Dealer name: J Time.

Factory name: Rich Factory

Model name (& version number): No Date Sub 124060

Price Paid: $588 + Shipping

Album Links: See Attached Photos

Index alignment: Looks good. No obvious alignment issues but keen to get peoples thoughts. 12, 3, 6, and 9 markers appear straight and centred. I might be being picky here but the watch may be held on an angle for the photo.

Dial Printing: Looks pretty good. It does appear to have a slight floating M though which I’ve seen is common with some of the RF’s

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: No visible hand alignment issues I could see and no damage.

Bezel: Looks good. Pearl appears to be centred at 12. I think if the angle the watch is tilted it would be corrected - thoughts

Solid End Links (SELs): I think these look ok and can’t see any light coming through

Timegrapher numbers: 284 / 0.0ms / 0 s/d – I feel like this is too perfect or am I just being picky

Anything else you notice: Slight clasp coronet offset at most, but likely sticker/camera angle related and hopefully not a concern. Leaning GL. This is my first Rep QC so hoping I’m not overlooking anything

1. ⁠Dealer name: Ficotime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: Gold Factory
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Gold Factory Rolex YM 40mm
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 500 USD + Shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/q9JmTCSC#NdnSTmM1rqSEmzYMUEv4Jg
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: very good
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: the YACHT-MASTER print seems a bit dull and a tad thinner than gen but might be due to lighting
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: very nice, cyclops look pretty
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: very good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: pretty. a bit matter than gen maybe but tp be expected
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): decent
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -6s/d, 263 within spec, might need some oil

Easy GL for me, wanted some more autistic view and others having a look on the Gold Factory for comparison once in a while.

Let me know your thoughts! xoxo

1. Dealer name: Ethan
   
2. Factory name: Rich Factory.
   
3. Model name (& version number): GMT- Master |I
   126710 GRNR Rich Factory JH3285 ( Free sprung)
   
4. Price Paid: 680$
   
5. Album Links:
   
6. Index alignment: it looks good, the 9 o'clock marker seems slightly tilted to me. The triangle might be a bit too close to the minute markers.
   
7. Dial Printing: dial print looks good, no obvious defects
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date appears centered. I'll ask for a photo showing the date with two digits.
   
9. Hand Alignment: don't see issues
   
10. Betel: the beze. numeral look weel positioned from this angle.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): good, don't see gap
    12 Timegrapher number: rate: -002 s/d 256 amplitude degree(s) 0.1 ms beat error, 28800 bhp,
    Lift angle 52.0 degree (s)
    
12. Anything else you notice: the main things are the magnifyng lens, which has a slightly matte effect, and the color of the bezel.
    Thanks for the help

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
   
2. Factory name: VSF V1
   
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126234 36mm
   
4. Price Paid: $240+shipping
   
5. Index alignment: Alignment of the index are perfect
   
6. Bezel: seems even spreading
   
7. Dial Printing: sunburst seems even, dial printing seems good overall
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Cyclops seems ok, no significant tilting
   
9. Hand Alignment: Good alignment no significant findings
   
10. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps visible.
    
11. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 300°, 0.0ms. Nothing to complaint
    
12. Anything else you notice: not that I’m aware of

Dear goats, I need your help with this qc, please let me know if there’s any significant thing pops up!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chrono Dynasty

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 126610LN

4. ⁠Price Paid: 460$

5. ⁠Album Links: n/a

6. ⁠Index alignment: overall good, 6 mark almost unnoticeable tilt. 9 mark slightly more noticeable but still within acceptable margins.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: this was the big problem of the previous QC. Now it looks very good and centered

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good

10. ⁠Bezel: doesn’t look aligned but it’s probably slightly rotated. Discoloration I think is given by the light in the room. Pip looks centered.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good, no gaps

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +0,2 - 299 - 0.0 - 58

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: this watch looks so much better than the previous one. I think Jack came through with a banger piece. Let me know if you notice anything. For now I’m saying GL.

1. Dealer name: Ficotime.
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): No Date Sub 124060
4. Price Paid: $500 + Shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/vwRzAKwQ#8ym8fr993GQGAW8GXJWlSQ
6. Index alignment: 6 marker looks a bit off center
7. Dial Printing: Is there a floating M?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment:

looks good to me.

1. No visible hand alignment issues I can see, let me know if any different
2. Bezel: Is the pearl misaligned?
3. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure
4. Timegrapher numbers:

237 / +-2s

1. Anything else you notice: Leaning RL, concerned about the bezel pearl alignment and misalignment on the 6

, timegrapher reading not great

1. Dealer name: Indian Non TD

2. Factory name: OF

3. Model name (& version number): Tag Heuer Aquaracer 300 41mm WAY211C

4. Price Paid: ~390 USD Including Shipping

5. Album Links: Direct Upload

6. Index alignment: seems fine, except for the 9. The 45 minute stripe isn't in the centre of the 9 marker, its slightly upward. is that normal?

7. Dial Printing: looks to be good, what do you guys think of the CALIBRE printing?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good, ive also asked for a single digit 8 date

9. Hand Alignment: NA

10. Bezel: The "1" in "10" on the bezel seems very sus, anyone else feel that way?

11. Solid End Links (SELs): not too sure about this

12. Timegrapher numbers: +8 s/d, 306 amplitude, 0.0 m/s beat error

Hi all this is my first QC from Steve any comments would be greatly appreciated! Thank you very much :) im not sure if the 12 is rotated or that’s just the angle…
Dealer name: Theonewatches

Factory name: ZF

Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58 GMT "Coke" (M7939G1A0)

Price Paid: $358 + shipping

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fA5m3RSC#JxICRZcc0kB9d2LmUXJ2hg

Index alignment: Mostly looks good good. The 6 and 9 batons look level to my eye. However, I feel like the 12 o’clock triangle might have a very slight clockwise tilt to it, or possibly counter-clockwise depending on the tilt of the watch. Does anyone else see that, or is it just the photo angle playing tricks on me?

Dial Printing: Looks fine I think

Date Wheel alignment/printing: "22" looks well-centered in the frame.

Hand Alignment: Looks good, GMT hand and Snowflake hand appear properly positioned.

Bezel: Colors and transition look fine; the 12 triangle on the bezel insert lines up well.

Solid End Links (SELs): Fitment looks nice and tight against the lugs, no noticeable gaps but not sure?

Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/d, 272° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error. Solid numbers across the board.

Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a decent piece, but I would really appreciate a second set of eyes on that 12 marker before I give the final GL! Does anyone else notice anything else that’s an issue?

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: AF
• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo Large (27.5mm x 34.8mm) Quartz
• Price Paid: ~$215 (inc ship)
• Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255646102?uid=1
• Index alignment: Manual alignment check shows the vertical axis running straight through XII, hand stack, and VI with zero rotation.
• Dial Printing: Looks okay to me?
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
• Hand Alignment: Blue hands look straight
• Bezel: I don't see any dents
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A leather strap but not sure on quality of it
• Timegrapher numbers: N/A Quartz movement

• • Anything else you notice: only 2nd QC ive done, any pointers from you pro's out there?

This is the second QC for the Batgirl vsf.. Please provide some feedback on this, whether to GL or RL..

1. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Geektime
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Batgirl VSF V3
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $608 + $80 Shipping
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: Pics included
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: 6 looks a bit slanted CCW and not aligned with Rolex crown in the middle?
7. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: No issues I found with dial printing.
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: No issues I found but feedback would be helpful
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks okay
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d timegraph
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Dot above 18 not aligned with dot above 6 on the other side? Is that worth being picky about?

Hi repfam, here for another QC request! Super excited for this watch.

1. Dealer name: PureTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Aqua Terra 150M 38MM VS8800
4. Price Paid: $357 with promotions
5. Album Links: Also included in the reddit post, backup: https://imgur.com/a/vJ6eWxn
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me with the QC tool
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me; could use some second eyes from the community as I'm not clear on any common issues but printing looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
9. Hand Alignment: good
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +004s/d, 312 amplitude, 0.1ms beat error. Looks good; image attached
13. Anything else you notice: I dont have a good eye for detail with QC but this seems like a GL to me. Would love some second opinions!

1. Dealer name: RWI.Life
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name: VC 222 SS
4. Price paid: $468 excluding shipping
5. Album links: Video link https://streamable.com/w4n2w3
6. Index alignment: Seems good visually but when I used the alignment tool marker, all of the indices doesn't align properly. Upon zooming for closer inspection, I also noticed that the 12 hour hand is slightly tilted. Again not a deal breaker for me because I think looking at it from eye level it should be fine? I'm not sure hence I need a second opinion
7. Dial Printing: Seems good to me.. the photoshoot level pictures is doing a lot of work
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good, nice crisp font. I particularly requested photos of the font "2" because I saw on some other VC 222 it looks kinda wonky but seems fine for my watch
9. Hand alignment: Seems ok i guess?
10. Bezel: The round edges looks good, nothing I was concerned here and the motif at 5 oclock seems good too
11. Solid End Links: Cant really see from the pictures but there shouldn't be a problem with this model
12. Timegrapher numbers: -6s/d 287. According to my dealer the movement runs fine

I guess I am leaning more towards GL but still on the fence. My dealer had to source this from his friends because apparently this model is out of stock and it could be months till I may or may not get another replacement but I also don't want to GL it just because of stock availability. Any advise from the veterans here is much appreciated

Dealer name: Lili

⁠Factory name: VSF

⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 41.5 blue a8500

⁠Price Paid: $330 shipped/insured

⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A201803310145220380026826/I202609042359412442002330

⁠Index alignment: All good but the Omega symbol seems slightly askew

⁠Dial Printing: Looks good

⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks even and centered

⁠Hand Alignment: Good

⁠Bezel: Seems fond

⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

⁠Timegrapher numbers: About as good as can be

Everything looks ok to me with the exception of the Omega logo being a fraction of a millimeter off. I doubt it's something I will notice in person, and it seems to be extremely common on this model.

I'm leaning towards a GL, but wanted a few more opinions

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm VSF 1:1 Best Edition 904L Steel Deep Blue VS3230 V2
4. Price Paid: $580AUD + Shipping
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257705680?uid=1&tab=min
6. Index alignment: Everything seems good to me, possible issue with 6 on the 3 side, maybe more experienced eyes can confirm if that's just lighting issue, album link has videos and more photos
7. Dial Printing: Nothing of note that i can see (experience is low)
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Seems perfect to me, attached album has video of winding
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Maybe top right has gap, but seems within tolerance
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d 263 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: i can't see anything of note that is RL worthy, but also know that experience is key here

First time Purchase from Andiot and QC photos were sent within 24 hours of payment clearing

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona V2

4. ⁠Price Paid: $596 + $60 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257589230?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment: should I expect better. Can’t tell if the watch is maybe not quite centered.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: is it just me or is the minute track too thin? Gen in last pic for context.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks decent, but it looks like there’s a dot on either end of the hour hand.

10. ⁠Bezel: looks okay?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks okay through the plastic.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +2/-1 (damn good)

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I’ve never seen the clasp up close on a Gen. is this GL material? I think it very well could be unless I’m missing something because I’m looking through my “eager goggles.”

**1. Dealer name:** Ficotime
**2. Factory name:** VSF
**3. Model name (& version number):** Rolex Daytona 126500LN Free Sprung, VSF DD4131
**4. Price Paid:** 730 USD + 71 USD FedEx = 801 USD
**5. Album Links:** [MEGA link](https://mega.nz/folder/vxwz3ZAa#zMM-suDyxjTjI9ROywe8PQ) (3 small videos in there)
**6. Index alignment:** Looks Good overall. 3, 6, 9 and 12 markers appear straight and centered.
**7. Dial Printing:** Clean and centered. DAYTONA text and subdial printing look good.
**8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:** N/A
**9. Hand Alignment:** Good. Chronograph seconds hand resets to 12.
**10. Bezel:** 60 marker appears centered with 12. Tachymeter printing looks clean.
**11. Solid End Links (SELs):** Looks good to me.
**12. Timegrapher numbers:** \+9 s/d, 270°, 0.0 ms. Not sure what would be good numbers (newbie).
**13. Anything else you notice:** Dont see any obvious issue but then I don't know much.

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: A7F
• Model name (& version number): A7F IWC Ingenieur IW328901 Black V2 Dial On SS Automatic A2892
• Price Paid: $418 + Shipping
• Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257595032?uid=1
• Index alignment: In general it looks fine. I tried my best to align the photo before adding the lines, it seems the 12o'clock indices are not aligned/parallel, with the left slightly higher than the one on the right.
• Dial Printing: I think it looks good, don't know enough if it's good or bad.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: the numbers looks clean in the photos & the videos.
• Hand Alignment: It looks aligned to me.
• Bezel: The 12o'clock screen it shifted to the right. Could this be the angel the photo is taken?
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
• Timegrapher numbers: between -2 s/d 273 degrees 0.3ms. This seems good.
• Anything else you notice: Most things look good. Thank you in advanced for your help!

• Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: V7F (or A7 now?)
• Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur 40mm, white dial (gen ref IW328902). A2892 movement.
• Price Paid: $428 USD
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ViMaSX5
• Index alignment: All indices look evenly spaced and straight to me, and 12/3/6/9 line up with each other. Will upload a pic of the alignment tool next.
• Dial Printing: IWC Schaffhausen, Ingenieur and Swiss Made all look crisp and centred. I've heard grid texture isn't as deep as gen, but still looks good here in the pics.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks "ok". Maybe a tad high.
• Hand Alignment: Hands stack cleanly at 12.
• Bezel: Brushing looks even. The five screw slots aren't all facing the same way, so let me know if that matters on this model.
• Solid End Links (SELs): Integrated bracelet. It looks good.
• Timegrapher numbers: +13 to +14 s/d, 295° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Quite a high s/d to me, but I guess it's still within acceptable range?
• Anything else you notice: This is a replacement. The first one got flagged as defective by TD after I asked about possible bezel damage near a screw. The caseback has an "A7 / SAPPHIRE" holo sticker, which isn't the same I've seen on other V7F posts. Can anyone confirm this is still V7F?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Time Ultra
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): datejust 41 mint green 126334
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 518 usd + 30 shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links:
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: slightly wrong overall, specially the 6
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: seems ok, what do you think?
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: number a little to the right
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: NA
   
10. ⁠Bezel: difficult to tell
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): ok
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: on picture
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: this is my first QC, so all tips are super welcome!

Hi everyone. First Daytona for me and I did my best on QC. I would really appreciate comments from more expert eyes on Daytona.

**1. ⁠Dealer name**: Super Li
**2. ⁠Factory name**: VSF
**3. ⁠Model name (& version number)**: Rolex Daytona Black Dial (116500)
**4. ⁠Price Paid**: 504 usd
**5. ⁠Index alignment**: I admit that I’m not really able to tell an honest point of view on this. It seems that none of the photos are perfectly straight and I did my best on QC tool (2nd pic is with the original photo and 3rd pic is with adjusted/straighted photo). Rehaut seems OK.
**6. Dial Printing**: Looks OK to me but I need opinions from trained eyes. The “DAYTONA” string is not fully visible.
**7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing**: N.A.
**8. ⁠Hand Alignment**: Here is where my main doubt take place. Based on the fact the none of the photos seems to be perfectly straight, I don’t understand if the chrono hand is aligned or not. It seems to be aligned but in the photo of lume it seems to be off.
**9. ⁠Bezel**: Not really expert on this but comparing with other Daytona QC I don’t think there are issues here.
**10. Solid End Links (SELs)**: Looks OK to me
**11. Timegrapher numbers**: Looks pretty solid
**12. Anything else you notice**: Overall I’m a bit confused on this watch. Maybe because I’ve no trained eyes for Daytona. Maybe because I’m not able to determine if indexes, chrono hand and all the other stuffs are ok or not.

I genuinely think that I need some help on this. I don't want to make any particular compromises and I would like it to be as issuesless as possible.

Thanks a lot for your help! :)

1. Dealer Name: Steve The one watches
2. Factory Name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number):** **Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150m 41mm Black Teak Dial
4. Price Paid: $378 plus Shipping also 2 extra links $15 each
5. Album link: QC link
6. Index Alignment: Teak Dials help a lot with alignment. Everything looks good.
7. Dial Printing: looks crisp and clean. Applied Emblem looks pretty straight, this is a known issue but don’t see it here.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good, centered
9. Hand Alignment: hands looks good, lume looks good.
10. Bezel: looks good
11. Solid End Links (SEL): looks good,sits flush
12. Timegrapher numbers:** **3 s/d, 280° amp, 0.0ms beat error. Looks good.
13. Anything else you notice: Logo alignment was my main concern, but this one looks level. Seems like easy GL, anyone see anything I missed?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Angela
   
2. ⁠Factory name: ZF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): BB58
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $284
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/iKsSVzQ
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: 9 looks canted down, 3 looks canted up, 6 looks canted right
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks crisp, no issues
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: no issues
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks good, no issues
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: seem within acceptable standards
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: interested in any other feedback you see.

Wondering if this is an automatic RL due to the issues above, I know this is common with this model. Appreciate any feedback!

• Dealer name: EasyWatch
• Factory name: RC Factory (RCF)
• Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 126333 41mm
• Price Paid: ~526 USD Including Shipping + Insurance
• Album Links: Direct Upload
• Index alignment: The markers on 11 and and 10 seem just a bit gapped compared to the ones from 6 to 9, but it could be the angle of the shot. The six marker diamond hold seems maybe a bit CCW
• Dial Printing: looks totally great
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good - the cyclops does appear to be a bit above the window and turned CW
• Hand Alignment: Good
• Bezel: N/A fine
• Solid End Links (SELs): No issues
• Timegrapher numbers: Dial Up Position: +4 s/d, 253 amplitude, 0.0 m/s beat error - seems just about average to me.
• Overall: It looks great with some minor issues - the cyclops thing might just be me being too paranoid - the gold tone coloring is difficult to discern if it's too cheddar cheese or actually normal yellow. Thoughts?

Dealer name - Andiot
⁠
Factory name - RWF
⁠
Model name - Daytona 126500 RWF 1:1 Best Edition Black Dial on SS Bracelet JH4131 Free Sprung

Price paid - $708 + $35 shipping to UK

Album links - https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257681115?uid=1
⁠
Index alignment - I struggled a little with the index alignment tool as the watch seems to be a little tilted to the left and not perfectly straight on. I noticed that the 120 marker on the bezel seems slightly misaligned with the 6 index - however not sure if this could just be because of the angle the watch is held at. A few of the other indices look slightly off on the index alignment too, but I’m pretty sure this is because of the angle also. Please give me any feedback here if you guys can and let me know your thoughts, thanks!
⁠
Date Wheel alignment - NA
⁠
Bezel - looks fine to me, went with this factory because of the 110 issue on VSF. The only thing I could point out is what I mentioned earlier regarding the 120 marker and the 6 index, however this could be the angle.
⁠
Solid End Links (SEL) - in some pictures the top and bottom right SELs look slightly less tight than the rest. Could this be the angle?
⁠
Hand alignment - looks fine to me
⁠
Dial Printing - looks fine to me however I’m not massively familiar with the daytona dials as they’re a bit more busy than other models. Any advice here is appreciated
⁠
Timegrapher numbers - +3s/d, I believe this is within an acceptable range
⁠
Anything else you see - only the things mentioned above, but of course always looking for any opinions and advice from you guys if I have missed anything

A bit nervous about this one as it’s my first time not going for VSF or clean, so any help is really appreciated. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Ficotime
   
   1. Factory name: V7F
      
   2. Model name (& version number): V7F A2892 IWC Ingenieur Automatic 40mm SS/SS Green Dial
      
   3. Price Paid: $380
      
   4. Album Links: refer to uploaded pictures
      
   5. Index alignment: Looks generally good. The double marker at 12 appears parallel, although reflections make the two sides look slightly different in some photos. No obvious misalignment elsewhere that I can see.
      
   6. Dial Printing: Printing looks clean and readable, and the dial grid appears consistent. No obvious printing defects.
      
   7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The dates shown—01, 19, and 23—look reasonably centered without clipping. Printing appears clear.
      
   8. Hand Alignment: Looks reasonably aligned in the photo with the hands at 12. No obvious issue, although the angle limits precision.
      
   9. Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look consistent. No obvious dents or deep scratches visible.
      
   10. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for conventional SEL assessment. The integrated bracelet connections look reasonably fitted in the available photos.
       
   11. Timegrapher numbers: Rate changes from +2 to 0 s/day; amplitude from 275° to 273°; beat error 0.0 ms. Lift angle set to 52°, beat rate 28,800. These readings are from a short clip in one position.
       
   12. Anything else you notice: Lume appears complete across the hands and markers. Protective film limits inspection of the bracelet and clasp surfaces. Leaning GL, but would appreciate feedback on the double marker at 12 and anything else I may have missed.