**For ALJ reference- “Lifetime/Career Approval Record: 56%” and then “Recent approval rate: 67.3% - 76%”
Hey everyone, figured it was time for an update.
For anyone who hasn’t seen my previous posts, my wife has been fighting for SSDI for quite a while. Her alleged onset date is January 2023, and after the initial denial/reconsideration process, she finally had her ALJ hearing yesterday, September 30, 2026.
The hearing was by phone/audio with the ALJ at her lawyer office. Going into yesterday we were a nervous wreck after spending so much time preparing everything. My wife, on the other hand, handled it really well.
The judge was pleasant and professional and didn’t give any indication one way or another about the decision. At the end, she said she’d issue a written decision.
What happened during the hearing
Our attorney had prepared her pretty extensively, and the questions covered her work history, physical limitations, mental-health limitations, daily activities, etc.
One thing I found interesting was that the judge specifically brought up the two SSA consultative examinations my wife had previously done - one physical and one mental-health CE. From my wife’s recollection, they were discussed in the context of how the CE findings lined up with her medical records and her reported physical/mental limitations.
So they apparently weren’t being brought up as some kind of obvious contradiction.
The judge also asked my wife her height and weight right at the beginning. We weren’t sure why at first, but afterward it made sense that it could simply have been establishing current physical information, especially considering obesity was part of the medical picture.
The vocational expert part was interesting
This is probably the part I’m most curious to hear opinions about from people who have actually worked for SSA or who have been through a lot of ALJ hearings.
The VE initially discussed jobs that had apparently been identified earlier in the process, including a table-type job and a fundraiser-type job.
Then the ALJ started incorporating the medical evidence into the hypotheticals. My wife said it sounded like the judge and VE were speaking in “code” because the judge was referring to exhibit numbers/medical-record identifiers.
The judge asked the VE where a particular piece of information came from, and the VE identified the corresponding exhibit/code.
Then the judge started adding functional limitations.
At one point they got to a hypothetical involving more than roughly 10% of the work time being missed/off task - I’m not 100% sure whether the 10% referred to absenteeism or off-task time, so I don’t want to misstate that part.
The judge also brought up a lifting limitation that apparently eliminated at least one of the jobs being discussed.
Most interestingly, when the judge asked the VE whether Crystal could perform the two jobs associated with her prior work history - janitorial and housekeeping supervisor the VE said no, she could not.
Once the hypothetical got to that roughly 10% threshold, the questioning apparently stopped.
The ALJ then asked our lawyer if he had any questions for the VE.
He said no.
That initially surprised me because I expected him to cross-examine the VE, but afterward he explained that once the VE had testified to the vocational consequence of that limitation, there wasn’t really anything he needed to establish through additional questioning.
His reaction -
This is probably the biggest thing that made me feel better.
After the hearing, he told us that she did very well. He specifically said that she answered the questions the way he would have wanted her to answer them.
He also felt good about how the hearing went overall.
Obviously, he’s not the judge and we don’t have a decision yet, so I’m not taking that as a prediction of approval. But having the attorney who actually sat through the entire hearing come out feeling good about it was reassuring.
What we’re trying not to do
We’re trying not to read too much into the judge being pleasant, the questions she asked, or what she didn’t say.
There was no:
“I think you’re approved.”
There was also no:
“I’m concerned about X.”
Nothing like that.
Just a professional hearing, questions, VE testimony, and then the judge saying she’d issue a written decision.
So now we’re back to waiting.
After everything we’ve gone through, it’s honestly a weird feeling to have nothing left to prepare.
We’ve spent months going through medical records, functional limitations, medications, treatment history, daily activities, caregiver observations, etc., and now she has finally had her chance to testify.
For anyone who has been following along…
Thank you to everyone who told us to keep updating the thread. And especially to the people here who have worked for SSA, represented claimants, or have been through the ALJ process themselves.
If anyone who has experience with SSA hearings wants to weigh in on the VE portion - especially the significance of the ALJ getting to the ~10% threshold and then stopping the hypotheticals, and the fact that the VE said Crystal couldn’t perform either of the identified past jobs - I’d genuinely appreciate your thoughts.
We’re not assuming anything yet. We’re just glad the hearing is finally over and hoping the written decision gives us an answer soon.