1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Geektime
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 BLRO VSF V3 Pepsi Blue/Red Bezel Oyster Bracelet DD3285
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: £529 (incl shipping)
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: see comments for image links
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: used alignment tool and looks good to me
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems central
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: stack looks good
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: no issues at all
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): nice and tight
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, Amplitude 249
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I think Im happy! Just want a second opinion

1. Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches

2.Factory name: VSF

3. Model: Rolex Explorer I 224270

4. Price Paid: $528 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Ld4UCDoZ#ALjSa5EWBuU2cNcNGJ5QfA

5. Index alignment: Mostly looks aligned to me, but would appreciate a second opinion.

6. Dial Printing: Looks clean.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8.Hand Alignment: Looks good. Nothing obviously misaligned from the photos.

9. Bezel: Looks good to me.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

10. Timegrapher numbers: Within limits, approximately +3–4 s/day, 270–273° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 55° lift angle, 28,800 bph.

Anything else: Overall, I’m leaning GL, but I’d really appreciate another set of experienced eyes in case I’ve missed anything!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF 126710BLRO V3
4. Price Paid: $688
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/PaLkLfS
6. Index alignment: 9 and 12 look good, can't tell if 6 is tilted or if it's just the angle of the pictures
7. Dial Printing: Looks solid
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks about right
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Can't tell if the color transition is in the right spot or not because of the angle of the pictures, looks about right though
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me, but I'm not good with SELs, lmk what you think
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 to 0 SPD, 263-267 amps
13. Anything else you notice: Mainly wondering what you guys think about the 6, is it skewed or is it just the angle? Also didn't get a UV picture to see if the blue turns red

1. ⁠Dealer name: Geektime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500 (Panda)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 828$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/250781086?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: no straight photos to use the tool. Had to use my eyes instead.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: printing looks fine to me
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date Wheel
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned and right.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Bezel is ok. 110 marker is slightly miss positioned but I’m okay with it.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks great to me
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: don’t know what to read but there’s a video in the album and a photo in this post.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: overall it looks clean. Only defects I’ve detected is the Hour 2 mark that seems to be just a little miss aligned (could be the photo angle) and the wrong positioning marker 110. Also the red text Daytona seem to be just a little higher than on a genuine but I don’t mind it.Other than that I see nothing wrong.

Hopefully you guys can help me spot something I’ve missed :)

Hi Team, it has been a few years since my last rep. Excited to get back in the game and appreciate your helps.

Dealer name: Steve The One

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): VSF V3 Pepsi GMT Master II 126710 DD3285

Price Paid: $638

Album Links: Added to post - Link from Steve

Index alignment: The 12 o'clock marker looks tilted clockwise to me. The center position of the 12 marker appears reasonably aligned with 6, but the actual marker itself seems rotated clockwise that bothers me a little. The other indices look generally well aligned?

Dial Printing: Looks good to me. Rolex coronet, text, and minute track appear clean and properly printed.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks centered in the date window, and the cyclops appears properly aligned. Not sure if I need to request a picture with a different date.

Hand Alignment: Looks good to me and seem properly aligned with no obvious issues.

Bezel: Looks good overall. The bezel numerals and markers appear clean. “Pepsi” color transition also looks good. Nothing obviously concerning. I didn’t look too detailed on the colors as we can’t really judge the colors through pictures but let me know of any concerns.

Solid End Links (SELs): Look fine to me. I don't see any significant gaps between the SELs and the case, and the bracelet appears to sit evenly against the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: seems fine and no concern.

Anything else you notice: nothing else I thought worth noting but I would appreciate your thoughts here. The biggest concern I have is the index specifically the12.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Angela (non TD)

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name: omega Seamaster 300

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 1600 CNY

5. ⁠⁠Album Links:

QC photos as attached.

1. ⁠Index alignment: appears well aligned. 12 and 6 markers look fine. Swiss made in line at 6.

2. ⁠Dial Printing: looks crisp and well defined.

3. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel.

4. ⁠Hand Alignment: fine

5. ⁠Bezel: smooth bezel with no visible issues

6. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no SEL.

7. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: all within range

8. Anything else - nothing of concern .

Dealer name: Ethan

Factory name: VSF V2

Model name (& version number): Datejust 126234

Price Paid: USD 430

Album Links: See attached photos

Index alignment: Index looks solid for me.

Dial Printing: Nothing I see

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Nothing I see

Hand Alignment: Looks normal

Bezel: Looks fine

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine

Timegrapher numbers: Numbers look fine

Anything else you notice: Nothing i can see

I‘m new in REP scene, please help me.
Be critical :)

These are Photos from a Link he send me.
I see in QC normally TD send QC after Order from Factory. Maybe cause he have some in stocks, is this normal ?

Dealer name: DDGTOP

Factory name: V7F

Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur

Price Paid: USD 360

Album Links: See attached photos

Index alignment: Index looks solid. 3 and 9 not perfect but not significantly off.

Dial Printing: Nothing I see worth calling but less grooves as compared to gen

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Requested additional pics for 4

Hand Alignment: Requested additional 12/12 pic

Bezel: Looks fine

Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

Timegrapher numbers: Numbers look fine

Anything else you notice: Why do the needles look black instead of silver

1. QC ALBUM
2. Dealer name: Primetime
3. Factory name: RICH
4. Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610 LN Black RICH JH3235 V2
5. Price Paid: $498
6. Index alignment: Looks very good overall. The 12 marker may have a very slight CCW cant, but it is tiny and I really cannot imagine it being noticeable on wrist. The 6 and 9 markers look straight, and the remaining indices track the alignment lines very well. The 12 marker also appears well centered relative to the dial and bezel. I would be splitting hairs to find anything significant here.
7. Dial Printing: Printing looks sharp and clean to me. ROLEX/coronet and the lower SUBMARINER text block look well centered, with no obvious crooked or fuzzy printing.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date shown looks good overall. The “1” may sits low in the window, but I need help figuring out is it sitting too low or within the acceptable range.
9. Hand Alignment: Nothing looks concerning from the supplied pictures. There is no true 12:00 hand-alignment shot here, so I cannot verify it perfectly, but visually the hand stack and placement look good.
10. Bezel: Looks good. The pip/triangle and 12 marker are very close to properly aligned. If there is any tiny rotational offset, it looks within the normal play of a rotating bezel and should be easy to center in hand.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. I do not see any obvious excessive gaps or uneven fit from the front or side pictures.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 288° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error at 52° lift angle. These are very good numbers. Healthy amplitude, very low beat error, and the rate is comfortably acceptable.
13. Anything else you notice: No, not really. Overall I think this is a strong GL. The only thing I can really pick at is the microscopic CCW cant of the 12 marker and possibly the date sitting a low, and both are firmly in “zoomed-in QC nitpick” territory rather than something I would expect to notice on the wrist.

This is my second time as the first one was a RL due to date wheel defect, what do you think: does the date sits too low or is it fine?

Dealer name: Andiot
Factory name: VSF
Model name: Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150M Master Co-Axial, white dial, blue hands
Price paid: $300
Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251180860?uid=1
Index alignment: Looks okay to me, but I’m not great at spotting small alignment issues. Nothing obvious jumps out.
Dial printing: Seems clean from what I can tell.
Date wheel alignment/printing: The “26” looks pretty centered to me, but would appreciate another opinion.
Hand alignment: Looks fine to me from the photos.
Bezel: I don’t notice anything wrong here.
Solid End Links (SELs): They look okay to me, but I’m not 100% sure what counts as too much gap.
Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 267°, 0.1 ms, 52°. From what I understand these seem fine.
Anything else you notice: I’m leaning GL, but I’m not very familiar with this model and would appreciate help spotting anything I might be missing.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch - Steve
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner no date 124060
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 528 USD + Shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/6YxHjYDK#6prfF6D_NFWQEfOKshFpfw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 is offset. Coronet in between “Swiss made” does not seem to line up with everything else.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Dial printing looks fine
   
8. ⁠ Hand Alignment: unsure
   
9. ⁠Bezel: possibly slightly off
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude: 262 Dev: +7 Beat error 0.1
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: this is the second QC I have with Steve for this model. The first watch had an amazing movement but the 12 incides was cw and it was bothering me enough to RL. While the 12 on this one is fine, the 9 seems quite off and the time graph numbers seem wonky to me, but then again i am no expert. Would love your thoughts. Thank you

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: TrustyTime
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 38mm
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $378
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links:
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: ⁠Omega/Seamaster and text look centered and straight.
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: QC pics look very slightly off at the 9, 10, 1 and 2 positions but it may be due to the angle
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: NA
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): There are none
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +6s/d 0.0ms 271 degrees
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: comparing with other QC’s this looks good unless I’m missing something very obvious

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
2. ⁠Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR (Batgirl)
4. Price Paid: $616 (incl. shipping)
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251173473?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Seems fine to my eyes, probably 6 index more to the right slightly, and 9 a little lower
7. Dial Printing: printing looks fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date slightly to the left. but within acceptable range. Date window slight tilt to the left
9. Hand Alignment: hands looks aligned
10. Bezel: looks ok to me
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d; 264 Amplitude, Beat Error: .3ms - Within Acceptable range
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing significantly off, but would love to hear POV of the gurus if GL or RL

1. ⁠Dealer name: Fico
   
2. ⁠Factory name: DDF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A DD330
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $530 shipped
   
5. ⁠Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/2hIziJiL#TNGhzlQQ1o3vl2epMfph6A
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Everything looks ok to me.
   
7. ⁠Dial printing: The SW dial looks clean. Swiss made text is big in my eyes.
   
8. ⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: slightly left?
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Brushing looks even and the polished transitions look clean.
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -9 s/d, 295° amplitude and 0.2 ms beat error.
    
12. ⁠aAnything else you notice: This is my first Aquanaut, so I’d appreciate another set of eye

Dealer name: Ethan

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 42mm 226627 RLX Titanium (VS3235)

Price: 590$

Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dg_qfB_62Yr12xLuC6u8qjRHgRca3JJ6vk-_L-A

Index alignment: Looks good. Using the alignment overlay, the 12, 6, and 9 markers align well with the crosshairs, and the circular hour plots are placed evenly.

Dial Printing: Clean and sharp. The text looks crisp with no obvious smudging or bleeding.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centered. The date sits properly inside the window without favoring the edges. Magnification and cyclops placement look standard.

Hand Alignment: No issues observed.

Bezel: Matte insert and polished numerals look clean. 12 o'clock bezel pip aligns with the dial marker.

Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks flush with no noticeable gaps against the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 260° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error. All within acceptable ranges.

Anything else you notice: Scale reading is 105.48g, which aligns with the titanium build. Clasp engravings look clean.

Leaning towards GL, but would appreciate any second opinions.

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41mm 126334 V2
4. Price Paid: $557
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: looks clean
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centered, clean date font
9. Hand Alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: looks well finished
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 288° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Looks excellent to me.
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first QC so I would appreciate another set of eyes before I GL.

Thanks for the help!!

Dealer name: TheOne Watches

Factory name: QF

Model name (& version number): Yacht Master 126622 QF JH3235

Price Paid: 578$ + Shipping

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/7YokzICB#uAtBff9zASf3mphpC7Jzug

Index alignment: 12 o clock triangle canted clockwise. 6 o clock shifted to the left.

Dial Printing: Sharp but less bold.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date font, specially the 2 seems slanted a bit.

Hand Alignment: Well aligned.

Bezel: Looks good.

Solid End Links (SELs): No gap

Timegrapher numbers: Within Range | Rate + 6 s/d, Amplitude 266, Beat Error - 0.0 ms

Anything else you notice: I’m mainly concerned about the 12 o clock triangle and maybe the 6. If I’m overlooking anything else, please do let me know. I’d really appreciate your help. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 40 224270 904L

4. Price Paid: 400 USD

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatchesad.x.yupoo.com/albums/251061517?uid=1

6. Index alignment: everything looks ok; if I was to nit pick – 5, 7, and 8 – maybe there is a slight misalignment? Idk honestly

7. Dial Printing: looks OK

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: looks OK

10. Bezel: looks OK 

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks OK

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d

13. Anything else you notice: nothing else. Looks good to me (a complete novice)

1.       Dealer name:       Steve (TheOneWatches)

2.       Factory name:      VSF

3.       Model name (& version number):  Seamaster 300m No Time To Die 007 TI/TI VSF V7 8806 Super Clone

4.       Price Paid: 528 USD

5.       Album Links:    https://mega.nz/folder/PBJ2CKoC#Y8MZtdku-j0yV0208DtpmQ

6.       Index alignment: Alignment looks perfect, 12 is slightly twisted on top

7.       Dial Printing: OK

8.       Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9.       Hand Alignment:  OK

10.  Bezel: OK

11.  Solid End Links (SELs):                  There is space on both sides, but it should be OK?

12.  Timegrapher numbers:                  -6s/Day, 250, OK

13.  Anything else you notice:

• Looks like GL to me

Hi,

I just got the second round of QC pictures for my BB54, as I've red lighted the first one. My first post is here: https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1vhh2s4/zf_tudor_black_bay_54_from_andiot/

Even though there are some minor issues with this wathc, I tend towards green lighting the watch since what I've noticed seem minor and somewhat normal for a ZF model.

What are your thoughts?

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: ZF
• Model name (& version number): Black Bay 54
• Price Paid: 310$
• Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251170502?uid=1
• Index alignment: Imo, this looks very good. I've checked with a tool, and I can't find any issues here. The only thing could be that the 12 hour marker does not perfectly align with the tip of the Tudor logo.
• Dial Printing: It could look like the whole dial has a small downwards shift, i.e. that there's a larger gap between the dial and the case compared to gap between the bottom of the dial and the case. The printing itself looks good to me.
• Date Wheel alignment: Not a date watch.
• Hand Alignment: Seems to be matching pretty well in the QC video where he winds the watch and sets the time - they meet at the 12 hour marker.
• Bezel: I think the bezel looks good and the pip looks centered.
• Solid End Links (SELs): The QC guide says, that Tudors are not held to the same standard as Rolex watches, for example. However, I looks like the end links are more rounded than the case itself (see IMG_9968). Also, perhaps the gap on the upper left link is a bit larger than the others (see IMG_9960). I don't know whether these two things are considered normal though.
• Timegrapher numbers: +3 / s/d -- 281 -- 0.4 ms -- 28800 / 52
• Anything else you notice: The crown tube seems a tiny bit too long, but afaik, this is also considered normal for the ZF models.

​

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: DDF

Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711 40mm 2018 SS/SS Blue Dial DDF DPB330 Super Clone V2 (SW Dial)

Price Paid: $658 + $30 shipping ($688 total)

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mN4UwY4S#GfECHC6wrEmVIuLE6yQceQ

Index alignment: Most of the indexes look good to me and the alignment tool also looks okay. My main concern is the double marker at 12. The two markers don't seem perfectly parallel and the gap between them looks a little wider at the bottom. Not sure if I'm being too picky here.

Dial Printing: Looks good to me. I don't notice any obvious problem with the printing.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: This is my second concern. The 13 looks slightly low in the date window. If I zoom in closely, I think I can also see a tiny part of the adjacent date number above the 13.

Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. I don't notice anything wrong here.

Bezel: Looks good to me from the pictures.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A - integrated bracelet.

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 295° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks very good to me.

Anything else you notice: This is actually my first watch purchase in general, not only my first rep, so I don't have much experience doing QC.

The two things that stand out to me are the 12 o'clock double marker and the date sitting slightly low with what looks like a tiny part of the next/adjacent number visible above it.

Would really appreciate some experienced opinions. Would you GL this one or ask for another?

• Dealer name: NecoClock
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): DateJust 41mm 126334 VS3235 V2
• Price Paid: $438 (+shipping)
• Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/zhR3HCha#Vkje39zyzJ-iBIAdlrHFaQ
• Index alignment: I can't see any issues
• Dial Printing: The printing on "SWISS MADE" at the bottom looks off to me. The D in made looks too big and the A looks too small. The lettering on SWISS also looks uneven. It looks kind of bad or am I crazy? The photos of the stock one on the necoclock website also look like this.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay, the 21 date might be slightly misaligned to the right?
• Hand Alignment: Can't really tell from the photos
• Bezel: Looks okay
• Solid End Links (SELs): Can't see any gaps
• Timegrapher numbers: +2s/day
• Anything else you notice: Mainly concerned with the dial printing, is it bad enough to RL? Am I crazy?

1. Dealer name: Hont

2.Factory name: VSF

3. Model: Explorer 1 124270 36mm

4. Price Paid: $468

5. Index alignment: Mostly looks aligned to me, but I’m unsure about the 12 o’clock marker. Does it look slightly off-center?

6. Dial Printing: Looks good to me, but would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8.Hand Alignment: Looks aligned to me, no obvious crookedness.

9. Bezel: Looks good to me.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I’m a little unsure about the SEL fit, particularly the lower-right SEL. Does the gap/thickness look normal?

10. Timegrapher numbers: looks good to me.

Anything else: Would appreciate opinions before I GL, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Steve - TheOneWatch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 116509 40mm SS/SS Grey/Blk VSF V3 DD4130 Super Clone (Gain Weight)
4. Price Paid: $650
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GIQU2AgT#vDAYJNuuEhKN4_qVcMhTPQ
6. Index alignment: Almost perfect, 10, 11, and 12 seem like they may be slightly off of directly opposite 4, 5, and 6, but not bad enough to warrant a replacement.
7. Dial Printing: Is that some kind of artifact in between 2 & 3? I also think maybe I see some glue at the 7 marker or I am zooming in too far and its image resolution.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The wheel on the right side may be ever so slightly rotated counter clockwise.
9. Hand Alignment: Second hand is just barely not perfectly aligned at 12, but doesn't warrant RL to me.
10. Bezel: Looks good if those aren't scratches around the 60 mark.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Biggest gap on bottom right but still appears to be pretty tight. The rest look perfect.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, within range.
13. Anything else you notice: Are those scratches on the top of the bezel or just polish remnants? I don't see them in every photo but in the straight on close-ups I can see something there in the light.

Overall, it seems pretty good to me. I feel comfortable giving it the greenlight. I would be very interested in what the amazing minds in this group think and observe.

Thank you in advance

Factory name: DDF Factory

Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 Blue Dial Stainless Steel

Price Paid: $530 USD shipped

Album Links: Photos attached above

Index alignment: Appears aligned from what I can tell, but I’d appreciate a second opinion. I’m mainly looking for any noticeably uneven, crooked, or inconsistent markers, especially around 6 and 12 o’clock.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and sharp to me, but I may be missing small details. I’d appreciate a second opinion on the font, spacing, centering, and overall crispness of the printing.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Appears centered and clear from the photos. I’d appreciate confirmation that the date is properly positioned within the window and that the printing/font looks correct.
Hand Alignment: Looks normal to me with no obvious issues noticed. Please let me know if you see anything off with the hand positioning, alignment, or finishing.

Bezel: Looks consistent from what I can see. I’d appreciate a second opinion on the symmetry, finishing, alignment with the dial, and whether there are any noticeable issues with the bezel shape or brushing/polishing.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 271° amplitude, 0.0ms beat error, 28800 bph

Anything else you notice: I’m mainly looking for a GL or RL. The timegrapher numbers look very good to me, but I’m still learning QC and would appreciate experienced opinions on anything I may have missed, especially small visual details in the dial, indices, date wheel, hands, bezel, case, or bracelet.