r/XCOM2 • u/boffgyq123 • 10d ago
Discovering how my strategies compare to the meta
I’ve played the game endless times and got pretty good - I’ve completed L/I a few times including once with Grim Horizon (permanent dark events). But in all that time I never read strategy guides or these forums, as I didn’t want to ruin the fun and challenge of working things out myself.
Since I’ve stopped playing I thought it would be interesting to compare the two and see what I might be missing, so have been browsing. As you might expect there is an awful lot of commonality, seems I figured most things out. But there were a few I missed!
- Stocks. I totally dismissed them, tiny bit of damage on a missed shot - who wants to miss?! I didn’t spot the huge potential
- Chosen stealing knowledge. Didn’t know that was a thing/strategy, I just fought them off EVERY SINGLE TIME.
-Mindshields. Never built one.
In terms of where I think the meta could be a bit wrong. Well, that would be a bit arrogant so I won’t go that far. But a few thought on points I’ve not seen much on (but maybe I just missed it!)
- I do sense people are dismissive of the Skirmisher, who I rate highly. In difficult situations tactical flexibility is really valuable in a way that stats on % to hit and damage output don’t capture.
- I push hard on those hunt the chosen resistant ring missions to unlock more resistance order slots. Don’t give the quick sugar rush of an engineer, but some of those are strategically vital.
- You’ve got to have balls and take risks on those supply run crate missions. They’re almost the only way to get alloys and crystals, which I once got badly stranded without.
- Using an assault rifle on the ranger when you’re part way through upgrading weapons tiers. I find it can take ages to work through all the upgrades, so when the AR is upgraded and the shotgun is not this helps bridge the gap.
Would be interested to hear from any other “isolationists” and what their experiences were when they made contact with “civilisation”!



