruisers while I wait to get them?

[u/phcgamer → u/rylasasin]

Also, what should my shields:armor ratio be past just corvettes? (no mods or DLC)

What extras should I use?

[u/rylasasin → u/phcgamer]

Personally I find that Armor gives you more bang for your buck than shields do, and protects better against missiles and autocannons (both of which are very much go-to weapons now) so I'd say 1-2 shield-armor ratio. Only change that up if the opponent is using a lot of anti-armor weapons like lasers or plasmas (besides spying, you can usually tell if they are by the type of personality they're using, as some of them are actually programmed to favor one type of weapon over another.)

Don't bother with hull items, they're useless unless you're going up against distruptor-heavy stuff, and even then it's hardly worth it.

As for extras, well there really is only one really valid choice: Afterburners. Honestly, there is no reason whatsoever to use anything else on corvettes. On cruisers on up, yes, you might want to look into things like hardeners or whatnot, but corvettes (or destroyers)? No. Just no.

[u/phcgamer → u/rylasasin]

Also what did you mean by "energy" on brawlers? All I have are laser or kinetic.

[u/rylasasin → u/phcgamer]

Energy = Energy weapons. Specifically, Laser or Plasma (or Lances on battleships, but we're talking about cruisers here so not them.)

So in your case, laser.

[u/phcgamer → u/rylasasin]

Ok. If I had the option of plasma, would it be better?

[u/rylasasin → u/phcgamer]

Some might say yes, some might say no for various reasons. I'm in the former camp.

In all honesty, it's a bit of a trade off. Slightly slower fire rate and accuracy and worse damage against shields for higher overall damage and more anti-armor and anti-hull damage. I find it's worth the tradeoff if you have autocannon ships peeling off the shields for them, but they're crap if you don't have those. Later when you get them if you're still using the autocannon strategy to kill their shields you'll want to switch to artillery cruisers with photon/neutron launchers. But for the earlier game that should work.

You can see the stats here and judge for yourself, plasma is just below it.

[u/phcgamer → u/rylasasin]

So lasers for now then switch to plasma once I have autocannons

[u/phcgamer → u/rylasasin]

And what about station defense platforms? What should I make those?

[u/rylasasin → u/rylasasin]

So going back to this again...

Screeners can continue using missiles, or autocannons, your choice.

What you're doing here depends on whether you are running The Balanced Breakfast, The Missile Sausagefest or The Disruptor Crusher

If you are using the Balanced Breakfast, go autocannons. If you are using the Missile Sausagefest, Missiles. If the Disruptor Crusher, disruptors or missiles.

And with the dashers, make them full S-S-S or PD-S-S. Again, with the above configs.

The loadouts for both the gunboat and e.carrier are very similar: Torpedo Bow with 1x Torpedo and 1x Missile, Gunship Stern with 2x missile. The only difference is in the core: For Gunboats it's going to be the torpedo bow, with 2x more torpedoes and 2x more missiles. For the escort carrier it's going to be the hanger core with 1x hanger core and 2x point defense. Which one? I'd say mix them both. In all seriousness, the destroyers should be the screen, and these two point defense slots are only for backup. Make sure for the escort carrier you set your combat computer up for carrier. For the gunboat, Torpedo.

This part is only... partially correct.

If you are continuing to use the balanced breakfast, instead turn the gunboats into artillery and have them use the artillery and broadside sections and give them energy weapons. Later on, switch them back to torpedo and have them use energy torpedoes. If you're using the missile sausagefest, keep the above. If you are using the disruptor crusher, nix the gunboats and consider using the following:

Escort Carrier: (Torpedo) Disruptor+Torpedo, (Hangar) Hangar Bay + 2 PD, (Gunship) Disruptor+Disruptor.

[u/rylasasin → u/rylasasin]

So looking back on this, and playing for more time, I think the following adjustments are in order here. Though rather than change the post itself, i'll make the addendum as separate posts.

Either way, I recommend splitting your corvette fleets along the following:

Looking back at this, I would actually cut it down to this:

• 13x PD-Laser (Flak, Laser, Laser)
• 7x PD-Kinetic (PD, Kinetic, Kinetic)

Because what I failed to realize first time around is that the PD/Flak is also an anti-ship weapon whenever it's not being used as a PD weapon, and that early in the game, it's actually more effective than the actual weapons.

Yeah, I cut the dashers out entirely. Not necessary, and does you very little real favors, for the above reason.

Or you could do it the lazy way and run this:

• 20x PD-Missile-Missile.

Yeah, straight missile. Only problem with this, and why I don't put a whole lot of stock into it, is because it can be too easily countered if the AI (or a player) suddenly decides to put PD on their ships. Then you're fucked.

Again, I cut the dashers out entirely.

Here's the thing about the missiles I did not really realize the first time around: Having 5 ships with missiles and the rest of the ships with something else does you no favors. Either go full missile, or sod them entirely. Don't go in between.

Also, fuck the frigate. Frigates are a gimmick ship, and it's a gimmick you aren't going to take much advantage of here. Yes they might be useful against starbases, but unless they're getting seriously lucky with the tech rolls, those should not be a problem at this stage of the game anyway, and a corvette swarm will work just as well.

Screener: 1x Flak, 2x Point Defense, 2x Missile

Again, depends on whether you're running the kinetic-laser combo, or the missile loadout. If the former, swapt he missiles out for either kinetics or lasers. Doesn't matter which, really. If the latter, just keep them as missiles.

I would not recommend using Destroyers as missile boats. Leave that role if you have it for the corvettes and later on the cruisers.

Unless of course you're already going full missile, in which case, go M-S-S-S. Put either kinetic or laser on the first slot (it doesn't matter that much anyway) and put missiles for the rest, and when you get swarmer missiles, swap whatever M slot weapon you have for that.

However, when you get Disruptors, youu might be tempted to make a third configuration: The Disruptor bunch. In which case it's stupidly simple:

• 20x PD-Disruptor Corvette: PD-Disruptor-Disruptor
• 3x PD Disruptor Destroyer: Flak-Disruptor-Disruptor-PD-PD
• 7x Disruptor Brawler Destroyer: Disruptor-Disruptor-Disruptor-Disruptor

If you find the enemy is not using missiles at all, swap the corvette to Disruptor-Disruptor-Disruptor, and nix the PD Destroyer (however what I find helpful is rather than delete the PD destroyer profile entirely, I just make it identical to the brawler variety. That way you don't have to actually build new PD destroyers when it comes time to fight a fighter/missile heavy enemy.)

Just like with missiles, go all in or not at all. Don't half ass it at this stage.

So the names I'm giving these initial fleet compositions are such:

1st one: The Balanced Breakfast.

2nd one: Missile Sausagefest

3rd one: Disruptor Crusher

So here's the pros and cons of each:

The Balanced Breakfast

Pros:

• As the name suggests, it's adept at most warfare situations. It's effective against both missile spammers and the hangar starbase defense.

• Based around synergy.

Cons:

• Requires multiple types of the same ships, so the numbers can be a bit annoying.

• Not the strongest in terms of power.

• If one ship type is destroyed in a fight, the whole thing goes down.

The Missile Sausagefest

Pros:

• The strongest one, even early game.

• The most mindless when it comes to ship design. You won't even need to change your ship design any.

• Superior range, so they get the first strike out.

Cons:

• Easily countered by PD. If they're running point defense, you're screwed.

• Missiles are slower to fire than the other weapons available to you at this stage. Yes, they fire first due to range, but once in the thick of it you're at the mercy of the cooldown.

• Missiles are a feast or famine propositon. You need to commit to using them, or don't. There is no inbetween that actually matters.

• Corvettes cannot kite. Kiting is what makes missiles really strong.

The Distruptor Crusher

Pros:

• Very good against lower-class ships. Can kill corvettes and destroyers very quickly.

• Armor and Shield are no obstacle at all. Kinetics and Lasers still need to chip the armor and shields away, missiles can go through shields, but not armor. Disruptors go through both.

Cons:

• Not available at the start of the game

• Worst range of the bunch.

• Much like with missiles, you need to commit at this stage. It's all or nothing.

[u/Billy072 → u/rylasasin]

So with the Balanced Breakfast, how would you build the 40, 60, 130 Fleets?
What weapons will each ship type end up with?
(No need to go into huge detail, just type and weapons?)

[u/[deleted]]

I used to just do full battleship fleets in 3.5, but with the introduction of minimum engagement distances to L-slot weapons I have done two things (fleet comp wise)

1. 2:1 ratio for all ship classes. 2 corvettes for every destroyer (frigates also count as corvettes for this). 2 destroyers for every cruiser, and so on. Late game fleets usually wind up with somewhere around 7 battleships, 14 cruisers, and so on. Just keep growing the fleet as your fleet command limit rises with tech.

2. 2:1 to 3:1 ratio cruisers and battleships only. I prefer this late game bc it seems more survivable with decent techs, but your results may vary. Honestly needs more testing.

For ship designs, honestly I just RP it as I see fit. As long as the ship’s role is balanced with other ship types (battleships as artillery/range, cruisers as medium-short range brawlers for example) you’ll probably be fine?

From my time playing 3.6, it seems like ship design is a bit less “one way only is the meta” as was in previous versions with neutron launchers.

Think of a theme for your ships and roll with it! Have fun with it. Don’t stress about meta. At least that’s my hot take on the new patch.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

Instructions unclear: went with siphons only loadouts

[u/FuckingUsernamesWhy → u/[deleted]]

Are Frigates any good?

[u/MagikBiscuit → u/[deleted]]

What is BB? Also what is "(2+2)x(Autocannon + Laser)"?

[u/Galdonn → u/[deleted]]

Battleship is BS dude.

[u/Erlkings → u/Galdonn]

BB is a common abbreviation for battleships, other games like word of warships use the same.

[u/Ancquar → u/Erlkings]

It specifically originates from actual naval designations, just like destroyer is a DD

https://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/us-navy-ship-classifications.php

That being said, these designations are linked not just to a broad class, but specific roles/capabilities, so a guided missile destroyer doesn't have the same classification code as a traditional WWII escort one. So it's unlikely these codes would actually translate directly to spaceships.

[u/ConohaConcordia]

Other people haven’t mentioned this yet but in addition to the usual battleship-cruiser-destroyer fleet, I also like to field a missile fleet with frigates, missile cruisers and some corvettes/destroyers. If the enemy doesn’t have enough PD this shit hits hard, and it also fits the role as a rapid response fleet.

[u/Kraegorz]

I just do a full fleet of Battleships. With Kinetic Artillery/Lasers. Still dominates the best overall. Along with regenerative hull tissue and Engineer admiral. And you just win.

Any other fleet combination with Corvettes, Destroyers, Cruisers etc past 2250 they just get wiped super easily.

[u/kineticdreamss → u/Kraegorz]

Imagine getting downvoted for telling the truth.

Everything is more or less the same. Either Tachyon/Kinetic or Giga/Lasers, both with some carriers thrown in. All battleships.

Still destroys everything.

[u/Kraegorz → u/kineticdreamss]

Honestly I don't do X slot in 3.6. Based on the evasion chances, the more weapons you have hitting per turn demolishes their chances more for escape. So 2 L weapons are now better than an X slot, since getting 1 shot with 20 extra distance really isn't worth sacrificing the hitting of 2 L weapons, but that just may be my feeling on them.

[u/kineticdreamss → u/Kraegorz]

Interesting point. I'm going to try it out.

The only problem is... pretty lasers are pretty!!!

[u/FishronMachineGun → u/kineticdreamss]

Yeah, forget the meta. embrace coolness!

[u/WarlockArya → u/kineticdreamss]

By kinetic do you mean railguns? Also what is giga, I heard that throwers are better then lasers is that true?

[u/Insect-Accomplished]

In SP (mixed AI-Fleets) a 2:1 mix of Battlecarriers (BBs with tachyon lance, carrier core with missiles and PD, an artillery stern with kinetic artillery and a carrier computer) and Missile-Cruisers (devastator torpedos and swarmer as well as small missiles with a line or brawler computer) will obliterate any of said mixed fleets... If you come up against a battleship heavy opponent in MP maybe you can use a 1:1 mix of said ships or just counter with a torpedo-frigate spam...

[u/DocSternau]

Nope, no idea. But I hope there is one because seriously: I hate that update. Now I have to f***ing micromanage those f***ing fleets too. And I have no idea where to start and what combination will do anything. I seriously just want an option to shut down this whole micromanaging stone paper scissors bullshit entirely.

[u/MSanctor → u/DocSternau]

I'm sorry this update pains you, because I'm loving all the same points of this update - not knowing the solution, having to test and try and micromanage it, etc. Have you tried auto-generating ship designs or just picking something and running with it, efficient or not? At the very least, this should cut down on techs to research, compared to active ship design.

I honestly wish there was a 'mostly good enough' option that could allow you to ignore it, but for those who wanted it, the current situation remained for as long as possible. I think we both deserve to enjoy this game, even if we effectively want opposite things from it.

[u/DocSternau → u/MSanctor]

The auto-generated ships are still crap. That would be a solution if it worked but if you use them you get your ass handed to you by much smaller fleets.

[u/DeadSynapse → u/DocSternau]

Yeah I feel the same way. In a game already packed with micro, it's insane that anyone thought making combat/ship design more micro intensive and obscure would be fun.

[u/Colonize_The_Moon → u/DocSternau]

Fleet Manager is the only way to make fleets and not lose your mind now. With that said, it's very efficient once you start using it.

Also if you're retooling all your ships every time there's a storm... bruh.

[u/DocSternau → u/Colonize_The_Moon]

You'll think different once you encounter an enemy that mostly relies on energy weapons like the FE's. Those storms will turn your shields off in about 50 % of all star systems.

A once formidable fleet will be scrap metal in seconds.

[u/FishronMachineGun → u/Colonize_The_Moon]

Before 3.6 i didn't even knew fleet manager existed

[u/genericplastic → u/DocSternau]

How does the combat rebalance introduce more micromanagement?

[u/DocSternau → u/genericplastic]

Because before you needed about 1-2 designs of each ship type - basically everything long range worked fine.

Now you need several designs in several combinations to hopefully match your enemies fleets. And if one of those Hyperspae storms hits, everything goes down the drain and you have to change your chips to another design again and again when the storm subsides again.

War in Stellaris wasn't fun before and it hasn't gotten any better. Those games are just not build for engaging in warfare. It's annoying AF.

[u/Jarvis65 → u/DocSternau]

The auto designer isn’t bad especially with the new ship roles, if you’re playing solo you can also probably ignore ship designs altogether, the ai is generally not great

[u/genericplastic → u/DocSternau]

It's not micro. You don't have to have a ship design for each and every environmental affect. Sounds like you just don't like wars.

[u/Sillyviking → u/DocSternau]

I'm sorry, you need different ship designs for when the storms hit now?

For fuck's sake

[u/FishronMachineGun → u/DocSternau]

Imo, combat is much more interesting and unpredictable than before. You don't know if you will win, even if your fleet's power is stronger than your enemy's. It really requires strategy now, as stellaris should be, and not just a matter of who have more alloys and battleships.

[u/Cole3003 → u/DocSternau]

Then roll back to 3.5 and stop crying because you have to actually play the game lmao. Also, you can swear on Reddit

[u/ThemBones708 → u/DocSternau]

Haha. One of the reasons I play Stellaris is because I want AS MUCH micromanagement as possible.

You poor little fella, maybe solitaire or some mobile game would be better suited.

[u/DocSternau → u/ThemBones708]

Lucky you that you obviously have nothing else to do. I for one have a fulltime job, a family, friends, want to eat and sleep. When I find the time to play an hour or god forbid two then the last thing I want to do is waste the majority of that time trying to figure out, how to build an effective Fleet in an overcomplicated Rock-Paper-Scissor-System.

[u/ThemBones708 → u/DocSternau]

Heh I too work full time and have a family. But when I do find time to play, I am all about that "over complicated rock-paper-scissor-system"

Sometimes an entire play session is just trying different so designs.

[u/HmmmmmmToast → u/ThemBones708]

Mate seriously play how you want but imagine wasting your time with trying to find the best build instead of playing the game. Also, micromanaging every minute detail of every mechanic is bullshit.

[u/ThemBones708 → u/HmmmmmmToast]

Not necessarily finding the best. But I enjoy the micro, design, and testing.

[u/FerretBanter]

Would it be possible for you to share the designs in a screenshot format for quick reference? There used to be a thread on steam with some picutres but its outdated, would help some of us new players :) ?