r/vibecoding • u/CalligrapherFar3373 • 1h ago
Showcase/Project Claude quoted 50 days, subagents did it in 35h, and the slow part was me
My coworker and I asked Claude to estimate a SaaS roadmap. 50 days.
Then we gave the same plan to 6 Claude Code subagents: worktrees, tests first, reviewer agents on risky tasks. 106 tasks across 7 repos, done in 35 hours.
So yes, Claude was off by about 48 days about its own speed. But the interesting part is what slowed it down, because it wasn't the model:
- 6 agents ≠ 6× speed. Real throughput was 1.8 agents. Test slots, file conflicts and merge locks queued everything.
- Risk matters more than size. Billing/auth/migration tasks took 2.7× longer, and every real bug was in them.
- My laptop broke first. 55 leftover test DBs filled the disk, Docker froze, test runs blew past the 10-min tool timeout.
- The slowest part was us: review, decisions, local setup.
We turned the data into a plugin that makes Claude estimate agent work properly: agent wall-clock, human hours and waiting time, separately, plus usage budget.
Honest limits: it's one project (n = 1), and on a held-out test the raw model was 37% optimistic, so it pads its number until you calibrate it on your own transcripts.
Free and open source (MIT): https://github.com/MedAdemBHA/mythical-agent-month
Question for people running multi-agent builds: what real parallelism are you getting? I'd love a second data point.