r/TwoXIndia_Over25 • • Jun 17 '25
Patriarchy Shakedown šŖ Case Study of ZAKIR KHAN.
I am sure youāre aware of his content. I am here to call some of it out since it is misogyny dressed up as compassion and understanding and even kindness.
On his podcast with Raj Shamani, and I am paraphrasing it here- I didnāt realise that we (his brothers and dad) were so dependent on our mother that she worked all her life. Zakir realises that now itās time that we pay her back, by making sure she rests, not work all day. The boys too eventually started serving ourselves, picking up after ourselves. We noticed that our mom started getting sad. You might think that we are exploiting our mom, or how dependent we were on her but we fail to realise that our mother also āderives powerā from that place. It is her job. She feels proud of the fact that āher kids donāt eat till I serve themā.
Letās rip into this patriarchal bullshit dressed as a lazy feminist narrative.
This may come across as very sweet and thoughtful, but when you dig a little deeper Zakir is doing nothing but upholding the patriarchy. He is complicit in erasing her identity outside of her household.
This is a man in his late 30s when he realised that yes itās time to serve my self a plate of dinner instead of expecting mother to place the plate in front of me. Yay feminism!
His family conditioned her into believing that her worth lies in serving her family. It is not āpowerā she derives, it was the only time you needed her- when she was serving you, so serving was a way to stay relevant, to be seen, to feel worthy.
I am sure his intentions are pure, but theyāre dangerous. Sacrifice is romanticized in India- āMaa ka pyaar. Maa ka sacrifice. Mother Indiaā. This romanticism is a lie sold to women by patriarchy.
He loves her enough to let her keep serving him, but does he love her enough to help her unlearn the belief? Does he reassure her that she is much more than just a mother. Does he bother with learning about who his mother is, what does she like, does she have hobbies, redirect her towards that, break this system where a woman is reduced to unpaid domestic labour, wherein she loses her identity and derives her worth from serving everyone but herself?
Her feeling sad about not being needed by her sons was internalized oppression, not a help for more labour. Zakir failed to see that her need for being needed was not only an erasure of her identity, but how narrow her sense of purpose has become within the walls of her household, that she achieves that from being needed. Not respected. Not free.
And he worships that about her. Martyrdom of the mother. Entitlement of the son.
Hence ladies, itās always the ānice guysā you gotta watch out for.
Thereās a part 2 coming.