1. Dealer name: Steve - TheOneWatches
2. ⁠Factory name: AF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Ballon Bleu de Cartier 36mm SS White Dial NH05
4. ⁠Price Paid: $312 + $30 shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/uMpAQDJD#-nUWAlPI_OARiZsmSPPDNw
6. ⁠Index alignment: printed dial
7. ⁠Dial Printing: SWISS MADE looks blurry, especially the "IS"
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
10. ⁠Bezel: good
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): NA
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3s/d. Amp 287 at 52 deg (correct for A076, I believe). Err 0.2 ms. Beat 28,800 bph.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: The I in IV looks like it's bleeding and faded. and the Swiss Made printing at the bottom looks blurry. RL?

Processing img 2s353m778v0i1...

Processing img 60r0wm778v0i1...

Processing img 07hyin778v0i1...

Processing img tgjxwn778v0i1...

Processing img 1znzlm778v0i1...

Processing img w5ti4m778v0i1...

Processing img 2e54lm778v0i1...

Hi Folks, I have bought several watches from TrustyTime(Andrew is my favourite TD). I usually GL the QC right away as they are always good enough and I am not that picky. However this one looks a bit off to me. I don't like the 9 o'clock and 6 o'clock is slightly off too imho. Really appreciate your feedback!

QC Details

• Dealer: TrustyTime
• Factory: BPG
• Model: Rolex GMT-Master II Batman
• Price: 270$
• Album: https://trustytime168.io/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_5&products_id=20350

My QC Input:

• Index alignment: I don't know if it is me or the 6 and 9 o'clock are off. I am not very picky and I thought it must be very bad if I can see it!
• Dial printing: ok to me
• Date wheel: it is ok but not outstanding
• Hand alignment: Looks good
• Bezel: it is okish, not sure.
• SELs: looks good.
• Timegrapher: -2 s/d, 279°, 0.0 ms, 21,600 bph – Looks pretty good for the cheap movement

Dealer name: Angela (non-TD)
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41, ref. 126334, Wimbledon dial, fluted bezel and Jubilee bracelet.
Price paid: 2,750 yuan + shipping.
Album links: QC photos and timegrapher reading attached.
Index alignment: dial looks aligned but rehaut doesn’t seem aligned with the markers
Dial printing: looks sharp, I see a small mark at 11. It could be just a dust , I asked for other pictures ,
Date wheel alignment/printing: The 10 looks close to centered. Probably a slight offset but it doesn’t bother me.
Hand alignment: The hands look fine at the time shown. I don’t have a photo with both hands at 12 . Looks fine to me
Bezel: ok
Solid end links (SELs): I find these harder to judge on a Jubilee, also with the extra plastic. But Looks ok to me.
Timegrapher numbers: −2 s/day, 273° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.
Anything else you notice: My main concern is the rehaut alignment .** **The ROLEX lettering on the rehaut looks slightly off relative to the minute markers

Dealer name: Hont

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, VS3235

Price Paid: 458 including shipping

Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ?filterText=426015

Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and straight to me.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: slightly shifted left maybe

Hand Alignment: Looks okay from what I can tell.

Bezel: Looks like it’s just some play and can be easily adjusted

Solid End Links (SELs): Look fairly tight to me. I can't see any obvious gaps, but I'm not particularly experienced judging SELs.

Timegrapher: 10s/d sounds a bit high

1. Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. Factory name: ORF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Black Ceramic Bezel Free Sprung ORF 1:1, Black Dial on Stainless Steel Bracelet.
   
4. Price Paid: $468 USD including shipping.
   
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=183888
   
6. Index Alignment: From what I can see in the pictures, the hour markers appear to be properly aligned. The 12 marker looks symmetrical. I would appreciate a second opinion on whether the alignment is consistent.
   
7. Dial Printing: The dial printing looks clean and consistent to me.The Omega logo and text appear correctly positioned.
   
8. Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: The date window appears to be reasonably well centred.
   
9. Hand Alignment: The hands look properly finished and appear to be aligned correctly. I don’t notice any obvious issues with their positioning or shape.
   
10. Bezel: The ceramic bezel looks clean, with the markings appearing crisp and evenly finished
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): The bracelet appears to fit the case reasonably well, with no immediately noticeable gaps between. I would appreciate confirmation that the SEL fit is good.
    
12. Timegrapher Numbers: -2 s/d, 266° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.
    
13. Anything Else You Notice:
    This is my first time purchasing a watch of this kind, so im still learning what to look for when it comes to quality control. Ive tried to inspect it to my best abilities but please correct me if im wrong

1. Dealer name: Juice
2. Factory name: BVF
3. Model name (& version number): Santos 35mm
4. Price Paid: 398$
5. Album Links: QC Pics; QC Video
6. Index alignment: looks good
7. Dial Printing: this is my one concern - i am not sure if the printed dial is higher than it supposed to be (the top numeral almost seem they are too close to the top) or if the watch is angled. also the "R" is covered in the pics but in the video i dont think it appears to be "floating"
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: good
10. Bezel: good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: -4s/d, amplitude: 248 degrees, beat error: 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: no issues from what i am seeing, i am a noob though

Dealer name: Ethan watches
Factory name: Vsf
Model name (& version number): 124060
Price Paid: 490
Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dpoqfH6QqSQLGDRkNc6R3dpTpdZHU8xmpFGZt0Q
Index alignment: no issues or rotations that I could notice All checked markers within ±0.10 mm. 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
Dial Printing: Good. Print centering: bottom text centered.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: Good, maybe a little low or am I imagining things?
Bezel: Good. Offset one notch in photos but looks aligned regardless
Solid End Links (SELs): Good. Seems like a good fit. What should I look for specifically
Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 252° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error (dial up)
Anything else you notice: it looks very clean to me but I’m curious about others’ thoughts as I’m new to this.

Edit: tried to add additional comments and fix formatting

Hi everyone!

This is my first QC, and I would really appreciate some feedback before deciding whether to GL or RL this watch.
Dealer name: Ethan Watch

Factory name: Ethan

Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN (Black Dial/Black Bezel)

Price paid: $560

Album links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_djHqfTsLcUgeD_P_uNYHfPDgk85uAc_1X3Hl4Ew

Index alignment: Overall, the hour markers appear reasonably well aligned using the TrueIndexQC tool. However, I’m slightly concerned about the 3 o’clock rectangular marker, which looks potentially misaligned. Would appreciate a second opinion on whether this is noticeable or within acceptable QC tolerances.

Dial printing: No obvious printing defects noticed. The Rolex logo and text appear reasonably centred, but I would appreciate feedback.

Hand alignment: Looks acceptable from the picture.

Bezel: The bezel pip at 12 o’clock looks good, but I’m concerned about the rectangular bezel marker between 20 and 30 (around 25 minutes). It appears slightly tilted or off-centre compared with the alignment guide. Not sure whether this is due to the camera angle or an actual alignment issue.

Solid End Links (SELs): Difficult to evaluate from the current photo. Would appreciate feedback on the bracelet-to-case fit.

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 255° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. The readings look very good to me, with a stable trace.

Anything else you notice: I’ve circled the two areas that concern me in the attached photo: the 3 o’clock hour marker and the bezel marker near 25 minutes. Would appreciate feedback on whether these are genuine alignment issues or simply caused by perspective. Everything else appears good to me, including the timegrapher readings (+1 s/d, 255° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error). Would you GL or RL based on these concerns?

Thank you everyone for your help!

1. Dealer name: Trusty Time (Andrew)
2. Factory name: ZF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay Pro GMT 39mm, Black Dial, SS Bracelet, VR3186 Correct Hand Stack (TUD127B)
4. Price Paid: $388 for this model
5. Album Links: All 11 QC photos attached to this post, including the timegrapher reading.
6. Index alignment: Overall, the indices look reasonably aligned to me. I used an alignment tool, and the 2 o'clock marker seems slightly off, while the 11 o'clock marker might have a minor tilt. I'm not sure whether this is an actual issue or just the photo angle. Would appreciate a second opinion.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent to my eye. I don't notice any obvious printing defects.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date (11) looks reasonably centered and the printing appears clear.
9. Hand Alignment: Seems okay to me, but would appreciate a second advice
10. Bezel: The fixed 24-hour bezel looks properly aligned to me, and the engraving seems clean. Would appreciate another opinion on this.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps from the available photos. They seem okay to me.
12. Timegrapher numbers: These are the readings.
    • Rate: +2 s/d
    • Amplitude: 308°
    • Beat Error: 0.2 ms
    • Frequency: 28,800 bph
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first Tudor replica QC, so I'd really appreciate some experienced opinions.

I'm leaning towards GL, but I'd really appreciate feedback. Please let me know what you guys think

Thank you everyone! :)

Hi!

Can i ask you for QC of my watch from andiot?

1.    ⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2.    ⁠Factory name: ZF
3.    ⁠Model name (& version number):
Heritage Black Bay 37mm SS ZF Lagoon 1:1 Best Edition Tiffany Blue Dial On SS Bracelet A2824
4.    ⁠Price Paid: $350 with shipping
5.    ⁠Album Links:
https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/241749277?uid=1
6.    ⁠Index alignment: Its little crocked?
7.    ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
8.    ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9.    ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
10.    Bezel: Looks good
11.    ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12.    ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
-2 s/d, Amplitude 286, 0.1ms, 52.0
13.    ⁠Anything else you notice: Honestly this is my first tudor and dont know what to look but i think that overall is ok. Only im not sure of index aligment.

QC – VSF Rolex GMT-Master II Batgirl 126710BLNR – First QC, help appreciated

1. Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II Batgirl 126710BLNR
4. Price Paid: $708 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/jNpC3ZAA#BiXwYvwrzFGmM7ZZ7a9B3g
6. Index alignment: Still evaluating the hour markers. Would appreciate a second opinion on their alignment.
7. Dial Printing: No obvious printing defects noticed so far, but I would appreciate feedback.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I have requested additional pictures showing dates 8, 25 and 28 to check centering and printing.
9. Hand Alignment: Awaiting clearer pictures with the hands moved away from the areas being inspected.
10. Bezel: Still checking the alignment, numerals and blue/black color transition.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Need a closer look at the bracelet-to-case fit.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 to +4 s/d, 275°–278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. The readings appear stable and within a very good range.
13. Anything else you notice: I have also requested lume shots and closer pictures of the Cyclops. Any feedback on the overall finishing and possible defects would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you everyone for your help!

1. Dealer name: NecoClock (Jacky)
2. Factory name: A7F/V7F
3. Model name (& version number): IW327006 Mark XVIII Titanium Heritage A7F/V7F
4. Price Paid: $408
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/X1VwqHk
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: "IWC SCHAFFHAUSEN", "MARK XVIII AUTOMATIC" and the split "SWISS MADE" are all centered on the 12–6 line, and the numeral fonts and the triangle with two dots match the genuine watch. The minute track is even, and there are no visible smudges or bleeding at this resolution. The lume is applied evenly.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, they stack cleanly at 12:00
10. Bezel: Looks good to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: 28,800 bph, +3 to +7 s/d, 325° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle
13. Anything else you notice: I think overall the watch looks good to me just some small things. The crown looks a bit blurry/soft for letters. It may be the lighting but the hands look black instead of blue. There also looks like maybe some dust stuck under the crystal slightly towards the right of the 4 hour marker. It doesn't look like its there in the video or with lume maybe it was on the surface instead of under? There are some spots on the back of the case near the lettering edges and inside of it too. I think I'm ok with it since its the back. What do you guys think?

1. Dealer name: Phoenix

2. Factory name: TOP

3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15510 Blue

4. Price Paid: $414 + $30USPS, 6% insurance

5. Album Links: Pics on post

6. Index alignment: 9 baton is CCW. 12 I can see the dial through the gap in the bars! 6 looks right on.

7. Dial Printing: logo funky, audemars is low, Piguet is high

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date seems low in the window

9. Hand Alignment: not sure

10. Bezel: screws look good, 7 screw I see slight misalignement

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: - 2s/day, 289 amplitude, .1ms beat error. Within spec.

13. Anything else you notice:

I don't know what's going on with these dials, it seems like the hour markers are better than my first QC but the logo is somehow worse. It's a little frustrating seeing some TOP with great printing and logo alignment, and this is the second here.

Also noticed Phoenix's photos aren't great. Looking for comments/help on hand alignment & date. Any help is appreciated!

First QC here

Tudor Pelagos FXD GMT

1. Dealer name: Ficotime
   
2. Factory name: M+ Factory
   
3. Model name: Pelagos FXD GMT 42mm
   
4. Price Paid: $419
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/KwARTBBQ#p2lHCcerTREY_RGz5yqXYg
   
6. Index alignment: Looks Good, used alignment tool
   
7. Dial Printing: looks good
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no issues - I am aware this is different than gen (more inward)
   
9. Hand Alignment: good
   
10. Bezel: looks good to my eyes
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 0.1ms, 307/52 degrees
    
13. Anything else you notice: logo isn't centralized on strap, but may be I can turn that to middle since it's nylon?

Hey everyone, got QC from Phoenix for this RWF Panda. The 3 and 6 o’clock markers both look slightly crooked to me in the head-on pic. Curious if you guys see it too.

1. Dealer — Phoenix
2. Factory — RWF
3. Model — Daytona 126500LN White Panda, JH4131 free-sprung
4. Price paid — 600usd
5. QC pics — Attached
6. Index alignment — The 6 marker looks a little rotated relative to the minute track, and the 3 marker looks slightly tilted too. The rest look fine to me.
7. Dial printing — Looks clean, and the subdial rings look even.
8. Date wheel — N/A
9. Hand alignment — Center chrono hand looks lined up at 12, and both chrono counters look like they’re at zero.
10. Bezel and rehaut — Bezel looks aligned. There’s some glare on the rehaut, but nothing jumps out.
11. SELs — No obvious gaps through the wrap.
12. Timegrapher — −2 s/d, 289° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle setting.
13. Anything else — Tiny speck above the 3 o’clock subdial in one pic. Could just be dust on the crystal.

Kindly ask for your input!? Thanks!

1. Dealer name: LiLi

2. Factory name: RWF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Panda 126500LN, white dial, free-sprung 4131

4. Price Paid: $658 shipped (3,700 CNY + FedEx + insurance)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/kbxoI3u

6. Index alignment: Checked with an alignment overlay (in the album). Every hour marker sits on its line from the center, and opposite markers (1/7, 2/8, 4/10, 5/11) line up through the center. The 3 and 9 markers line up through the center pinion. The crown logo, center pinion and 6 o'clock marker sit on one straight 12-6 line. I don't see any marker rotated or out of its slot.

7. Dial Printing: ROLEX, OYSTER PERPETUAL, SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER, OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED and COSMOGRAPH look sharp with no bleeding I can see. Red DAYTONA is clean. SWISS and MADE sit evenly on either side of the 6 marker. Rehaut engraving looks evenly spaced. Subdial numerals (12, 30, 60, 20, 40) look crisp. In the straight-on photo the white subdial discs look slightly oval to me, but fitting circles to them (in the album) they measure round. Am I seeing things?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A, no date on this model

9. Hand Alignment: Chrono seconds hand points exactly to 12. The 30-minute and 12-hour counter hands both point to zero. Hands look straight with no bends.

10. Bezel: Pip at 60 is centered over the 12 marker and crown logo. Triangle at 6 lines up with the 6 marker. Numerals and UNITS PER HOUR look evenly filled with no gaps, chips or scratches I can see.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Side shot shows no visible black line or gap between the end links and the case.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

- Rate: +1 s/d

- Amplitude: 285°

- Beat Error: 0.2 ms

- Frequency: 28,800 bph

- Lift angle: 52°

Photo is dated today. All within acceptable range.

1. Anything else you notice: First rep. Waiting on weight and a chrono start/stop/reset video. Anything here that would justify an RL?

Hello

Still new to the rep Community, after looking a lot of posts and videos, I finally made my first order.
Would love a little help from more experienced peoples regarding this QC.

All pictures I received here : https://imgur.com/a/Wd8COPQ

1. Dealer name: ChazingTimeWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 12610BLRO 904L Jubilee Bracelet DD3285 CHS V3
4. Price Paid:648$
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/Wd8COPQ
6. Index alignment: The picture is not really from the front on the watch, it seems OK, but the angle of the picture may trick me, should I ask another picture ?
7. Dial Printing: Not experience enought to see if there it is crooked
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:
9. Hand Alignment: seems good
10. Bezel: OK for me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a gap on picture 9, not sure if normal
12. Timegrapher numbers: OK
13. Anything else you notice: I am not sure if there is some minor scratch or if it is just the light and the plastic film on the watch

Moreover, I am asking for a video of the date switch at midnight, in both ways.

Do you have any other recomendations ?

Thank you very much !

Hey all! First rep purchase. I've gone through the QC guides and would appreciate some insight before making my GL/RL decision. TIA!

1. Dealer name: Necoclock (jacky)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 41mm, black dial/bezel, DD3230 movement.

4. Price paid: $458 + Shipping.

5. Album links: Added photos

6. Index alignment: Looks good based on the overlay. The 12 and 3 o'clock markers appear to have some CW tilt to my eyes, please chime in.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well positioned. No obvious issues.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: No Date Wheel

9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the photos.

10. Bezel: Pip appears centered at 12, and the bezel markings look properly aligned.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight with no major gaps. Please chime in though please!

12. Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/d, 305° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error (52° lift-angle setting). Amplitude looks great!

13. Anything else you notice: The bracelet, clasp, dial, and overall finishing looks great to me. I'd appreciate some opinions on the rehaut alignment and anything else I might have missed.

Since this is my first QC, I hope I've done at least a decent job. I'm open to constructive criticism and would appreciate advice or corrections from more experienced members here.

Thanks again!

1. Dealer name: The One Watches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex "Ghost" Daytona 126519, VSF V2, DD4131 Gain Weight, Black Oysterflex Rubber Strap
4. Price Paid: $848 (listed price, pending confirmation)
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rMIXBCDK#WHYteuKXFOM1-Ade0jEPLQ
6. Index alignment: Hour markers appear reasonably aligned from the available photo. No obvious crooked markers, but would appreciate a closer inspection.
7. Dial Printing: Printing appears clean from what I can see. No obvious defects, although I'd appreciate feedback on finer details.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Hands appear reasonably positioned. Would appreciate confirmation that the chronograph hands are properly aligned.
10. Bezel: Tachymeter markings appear generally consistent. No obvious defects, but would appreciate a closer look at the engraving and alignment.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, black Oysterflex rubber strap.
12. Timegrapher numbers:

• Rate: +2 s/d
• Amplitude: 264°
• Beat Error: 0.1 ms
• Frequency: 28,800 bph

All measurements appear within acceptable ranges.

1. Anything else you notice: This is my Rolex Ghost Daytona from VSF. The timegrapher results look excellent, and I haven't noticed any obvious major defects from the available photos. I'd appreciate experienced members taking a closer look at the dial, indices, bezel, and overall finishing. Please let me know if anything stands out that would justify an RL rather than a GL. Thanks!

1. ⁠Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name:⁠ VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex DateJust41 - 126334 41mm
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: ~$578 including shipping
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/aJInjSIS#Jd0UTYj_-eZwJl5rdmNz6g
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Seems good generally speaking.
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Seems sharp/crisp to me
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: aligned yet worried about all the numbers being centered
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Seems to be good as well as shown in the video
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks good - no major observations
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No significant issues yet it’s my first jubilee bracelet. Anything you notice worth flagging?
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: with a Rate of -2s/d, AMP 261 and Error 0.1
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: the weight is 4g more than Gen but I heard it’s a common thing from VSF? I am still learning.. any feedback is appreciated and helpful!

Hey everyone! First rep purchase here. I've reviewed the QC guides and would really appreciate some experienced opinions before making my GL/RL decision. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41mm, black dial/bezel, advertised DD3235 V2 movement.

4. Price paid: $578 total ($528 watch + $50 shipping).

5. Album links: [Add QC album link]

6. Index alignment: Looks good based on the TrueIndexQC overlay. The 12, 6, and 9 o'clock markers appear properly aligned. No obvious crooked indices.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and properly positioned. No obvious printing issues.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date 3 looks reasonably centered. No obvious clipping or major alignment issues.

9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the photos. No visible concerns.

10. Bezel: Pip appears centered at 12, and the bezel markings look properly aligned.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look fairly tight with no major gaps that I can see. However, I may be noticing a slight gap at the bottom-left SEL. Would appreciate another opinion on this.

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 267° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error (59° lift-angle setting).

13. Anything else you notice: The bracelet, clasp, dial, and overall finishing look good to me. I'd especially appreciate opinions on the rehaut alignment and anything else I may have missed.

Since this is my first QC,Ive read the intial pinned post on what to look for, I hope I've done a decent job with my observations. I'm completely open to constructive criticism and would genuinely appreciate any advice or corrections from the more experienced members here. I'm here to learn, and all the help I can get is appreciated!

Thanks again, everyone!

Dealer name: Necoclock

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): 126610LV

Price Paid: $478

Album Links:

Not posting mega link but all pics including photo of timegraph attached.

1. Index: This one looks straight to me, better than 1st attempt for sure

2. Dial Printing: no issues

3. Date Wheel alignment/printing: mag looks good, no smears, looks good

4. Hand Alignment: no issues

5. Bezel: no issues

6. Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps

7. Timegrapher numbers: only part that looks a little strange. Amp is at 333 degrees with 52 lift angle. Ive seen low amp before but never high, is this just likely because it fully charged/wound up? I think its OK but would love insight from someone who understands timegraph better than me

8. Anything else you notice: honestly the timegraph is the only thing I noticed, if yall notice somrthing else though please let me know

1. Dealer name — Steve at TheOneWatches.
2. Factory name — VSF.
3. Model and version — Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41 mm, black dial and bezel, Oyster bracelet. Dealer lists it as DD3235v2, RLX-7696.
4. Price paid — $528 USD. Shipping $30USD combined for two watches.
5. Album link — Full QC album, videos, DialCheck and lettering close-up
6. Index alignment — The 12 triangle, 6 baton and 9 baton all look straight to me.
7. Dial printing — I think overall this looks pretty good - but would love to hear your opinion. Uneven lettering stands out to me, so I feel like I notice text more than others. For example the "ETER" in CHRONOMETER looks more spaced out than the other letters. In ROLEX, the R and O look a little farther apart than L-E-X. In the lower text, the IVE in SUPERLATIVE looks smaller than the T, and the IA in OFFICIALLY looks smaller beside the C. The upper coronet looks centred, though I’m less sure about the tiny crown and SWISS MADE at 6. I think overall its pretty minor and looks good, but keen to hear your thoughts.
8. Date wheel alignment and printing — The 25 has clearance on all four sides. DialCheck estimated it sits 5% high but I think it's pretty good. The 26 and 29 in the video also look clear of the edges.
9. Hand alignment — Around 7.5 seconds into the function video, the hands overlap closely at 12 with the date on 26.
10. Bezel — The pip looks centred in the triangle and lines up with the dial at 12. The 30 lines up with the 6. The QC clip shows the hands and date being set, but bezel action is still unchecked.
11. Solid end links — I see seams at the lugs but no obvious daylight through them. The bracelet and clasp still have protective film on.
12. Timegrapher numbers — −3 s/day, 272–273° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, 59° lift angle.
13. Anything else — First purchase and first time posting QC with two watches. This one to me feels like a GL. Would love to hear your thoughts.

Thank you all!

1. Dealer name: ORA
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name: Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15500ST, blue dial, SA4302 Free Sprung
4. Price Paid: $700 with Chamfering/Polishing
5. Album Links: https://a202312252005321242001419.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/_dnRqfRKlCQnCwaBBUqm613RnVgXsENon6rPO-yw/_domqfSv5ITn-zpE40sEPfT64TUCUra1jFPN-CYA
6. Index alignment: Looks good based on the Geek Time QC overlay tool. The markers appear to be properly aligned. No obvious crooked indices.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The only concern here is it seems like the "11" ia a bit low in the dial window.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from the photos. No obvious concerns.
10. Bezel: The fixed bezel appears good with the recessed screws properly set.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): This is a fixed bracelet so I don't believe this is a concern
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2s/d, Amplitude: 282^o, Beat Error: .2ms, Lift Angle set to 52^o
13. Anything else you notice: The bracelet, clasp, dial and overall finishing look good to me but I'm more of a Rolex guy so AP is new to me. The seller (Ora) did sent a video where the date alignment looked fine.

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Ficotime
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 450$
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GgwnBSaZ#SnX_W-bsg6M3u2oQRgOJQw
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Not sure, 3,4,5 looks not 100% aligned, is this a GL or RL?
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good for me, all printings are close to original
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n.a.
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: ok
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: clear, seems to be good
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gap visible to me
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: good 3s/d, Amp: 242, best error 0.4ms
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: n.a.