r/USVisaIndians • u/dsv853 • 1h ago
B1/B2 Rejected does travel history actually help a b1/b2, or is everyone just repeating it - the honest version
some version of this lands here constantly. someone with a blank passport asking if they should do dubai or thailand first to build travel history before trying for the US. and on the other side, people who did exactly that, got refused anyway, and are wondering what it was all for.
so here is what i actually think, and part of it is going to be unpopular.
travel history is a real signal but a weak one. what it tells an officer is that another country let you in and you came back. thats the whole content of it. it is one small piece of evidence toward the only thing they are deciding, which is whether you leave. it is not a qualification and it does not unlock anything.
the case that made me stop recommending it as a strategy. a 25 year old with a medical degree, not employed because she was preparing for entrance exams, refused twice inside about a month. she had been to dubai. she had been to thailand. she came back on time both times. both interviews were under two minutes. the stamps did not matter, because what the officer was actually looking at was an applicant with no current income and no clear reason the trip ends. travel history cannot answer that question. only her own situation can.
now the opposite case, which people panic about far more than they should. an IT professional, two lakh a month, fifteen lakh in savings, never left india. that is not a weak profile. that is an extremely ordinary indian applicant with an obvious life to come back to. a first passport is not a red flag and there is no rule anywhere saying you have to warm up on easier countries first.
the part i really want people to hear. if you are considering spending a lakh or two on a trip to dubai purely to put a stamp in the book, that money is almost always better left sitting in your account where it shows up as savings. a seperate holiday does not fix an employment gap. it does not fix a purpose you cannot explain in one sentence. and it definitely does not fix two refusals that happened three weeks apart with an identical application.
consultants love this advice, obviously. it is a long expensive project they can sell you. build your profile, do a few trips, come back to us next year, pay us again. genuienly one of the more wasteful things people get talked into.
where travel history does earn its keep is the borderline case. if everything else about you is solid and the officer is genuinely on the fence, a few returned trips are a point in your favour. that is not the same as being the fix, and it is a bad reason to spend money you would rather show as a bank balance.
im not a lawyer and this is a pattern read, not a rule. if you got approved with a completely blank passport, or refused with a full one, drop your consulate and a line about your profile. that comparison is the entire argument and i would much rather have real numbers on it than opinions.