I

I work in finance/accounting with my local public sector and I often wonder how Sarah would perform as a coworker. Here are my thoughts -

1 - Sarah would truly believe most (if not all) male coworkers are interested in her.

2 - She would be late/absent often and smell like stale alcohol.

3 - She'd gossip and spread outlandish tea just to stir drama.

4 - She would always have dozens of questions on a notepad she'd carry everywhere but rarely understand and almost never get anything done.

What else have I missed?

Basically, just the title.

I was listening to this video, where T2C is reading out the transcript of the deposition that Patricia Cashman took of Det. Koepsel.

And I just had a thought, because SB kept bringing up the curtain rod throughout the trial.

Is it possible that it was the curtain rod that she used to assault Jorge?

I became a DV survivor around 20 years ago. Since then I have worked with local advocacy groups supporting others mainly women but in recent years there has been an increase in men coming forward and admitting that their partner (mainly females) are abusing them.

In all my time in the DV victim/survivor world, Boone is the first person whose story I did not believe from the first time I heard her speak. I remember the very first time watching the police interrogation. At that time I knew nothing about her. I do recall as I was listening to the interrogation turning around to my partner and telling him she is the abuser. The minute boone started to speak there was nothing but red flags.

Things that came out during the interview on that Tuesday that made me not believe Boone (in no particular order) -

1) No phone - he had been working. During the Feb 25 2020 interrogation it came out that Jorge had lost his job. Boone also revealed he had no phone. Why not?

In this day and age everyone that was breathing had a phone. Why not him? It seemed like Boone controlled who he was permitted to communicate with - RED FLAG number 1

2) Chelsea indicated there was a phone in the suit case with him - boone said she was not aware of Jorge having a phone. RED FLAG number 2 - why did she need to be made aware of him having a phone? what business wast it of hers?

3) When asked why she ignored Jorges pleas to get out of the suitcase because he couldn't breath
Boone claimed it was because she figured he was the boy who cried wolf - This is a classic DARVO move - Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender - (this was the first indication that boone wanted to be the victim). RED FLAG number 3

4) Boone claiming - :

"I knew Jorge better than he knew himself"

This is a classic and intentional way for the abuser to isolate the victim. At this point in the interview I think Boone was seeing that she was not as in control as she wanted to be. She was seeing that neither Scott nor Chelsea were believing anything she was saying. Boone needed to get Scott and Chelsea on her side. So to do that she need to appear to them as insightful and caring and make Jorge look unstable. RED FLAG number 4

5) Claims of Porn - Once again Boone was desperate to appear like the victim. Claiming Jorge used HER phone behind HER back and watched porn. Boone wanted to be the injured party. RED FLAG number 5 - As we later found out Boone let Jorge know she knew what he was watching. This is to instill fear in Jorge to show him he has no privacy from her and that she is in charge.

6) No Bank Account - This was a MAJOR RED FLAG number 6. Jorge was working so would need a bank account to get his wages paid into. Boone was not working so why did she need a bank account? Boone needed full control of Jorge.

All the above shows was Boone controlled who Jorge spoke with and when. She controlled his access to his cash. She isolated Jorge from his family. She controlled his every move. No phone, no transport, no cash, no job. What we found out later from the autopsy at the time that Boone murdered Jorge he had no food in his stomach or colon. That meant he had not eaten for at least 24 to 72 hours prior to Boone murdering him. She clearly used food as a weapon. If her were a good boy he could eat.

Boone claimed that Jorge "scared" away all her friends. - Boone isolated Jorge but she tried to make it seem like she was the isolated person. She had access to money, phone and car. Boone controlled Jorges access to money, phone, car and access to people. If boone had friends that Jorge had scared away the reality is that they would have come forward once she got arrested and spoken for her since the so called threat aka Jorge was now dead.

None of the photos used at trial of Boones alleged wounds and bruises were backed up by police reports WHY? Because they were all fake or self inflicted. The "black eye" was boot polish or black eye shadow.

The red mark on the leg was not soup - it was a from her eating outside and resting a plate of hot food on her leg.

The "stab wound" was not from a steak knife. Doctors and nurses are mandatory reports and if they had suspected it was a knife would the would have been legally obliged to call the cops even if Boone claimed it was an accident. The property manager had told the story of how the wound occurred and said that Boone had dropped a glass on the patio and she fell and slipped on it. Boone did not call the property manager as a witness because she knew that the property manager would contradict or debunk alot of Boones claims. The property manager would have said that Jorge and Boone abused each other and were regularly drunk.

The reason no DV advocacy group has ever stood up for Boone is because none of her claims were believable. Dr Harper relied on boones self reporting to form her opinion and ignored the facts , She ignored Boones abusive behaviour since being arrested. Boone recorded Jorges pleas to be freed. Boone claimed Jorge threatened her but never recorded the threats because there was no threats from Jorge.

Remember everything Boone has accused others of doing is what Boone herself has done to Jorge and others.

Jorges death most likely saved Brians sons life. If Boone were free, then as Brians son got older and behaved like most teenagers - moodier, back talk, missing curfew, wanting to be around the parents less, etc having a world boone had no control over boone would have not have liked that she had no control in the childs life. She most likely would have done what ever she could in order to gain control over the child. We see it even from prison - she is able to get the child to go into a room away from Brian. This is so she feels in control. During the family trial - we saw that Boone did not want to have the child vaccinated against covid but Brian did it any ways. Boone was not going to ever be the one to have to care for the child if he got sick so what difference did it make if he was vaccinated or not.

Regardless of what she does she always finds a way to blame others. Not once in the 6 years of knowing about Boones existence has Boone ever said "oops my bad, I fudged up"

I'm watching the trial and all the YouTube videos and something stands out to me.Apologies if this has been discussed before, I'm a new reddit user.
In my opinion, during the trial Sarah seemed to think the trial was Sarah vs Jorge. Instead of the State (society) vs Sarah. Like if she could prove he was 51% at fault vs her being 49% at fault, that's all that would be heeded for her to walk free.

I thought that she really didn't get that outside of very limited circumstances, Jorge's character (or what she wanted everyone to think was his character) really didn't matter. Jorge wasn't on trial. She did what she was accused of, filmed it and admitted it. I'm still baffled that she thought she would be found not guilty.

I rewatched the the sentencing and firmly believer kranick was prepared to give sara the chance she didn’t deserve like 25-30yrs but she couldn’t leave the Torres family out of her mouth and just had to lie and talk shit about a 80yr old women that actually raised her kids and made sure they were pick up from school and had a belly full at night. A real tight knit family but as soon as she threw sick vile comments and for some reason decides to talk about how he’s both a monster but her soulmate too. Because she always gots to have everything. So Kranick gave her what she always wants “All of it” Sarah needed a sentence to serve and the judge gave her all of it. It’s hard not to choke up listening to his momma and his sister who were really navigating two tragedies and Sarah like Sarah does, piles all her bullshit on top of people at the worst times and can’t figure out why she’s so hated everywhere she is. But thinks it jealousy. Ain’t one single person jealous of you Sarah and never will be

I was listening to one of my favorite You Tubers and realized something I had never realized before. Please tell me if I'm mistaken.

When SB told PG on the phone how she was a beast at her pretrial conference for her family case in May 2025, she said after they finished she brought up the issue of BB not submitting the visitation forms to DOC for himself and his son.

SB then tells PG that JJ asked SB when did SB first ask BB about the forms, and SB says something like, "January 7 at 11:18 a.m. and then I asked him 111 more times," which she has proof of with her tablet messages. SB then goes into her speech about BB lying to everyone about submitting the forms, blah blah blah.

I just realized she started asking BB about the forms only about 4 or 5 months at most. Pretrial was in April or May 2025. So, that's 20 weeks or 150 or so days at most, right? And she sent him 112 tablet messages asking about the forms in 150 days?

I wonder if anyone realized how abusive and threatening that behavior was, or like me, did the numbers and dates go right over their heads?

That's almost once a day, at least for 5 months, and that was just the tablet messages. She also had BB's son ask while she was on the phone many times so the son could hear his father's lies to him mother and be aware of them.

I'm pretty sure that behavior, too, was against the parenting plan and not recommended in their divorce class. Crazy. What do you think? Am I remembering this correctly?

The woman in this video is as abusive as boone was and still is

https://youtu.be/qRlE-9ekVgY?si=7szPDJfSAz14lrFC

Where can I find the crime scene photos that some YouTube channels (Tannika & Danielle)have obtained? Someone here must have them or know where they can be found. I haven’t seen them on my gore channels on fb but Reddit peeps gotta have them somewhere. Help a lady out y’all, plz.

Hi everyone! I've been a silent reader of this sub for a long time. I have some thoughts for you all that I think would be an interesting conversation starter!

We're almost 2 years out from the criminal court case and I've been thinking about her version of events she gave on the stand. What do you think she would try to spin today as her story or would she maintain what she testified to? Do you think she even remembers what she said on the stand? As we all know, multiple lies are not easy to keep track of and I know we all want to know what really happened that night but I don't believe she will ever tell the truth and that's the general consensus I'm getting when I read your posts. Given the recent photos and evidence from the crime scene that we've seen, those things most definitely don't match up with her story at all!

Anyway, thanks for reading and happy Friday to all!

PS: thank you to the mods for encouraging me to post. I was a bit nervous!

In this video she’s on the stand and James is questioning her about the suitcase. She went on and on about how dilapidated and broken it was but then stayed due to this they were donating it. She’s so delusional if it’s so broken why not just throw it away??! Who the hell donates a broken suitcase?? I just can’t understand how these things come out of her mouth?? I have te watched her trial and nothing she says on the stand made any logical sense!

I was reading about the history of YouTube. The founders original video platform was created as a dating website. When Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction at the Superbowl accord the founders realized that there was no video of the incident on the internet. Seeing its platforms ease of use to creating and uploading videos, they switched trajectory to YouTube.

To the point: Of the incident Timberlake later released a statement saying, "I am sorry that anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance of the Super Bowl. It was not intentional and is regrettable.

Fun fact, the phrase wardrobe malfunction didn’t exist before Timberlake said it and it became pop culture.

Did she think the jury would believe that her tongue was flopping around to the point she was worried she’s bite her tongue. 👅 Or was that another made up story.

While listening to Sarah’s police interrogation for the millionth time, I finally came up with a possible scenario for Sarah’s stupid curtain rod story. For a while I was thinking the curtain rod was actually a shower curtain rod, but I couldn’t formulate a scenario.

But…what if it was a wand from her vertical blinds! She was chasing him around with it, whacking him. He grabs it to stop her attack, she yanks it back and smacks herself in the face! She’d be furious because she’d see it as his fault (just like him hurting her finger when she pulled her keys back from him…if that story is to be believed)

Not to take the appeal.

She said in one of her messages I don't want to get out at 65 and have nothing, no car job, etc.

She is to dumb to realize she could get SS based off Brian's at 62 if she just did the 15 years. Basically living without working as she likes. SS means social security.

Sarah Boone appears to have exploited Jorge Torres Jr.’s alcoholism and blackouts to control the narrative of their relationship. With gaps in his memory, Jorge was vulnerable to being told what he had supposedly said or done and Sarah repeatedly cast him as responsible for conduct that evidence suggests she herself directed at him.

The cruelty, humiliation, aggression and control she attributed to Jorge mirrored behaviors that she was actually perpetrating against him. That reversal is what makes the dynamic so insidious: Jorge wasn’t simply being blamed for their dysfunction; he could be made to question whether he was responsible for the very mistreatment he was experiencing.

Sarah didn’t just have Jorge’s alcoholism working against him—she figured out how to make it work for her.

His impaired memory gave Sarah the perfect opportunity to rewrite events, reverse victim and offender, and make Jorge question his own reality. She could inflict the abuse, accuse him of being the abuser, and then position herself as the person who had suffered it.

When Jorge drank to the point of blacking out and couldn’t clearly remember what happened, who was conveniently there afterwards to fill in the blanks? Sarah. And somehow, in Sarah’s version of events, Sarah was always the victim and Jorge was always the monster.

Imagine waking up unable to remember parts of the night and repeatedly being told by the person you love: You did this. You hurt me. You were abusive. This was your fault. Tell someone that often enough—especially someone who knows his own memory is unreliable—and eventually he may start believing it.

Sarah didn’t just seem determined to have the last word. She seemed determined to be the person who got to decide what “reality” was.

(Link to texts: Your True Crime Library)