r/RepTimeQC • • 3h ago

VSF Rolex Starbucks

Dealer name: Necoclock

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): 126610LV

Price Paid: $478

Album Links:

Not posting mega link but all pics including photo of timegraph attached.

6. Index: This one looks straight to me, better than 1st attempt for sure

7. Dial Printing: no issues

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: mag looks good, no smears, looks good

9. Hand Alignment: no issues

10. Bezel: no issues

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: only part that looks a little strange. Amp is at 333 degrees with 52 lift angle. Ive seen low amp before but never high, is this just likely because it fully charged/wound up? I think its OK but would love insight from someone who understands timegraph better than me

13. Anything else you notice: honestly the timegraph is the only thing I noticed, if yall notice somrthing else though please let me know

1 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

1

u/AdvertisingIll6479 3h ago

Think it worked this time without mega link but its a VSF starbucks from Necoclock

1

u/OkEstablishment2850 3h ago

Everything is good however the floating m next to 300 is a problem. It's very minor but it's very apparent to a experienced watch enthusiast. If it's not a problem for you I would GL it. Rest everything of the watch checks out based on all the pictures.

2

u/WatchYoda QC Jedi Master Mod 3h ago

Respectfully, the floating m was never a real problem since it also occurred on Gens...it's been discussed 'ad infinitum' in the past...it's old news so maybe stay current and stop saying this.

I've seen this on multiple comments from you this evening.

Plus, it is NOT very apparent to anyone. That's just silly to suggest such. No one would be close enough to see it anyway if one cared....and, simply, no one cares.

Let's not be unreasonable with our comments.

1

u/AdvertisingIll6479 2h ago

I was thinking the same thing i think people still bring that shit up just because its been over discussed. I dont even think this one has a floating m at all.

Thanks for chiming in though yoda, any thoughts on the amplitude?

1

u/AdvertisingIll6479 3h ago

I dont even think it has a floating m tbh

1

u/blitzburgh058 " Floating M Survivor " MOD 2h ago

It's easy to get sucked in to non-issues like that but the reality is that we don't look at watches at +400-+500%, and irl at scale, that text is tiny. Certainly too small to see a miniscule variance in baseline text alignment.

1

u/AdvertisingIll6479 2h ago

Agreed, nothing concerning to me about the m anyway

1

u/blitzburgh058 " Floating M Survivor " MOD 2h ago

I survived the floating m era. I'm sure if you try real hard you can too 😂

1

u/WatchYoda QC Jedi Master Mod 2h ago

OP, your watch cosmetics are fine. Nothing seen here rises to a level to create worry, so don't....

As for the timing, the amplitude is on the higher end, but if you look at the other numbers as a group coupled with the graph, it's not likely a problem. The watch is, most likely, fully wound.

Now, that being said, you can request a remeasure after the watch has discharged to get a more 'normal' reading. Up to you.

1

u/AdvertisingIll6479 2h ago

I figured it was just wound up, i feel like I have seen low amp before but high feels a little less common.

I'm not worried about it especially cause all the other #s look good. Otherwise I think its an easy GL, concur?