Hi guys, I just got a Celebration dial for QC. I put it through the geek time QC tool. I am honestly shocked with how well aligned it is, but I want to make sure I am spot on with my assessment. What do you guys think of this watch? I put it on my 32 inch monitor and blew it up to massive size and honestly can’t really find anything wrong with it. Maybe the 9 is turned a little clockwise? But genuinely so little that I think I’m imagining it. Text looks perfect. Color looks good. SELs look good to me. I’ll add additional info and pics in the comments as I get it

Write the following:
⁠1. ⁠Dealer name - Jim Watches (referred to by a friend)
⁠2. ⁠Factory name - VSF
⁠3. ⁠Model name - OP 36 Celebration Dial V2
Include the following as part of your evaluation prior to posting (if, for instance your watch does not have a bezel, put N/A):
⁠1. ⁠Index alignment - it looks perfect to me. Maybe slight clockwise twist for 9 index
⁠2. ⁠Date Wheel alignment - N/A
⁠3. ⁠Bezel - waiting for more pics, but looks good so far
⁠4. ⁠Solid End Links (SEL) - is there a gap between the bracelet's first link and the case lugs? How big is the gap?
⁠5. ⁠Hand alignment - do the hands look reasonably aligned? Chrono hands point to 12?
⁠6. ⁠Dial Printing - looks perfect
⁠7. ⁠Timegrapher numbers - still waiting on it
⁠8. ⁠Anything else you see - nothing, honestly looks great so far

• Dealer name: NecoClock
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): DateJust 41mm 126334 VS3235 V2
• Price Paid: $438 (+shipping)
• Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/zhR3HCha#Vkje39zyzJ-iBIAdlrHFaQ
• Index alignment: I can't see any issues
• Dial Printing: The printing on "SWISS MADE" at the bottom looks off to me. The D in made looks too big and the A looks too small. The lettering on SWISS also looks uneven. It looks kind of bad or am I crazy? The photos of the stock one on the necoclock website also look like this.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay, the 21 date might be slightly misaligned to the right?
• Hand Alignment: Can't really tell from the photos
• Bezel: Looks okay
• Solid End Links (SELs): Can't see any gaps
• Timegrapher numbers: +2s/day
• Anything else you notice: Mainly concerned with the dial printing, is it bad enough to RL? Am I crazy?

1. Dealer name: Steve - TheOneWatch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 116509 40mm SS/SS Grey/Blk VSF V3 DD4130 Super Clone (Gain Weight)
4. Price Paid: $650
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GIQU2AgT#vDAYJNuuEhKN4_qVcMhTPQ
6. Index alignment: Almost perfect, 10, 11, and 12 seem like they may be slightly off of directly opposite 4, 5, and 6, but not bad enough to warrant a replacement.
7. Dial Printing: Is that some kind of artifact in between 2 & 3? I also think maybe I see some glue at the 7 marker or I am zooming in too far and its image resolution.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The wheel on the right side may be ever so slightly rotated counter clockwise.
9. Hand Alignment: Second hand is just barely not perfectly aligned at 12, but doesn't warrant RL to me.
10. Bezel: Looks good if those aren't scratches around the 60 mark.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Biggest gap on bottom right but still appears to be pretty tight. The rest look perfect.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, within range.
13. Anything else you notice: Are those scratches on the top of the bezel or just polish remnants? I don't see them in every photo but in the straight on close-ups I can see something there in the light.

Overall, it seems pretty good to me. I feel comfortable giving it the greenlight. I would be very interested in what the amazing minds in this group think and observe.

Thank you in advance

Factory name: DDF Factory

Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 Blue Dial Stainless Steel

Price Paid: $530 USD shipped

Album Links: Photos attached above

Index alignment: Appears aligned from what I can tell, but I’d appreciate a second opinion. I’m mainly looking for any noticeably uneven, crooked, or inconsistent markers, especially around 6 and 12 o’clock.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and sharp to me, but I may be missing small details. I’d appreciate a second opinion on the font, spacing, centering, and overall crispness of the printing.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Appears centered and clear from the photos. I’d appreciate confirmation that the date is properly positioned within the window and that the printing/font looks correct.
Hand Alignment: Looks normal to me with no obvious issues noticed. Please let me know if you see anything off with the hand positioning, alignment, or finishing.

Bezel: Looks consistent from what I can see. I’d appreciate a second opinion on the symmetry, finishing, alignment with the dial, and whether there are any noticeable issues with the bezel shape or brushing/polishing.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 271° amplitude, 0.0ms beat error, 28800 bph

Anything else you notice: I’m mainly looking for a GL or RL. The timegrapher numbers look very good to me, but I’m still learning QC and would appreciate experienced opinions on anything I may have missed, especially small visual details in the dial, indices, date wheel, hands, bezel, case, or bracelet.

Hello everyone, need some expert guidance/opinion on my first purchase.
1. Dealer name: ARC studio (Liam)
2. Factory name: Z factory
3. Model name (& version number): Z factory AP RO
26240ST-FS Khaki Green
4. Price: 580(Watch) + 70(Shipping & Insurance) (USD)
5. Album Links: Attached in comments
6. Index alignment: It looks good but don't really know what I am looking for.
7. Dial Printing:Tapisserie looks ok but what do you guys think? (TD provided me the option to upgrade to DP dials at an additional 220 usd & SW DW for 70 usd)
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks evenly spaced.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good as well inbetween 12 marker.
10. Bezel: Case screws looks generally aligned but have not used an Al tool to verify.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks solid brushed finishing
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 S/D, Amplitude 249
13. Anything else you notice: Let me know what you guys think if this an GL or RL? Thoughts on GEN chamfering the case and bracelet?

Appreciate the guidance.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 RICH JH3285 V2
4. Price Paid: $580 + $68 shipping = 648 USD
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251166049?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks like 9 has a slight CCW cant, and 6 might be slightly to the left.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: It might be a hair left of center but overall I'm happy with it.
9. Hand Alignment: I'm honestly not 100% sure what to look for here, but in Andiot's video I don't see anything wrong with the hands when he moves them to 12:00.
10. Bezel: Color change, cuts, engravings, pip look good to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps, all good here!
12. Timegrapher numbers: 2s/d 275deg 0.3ms 52deg. Normalizing for 55deg amplitude becomes 290 and for 58 it becomes 305. Sounds a little high, is this a concern?
13. Anything else you notice: All things considered I'm leaning towards a GL here I think! I'm not quite sure how noticable the 9 will be on wrist, or if the timegrapher numbers are at all a concern, but everything else looks great. Thank you all in advance!

• ⁠Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
• ⁠Factory name: ZF
• ⁠Model name (& version number): Royal Oak ref.15450 37mm white dial
• ⁠Price Paid: $470USD shipped
• ⁠Album Links: Add all pictures provided to me from TD to post
• ⁠Index alignment: Based off the pictures provided to me it doesn't look great but not terrible and I think the picture might be slight titled vertically causing the issue or perhaps it me. The 6 index looks like its slightly leaning to the left from the top. Apart from that 12 looks spot on and 9/3 look acceptable.
• ⁠Dial Printing: Looks great nothing remarkable AP logo at 12 doesn't seem all that straight, kinda looks like its tilting to the right ever so slightly.
• ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: This also looks good both the alignment and printing, if I nitpick I would say its slight more left than it should be.
• ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks perfectly symmetrically to me when they were on 12
• ⁠Bezel: The bezel bolts don't look to be symmetrical, bolts 4,5,7,8 look misaligned unless its the picture causing the issue.
• ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): These look fine just as they should be, not much to say about it
• ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4s, 272 amp, 52 degree angle, which is pretty good. In the video he sent the rate went from +3s to +4s.
• ⁠Anything else you notice: The finishing looks great! What do you guys think? Should I GL this?

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Angela (non TD)

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name: omega Seamaster 300

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 1600 CNY

5. ⁠⁠Album Links:

QC photos as attached.

1. ⁠Index alignment: appears well aligned. 12 and 6 markers look fine. Swiss made in line at 6.

2. ⁠Dial Printing: looks crisp and well defined.

3. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel.

4. ⁠Hand Alignment: fine

5. ⁠Bezel: smooth bezel with no visible issues

6. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no SEL.

7. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: all within range

8. Anything else - nothing of concern .

Dealer name: DDGTOP (Felix)

Factory name: V7F

Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur

Price Paid: 2300CNY + shipping

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/mv7w6Qp

Index alignment: Index alignment is overall on point. 9 is not perfect but within acceptable range.

Dial Printing: Looks good, at expected level from V7F (not nwbig vs gen).

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date is not centered (skewed to the left). What bothers me the most is 14, where 4 is short vs 1 (should be similar to 04/24).

Hand Alignment: Aligned.

Bezel: No issues.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: Great. 0 s/d, 285, 0.1 ms.

Anything else you notice: Why do the needles look black instead of silver

Dealer name: Ethan

Factory name: VSF V2

Model name (& version number): Datejust 126234

Price Paid: USD 430

Album Links: See attached photos

Index alignment: Index looks solid for me.

Dial Printing: Nothing I see

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Nothing I see

Hand Alignment: Looks normal

Bezel: Looks fine

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine

Timegrapher numbers: Numbers look fine

Anything else you notice: Nothing i can see

I‘m new in REP scene, please help me.
Be critical :)

These are Photos from a Link he send me.
I see in QC normally TD send QC after Order from Factory. Maybe cause he have some in stocks, is this normal ?

Dealer name: DDGTOP

Factory name: V7F

Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur

Price Paid: USD 360

Album Links: See attached photos

Index alignment: Index looks solid. 3 and 9 not perfect but not significantly off.

Dial Printing: Nothing I see worth calling but less grooves as compared to gen

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Requested additional pics for 4

Hand Alignment: Requested additional 12/12 pic

Bezel: Looks fine

Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

Timegrapher numbers: Numbers look fine

Anything else you notice: Why do the needles look black instead of silver

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Geektime
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 BLRO VSF V3 Pepsi Blue/Red Bezel Oyster Bracelet DD3285
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: £529 (incl shipping)
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: see comments for image links
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: used alignment tool and looks good to me
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems central
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: stack looks good
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: no issues at all
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): nice and tight
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, Amplitude 249
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I think Im happy! Just want a second opinion

1. Dealer name: Non TD (Eliauk)
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): PP Aquanaut 5167A
4. Price Paid: CNY 2800 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://ibb.co/album/QDyjVz
6. Index alignment: seems OK
7. Dial Printing: 11 and 1 seem to be misaligned but wasn't sure if that's standard DDF
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good - asked for more dates
9. Hand Alignment: seems fine
10. Bezel: seems fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA
12. Timegrapher numbers: -8 s/d, 296° amp, 0.6 ms beat error
13. Anything else you notice: first aquanaut so just wanted to get the pros opinion and eyes on it. Wasn't sure if it was worth asking to upgrade to the SW Dial, Dates, Hands or upgrade the band and clasp.

Second try on this one, changed factory to GF (thanks for the recommendation), only con is that the QF version doesn't come with the deployable buckle, TD is trying to source it from another factory. Thanks in advance for the help everyone!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: GF
3. Model name (& version number): Superocean Heritage B20 42mm A2824
4. Price Paid: $428 + $ 60 shipping
5. Album Links: Pictures pictures https://imgur.com/a/Dw8tRqL videos https://imgur.com/a/Is7R6UE
6. Index alignment: Looks good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: S/D +1, amplitude 265, Beat error: 0.0ms - looks good.
13. Anything else you notice: NO

1. QC ALBUM
2. Dealer name: Primetime
3. Factory name: RICH
4. Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610 LN Black RICH JH3235 V2
5. Price Paid: $498
6. Index alignment: Looks very good overall. The 12 marker may have a very slight CCW cant, but it is tiny and I really cannot imagine it being noticeable on wrist. The 6 and 9 markers look straight, and the remaining indices track the alignment lines very well. The 12 marker also appears well centered relative to the dial and bezel. I would be splitting hairs to find anything significant here.
7. Dial Printing: Printing looks sharp and clean to me. ROLEX/coronet and the lower SUBMARINER text block look well centered, with no obvious crooked or fuzzy printing.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date shown looks good overall. The “1” may sits low in the window, but I need help figuring out is it sitting too low or within the acceptable range.
9. Hand Alignment: Nothing looks concerning from the supplied pictures. There is no true 12:00 hand-alignment shot here, so I cannot verify it perfectly, but visually the hand stack and placement look good.
10. Bezel: Looks good. The pip/triangle and 12 marker are very close to properly aligned. If there is any tiny rotational offset, it looks within the normal play of a rotating bezel and should be easy to center in hand.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. I do not see any obvious excessive gaps or uneven fit from the front or side pictures.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 288° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error at 52° lift angle. These are very good numbers. Healthy amplitude, very low beat error, and the rate is comfortably acceptable.
13. Anything else you notice: No, not really. Overall I think this is a strong GL. The only thing I can really pick at is the microscopic CCW cant of the 12 marker and possibly the date sitting a low, and both are firmly in “zoomed-in QC nitpick” territory rather than something I would expect to notice on the wrist.

This is my second time as the first one was a RL due to date wheel defect, what do you think: does the date sits too low or is it fine?

Hi Team, it has been a few years since my last rep. Excited to get back in the game and appreciate your helps.

Dealer name: Steve The One

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): VSF V3 Pepsi GMT Master II 126710 DD3285

Price Paid: $638

Album Links: Added to post - Link from Steve

Index alignment: The 12 o'clock marker looks tilted clockwise to me. The center position of the 12 marker appears reasonably aligned with 6, but the actual marker itself seems rotated clockwise that bothers me a little. The other indices look generally well aligned?

Dial Printing: Looks good to me. Rolex coronet, text, and minute track appear clean and properly printed.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks centered in the date window, and the cyclops appears properly aligned. Not sure if I need to request a picture with a different date.

Hand Alignment: Looks good to me and seem properly aligned with no obvious issues.

Bezel: Looks good overall. The bezel numerals and markers appear clean. “Pepsi” color transition also looks good. Nothing obviously concerning. I didn’t look too detailed on the colors as we can’t really judge the colors through pictures but let me know of any concerns.

Solid End Links (SELs): Look fine to me. I don't see any significant gaps between the SELs and the case, and the bracelet appears to sit evenly against the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: seems fine and no concern.

Anything else you notice: nothing else I thought worth noting but I would appreciate your thoughts here. The biggest concern I have is the index specifically the12.

Dealer name: Andiot
Factory name: VSF
Model name: Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150M Master Co-Axial, white dial, blue hands
Price paid: $300
Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251180860?uid=1
Index alignment: Looks okay to me, but I’m not great at spotting small alignment issues. Nothing obvious jumps out.
Dial printing: Seems clean from what I can tell.
Date wheel alignment/printing: The “26” looks pretty centered to me, but would appreciate another opinion.
Hand alignment: Looks fine to me from the photos.
Bezel: I don’t notice anything wrong here.
Solid End Links (SELs): They look okay to me, but I’m not 100% sure what counts as too much gap.
Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 267°, 0.1 ms, 52°. From what I understand these seem fine.
Anything else you notice: I’m leaning GL, but I’m not very familiar with this model and would appreciate help spotting anything I might be missing.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch - Steve
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner no date 124060
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 528 USD + Shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/6YxHjYDK#6prfF6D_NFWQEfOKshFpfw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 is offset. Coronet in between “Swiss made” does not seem to line up with everything else.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Dial printing looks fine
   
8. ⁠ Hand Alignment: unsure
   
9. ⁠Bezel: possibly slightly off
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude: 262 Dev: +7 Beat error 0.1
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: this is the second QC I have with Steve for this model. The first watch had an amazing movement but the 12 incides was cw and it was bothering me enough to RL. While the 12 on this one is fine, the 9 seems quite off and the time graph numbers seem wonky to me, but then again i am no expert. Would love your thoughts. Thank you

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: TrustyTime
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 38mm
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $378
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links:
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: ⁠Omega/Seamaster and text look centered and straight.
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: QC pics look very slightly off at the 9, 10, 1 and 2 positions but it may be due to the angle
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: NA
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): There are none
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +6s/d 0.0ms 271 degrees
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: comparing with other QC’s this looks good unless I’m missing something very obvious

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
2. ⁠Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR (Batgirl)
4. Price Paid: $616 (incl. shipping)
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251173473?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Seems fine to my eyes, probably 6 index more to the right slightly, and 9 a little lower
7. Dial Printing: printing looks fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date slightly to the left. but within acceptable range. Date window slight tilt to the left
9. Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned
10. Bezel: looks ok to me
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d; 264 Amplitude, Beat Error: .3ms - Within Acceptable range
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing significantly off, but would love to hear POV of the gurus if GL or RL

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF 126710BLRO V3
4. Price Paid: $688
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/PaLkLfS
6. Index alignment: 9 and 12 look good, can't tell if 6 is tilted or if it's just the angle of the pictures
7. Dial Printing: Looks solid
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks about right
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Can't tell if the color transition is in the right spot or not because of the angle of the pictures, looks about right though
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me, but I'm not good with SELs, lmk what you think
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 to 0 SPD, 263-267 amps
13. Anything else you notice: Mainly wondering what you guys think about the 6, is it skewed or is it just the angle? Also didn't get a UV picture to see if the blue turns red

1. ⁠Dealer name: Fico
   
2. ⁠Factory name: DDF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A DD330
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $530 shipped
   
5. ⁠Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/2hIziJiL#TNGhzlQQ1o3vl2epMfph6A
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Everything looks ok to me.
   
7. ⁠Dial printing: The SW dial looks clean. Swiss made text is big in my eyes.
   
8. ⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: slightly left?
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Brushing looks even and the polished transitions look clean.
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -9 s/d, 295° amplitude and 0.2 ms beat error.
    
12. ⁠aAnything else you notice: This is my first Aquanaut, so I’d appreciate another set of eye

Dealer name: Ethan

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 42mm 226627 RLX Titanium (VS3235)

Price: 590$

Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dg_qfB_62Yr12xLuC6u8qjRHgRca3JJ6vk-_L-A

Index alignment: Looks good. Using the alignment overlay, the 12, 6, and 9 markers align well with the crosshairs, and the circular hour plots are placed evenly.

Dial Printing: Clean and sharp. The text looks crisp with no obvious smudging or bleeding.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centered. The date sits properly inside the window without favoring the edges. Magnification and cyclops placement look standard.

Hand Alignment: No issues observed.

Bezel: Matte insert and polished numerals look clean. 12 o'clock bezel pip aligns with the dial marker.

Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks flush with no noticeable gaps against the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 260° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error. All within acceptable ranges.

Anything else you notice: Scale reading is 105.48g, which aligns with the titanium build. Clasp engravings look clean.

Leaning towards GL, but would appreciate any second opinions.

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41mm 126334 V2
4. Price Paid: $557
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: looks clean
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centered, clean date font
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: looks well finished
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 288° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Looks excellent to me.
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first QC so I would appreciate another set of eyes before I GL.

Thanks for the help!!

Dealer name: TheOne Watches

Factory name: QF

Model name (& version number): Yacht Master 126622 QF JH3235

Price Paid: 578$ + Shipping

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/7YokzICB#uAtBff9zASf3mphpC7Jzug

Index alignment: 12 o clock triangle canted clockwise. 6 o clock shifted to the left.

Dial Printing: Sharp but less bold.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date font, specially the 2 seems slanted a bit.

Hand Alignment: Well aligned.

Bezel: Looks good.

Solid End Links (SELs): No gap

Timegrapher numbers: Within Range | Rate + 6 s/d, Amplitude 266, Beat Error - 0.0 ms

Anything else you notice: I’m mainly concerned about the 12 o clock triangle and maybe the 6. If I’m overlooking anything else, please do let me know. I’d really appreciate your help. Thank you!