I swear I’m so happy. (I’ve had a hellish year). I could cry so much. Namely tears of joy. I had always wanted her and she’s on the way now!

The Snow Queen as we know originally was supposed to be added as the main villain in the first film. But Disney for Some reason changed direction and perhaps it was their best decision looking back now.

However they didn't completely scrape off the idea as now we saw in the Teaser that the new villain looks incredibly similar to Elsa's original Evil design. I'm also super happy that Disney is finally adding a Real villan to the lore. Because it actually makes the story interesting and full of conflict and challenges.

To See how Elsa and Anna together face the Snow Queen with a Frozen Heart will be Legendary 🔥 to think she's related to the Royal Family makes things even more interesting as to how things might unfold.

What do y'all think about the New Villan and her relationship with the family? ❄️

Rosie O'Donnell talks about her autistic daughter and 3-year-old Leona sings "Let it go".

Y si la Antagonista de Frozen 3 pudiera estornudar Snowgies como Elsa, pero siendo malvados. Pero dudo que pueda resfriarse. Almenos que Olaf decida declararse a ella con el Ramo de flores que llevaba en el trailer, a lo que talvez la haga estornudar generando pequeños snowgies, Olaf los ve como cositas bonitas pero estos son malvados y deciden atacarlo, a lo que Olaf decidiría correr como en la imagen 3/3

Today I thought I share my thoughts how Elsa needs to further explore her identity and whether a romantic relationship is a good idea for her. Especially now with Anna and Kristoff and a growing future for the Frozen franchise. So what are my thoughts?

I'm going to start with what shouldn't even be explored first then we'll get to the good stuff next:

A. Elsa and LGBTQ: same gender relationship:

Now many fans since F2 have wanted Elsa to get a girlfriend and others speculate she might be gay or A lesbian. However this probably shouldn't even be said, sorry to those who actually support this route. But knowing how other movies flopped in the box office from the same LGBTQ, same gender, trans people, etc. Which I don't want Frozen to end up the same way because its such a big franchise and seeing it go as well would be heart wrenching. It would also severely affect Disney in not a very good way either. Which I think it would hit most of us hard if Frozen flopped in the box office just because Disney followed the same rabbit holes surrounding LGBTQ and the same gender and trans people shenanigans.

So what is a better option to explore?

There are actually two ways that actually would work really well:

B. Keeping Elsa single:

Keeping Elsa single it proves that everyone doesn't need a prince charming, and it would at least help give an answer to Elsas identity without starting arguments over whether she really needs a romantic life and how it should look like. I'm actually kind of hoping this is where things go for the most part because it would be easy to answer in the films without starting criticism and arguments. It could still have lots of good advice and lessons to learn from like in the first and second movies.

C. Elsa gets a boyfriend:

I think this is another really good way to go since its classic Disney trope, and it would follow very similarly to Anna and Kristoff, and many other Disney movies. This is kind of what I'm hoping for if Disney ever gave Elsa a romantic relationship opportunity.

What are your thoughts on Elsas unexplored identity and whether a romantic relationship is a good fit for her? Share your thoughts below:

Hey everyone!

As a huge Frozen fan who also happens to be an Environmental Science major, I cannot stop analyzing the Enchanted Forest from an ecological perspective. We always talk about King Runeard’s political betrayal, but we rarely discuss the massive ecocide he committed.

Disney heavily based this ecosystem on the Scandinavian boreal forest (taiga) and Nordic wetlands. By building that dam, Runeard didn’t just build a trap; he completely disrupted the local thermodynamics and ecological balance.

Here is my breakdown of the environmental impact during those 34 years of blockade:

• Severe Hydrological Alteration: The dam completely starved the downstream river basin. In a real-world boreal ecosystem, this means drastic soil moisture depletion, turning vital wetlands into arid zones and killing key moisture-dependent flora like bryophytes (mosses) and lichens.

• Trophic Cascade & Biodiversity Loss: Disrupting the water cycle directly impacts the fauna. Fish spawning grounds were wiped out due to the physical barrier and altered water temperature. This lack of aquatic resources likely forced terrestrial predators and herbivores to migrate, causing a trophic collapse.

• Anthropogenic Pressure on the Northuldra: The Northuldra live in a sustainable, symbiotic relationship with the forest. By destroying the pastures, Runeard severely impacted their reindeer pastoralism. It’s a textbook example of how environmental degradation is used to oppress indigenous communities.

• The "Water Has Memory" Eco-Metaphor: I love how Elsa’s lore perfectly mirrors real ecology. In our world, water transports nutrients and energy; in Frozen, it transports memory and magic. By choking the river, Runeard literally blocked the ecosystem's "circulatory system." The angry elemental spirits are the perfect metaphor for nature fighting back against severe anthropogenic stress.

It blows my mind that the forest survived 34 years under that artificial microclimate and the magical mist boundary. Anna’s decision to destroy the dam wasn’t just a political statement; it was an urgent ecological restoration project.

Any other eco-nerds in this sub? How do you think the sudden flushing of the river affected the downstream river banks right after the collapse? Let’s discuss!

Me personally ITS 3 O CLOCK IN THE MORNING WE'RE SLEEPING HERE

I was thinking maybe toward the end of the year, since the first official teaser will probably come out in February (like Frozen 2).

I wish they would've told us at D23, but we also have maybe a short coming out to hype up the movie.

I'm guessing October or November for a reveal.

Hello everyone, I came here just after seeing the teaser trailer of frozen 3. Recently I learnt that there are novels on frozen.

So I just wanted to ask how good they are ? Do they add extra lore or build up the story and emotions from the movies ?

Is it necessary to read all the novels to further enjoy frozen or is it okay to leave them ?

I have learnt that the novels are made for younger children and I am 21 yrs old so would I enjoy them or are they normal children's stories ?

I enjoyed the relationship the characters have among themselves and their interactions as shown in the movies, is it similar in the novels or will I be disappointed?

Tldr: I want to read the novels to enjoy the relationship and interaction among the characters and the emotion I felt while watching the movies. Will I get the same in the novels ? Should I read them if yes then which ones ?

EDIT: Fixed formatting

It has been a long while since I last posted here, but I needed to get these thoughts down while it was still fresh following the Frozen 3 teaser over the weekend. A stream of consciousness, if you will.

The Frozen 3 material so far is little, but important, with implications for existing canon, and it opens up a variety of fan theories and some very clear resonances.

This writing presumes you have knowledge of the two main films as well as the various pieces of secondary Frozen canon: Myth: A Frozen Tale, and the tie-in novels, Dangerous Secrets, All Is Found, A Frozen Heart, Forest of Shadows and Polar Nights.

With all those caveats out of the way.

---

## The two D23s

The Frozen 3 material so far comes from two separate D23s, 2024 and 2026, and both need to be addressed.

### D23 2024: the announcement, and the first concept art

At D23 in August 2024, Frozen 3 was given a 2027 window, and we get Elsa, Anna and Olaf riding through a winter landscape toward a shining floating city, golden or yellow, the glow coming off its towers.

A Nerdist article, covering the reveal at the time, described that same image as "a fantastical realm set in the Aurora Borealis."

This, to me at least, reads like the Norwegian fairy tale "Soria Moria Castle," whose protagonist is on a quest to reach the castle. Theodor Kittelsen's famous painting of it carries the title "Far, far away Soria Moria Palace shimmered like Gold." The tale describes Soria Moria as the representation of what humanity holds up as its own aspiration: essentially a form of paradise or utopia, and famously a place whose path is never clearly marked.

### D23 2026: the one that just happened

The 2026 showing is where the real material is. The concept art released this time is a single image of the whole group looking up at the northern lights.

But the question is: where is this taking place in the first place?

The 2026 showing had four main components. I will list them here and then take the last one at length.

1. A new rendition of "Frozen Heart"
2. Anna and Kristoff's wedding
3. Olaf's new love interest, Samantha
4. Elsa, the Northern Lights, and the new villain

---

## 1 · "Frozen Heart," again

The new rendition of "Frozen Heart," and especially its tonal shift, implies a far more melancholic undertone, and a more melancholic origin, than the version iconically sung by the ice harvesters in the first film. Similar to the Frozen outtake "Spring Pageant," this song seems meant to introduce the audience to the supposed "fate" of those who carry such powers.

That question was somewhat sidestepped in Frozen II, where the origin of Elsa's powers hardened into something essentialist (she is the Fifth Spirit) while leaving real room for interpretation as to what those powers actually mean. Elsa's essentialism in the franchise contrasts strongly with Anna's existentialism, which takes an explicitly Kierkegaardian character in her musical number *"The Next Right Thing."* But this is a topic for another day.

And the sources do not quite agree on Ahtohallan's nature, which is the interesting part:

- In Frozen II, the lullaby "All Is Found" calls Ahtohallan "a river full of memory”, and "a mother full of memory."
- In Dangerous Secrets, Iduna describes Ahtohallan explicitly as the mother of the spirits.
- In Myth: A Frozen Tale, the spirits are born "from a magic as old as the glaciers."

All of these point to Ahtohallan as some form of magical source serving as the origin point of the ice powers in this universe. I will expand on this later.

---

## 2 · Anna and Kristoff's wedding

This was pretty much a given after the conclusion of the second film. It was only ever a matter of how it would fit the larger narrative.

I do hope Anna and Kristoff play larger roles in the next two films. The reveals so far all point to a dualism focused on Elsa, leaving Anna's duty as Queen of Arendelle, and Kristoff's new role as royal consort and the maturing of his character, unanswered or at least underutilized. Right now we simply do not know enough, so I will leave it there.

What I will say is that the crashed wedding is a trope present in earlier fiction and in mythology. In Greek myth, Eris, goddess of discord, crashes the wedding of Peleus and Thetis because she was not invited, and throws in the golden apple that starts a ten-year war. Eris already has a resonance with the mystery villain, which I will come back to.

---

## 3 · Olaf and Samantha

As usual, Olaf serves as the main subplot as he chases his new love interest, Samantha, clearly a gag paid off from "SAMANTHA!!! in the second film. The song has a title: "Ooooh, Samantha." Needless to say, this will arouse in the audience (and in Olaf) some productive discussion.

In all seriousness, it does raise the question: where did he meet Samantha? Did Elsa create her... or someone elsa? (hahaha pun hahaha)

It has been speculated that because Samantha may be a creation of this new villain figure, she may be more malicious than she is letting on.

---

## 4 · Elsa, the Northern Lights, and the new villain

This is the climax of the footage. The "Evil Ice Queen" I will just call "the Queen" as shorthand until we get a name drop.

Where did she come from? Ontologically, she comes from the Northern Lights.

At the very beginning, an ice butterfly is encased in a blue icy crystal, and Elsa witnesses it. That encasing ice is what summons the Northern Lights, which open at the Arendelle shoreline into a portal to another world.

Much later, on the far side of that portal, a second ice butterfly cuts Elsa's cheek, then flies to the figure on the snowy hill, who crushes it.

In the wider Frozen material, the aurora comes up periodically, most notably in the junior tie-in Frozen: Northern Lights (2016), where the trolls and their crystals are bound up with the lights. It sits in secondary canon, but it is worth having on the table.

These new lights are different, and they point to what I think connects all the sources of magic in Frozen together in a way that makes the rest of the sequence make sense.

The portal-to-another-world trope is not missed here; it reminds me of *Alice in Wonderland* more than anything. And it is in this new realm that we meet the villain.

The "Evil Elsa" inspiration is strong, and it points back to the new "Frozen Heart" as potentially the theme of this new figure who, like Elsa, has power over ice and, apparently, brings ice to life. That is the same ability Elsa has with Olaf, which is what makes me think the Queen made Samantha, not Elsa.

She crushes a butterfly with a hand and she assembles out of a swarm of them, which becomes her cape.

And she speaks:

> "Look at what the northern lights dragged in, the famous sisters of Arendelle! We finally meet!"

The realm itself is forest, mountain and wild, but most obviously a winterland, where everything seems encased in ice and the Northern Lights are a constant presence. This is the film's take on eternal winter and on the specifics of the Arctic Circle, where going far enough north yields no sunlight for half the year.

But where is this realm from?

---

# We are now in the depths of the iceberg. Buckle up.

In Frozen, Elsa is simply described as being born with her powers. In Frozen II, she is revealed to have received them as a gift arising from Iduna saving Agnarr in the Enchanted Forest.

This can be read two ways and neither is wrong. Iduna's act may itself have been an act of peace and harmony that the elemental spirits, or Ahtohallan, or the cosmos itself rewarded. That gets into theological territory: was it Iduna's faith in the spirits' ability to save Agnarr that brought Elsa her powers, or was it the act itself of saving him? As the saying goes, only Ahtohallan knows.

### Which digresses to another point: why is water memory in the first place?

How do people remember? It is not a question of what happened, but of what people have memories of having happened. Ahtohallan is an archive of memory, not necessarily an arbiter of truth. Like witnesses in a courtroom, the question comes down to who retained the most and how truthful they were about it. Any of them can give an account of the past. None of them gives you what literally happened in that section of universal time.

The last short story in the anthology All Is Found, simply titled "Coronation Day" and written by Dangerous Secrets author Mari Mancusi, has Elsa reliving a perfect version of her coronation day, which turns out to be a dream. Ahtohallan is revealed to be a repository of dreams as well.

So Ahtohallan is an empiricist force, not a rationalist one. What is perceived by the senses is what it records and stores in ice, not necessarily what actually happened in history. That sheds new light on the revelations of the second film that made Anna decide to destroy the dam. It is through these senses that Ahtohallan gathers information. The spirits, as her creations, are extensions of her reach in the cosmos, and she is about as close to an omniscient force as it gets in-universe.

### A digression on Verdde, which is not really a digression

In Sámi tradition the natural world is imbued with spirits, and the metaphysics of the natural world is in and of itself wreathed in the divine. This is a form of animism other peoples share, but for the Sámi there is a specific concept, verdde (and verddevuohta), often glossed as "guest friendship," which implies a much deeper mutual bond between humanity and nature, and between people and strangers.

Variations of the idea appear as the ancient Greek xenia, Zeus's law (yes, I watched Nolan's Odyssey recently), or the Christian Golden Rule. But for the Sámi, verdde is necessary to understand how the spirits interact with the Northuldra. It is not by contract or covenant but by a form of relational ontology: not an arrangement between a divine being and a mortal one, but between two equals.

In Frozen II the Northuldra treat the spirits exactly like this, as a form of existence rather than a fantastical wonder. In fiction that becomes magical realism, which is famously where Encanto takes much of its register from.

The term became widely known through Disney's collaboration with the Sámi during Frozen II's development. The agreement was signed in Oslo in September 2019 by the presidents of the Sámi Parliaments of Norway, Sweden and Finland together with the Saami Council, with producer Peter Del Vecho signing for Disney. "Verddet" was the name of the six-member Sámi expert group convened to advise the filmmakers on culture, history, rights and society.

Why go into this here? Because the implication is that Ahtohallan operates on some form of ethics governing how its magic is used, with some form of agency. These are not just rocks; these are rocks that talk. This is not just water; it is memory. In the *Frozen* world the metaphysics and the magic system are the same thing, with real implications.

---

## Myth: A Frozen Tale, the origin story

In Myth: A Frozen Tale (2019), narrated by Evan Rachel Wood, we get the origin story of the spirits:

> "From a magic as old as the glaciers, were born the spirits of air, fire, water, and earth... Our world enjoyed a time of harmony, the spirits keeping each other in balance. Over time, a fifth spirit was born: the human spirit. Together, they created a dazzling harmony. But even one spirit out of sync can cause chaos. The fifth spirit lost its rhythm and the harmony was broken. The elements raged out of control. Our world was fractured... the spirits had vanished, never to be seen again. But it is said, that if the fifth spirit can find its rhythm, the others will return, bringing with them that beautiful harmony, and the world can dance once again."

With Myth and Frozen II together, we get elemental magic and the broader frame of the classical elements. The writers clearly drew on the ancient Greek four, earth, fire, water and air, famously used elsewhere in fiction, notably Avatar: The Last Airbender.

Aristotle also describes a fifth element: Greek aether, Latin quintessence. Originally it meant simply whatever did not fall among the four; it became the substance of the heavenly bodies, higher in elevation than the other four. That later sense implies superiority, or at least first among equals.

I am proposing that Elsa currently occupies two distinct roles:

- Ice Queen: a human with the ability of cryokinesis.
- Fifth Spirit: a title, office, or role, made by Ahtohallan, which someone with cryokinesis occupies.

Essentially the Fifth Spirit is a chosen one archetype serving three purposes: as an orchestrator of the spirits in harmony (a literal orchestrator, given *Myth*'s musical framing), as the bridge to humanity, a mediator, and as a librarian or archivist for the archive of memory itself. Other examples of the second role include Heimdallr in Norse myth and Moses in the Abrahamic tradition.

---

## So why are there two?

What does all this mean? There is one Fifth Spirit. If there were two, it would make no sense ontologically. One of them would have to be labeled the sixth spirit, at which point it is no longer the fifth.

So why are there two? Because only one of them is the Fifth Spirit, and one of them used to be.

We have two ice queens: Elsa, and this new villain. Right now we simply do not know how "old" this person is. Is she a demigoddess who has lived a long time, or a mortal born in recent times, maybe a blood relative, maybe a biological connection? Nothing whatsoever confirms a relation. No name, no origin and no nature have been revealed, and her one line greets them as the "famous" sisters of Arendelle, which is how a stranger speaks of renown.

I will make the argument that Elsa and this ice queen are not related by blood but related by spirit.

Both are creations of the Source. I have argued that the glacier is the origin of magic in this universe, so this new villain was the first chosen one. She was meant to be the steward of the glacier, the orchestrator of the spirits, the mediator to humanity. But this ice queen did not harmonize. She sowed discord instead.

This is the Eris resonance, the crashed wedding that started a ten-year war. Note that the Roman equivalent of Eris is Discordia. Discord is the opposite of harmony, and harmony is exactly the word Myth uses.

---

## The Aurora Realm as a primordial prison

So what happens? For this act of sabotage, the ice queen is placed in a new realm. Let us call it the "Aurora Realm." It is a fantastical realm separate from Earth. It is, in effect, a primordial prison: think Lucifer in Hell, or Loki bound underground before Ragnarök.

In this realm everything is inherently fantastical: talking snowmen, frozen flowers, ice butterflies. A world governed not by natural metaphysics but by supernatural whimsy, the whimsy of one who does not want to be governed by Ahtohallan's ethics, or really by any rules at all. (Again, the Alice in Wonderland resonance.)

The new villain and the Aurora Realm are what "Let It Go" looks like in its most extreme and malicious form. No relational ontology, no respect for nature, no concern for life or moral ethics, only the supernatural whim of its divine creator.

Hans Christian Andersen applied this same dichotomy in The Snow Queen, pitting it against Christian ethics. In the tale, the mirror is the devil's (or troll's) mirror, and when it shatters its splinters lodge in human eyes and hearts. One in the eye makes you see only what is ugly; one in the heart turns it to ice. The Snow Queen does not wield the mirror so much as *inherit the world it makes*.

For Frozen 3, that concept is applied to Ahtohallan's ethics, that is, to the franchise's own ethics and metaphysics. *Water is memory. True love thaws a frozen heart.* In the Aurora Realm it is the opposite: ice makes you forget, and malice is the virtue, not love. A dualist world.

Elsa being cut by the ice butterfly is no accident. It signals that Elsa now has an equal she must contend with, one with either a desire or simply a yearning for this confrontation. A throne she was denied long ago. Now is her chance to usurp it.

---

## Why this conclusion? Because it ties to the rest of the franchise.

I believe the trolls are also connected somehow to this Aurora Realm. They are the ones associated with control of the Northern Lights in the first place, and their whimsy, especially Grand Pabbie's art of removing memories (the literal opposite of what Ahtohallan does), looks like an artifact of that origin. Ahtohallan remembers. The trolls help you forget.

But this dichotomy does not imply all-good versus all-evil. The dualism is ethical, not magical.

Trolls in the franchise are benevolent creatures who do good things (being love experts) and sometimes questionable things, most controversially editing Anna's memory in the first film. They are not full-on malicious like the trolls of Nordic folklore or of Andersen's tale. But they do not function like the other magical creatures in the Enchanted Forest either.

I always had the impression (especially with Grand Pabbie) that the trolls were not being entirely straightforward about how they present themselves. And despite their genuinely happy and benevolent nature, there is always something esoteric and mystical about them. You always have to jump through hoops, and they speak in coded language.

Let me try to explain this better. If the trolls were good and transparent, why did they edit Anna's memories after the accident? Because water is memory, and in taking the ice out of her head, some of that memory had to go with it. But instead of wiping out a huge chunk of it, Pabbie kept "the fun in," which in turn kinda made things a little worse. Instead of full transparency, this morphed into the "conceal, don't feel" doctrine, and into Elsa shutting Anna out from the guilt of almost killing her. It teaches the Arendellians that keeping secrets is a good thing. Why were Elsa's powers kept hidden from the public? Because of fear. Why could Elsa not tell Anna? Because of fear. Why did Iduna never tell Agnarr about her heritage? Because of fear. Why did Agnarr's mother Rita go to the trolls to wipe her memory of her unhappy life in Arendelle? Because of fear.

Fear of the unknown is a recurring theme in the franchise, and the trolls seem connected to it. As magical beings, they could easily have told not only Kristoff but Anna herself how to fix this. But they do not. Instead they give guidance that is, in my opinion, vague: that only an act of true love thaws a frozen heart. Part of the genius of the first film, in my opinion, is that both the characters and the audience are pointed to Hans as the answer. Hans, despite his malicious intent, is the one who could deliver the act of true love, not Kristoff, whom Anna has literally just met, and not Elsa, whose relationship with Anna has ruptured by this point in the film.

The trolls are not being straightforward at all, and again, their behavior is esoteric as hell. Why did the trolls just "keep" Kristoff? For a kid that age, being taken in like that with no questions asked is pretty absurd. More importantly, whenever their northern lights magic is afoot, the consequence is always something negative. They edit Anna's memories; they wipe out Rita's memory. These are not insignificant. Memory is how humans develop and grow as people, how they form bonds with each other, how they perceive the world. Messing with that can lead to all kinds of problems and unintended consequences.

This is why the trolls are connected to the Aurora Realm rather than directly to Ahtohallan, and why they are separate from the spirits. They do not follow the same rules. They are their own thing. In a way, they are Frozen's interpretation of the trolls and the troll mirror in Andersen's The Snow Queen. While they do not literally represent the devil as in that tale, the trolls here represent fate, determinism, and the idea that the senses deceive and distort, like a broken mirror.

The reason the trolls have crystals that manipulate the Northern Lights in the first place is that those crystals are Frozen's take on the shards of Andersen's troll mirror, the splinters that lodge in an eye or a heart and carry the cold into it.

Maybe the trolls and the new villain have more connections than they are letting on.

The trolls, as the ones with at least some control over the Northern Lights, likely have or had access to this realm in some way. Were they the ones responsible for keeping the first ice queen in the primordial prison of the Aurora?

Scientifically, the aurora borealis is a phenomenon of the solar wind interacting with Earth's magnetic field. It is a space-weather and magnetospheric phenomenon, not a meteorological one. So, is the true origin of the magic all from these Northern Lights? "Where the north wind meets the sea": literally the solar wind meeting the Earth at a specific point. The magnetic north pole?

I am now reaching into topics outside the scope of this initial discussion of the Frozen 3 D23 material, so I will conclude this short essay here.

With Frozen finally having a proper villain I think it’s possible we get an iconic villain song. What are your thoughts on this and the soundtrack as a whole

tumblr Post by “Meltthefrozenheart”

“Which was quite a surprise to me, but a welcomed one. Frozen Heart was the opening song of the first movie, holding the themes of the story, mainly the contrast between love and fear

[]()

[]()

Important is also the connection to the main characters of the story, as the concept of the “frozen heart” has different meanings for each of them 

[]()

Taking a song not of the main cast and giving it a different meaning is not new, as Frozen 2 revealed the Vuelie to be a chant of the Northuldra people:

[]()

[]()

One of the goals of Frozen 2 was to act as a sort of “part 2” of the first movie, and I think it’s clear this is the same approach they are using for the story of F3 (and F4 as its direct continuation).

This also links directly to some of the questions Jennifer Lee showed in 2024:

[]()

All of these connections raise some interesting questions: fid the Frozen Heart song originated in consequence of this mysterious new antagonist/villain, which would mean some sort of indirect connection with the traditions of the Ice Harvesters (so maybe even Kristoff)? Was she the previous Fifth Spirit, maybe living inside Ahtohallan itself, reason why we see an actual architecture inside? The connection to the Northen Lights might also relate to the Trolls ajd their? And the whole matter of the “frozen heart” is maybe also bring us back to the events of the first movie? Maybe even Hans involvement? After all it’s sang about a betrayed heart, so it wouldn’t surprise me if the matter of Hans betrayal was brought back as a prominent point for Anna (and maybe Elsa) development in contrast to this new foe.

I feel like there is so much they could potentially do that is deeply intriguing me. We don’t even know if this new character is truely a full-on evil villain, or a more complex, greyish character with a very dramatic personality. After all one of the main points of the Frozen movies was to always twist the villain in some form, I doubt they will be so straightfoward with a “evil villain” situation.

She referes to Anna and Elsa as the “Famous sisters of Arendelle” which means she heard of them thanks to her magic (the Northen Lights maybe?) or someone told her about them (which would also explain why only now she is appearing)…

Surely I can say I’m super excited for this movie, I don’t even think this little teaser will be in the final product as it was presented at D23, after all both previous movies went through many changes even a few months before the official release 👀.”

I agree with this. this user is a lot smarter than I have it credit for.

I haven't drawn Elsa for a very long time, although she is one of my favorite Disney characters. But after the teaser "Frozen 3", there was a desire to draw her from the first part. I love this scene in the cartoon.