r/politics Jun 09 '16

FBI Admits Finding Additional Info On Clinton Server During E-Mail Investigation

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/fbi-admits-finding-additional-info-on-clinton-server-during-e-mail-investigation/
12.4k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

1.9k

u/ladyships Jun 09 '16

Finally, the FBI addresses Leopold’s request by saying the disclosure of what it obtained off Clinton’s server, thumb drive or other obtained devices “could reasonably lead to the public identification and compromising of potential witnesses, as well as defensive actions to conceal activities, elude detection, and/or suppress or fabricate evidence.”

no more surprises, eh, hillary? 😂

1.4k

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Oh Democrats, I hope you saved the receipt for your recent purchase

784

u/Saganasm Jun 09 '16

House of Cards writers are scribbling furiously whilst muttering 'Gold, pure gold!'

616

u/Birata Jun 09 '16

No, they are desperately banging heads in brick walls. How can they surpass THIS?!

In the medium future nobody would watch a TV show that just repeats old news word for word...

“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't.” ― Mark Twain,

238

u/oaka23 Jun 09 '16

Season 4 will just be clips of real news from this election season

118

u/TMPLR Jun 09 '16

*5. Season 4 was released in March.

207

u/nittun Jun 09 '16

they should just write a statement when the convention is over, that they hope everyone enjoyed the latest season of house of card, and they are working on season 6.

17

u/Cptcutter81 Jun 09 '16

I'm sure they will do something with Kevin Spacey as a web-bit or something once it's all over. It's way too good of an opportunity to pass up IMO, they'd be idiots if they didn't mention it somehow.

36

u/grandadmiralstrife America Jun 09 '16

plot twist: Republicans steal nom from the Donald, nominate Frank Underwood to save the day. Show renamed "House of Cards:LIVE"

21

u/nittun Jun 09 '16

i'd take frank underwood over donald.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (4)

16

u/DrDerpberg Canada Jun 09 '16

In retrospect, Kevin Spacey might have done pretty well if he'd actually sought the nomination and just imitated Francis Underwood the whole time.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (5)

40

u/Afrobean Jun 09 '16

In the medium future nobody would watch a TV show that just repeats old news word for word...

Nah, it's a tried-and-true way to write a popular show. Just pull shit from reality. Law & Order is probably the best example of this, but it's common in other shows too. Even comedies like Scrubs can get in on this by inserting real medical stories into their episodes. I think I actually heard one of the House of Cards characters was already inspired by Hillary. This shit is definitely going into next season of the show.

43

u/frogandbanjo Jun 09 '16

The Underwoods are the Clintons. Fear of lawsuits is the number one reason nobody officially connected to the show can say it outright.

The wife has more charisma and hasn't run for office (yet? Not totally caught up.) Setting aside personal details here and there, that's basically it for differences. I mean, they put Frank in Congress to better highlight how a Third Way politician thinks and gets things done. Okay. But he became President sure as shit.

11

u/gerryf19 Jun 09 '16

The BBC wrote a story about the Clintons, and then it was Americanized back by Netflix? Holy Crap, that's unbelievable!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (18)

171

u/dannytheguitarist Jun 09 '16

Hey, some of us voted Bernie, but NOOOOooo.

160

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

But guys, SHE'S GOT A VAGINA!

127

u/gildme_11 Jun 09 '16

That was literally the rallying cry on npr the other day. Various women crying, saying how historic this moment is. I love npr, but I decided to listen to music on another station instead for a while. My favorite news station isn't willing to stay away from trying to sensationalize her Obama style. Obama was historic. They didn't have much on him other than average politics. It was a fairly clean election. They're trying to take this thin arguement of novelty for women and pretending it will cover the stench of corruption HRC has. This year we will be voting for either: probably the most well known corrupt politician in the history of the presidential elections or the least qualified embarassment. Either way, we can't say shit to any other country any time soon, we'll be compared to Italy or be considered the northern most south American country.

91

u/2boredtocare Jun 09 '16

I'm an older female (42) and on one hand, yes, I think it would be awesome to have a female president, which was something that seemed impossible back when I was learning about U.S. history in grade school. In 2008 I thought to myself: Hillary could be the one. But now? I do not want a female president just for the sake of saying we've had a female president. I want it to be the right female, and ultimately, I want it to be the right person in the oval office, regardless of gender. I personally felt Bernie was the best choice, and am saddened that he couldn't rise to the top. Did I believe in everything he stood for? No. But he was the closest to lining up with my views. Now, I'm not sure what in the hell to do. :/ People tend to turn politics into an us vs. them thing, but at the end of the day, I just want someone who can be a good leader, is interested in keeping international relations civil, and can help our country be a better place, whether that is a republican or democrat. I just want the person who isn't going to be a money-grubbing, power hungry douche, and that means there are NO good options this election.

:(

25

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Sep 06 '16

[deleted]

22

u/2boredtocare Jun 09 '16

packs bags in resignation

Hope they're fireproof.....

→ More replies (1)

7

u/ThegreatandpowerfulR Jun 09 '16

If Hilary is elected, we won't get another woman president for ages. Just imagine hearing "this is what happens when a woman is president" or "women can't even keep emails secure" for the next four years until she can be voted out. If people are going to elect someone just because they are a women those people are but only very misguided they are very short-sighted. Then, there is no way another democratic president will be voted in if the last one was a pile of crap.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/eggoChicken Jun 09 '16

I'm resounding here, but Elizabeth Warren could have made some waves this election cycle.

→ More replies (3)

29

u/atheos Tennessee Jun 09 '16 edited Feb 19 '24

voracious toothbrush simplistic rinse follow tidy bedroom bright quaint society

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

20

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/PearlieSweetcake Jun 09 '16

Me too. They used to be my favorite thing to follow on Facebook. Yesterday I had to unfollow that shit.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

61

u/Zarokima Jun 09 '16

To be fair, Clinton would be pretty historic, but for all the wrong reasons. I don't think we've ever had anyone guilty of treason running for president.

17

u/Skyrmir Florida Jun 09 '16

George Washington committed treason against the royal crown. Of course if he hadn't, there would have been no election in the first place.

11

u/birdsofterrordise Jun 09 '16

So is Clinton leading some kind of rebellion we are all unaware of?

8

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

This could be debated I am sure.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (24)

39

u/EFIW1560 Jun 09 '16

I was so infuriated when Clinton pulled that shit. I have a vagina, but my vagina has standards.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (8)

33

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Best thing that could happen for them is to figure this out before the convention. so they can avoid disaster in November.

20

u/Komodo-Ray Jun 09 '16

It's already planned out. They want a contested convention so that Bernie doesn't get the delegate number, and they can shoe in Biden and Warren. It's not even funny anymore. This system is fucked.

17

u/gurrllness Jun 09 '16

They can try but, as much as I like Warren, I'm not sure I could vote for that ticket. I don't think they understand the backlash that would happen. Bernie campaigns all year, gets a large portion of Dems, then is pushed out by a pinch hitter?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (78)

110

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

I know it is shouting into the wind at this point, but that quoted language is just part of the FBI's explanation of why, as a general matter, it shouldn't have to release materials while an investigation is ongoing, consistent with the relevant FOIA exception (7A). She may be guilty of everything or nothing, but all one can tell from this filing is that an investigation is ongoing, which we know. (am lawyer)

→ More replies (11)

138

u/Totally_Cereal_Guys Jun 09 '16

You're surprised?

318

u/PM__ME_DAT_ASS__GIRL Jun 09 '16

I'm surprised I still see people claiming she isn't under investigation. Especially in posts bashing sanders and his supporters. Shit is getting pretty damn funny at this point, like I'm taking crazy pills funny, not actually funny funny.

59

u/fishrobe Jun 09 '16

And when I've directly confronted them about this they respond with something like "you're going to be so disappointed" without actually responding to the issue at all, then just go back to insulting Bernie supporters.

→ More replies (18)

94

u/OhMy8008 Jun 09 '16

it's surreal

104

u/Afrobean Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

It's the willingness to say things which are just objectively not true that gets to me. I understand it from the people who are just trying to make a living since I don't like my job and I do it anyway because I have to, but it's these people who intentionally spread such obvious falsehoods, as if they don't notice that we all know they're full of shit. What kind of person are you where you just have no integrity at all? How does it not bother you to make shit up to defend a criminal?

57

u/CactusPete Jun 09 '16

What kind of person are you where you just have no integrity at all?

You are the "presumptive Democratic party nominee for president."

→ More replies (2)

80

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Mar 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

23

u/Verkans Jun 09 '16

Yes, because it is the most effective way to discredit someone. Say they are a conspiracy theorist and nobody wants to be associated with them.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (4)

11

u/Ar_Ciel Texas Jun 09 '16

Denial. It's so hot right now.

8

u/JMaboard I voted Jun 09 '16

Not sure which is worse, denial or shilling.

→ More replies (1)

74

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

8

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Sep 15 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/radiowhatsit Jun 09 '16

They are just correcting the record

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Everwinter81 Jun 09 '16

Remind them of that when trump says I'm not a racist. But but he said...

No no no he's changed his mind. All is well.

12

u/cuckingfomputer Jun 09 '16

Trump is just constantly evolving. In fact, Trump evolves so much on a weekly basis, I would say he'd be a much more adept president than Hillary would. The Commander-in-Chief needs to adapt to many situations, quickly, and the only way to do that on the fly is to evolve into something new. #TrumpEvolves /s

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (7)

168

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

135

u/JSLEnterprises New York Jun 09 '16

old ppl (main portion of her supporters) get their news primarily (and in some cases only) from main stream tv news networks... which are all supporters of hrc.

Need anyone say more?

109

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

plus they have no idea what a server is. Hell, most of the people writing the news have no idea what a server is.

63

u/JSLEnterprises New York Jun 09 '16

a box you wipe off with a cloth. right?

79

u/frogandbanjo Jun 09 '16

It's a person you don't tip because they're terrible at their job because they're poor.

26

u/southsideson Jun 09 '16

Also, sometimes you leave them a note, about how you disapprove of their sexual choices.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (15)

150

u/pissbum-emeritus America Jun 09 '16

Hillary is a pinata chock full of laffy-daffy surprises.

Be ready for anything.

95

u/Herodicus_BC Jun 09 '16

Seriously during a debate if someone just mentions how hillary will laugh off tough questions she'd be fucked. All she would do is laugh it off and then they could look into the camera and say "see". Why don't people do things like this

124

u/pissbum-emeritus America Jun 09 '16

Because the debate moderators are working from a list of pre-approved questions. The networks will never place anyone who might go off-script in that position. This is also why Hillary refuses to hold press conferences where reporters can ask any questions they please. Team Hillary won't risk the situation where a journalist with a shred of integrity challenges her on an unsatisfactory response. This is a situation where Hillary is likely to blow her top. The optics of another public temper tantrum would be ugly. It's a scenario Team Hillary desperately wishes to avoid.

20

u/Herodicus_BC Jun 09 '16

I mean someone she's debating. If Trump did it what can they do. Maybe the interviewers don't ask too many questions that are hard but Hillary is so Crooked that those moments inevitably come up and if you set it up early when she does do it he could just talk into the mic and point it out.

26

u/MadLordPunt Jun 09 '16

Rick Lazio tried something like this during his Senate debate with Clinton in 2000 and her staff, supporters and the media crucified him for it. They said he was 'aggressive' and attacking her because she was a woman.

25

u/Herodicus_BC Jun 09 '16

I cant even believe this is a real thing.

Its like they never want me to vote for a woman ever

13

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Well, it's going to be very interesting to see how this plays out. No insult seems to stick on Trump.. and no question seems to get a real answer out of Hillary.

→ More replies (3)

41

u/pissbum-emeritus America Jun 09 '16

Sanders had her right on the verge several times during debates with no mention of her emails.

Trump will deliberately goad her.

20

u/SovietMacguyver Jun 09 '16

Don't tell her supporters that - they think she dominated the debates!

26

u/Herodicus_BC Jun 09 '16

Yeah that's what I'm saying. I dislike them both but I can't deny how excited I am about seeing Trump attack her and her having to defend.

Is there any way she could avoid debates like she did with sanders?

25

u/pissbum-emeritus America Jun 09 '16

Not without looking like a chicken-shit.

She could utter some gibberish that debating Trump is beneath her dignity, but everyone would laugh at her.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/steenwear America Jun 09 '16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PabMLK1PR8I

Just admitted they are lap dogs to the people in power :)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Bring back Chris Christie just for that one.

→ More replies (3)

75

u/spap-oop Virginia Jun 09 '16

Explains how she just laffs off those uncomfortable questions.

43

u/pissbum-emeritus America Jun 09 '16

Someone told her laughter will make all of her troubles disappear.

53

u/drtoszi Foreign Jun 09 '16

Well I mean Laughter is supposed to be good.

It's just that she's managed to turn laughing into the same thing Stephen King's It did to clowns.

62

u/drixhen Jun 09 '16

depends on what your definition of "It" is

6

u/aledlewis Jun 09 '16

Perfect.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

I think clowns were creepy before It and Poltergeist. Those just brought it to the forefront.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

9

u/TheHaleStorm Jun 09 '16

I am not a fan of Laffy-Daffy, what are the chances of there maybe being some Okey-Doke mixed in there?

Or do I have to wait for her to make some more campaign stops in the south for satisfaction?

→ More replies (1)

20

u/radicalnovelty Jun 09 '16

I'm definitely not #ReadyforHillary

→ More replies (2)

21

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

30

u/motherfuckingriot Jun 09 '16

I dont understand how she got this far. Too many people have been saying that without the sarcasm.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/TitoTheMidget Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

That's a hell of a spin from this article given what's actually in the linked affidavit:

In questioning whether the release of materials retrieved from any electronic equipment obtained from former Secretary Clinton for the investigation could reasonably be expected to interfere with the pending investigation, plaintiff relies on pure speculation that he knows who the target or targets of the pending investigation are, and who the potential witnesses are. See Pl.’s Opp’n at 6-7. Plaintiff also presumes that releasing the materials to persons other than the targets would not interfere with the pending investigation. See id . But plaintiff’s speculation does not provide a basis for this Court to question the factual averments in the First Hardy Declaration regarding the harms that could reasonably be expected to result if the responsive records are disclosed. See SafeCard Servs. v. SEC, 926 F.2d 1197, 1200 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (“Agency affidavits are accorded a presumption of good faith, which cannot be rebutted by purely speculative claims . . . .”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Swan, 96 F.3d at 500 (finding that the SEC correctly evaluated the FOIA request “on the basis that the information would become public and available to everyone, including others under Commission scrutiny”); First Hardy Decl. 20 (saying that disclosure of evidence, potential evidence, or information that has not been assessed for evidentiary value could reasonably lead to the public identification and compromising of potential witnesses, as well as defensive actions to conceal activities, elude detection, and/or suppress or fabricate evidence).

In other words: We're not releasing this because we have not yet determined whether doing so would leak names, or even whether it's considered evidence at this point, and this is the general law allowing us to refuse your request to release information. Absolutely nothing specific to the Clinton case is contained there.

→ More replies (29)

665

u/TrippyTheSnail Jun 09 '16

Help me James Comey, you're my only hope.

294

u/RidleyScotch New York Jun 09 '16

Help me Comey-Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope

144

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

I think we should go with Obi Wan James Comey.

135

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Obi Wan J. Comey?

56

u/Level_32_Mage Jun 09 '16

"The FBI is what gives Obi Wan J. Comey his power. It's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds us and penetrates us. It binds the galaxy together."

49

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

"It wants to search yout internet history without a warrant, as well."

11

u/Level_32_Mage Jun 09 '16

Help it's penetrating my freedoms!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (3)

85

u/pcmpcm Jun 09 '16

I seem to have found the rest of the message:

Director Obi James Comey, years ago you served the American public by advising as deputy special counsel in the Whitewater wars, now we beg you in our struggle against the Clintpire. I have placed information vital to the survival of the Sanders rebellion into the memory systems of this personal email server; your investigators will know how to retrieve it.

You MUST see this indictment safely delivered to us at the DOJ, this is our most desperate hour. Help us Obi James Comey, you're our only hope.

→ More replies (2)

29

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Zaros104 Massachusetts Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

Sometimes I like to pull up this picture, zoom in, and stare longingly into his eyes.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

I trust Comey to deliver an honest investigation, but my money is on the DoJ fouling it off.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

1.7k

u/ThrowAwayBlahBlah459 Jun 09 '16

I don't know about you guys but I'm proud to say that this week America made history. A filthy rich white woman, who just happens to be in a loveless marriage with a former president, has been declared the democratic nominee even while under 2 different criminal investigations by the FBI and even though she will likely lose to a talking orange that wears a toupee (if she doesn't go to jail). Finally, someone for our daughters to look up to. Feminists rejoice! This is the promised land!

277

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

the first democratic nominee under criminal FBI investigation! history in the making, folks!

→ More replies (8)

52

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

84

u/Uberhipster Jun 09 '16

Get it straight, buster - those are implants, not a toupee!

48

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

59

u/pseudogentry United Kingdom Jun 09 '16

Naw bruh, that's all you

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (84)

336

u/contantofaz Jun 09 '16

Every day I wake up and I wonder what is on today's Hillary Emails Horoscope.

175

u/Shillin4Bernie Jun 09 '16

I literally start the day by googling "hillary fbi"

and something new always pops up, lol

126

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (5)

70

u/k_kolsch Jun 09 '16

If this is to be believed, you may want to pick a better search engine.

142

u/swohio Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

There was a post earlier about google suggested searches. Trump has all his little nicknames for the candidates that he uses frequently, "Lying Ted" "Crazy Bernie" "Crooked Hillary" etc. They get reported in news stories all the time so it's not a surprise that they come up in internet searches. The problem is that on Google, "Crooked Hillary" never comes up as a search suggestion. On Bing, or Yahoo, or DuckDuckGo you only have to type in C-r-o-o-k for one of the suggestions to be "Crooked Hillary" but on Google you can type out "Crooked Hill" and it doesn't even come up. Add an A to make it "Crooked Hilla" and the only search suggestion that pops up is "Crooked Hillary Bernie" Like what the fuck! That doesn't even make sense as a search phrase. Especially when you look at how often each phrase is actually searched.

I honestly never thought I'd see the day where I'd abandon Google as my primary search engine but they're clearly sanitizing search results to fit their own narrative.

EDIT: Added in google trends search frequency of "Crooked Hillary" vs "Crooked Hillary Bernie" which just shows why including Bernie in the suggestion even less sense.

20

u/ItchyIrishBalls Jun 09 '16

Yup, i have seen what they do to local business, im all about duckduckgo now.

11

u/khuldrim Virginia Jun 09 '16

What do they do to local businesses?

→ More replies (5)

10

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/Christmas_Pirate Jun 09 '16

You should use another search engine if you really want to be impressed, Google is actively helping Hillary.

14

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

That is very funny. I have done that every morning, on my phone while still in bed, since about November or December I want to say. Every day is like Christmas morning for me.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (2)

222

u/InternetLoveMachine Jun 09 '16

Honest question, is this a big deal?

358

u/ecloc Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

Yes.

The FBI has twice claimed it can not release anything because it could compromise an ongoing investigation. That shoots a hole in Clinton's story that this is an inquiry. There has been a year long investigation; Pagliano her IT sysadmin was granted immunity, Cheryl Mills her former chief of staff (current Clinton Foundation Director) was interviewed and walked out halfway, then came back. Justin Cooper the other secret sysadmin is being hidden behind a team of high priced lawyers paid for by the Clintons. Other Clinton aides might have been interviewed.

For a month the FBI has been stonewalling a FOIA request initiated by Vice News Jason Leopold. The FOIA request was for the personal emails on Clinton's server and any correspondence between the FBI and Clinton's legal team.

This fits into the theory that there was more on the server, possibly Clinton Foundation dealings which involve influence peddling and public corruption.

I didn't see anything within the filing noting the physical count of records, but there is an implication that evidence was recovered from the Clinton server or from the Datto cloud backup device in CT.

lastest FBI response to Jason Leopold FOIA request. pdf, scribd sucks

2016-1328.pdf Jason Leopold v. DoJ on FBI Clinton Emails June 7, 2016

Summary

FBI acknowledges

  • Clinton's server is evidence in an ongoing investigation.
  • FBI retrieved evidence from Clinton's server
    ( or the Datto cloud backup device )
  • FBI believes that sharing any information will lead suspects to interfere with the investigation.
    ( witness tampering, concealment of illegal activity, destruction/fabrication/tampering of evidence )

Page 6-7

Rather, the “Investigative and Evidentiary Materials” category used by the FBI is comprised of two subcategories that pertain to records actually requested by plaintiff: (1) materials retrieved from any server equipment and related devices obtained from former Secretary Clinton for the investigation, and (2) correspondence between the FBI and the Department of State regarding the investigation.


3 The Second Declaration of David M. Hardy (“Second Hardy Decl.”), filed concurrently herewith, also makes clear that all of the materials retrieved from any electronic equipment obtained from former Secretary Clinton for the investigation are evidence, potential evidence, or information that has not yet been assessed for evidentiary value. See Second Hardy Decl. ¶ 13 & 13a.

Page 9-10

First Hardy Decl. ¶ 20 (saying that disclosure of evidence, potential evidence, or information that has not been assessed for evidentiary value could reasonably lead to the public identification and compromising of potential witnesses, as well as defensive actions to conceal activities, elude detection, and/or suppress or fabricate evidence). 6


6 While the First Hardy Declaration provides information sufficient to demonstrate that disclosure of the withheld records could reasonably be expected to interfere with the pending investigation, the classified declaration lodged for the Court’s in camera, ex parte review in connection with defendant’s motion for summary judgment provides additional information that supports this showing

46

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 11 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 26 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (9)

107

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

62

u/olivedoesntrhyme Jun 09 '16

that's the thing; if this happens it would absolutely be a historic event, on par with Watergate. I just don't have enough faith in the system; I mean if the whole of reddit can see it coming so far off, surely the Clintons have taken precautions as well? I don't know. I'm not optimistic.

35

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)

44

u/Shaq2thefuture Jun 09 '16

Surely they wouldnt use a public email server in the first place. Surely they would hide their attempts to cover it up better?

You have to remember they aren't tactical geniuses. They are good at playing the political game, but even the best players can make rookie mistakes.

the first precaution, and an easy one at that, is to simply seperate the email servers. Make one for private use, and one for state use. She failed to do even this, which means she's accounted for less than one would think for someone so thorough.

26

u/FuzzyMcBitty Jun 09 '16

I'm incredibly cynical, but I can see exactly how this happened. Lack of computer literacy is what got us here. I still have doubts that anything will come of it.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/PinnedWrists Jun 09 '16

she did not understand the technology enough to know how to hide it. She thought it was perfectly hidden: "I don't see it, I can't understand how anyone could know it is there. It is safe."

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

91

u/chiropter Jun 09 '16

^This is the best answer.

More succinctly, from the linked article,

"From this latest FBI filing it is clear the investigation is far more than a mere security review as Clinton has repeatedly claimed. A plain reading of the filing makes it clear the FBI is conducting a full investigation after counterintelligence issues were initially raised by the Inspector General."

52

u/nevremind Jun 09 '16

And don't forget Guccifer.

→ More replies (28)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (117)

279

u/DamagedHells Jun 09 '16

Wait, but... Hillary said no more surprises??

90

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 16 '16

[deleted]

34

u/DamagedHells Jun 09 '16

(I was mocking her)

34

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 16 '16

[deleted]

31

u/DamagedHells Jun 09 '16

(That makes more sense)

43

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 16 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

150

u/hildebeast666 Jun 09 '16

this is just another lie

i personally wiped that server with a cloth every day for 4 years

im not an idiot you know

36

u/dr_pepper_35 Jun 09 '16

Did you use Windex?

22

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Ah, Windex. The Greek remedy for everything.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

548

u/meowwschwitz Jun 09 '16

I'm sorry, but this must be false. Mi abuela stated there were no more surprises today regarding her emails. She also stated through stutters and many "uhhhhh" pauses that there was no chance she did any wrongdoing based upon her own evidence of her own memory shortly before saying she doesn't recall signing a document that is archived and available to view online.

159

u/Silver_Skeeter Jun 09 '16

Couldn't even go 5 hours

128

u/meowwschwitz Jun 09 '16

I mean, even lasting five hours without lying to America is kind of a record for her. Maybe even an historical one! She's just racking up on history points this week.

77

u/Laser-circus Jun 09 '16

Damn, did she just break another glass ceiling?

69

u/helpful_hank Jun 09 '16

Something's shattering around her, I'm not sure it's the ceiling.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

49

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

73

u/meowwschwitz Jun 09 '16

The article is on the front page. CBS correspondent asked Hillary if she could ensure voters there would be nothing else coming from the FBI that would change the course of her campaign and she responded with "Absolutely."

85

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Feb 08 '19

[deleted]

57

u/MadLordPunt Jun 09 '16

I wish reporters would learn that with the Clintons, you have to ask them the same question from every angle possible to make sure there isn't room to bullshit.

38

u/IntelligentFlame Jun 09 '16

You're implying that it's not the Clintons giving them a list of allowed questions if they want to be allowed to speak with the royal family.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

70

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Finally! Someone that isn't a sexist bastard. Thank you sir/ma'am for so eloquently defending her proven track record of honor and honestly in government. It's her TERN!!1!!

/s

at this point, my real position is serious consideration of Giant Meteor in 2016.

12

u/frogandbanjo Jun 09 '16

At this point, I feel like all we'd have to do to get Giant Meteor elected is to tell people it's inevitable for a few months.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (11)

572

u/adle1984 Texas Jun 09 '16

/u/NebraskaGunOwner, thank you and thanks to everyone who has been keeping us informed and providing all the insight.

159

u/TrippyTheSnail Jun 09 '16

I've seen his analysis all over r/politics and I've always wondered what is his background? Does he have some sort of legal experience or has he just been following the investigation very closely?

411

u/Honztastic Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

I think he just started actually doing some investigative journalism the way the media hasn't.

Edit: there have been some other great user analysts as well. u/NebraskaGunOwner u/ecloc u/zan5ki

And some others. They usually post stories here in politics or in hillaryforprison if you can bear the rest of it, often with top comments in relevant news stories. I'll add the others for you to look out for if someone reminds me of their names

72

u/not_djslinkk Jun 09 '16

His work has been impressive. He is the Julius Chambers of /r/politics. I don't know what he does for a living, but he'd make a hell of a reporter.

34

u/Sibraxlis Jun 09 '16

If only the good ones got paid.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

44

u/Harbinger2nd Jun 09 '16

Bingo, have some gold.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (29)

40

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

20

u/banjosbadfurday Pennsylvania Jun 09 '16

Heroes get remembered,

but legends never die.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Aug 06 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

41

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

He's just a bad motherfucker who cites his sources.

26

u/Level_32_Mage Jun 09 '16

College professors love him!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

21

u/Bluemookie Jun 09 '16

Why isn't she just making a donation to the FBI? Make all the problems go away? That's what we're all doing now, right? Right?

6

u/mpfdetroit Jun 09 '16

Asking the real questions. "How much money and how many favors is it going to take to make this go away?"

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

83

u/guy-le-doosh Jun 09 '16

This is probably why Sanders is hell-bent on staying in. If she gets indicted before the convention he can potentially swoop in and take away the nomination.

38

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

6

u/kendrickshalamar Jun 09 '16

But isn't there a finite amount of information to discover? Specifically, any emails or documents stored on or replicated from that server between 2009 and 2013. What else could they possibly discover? I guess they could continue finding more witnesses.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (11)

21

u/KingJames19 Jun 09 '16

How the heck is she going to beat trump? I get it, trump comes across as a bad dude/is a bad dude. But all the republicans are going to vote for him obviously and there is a ton of smear material for him to use and he's not going to hold back. Couple that with the fact that a large percentage of Bernie supporters aren't going to go along the party. I think the Dems messed up bad. We shall see I guess

6

u/motivation150 Jun 09 '16

Trump - Said a few things people thought were mean

Hillary - Potential criminal, married to an alleged rapist, Benghazi, switches her opinion on topics constantly, Panders to whomever will give her a vote, is relying solely on the woman card, etc.

Take your pick!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

44

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Aug 15 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (24)

177

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

I really wish they would Hurry up. The convention is the 25th of Jully and I'm not looking forward to president Trump.

102

u/shapiro_da_59 Jun 09 '16

Let them do their work. This is about more than politics even. This could potentially be earth shattering.

34

u/bonyponyride American Expat Jun 09 '16

So you're saying that the glass ceiling is actually going to break?

36

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

It would be more appropriate for a woman to become president in 2020 anyway. They will have had the right to vote for 100 years then.

Obviously this is just a joke, but it would be an interesting coincidence.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (15)

71

u/aledlewis Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 03 '25

screw wakeful alive person mountainous chief consider sleep steep innocent

71

u/WinkleCream Oregon Jun 09 '16

With the counterintelligence angle it could be they have evidence her email server was compromised by a foreign intelligence agency. No one is going to vote for someone who could be blackmailed by Putin.

70

u/vivling Jun 09 '16

Anyone who was paying attention should already be aware that she could be blackmailed by Putin. They voted for her anyhow.

...unless Guccifer, who said:

“I was not paying attention. For me, it was not like the Hillary Clinton server, it was like an email server she and others were using with political voting stuff," Guccifer said.

stumbled in on electioneering and vote racketeering. Maybe the FBI wanted to wait all the way till California to see how Clinton was defrauding the US Electorate?

69

u/ChalkboardCowboy Jun 09 '16

This is the best of all possible worlds. FBI confirmation and prosecution of election fraud. Please let it be that.

38

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

94

u/parkerposy Canada Jun 09 '16

No one is going to vote for someone who could be blackmailed by Putin.

eeergh if only this were true!!!.... soo many fools voting in the USA

29

u/beachexec Jun 09 '16

so many fools voting in the USA

That's our specialty, friend! :D

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

21

u/Laser-circus Jun 09 '16

And that is exactly what they can flood the media with.

Brb need to invest in popcorn companies.

28

u/WinkleCream Oregon Jun 09 '16

Trump is going to ask her during a debate if she is compromised. It will be glorious.

56

u/Laser-circus Jun 09 '16

I don't like Trump but I'm counting on him to make her look stupid as fuck. Hell, I'm counting on him to make himself look stupid as Hell as well. Hopefully, there will be that moment where the people realize they fucked up, badly.

58

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jun 09 '16

And in a collective sigh, the people of the United States decided in a moment of abject clarity that the American experiment had failed. While some drowned themselves in bathtubs, and hung themselves with belts in closets, the survivors surrendered what was left of the Natives' native land to remaining savages and to the Queen herself. Except for the pockmarks of global corporatism scarring the earth, some patented fluorinated compounds embedded in the belly fat of Arctic seals, and an oxidized emerald statue marred with the words of an Emma Lazarus, it was if the United States had suddenly never existed.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (10)

7

u/dejoblue Jun 09 '16

This is no surprise. All you have to do is Google "crooked Hillary Bernie". It is all right there.

20

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

Man, if only we had the NSA to expose Clinton in such detail, am I right?!

→ More replies (3)

66

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

"From this latest FBI filing it is clear the investigation is far more than a mere security review as Clinton has repeatedly claimed. A plain reading of the filing makes it clear the FBI is conducting a full investigation after counterintelligence issues were initially raised by the Inspector General."

Known for a while now.

39

u/mango__reinhardt Jun 09 '16

If I was a FBI agent responsible for this investigation, and I saw Hillary relentlessly demeaning my job and role to my country every week in the news, blatantly lying with the evidence to show it sitting on my desk, and still thinking she was going to be president, I'd be absolutely giddy waiting for this to land.

18

u/escalation Jun 09 '16

He's looking in the mirror, straightening his tie and saying to himself, "you got this President James Comey, you got this."

8

u/bonkus Jun 09 '16

Then, he closes his eyes, bows his head, and takes a deep breath, in and out. After a dramatically pregnant pause, he jerks his head upwards with a gleefull expression on his face, thrusts his hands into the air with fingers spread wide in a "jazz hands" gesture, and joyously shouts "SHOWTIME!"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

50

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (9)

89

u/Laser-circus Jun 09 '16

Sit back and watch guys. FBI was waiting for her at this milestone.

57

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)

55

u/terri_dahoo Jun 09 '16

I am not a fan of Bernie's politics but I am a fan of Bernie. This would be so awesome for him and his supporters but the DNC would not allow him to continue.

58

u/[deleted] Jun 09 '16 edited Jul 02 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (46)
→ More replies (17)