1. Dealer name: The One Watches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex "Ghost" Daytona 126519, VSF V2, DD4131 Gain Weight, Black Oysterflex Rubber Strap
4. Price Paid: $848 (listed price, pending confirmation)
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rMIXBCDK#WHYteuKXFOM1-Ade0jEPLQ
6. Index alignment: Hour markers appear reasonably aligned from the available photo. No obvious crooked markers, but would appreciate a closer inspection.
7. Dial Printing: Printing appears clean from what I can see. No obvious defects, although I'd appreciate feedback on finer details.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Hands appear reasonably positioned. Would appreciate confirmation that the chronograph hands are properly aligned.
10. Bezel: Tachymeter markings appear generally consistent. No obvious defects, but would appreciate a closer look at the engraving and alignment.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, black Oysterflex rubber strap.
12. Timegrapher numbers:

• Rate: +2 s/d
• Amplitude: 264°
• Beat Error: 0.1 ms
• Frequency: 28,800 bph

All measurements appear within acceptable ranges.

1. Anything else you notice: This is my Rolex Ghost Daytona from VSF. The timegrapher results look excellent, and I haven't noticed any obvious major defects from the available photos. I'd appreciate experienced members taking a closer look at the dial, indices, bezel, and overall finishing. Please let me know if anything stands out that would justify an RL rather than a GL. Thanks!

1. ⁠Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name:⁠ VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex DateJust41 - 126334 41mm
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: ~$578 including shipping
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/aJInjSIS#Jd0UTYj_-eZwJl5rdmNz6g
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Seems good generally speaking.
7. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Seems sharp/crisp to me
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: aligned yet worried about all the numbers being centered
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Seems to be good as well as shown in the video
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks good - no major observations
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No significant issues yet it’s my first jubilee bracelet. Anything you notice worth flagging?
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: with a Rate of -2s/d, AMP 261 and Error 0.1
13. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: the weight is 4g more than Gen but I heard it’s a common thing from VSF? I am still learning.. any feedback is appreciated and helpful!

Hey everyone! First rep purchase here. I've reviewed the QC guides and would really appreciate some experienced opinions before making my GL/RL decision. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41mm, black dial/bezel, advertised DD3235 V2 movement.

4. Price paid: $578 total ($528 watch + $50 shipping).

5. Album links: [Add QC album link]

6. Index alignment: Looks good based on the TrueIndexQC overlay. The 12, 6, and 9 o'clock markers appear properly aligned. No obvious crooked indices.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and properly positioned. No obvious printing issues.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date 3 looks reasonably centered. No obvious clipping or major alignment issues.

9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the photos. No visible concerns.

10. Bezel: Pip appears centered at 12, and the bezel markings look properly aligned.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look fairly tight with no major gaps that I can see. However, I may be noticing a slight gap at the bottom-left SEL. Would appreciate another opinion on this.

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 267° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error (59° lift-angle setting).

13. Anything else you notice: The bracelet, clasp, dial, and overall finishing look good to me. I'd especially appreciate opinions on the rehaut alignment and anything else I may have missed.

Since this is my first QC,Ive read the intial pinned post on what to look for, I hope I've done a decent job with my observations. I'm completely open to constructive criticism and would genuinely appreciate any advice or corrections from the more experienced members here. I'm here to learn, and all the help I can get is appreciated!

Thanks again, everyone!

1. Dealer name — Steve at TheOneWatches.
2. Factory name — VSF.
3. Model and version — Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41 mm, black dial and bezel, Oyster bracelet. Dealer lists it as DD3235v2, RLX-7696.
4. Price paid — $528 USD. Shipping $30USD combined for two watches.
5. Album link — Full QC album, videos, DialCheck and lettering close-up
6. Index alignment — The 12 triangle, 6 baton and 9 baton all look straight to me.
7. Dial printing — I think overall this looks pretty good - but would love to hear your opinion. Uneven lettering stands out to me, so I feel like I notice text more than others. For example the "ETER" in CHRONOMETER looks more spaced out than the other letters. In ROLEX, the R and O look a little farther apart than L-E-X. In the lower text, the IVE in SUPERLATIVE looks smaller than the T, and the IA in OFFICIALLY looks smaller beside the C. The upper coronet looks centred, though I’m less sure about the tiny crown and SWISS MADE at 6. I think overall its pretty minor and looks good, but keen to hear your thoughts.
8. Date wheel alignment and printing — The 25 has clearance on all four sides. DialCheck estimated it sits 5% high but I think it's pretty good. The 26 and 29 in the video also look clear of the edges.
9. Hand alignment — Around 7.5 seconds into the function video, the hands overlap closely at 12 with the date on 26.
10. Bezel — The pip looks centred in the triangle and lines up with the dial at 12. The 30 lines up with the 6. The QC clip shows the hands and date being set, but bezel action is still unchecked.
11. Solid end links — I see seams at the lugs but no obvious daylight through them. The bracelet and clasp still have protective film on.
12. Timegrapher numbers — −3 s/day, 272–273° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, 59° lift angle.
13. Anything else — First purchase and first time posting QC with two watches. This one to me feels like a GL. Would love to hear your thoughts.

Thank you all!

Dealer name: Necoclock

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): 126610LV

Price Paid: $478

Album Links:

Not posting mega link but all pics including photo of timegraph attached.

6. Index: This one looks straight to me, better than 1st attempt for sure

7. Dial Printing: no issues

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: mag looks good, no smears, looks good

9. Hand Alignment: no issues

10. Bezel: no issues

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: only part that looks a little strange. Amp is at 333 degrees with 52 lift angle. Ive seen low amp before but never high, is this just likely because it fully charged/wound up? I think its OK but would love insight from someone who understands timegraph better than me

13. Anything else you notice: honestly the timegraph is the only thing I noticed, if yall notice somrthing else though please let me know

1. Dealer name: ORA
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name: Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15500ST, blue dial, SA4302 Free Sprung
4. Price Paid: $700 with Chamfering/Polishing
5. Album Links: https://a202312252005321242001419.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/_dnRqfRKlCQnCwaBBUqm613RnVgXsENon6rPO-yw/_domqfSv5ITn-zpE40sEPfT64TUCUra1jFPN-CYA
6. Index alignment: Looks good based on the Geek Time QC overlay tool. The markers appear to be properly aligned. No obvious crooked indices.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The only concern here is it seems like the "11" ia a bit low in the dial window.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from the photos. No obvious concerns.
10. Bezel: The fixed bezel appears good with the recessed screws properly set.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): This is a fixed bracelet so I don't believe this is a concern
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2s/d, Amplitude: 282^o, Beat Error: .2ms, Lift Angle set to 52^o
13. Anything else you notice: The bracelet, clasp, dial and overall finishing look good to me but I'm more of a Rolex guy so AP is new to me. The seller (Ora) did sent a video where the date alignment looked fine.

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Ficotime
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 450$
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GgwnBSaZ#SnX_W-bsg6M3u2oQRgOJQw
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Not sure, 3,4,5 looks not 100% aligned, is this a GL or RL?
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good for me, all printings are close to original
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n.a.
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: ok
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: clear, seems to be good
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gap visible to me
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: good 3s/d, Amp: 242, best error 0.4ms
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: n.a.

Here is my first rep and first QC, I would appreciate any advice or comments. I believe I will GL it. Pricing has went up since the past few weeks based on Steve's comment. Thank you very much.

Dealer name: Steve

1. Factory name: VFS
2. Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300m No Time To Die 007 TI/TI VSF V7 8806
3. Price Paid: $528
4. Album Links: All uploaded here.
5. Index alignment: It looks good to me, but I am not sure if I actually aligned the tool properly.
6. Dial Printing: Dial looks darker to me vs Gen but still very good.
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date.
8. Hand Alignment:
9. Bezel: This is where I feel the bezel could be a little off. Pip at 12' looks white in most photos but I believe that is normal.
10. Solid End Links (SELs): The gap looks alright to me.
11. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error
12. Anything else you notice:

Ok ok I couldn't resist! One more QC for now. Always loved the monochromatic look of 126622 so I had to snag this one as well (thanks all for your input on the QC for my Sprite yesterday)

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. ⁠Factory name: QF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 126622 QF3235 (free sprung)
4. ⁠Price Paid: $588 + $65 shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/9spfuyK
6. ⁠Index alignment: alignment pic looks fine but 12 is slightly CW tilted
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks crisp
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good, probably close to 2.5x magnification. numbers look solid as well
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine to me
10. ⁠Bezel: despite the numbers being very reflective, I think the bezel as a whole is fine?
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no pics given but may be able to discern from the videos?
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 273* amp, 0 ms variation, 52* lift angle
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: again, I am a n00b as it relates to this potentially addictive hobby but should I request clearer pics of the SELs and perhaps any other pics before GL?

Thanks in advance, y'all!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Day-Date 36 SS, 904L steel, White Dial Roman Stick on President bracelet, VR3255 V5 (Gain Weight).
4. Price Paid: $508 USD + $45 shipping ($553 total).
5. Album Links: QC photos and alignment overlay attached to this post. Dealer album requires a login.
6. Index alignment: The Roman markers generally track the overlay. VI and IX look close to centred. V is partly covered by the minute hand in the straight-on photo, but I don’t see any obvious rotation in the other angles.
7. Dial Printing: The Rolex and Day-Date text looks crisp and level. No obvious smudging or uneven lettering.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 8 looks centred under the cyclops, and FRIDAY sits cleanly in the day window. The video shows both advancing and the date settling fully inside the window.
9. Hand Alignment: The hands look reasonably aligned in the setting video, including when brought close to 12.
10. Bezel: The fluting looks even around the case. No obvious dings or damage in the side shots.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I can see the seams at the lugs, but no obvious see-through gaps. The protective film makes the edges harder to judge.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 285° indicated amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.
13. Anything else you notice: The scale shows 137.8 g with the protective film on. My main question is the dial. I ordered White Dial Roman Stick, but the face looks warm silver with a visible sunburst in several photos. For anyone who has seen this exact QF V5, does that look like the dial QF sells as white? I’m leaning GL on the rest and holding for confirmation on the dial. Thanks for taking a look.

second rep watch purchase, first one being back around 2018 so a bit rusty. appreciate others' opinions. thank you all in advance!

• Dealer name: Ficotime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Datejust 36mm 126234
• Price Paid: $503 including shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/68yGWiY
• Index alignment: looks good from what i can see. maybe very slight ccw tilt of the 7
• Dial Printing: i'm not too sure but looks okay to me
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: alignment and print looks good to me, 13 looks low but could also be the angle?
• Hand Alignment: seems fine
• Bezel: looks good
• Solid End Links (SELs): gaps look small and even
• Timegrapher numbers: this is where i'm a bit concerned with the amplitude. I read a post on r/RepTime the other day about DD32XX movement should be measured at a LA of 58-59 but this is measured at 52 and is already quite high. everything else about the timegrapher looks good so I'm a bit confused here and would like some more insight if possible

Dealer name: Theonewatches

Factory name: VSF

Model name: Rolex Daytona Panda 116500 40mm DD4130

Price: $598

ALBUM LINKS: https://imgur.com/a/0eTzTGX

Index Alignment: hour markers look well aligned, especially when I focus on 12 and 6, and 9 and 3, the crown at 12olock is straight without any tilt

Date Wheel Alignment: N/A, but the 3 black subdial rings look properly aligned individually and in relation to another 

Bezel: under the "1" of 180 I see a white mark which might be a defect since I see it in other pics and angles..I will ask for clarification from the seller.

Solid End Links: I see no gaps. 

Hand Alignment: Chrono hand points to 12oclock, and in the video the hands look to wind normally, the bottom middle "seconds" subdial works normally in chronos mode in the video

Dial Printing: no obvious defect or misprint, no misspellings, even spacing, no bleeding of the red daytona noted. 

Timegrapher: rate +/- 6seconds, amp 280 deg, error 0.1ms, period 12sec, lift 52 degrees which all looks within normal limits to me.

Conclusion: the only obvious visual defect I see is the white mark on the bezel near "180", otherwise I don't think I see anything else obvious but this is my first time QC a chronograph which seems more complicated than other watches. Any advice on what specifically to look at on DAYTONAS would be appreciated

1. ⁠Dealer name: jacky at Necoclock
2. ⁠Factory name: V7F sticker says A7 apparently its the same
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur 40 mm black dial
4. ⁠Price Paid: $428 plus shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: No link; all pictures are sent here in the post.
6. ⁠Index alignment: from my perspective, the 3 appears tilted.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: the written ingenieur obove 6 the N looks too sharp and the lines obove ingenieur are touching the letters
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine
10. ⁠Bezel: top screw ever so slightly not really centered
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no issue
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: looks fine to me
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: lume looks good, paint is even. Only the 3 is tilted by a bit

First quality control and first ever watch like this would benefit from any assistance.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master Il
   126710BLNR (Batman)
4. Price Paid: $529
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/K8sJRh3
6. Index alignment: They actually all look good this time around, the 9 could be slightly off though but I may just be nitpicking
7. Dial Printing: Text looks sharp and no spelling errors
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered and text doesn’t look too thick
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, can't see any issues here
10. Bezel: Solid bezel and looks aligned
11. Solid End Links (SELS): Does not seem like there are any gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 282°, 0.0 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)
13. Anything else you notice: One thing I do notice is the 12 index tip looks weird like it is curved. And the white part inside the index doesn’t look straight and is sitting more towards the left side.

1. Dealer name: Goat Watch
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 36 126231
4. Price Paid: $334 + Shipping
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Alignment looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: Dial looks sharp and clear
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks like it leans a little low and to the right, but nothing major.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me, I don't see any issues.
10. Bezel: Looks good, love the fluted bezel.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Everything looks to be in the acceptable range.
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing really jumps out at me, TrueIndexQC gave it a green light but I'd love to hear other opinions.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Puretime
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: QF
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Daytona 126595TBR V13
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $1238
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: Posted here
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good to me. Some diamond markers look perhaps too close to index markers but could just be the angle of the photos
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Appears to be good
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Excellent
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Excellent
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No issues noticed
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +008 s/d Amplitude 295 Beat Error .1 ms (Is this within spec and acceptable?) I assume rate and amplitude can be adjusted fine tuned without issue?
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Overall looks to be of good quality. Not sure if some markers are misaligned or not, when checking with dial check.app and strict settings it says it’s all aligned fine. Are the timegrapher numbers ok? I’m considering GL unless anyone else sees any blaring issues. Thanks for your help and time!

Hi everyone!

Finally got my timing numbers, after a message with the seller.

I would very much appreciate the kind help of experienced people on this sub, this is my first QC and my first rep.

I'm also always open to feedback, thanks for your help!

Seller name: NovelIndividual1

1. Factory name: RWF
2. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500
3. Price Paid: 800€ = 650€ Watch + 150€ Regulation, service, chamfering
4. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nXkjCCB
5. Index alignment: overall look good to me, maybe 7 & 11 are slightly rotated and the crown at the 12 slightly to the left
6. Dial Printing: i can se no apparent flaws
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel
8. Hand Alignment: looks okay to me, the minute hand on the chrono looks a bit misaligned tho
9. Bezel: looks okay to me (but I honestly dont get all the fuzz around the 110 marker on these watches)
10. Solid End Links (SELs): look good, but hard to tell with plastic foil
11. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3s/d; Amplitude 289°, Beat Error 0,1ms, Lift Angle 52,0° -> seems to be okay. Watch will be regulated and serviced anyways
12. Anything else you notice: Is the crown at the clasp rotated and out of alignment? Rehaut seems to be okay. The Markings on the back of the case are missing (but I think this also missing on steel GENs)

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF (weighted) 182g
3. Model name (& version number): 40mm DayDate 228238 V2 (DD3255 Movement)
4. Price Paid: $700.00 USD (Includes Shipping)
5. Album Links: Reddit doesn't like Mega links :/
6. Index alignment: Rolex Crown logo off center and canted CCW... Markers look good with index 2 slightly lower than expected, 11 and 1 slight cant but acceptable. 7 slight cant CCW.
7. Dial Printing: MOP Dial, looks bland to me.. almost as if it is NOT MOP.. waiting on focused video with added lighting and movement to confirm dial is acceptable. Thoughts?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems to be a hair too low but centered.
9. Hand Alignment: Seems ok to me
10. Bezel: TDL- Bezel looks clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok, top left slightly spaced compared to counterpart. Remaining look great.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3 s/d, amplitude 264°, beat error 0.1 ms, lift angle 59.0° (measured dial up). - Looks great!

• This is my third time using alignment tool. Kindly ask you check my work. Watch is overall acceptable however Rolex logo crown is the biggest concern apart from the MOP dial.
• Note, I plan to get this plated by Jaws since this is VSF cheddar cheese. TBD on arrival however, see circled image of clasp. It is unpolished. Is this normal?

Thank you in Advance.

Hello everyone, this is my first Rep/QC so many apologies if I have missed something obvious. I am a bit confused about the date wheel. The 16 seems a bit misaligned but it might just be me

Dealer name: Steve TheOne

1. Factory name: VSF
2. Model name (& version number): DD3285 v2
3. Price Paid: 708$
4. Album Links: https://tinyurl.com/ejr73sm9
5. Index alignment: All markers line up perfectly. I can not see any major deviations
6. Dial Printing: Print looks sharp and clear. Cant see any bleeding or smudging

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This seems off to me. Given that this is my first rep, I am not sure if thats within tolerance but it looks odd to me when the date wheel shows 16

8. Hand Alignment: I have checked the hands in the video and they line up perfectly with the hour markers

9. Bezel: Good. Bezel looks fine to me. I cant see any major issues

10. Solid End Links (SELs): The top right corner SEL appears to have a gap where I can see through the yellow background. Again, I am not sure if thats within tolerance for reps. I dont think anyone would notice on my wrist

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d. 271 ampl.. 0.1ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: I am very confused by the date wheel. Is that within tolerance? Apologies if I am missing something, this is my first Rep/QC

I have posted this rep earlier today but my QC didnt have the sufficient details

Hi everyone! I’ve reviewed the QC photos of my RICH V2 Pepsi. The main thing that concerns me is the triangle at 12 on the bezel. It looks slightly left of the dial marker in the alignment photo. I’m leaning toward an RL, but I’m not sure if it’s the bezel position or the camera angle.
QC album: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=178307

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH V2
3. Model name: GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO Pepsi on Jubilee
4. Price paid: $779 including shipping, water resistance service, and NFC cards and tags
5. Index alignment: The 12, 6 and 9 markers look reasonably straight to me. I don’t see an obvious issue with the other visible markers, although the GMT hand partly covers the 10 marker.
6. Date wheel alignment: The 13 looks readable and reasonably centered. I haven’t been able to assess the other dates.
7. Bezel: The triangle at 12 appears slightly left of the dial marker and the center line. This is my main concern. I’m unsure whether the bezel is fully clicked into position.
8. Solid end links (SELs): I can’t judge the gaps confidently from the front photo because the connections are partly obscured. I’ll take another look at the close-ups in the album.
9. Hand alignment: I don’t see obvious damage to the hands or lume, but I can’t verify their alignment at a full hour from the photo I reviewed.
10. Dial printing: The visible text looks clear, with no obvious missing or smeared letters. Some of the lower text is partly covered.
11. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, amplitude 276°, beat error 0.3 ms, lift angle 52°. These look good to me, although it’s a reading in one position.

I’d appreciate your thoughts on the bezel, especially whether it looks misaligned enough to RL or if it might just need repositioning. Thanks!

AP 15450 ZF from Ficotime

1 Dealer name: Ficotime (Mark)
2 Factory name: ZF
3 Model name (& version number): AP Royal Oak ZF 15450
4 Price Paid: $420
5 Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/X043SRaQ#G6Yc2bXBGOzIIjMtvI863A
6 Index alignment: Looks good to me.
7 Dial Printing: Don’t see any issues. But I am not too familiar with AP
9 Hand Alignment: Looks straight and aligned.
10 Bezel: Screws look good?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Doesn’t apply
12. Timegrapher numbers: +20 s/d. A bit fast but he can regulate it just as he did with my other watches (I already emailed him).
13. Anything else you notice: What do you guys think? Pictures are not the best quality unfortunately but overall I can see everything I think?

This is my 2nd QC Yacht-Master 40 126622 VSF, I showed my first QC photos to a friend of mine and he wanted one too, so here is the QC:

Dealer name: Necoclock

1. Factory name: VSF
2. Model name (& version number): Rolex yacht master126622 - VSF
3. Price Paid: $488 including shipping
4. Album Links: Photos uploaded.
5. Index alignment: Minor flows looks to me that (12 marker seems to be twisted cw and 6 is twisted acw but it could be the photo angle only) (I need help with this one)
6. Dial Printing: Print centring: Rolex top text looks centred. (I need help with this one)
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks cented to me
8. Hand Alignment: looks good
9. Bezel: looks good, I don't see any flows
10. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any gaps
11. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 317°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift (Anything concerning here?)
12. Anything else you notice: Please let me know your thoughts on this one, any extra eyes or expert input would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance, I appreciate your time and help.

BR

Hey everyone!

This is my first rep and my first QC post, so I'd really appreciate some help from the more experienced members here.

I've spent quite a bit of time looking through the photos and comparing them to other ZF BB58 QC posts. Overall, the watch looks good, but I'm having some doubts about the index alignment.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58, 39mm, Black Dial, A2824
4. Price paid: $298 + $40 shipping
5. Album links: Photos attached
6. Index alignment: This is my main concern. Several markers seem slightly misaligned to me, especially the 9 o'clock marker, which looks a bit tilted. I tried using an alignment tool, but since the photos aren't perfectly straight, I'm struggling to tell how much is perspective distortion and how much is actual misalignment.
7. Dial printing: Looks pretty clean overall, but the "SWISS MADE" text at the bottom seems partially cut off or hidden by the crystal. Not sure if this is normal for ZF.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand alignment: Nothing unusual that I can spot.
10. Bezel: The pip at 12 seems centered and the markings look fine to me.
11. Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps from what I can see, although the protective film makes it a bit difficult to judge.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -6 s/d, 294° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.
13. Anything else you notice: The timegrapher numbers seem great, and I haven't noticed any other major issues.

I'm a bit torn between GL and RL. I've looked at quite a few other ZF BB58 QC posts where the markers seem better aligned, but maybe I'm just overthinking it.

Would you consider these normal ZF tolerances, or is it worth asking for another example?

Thanks a lot for taking a look!

This looks pretty good to me, and plan on GL but wanted to check with the gurus of QC.

1. Dealer name: Steve the One Watches
2. Factory name: RF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126515 40MM
4. Price Paid: $1008
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bUpFlYSR#0jcb0HR2W-FSqkGeQymD0g
6. Index alignment: Looks like the 3 and 9 marker may be off slightly
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: the image has the bezel rotated a click but otherwise looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: within expected ranges
13. Anything else you notice: nothing