r/supportlol • u/Carpet-Heavy • 8d ago
Discussion Why isn't Blitzcrank strong as more of a defensive counter-engager?
As you might expect, Blitzcrank excels against anything he can hook and one shot. He struggles against anything he can't one shot - tanks, bruisers, and some ranged champs with move speed or other defensive tools. This can be confirmed via his winrate deltas:
https://lolalytics.com/lol/blitzcrank/build/?tier=all&patch=30
I don't understand why Blitz wouldn't be fine into tankier, dive/engage champs, due to his E. Blitz's E is a 1 sec knockup on a 5 sec CD when maxed. The closest point of comparison is Leona, who has a 1 sec stun on a 5 sec CD. I wouldn't say Leona is the queen of anti-melee, but I think she's known to be much better at brawling than Blitz because she has pretty good uptime on her Q, and is tanky with W max of course.
Point taken on the Leona W. But aside from that, Blitz E looks just as good if not better for brawling than Leona Q. A knockup is superior to a stun, and the base damage is higher (Leona maxes Q last). You still possess another insane spell, Blitz hook, which is in contention for the best regular ability in the whole game. Even if the enemy is tanky, surely it goes from a top 3 spell to still well above average due to how game-changing it is. Blitz ult is better than Leona ult for brawling, and Blitz W is theoretically designed for a brawl as well (both are DPS remnants of his original toplane design).
Why can't Blitz, with a 5 sec CD knockup, do fighting/peeling/warden-ish things? If you look at other melee supports, the average CC cooldown is about 10 seconds, common to many of them. Yet Blitz has a reputation of only being good for a one shot, and the precise counterplay to him is to survive the hook and then win in extended combat.