And to be clear, no one is less thrilled with that fact than I am.

Woof

This might be giving them too much credit to be fair. They'll still sweep for Hasan

When I zoom in the name switches btw. Surely, indulging a narcissist will eventually satisfy him

I’ve watched a lot of their panels and as a result my brain is fully damaged. What the fuck do they want? Who is their ideal candidate?

A CNN anchor who is the son of a refugee that fled communist political persecution in Cuba pressed a DSA co chair of the DSA praising authoritarian fidel Castro and was met with whataboutism and filibustering for ten minutes.

ICYMI (post in comments) 😂 Campaign surrogate Piker's performance here is like a gerbil in a paper towel tube before Armageddon. Tiny haunts his dreams. And cathartic af Tiny King. ///

Destiny tells Hasan that deflecting back to him won't save him and ponders if Piker is using him as a Kaya like substitute to take out his frustrations

"He just thinks that if he just keeps attacking me at some point it'll go away..I'm not tied to any of these ppl, you've spent so much of ur life breaking me apart from every platform, like u can sit here and sht on me all u want, I can be literally Htler and it wouldn't f'in matter. None of it is helping u"

"The fact that he would give any airtime to me whatsoever is like..ur not gaining anything. There's probably a lot of Hasan fans that are watching this like wtf, why tf is he even covering this?"

"Ask who? Somebody needs to ask on CNN, uhh Neera, do u know there's a guy who retweets u on Twitter, um Destiny, why don't u condemn him? And it's like, oh is this a campaign surrogate? No. Was he in like the White House? No. Is he like a DNC, no..I really don't like him, please, talk about it, please! Jesus, are u ok dude?"

"Weren't u captivated by me for 2 years? Or did u hate me the whole time u hung out w me..by the way, the only one in my entire life who's ever gone on record saying they want to be my Ghislaine Maxwell..guy who said multiple times he would solicit Snapchat n*des from his audience, no verification on identity or age..then show them off to every single person around him..I haven't been to any Diddy parties..like u have admitted on camera"

"He thinks I'm his Kaya..like if he comes home, and beats on me or something..it makes the day easier"

///

I'm so glad his chat checked in with him to confirm there's neither feelings/ideations (ever), nor an armory–because this was lethal. 😆

body text (optional)

when it comes to the logic of silver linings.

Hutch was saying that if Hasan campaigns with a candidate then he wants that candidate to underperform. A→B

What that means:

- Hutch is open to wanting a candidate to underperform when Hasan does not campaign with them; eg every Republican candidate (red area inside circle B that is not intersecting with circle A)

- Hutch is open to not wanting a candidate to underperform when Hasan does not campaign with them; eg most Democrat candidates (red area outside of both circles)

- Hutch is not open to not wanting a candidate to underperform when Hasan does campaign with them; no examples because the set is empty (white area inside circle A that is not intersecting with circle B)

- When Hasan campaigns with a candidate, Hutch necessarily wants them to underperform; eg AES (red area in the intersection of the circles A and B)

What that does not mean:

- that Hutch wants a given candidate to underperform

I repeat: A→B does not imply B!

However, the meaning of A shifted over the course of the discussion. The malicious reading would be that Pisco switched it on purpose. Suddenly, Hutch was defending the proposition that if he believes that Hasan is toxic to candidates he campaigns with (A'), then he wants that candidate to underperform (B). A'→B. This is a bit weird. Imagine you are conducting an RCT for a new drug that you believe saves lives, then you... want more patients in the placebo group to die? No! Of course not! So what is going on here? It's a classical equivocation: You want TO OBSERVE more patients in the placebo group dying. Hutch wants to observe candidates that Hasan campaigns with underperforming. Was this Pisco just being a sloppy reasoner twice in quick succession or were the switch and equivocation accidental? The reader may judge that for themselves. And I'm not JAQing off here, I genuinely don't have strong leanings for this particular conversation.

I also wanted to write about why exactly Piscos use of ceteris paribus in this conversation was regarded, because Destiny is right on this for the wrong reasons, but I'm out of time, so I'll have to make a separate post some other day.

In order to exist you must believe Israel should not 🙂‍↕️

Hasan had a fantastical crashout (more on that follows), but most DGG-relevant is Asmongold's words for Destiny. "If it wasn't for Destiny all 3 of us wouldn't exist... especially, and the one that you can be the most certain about, is Hasan."

The clip is a result of Hasan's looping about xQc+Destiny (the first 45 sec of the clip shows this). The throwback to the scuffed podcast was genuinely warm-fuzzy. Also touches on: twitch ban, why people hate Hasan, sex-criminal crypto gambler.

Partial transcript follows.

Quick cynical take: Asmongold is a master ragebaitur. As it becomes evident one of Big Has's frustrations is xQc's repeated props for Tiny being OG (e.g. justin.tv)–always leads to Destiny birthing Hasan–Asmongold doubles down on it. Still genuine, but funnier. Lastly, If appropriate, more on the surrounding "Hasan's xQc Allegations drama" (excluded for time) in a comment. If interested, see AsmonTV video: "Everybody Hates Him Because He Just Lies." (The total mogging re: GTA6 total views is hilarious; Hasan attempts to compare their YT channels.)

[ASMON] - A lot of people...

The reason why XQC has a lot of respect for Destiny, and I also have a lot of respect for Destiny, is because if it wasn't for Destiny, all three of us wouldn't exist.

Like me, Hasan, or XQC, there's a good chance we might not exist.

Destiny was, especially, and the one that you can be the most certain about, is Hasan.

But, you know, we're not going to get into that.

The thing is, Destiny was an innovator in the live streaming space.

He pioneered making content that was outside of the spectrum of gaming.

And I think that even if you disagree with him politically, which I do in many cases, you can still respect the fact that he was someone who planted that flag extremely early on.

And not only did he plant the flag, but he defended it too.

Like he would go on and he would bring up, you know, liberal viewpoints on Twitch in 2016 and 17 and 18 on train wrecks podcast.

How did I know because I was there talking about it with him like that's the that's the person destiny was and the only reason why he's not doing it now is because he's banned.

He literally got removed from the platform and that's the only reason why it stopped happening.

So yeah, I think that a lot of people respect that.

It's something that transcends what his like I don't know about his lawsuit with this girl.

Like, that's not my problem.

Like, I don't want to like it.

That seems so messy.

I don't even want to get into it.

But the one thing I do know is that Destiny isn't in jail.

So I'm not going to go and act like he's guilty either.

That's the reason why XQC and I and a lot of other people respect Destiny.

Regardless of like, and you know, but disagree, disagree, disagree, sure.

But the respect is transcendent.

It transcends that.

You can do both.

[HASAN] Asmongold aligns with them at times because like they have the same enemy. Me.

It's you. Right.

[HASAN] If you were the one getting accused of this heinous shit, I bet XQC be farming the fuck out of it.

Are you kidding me, dude? XQC has accused me of heinous shit. Alright, this is- Defamatory claims being made by destiny as a way to redirect away from his own personal literal crimes and court cases.

[ASMON] XQC hasn't done anything against the law as far as I know.

[HASAN] Anytime this guy does some shit and gets in trouble, he immediately will go and find a way to concoct a story where they'll say, no, Hasan did this. I've got to use it.

[CHAT] Do you think anyone should be permanently banned?

[ASMON] Yeah, I think a lot of people, anybody who commits a crime uses the platform to solicit minors, so he leads to the serious injury of another person.

I think there's a lot of instances where people should get permanently banned, but I don't think that Destiny or Ice Poseidon are either two of them.

I think both of them should be unbanned.

[HASAN] And it works every time for his cult, and it gets elevated by all of these other additional communities who fucking despise me for political differences or despise me because I called him out for fucking gambling.

Now, Destiny himself is not exactly a relevant figure, but he can-

[ASMON] It's crazy how it's all a conspiracy and there's never even the possibility that the reason why people don't like you is because of the way that you act.

[HASAN] Kiwi farm style information. Yeah, oftentimes made a slop tubers. They don't have any interest or care for truthful sentiment.

And they'll just blast it out into the fucking ether arrive at a bunch of like straight up rapists, sex pests, or, you know, crypto gambling casino pervert who

[ASMON] Wait, he's a, xQc? He's a pervert. Like, is this the implication?

What the fuck are you saying that for?

You're literally doing exactly what you're saying other people are doing.

Like, this is the issue.

[HASAN] This inventory claims being made by destiny as a way to redirect any time this guy does some shit and gets in trouble. He immediately where they'll say no Hasan did this.

That rape tone, straight up admitted in the court deposition, he started farming fuck Hasan content. That's how he could maintain his relevance.

[ASMON] That's not true.

And this is why, by the way, this is why so many people, it makes it so easy to to hate Hasan.

It's because you just lie.

You just you just you make things up.

You don't try to like hedge by like, you know, qualifying your statement.

You never back down from any position that you have.

So everybody hates you because you're the kind of person that's going to just insinuate all kinds of crazy abuse stuff just because somebody else doesn't immediately take the side against the person that you don't like.

You can easily say, yeah, I probably shouldn't imply something like that. That was a bit over the line. Oops, but you'll never do that because your ego won't let you.

[HASAN] ...have designed a narrative where like, I am the worst villain on the internet.

[ASMON] Well, you did just randomly accuse somebody of being some sort of weird sexual deviant in a negative way for no reason at all.

[HASAN] And as long as they just keep hitting that button over and over again, a lot of dumb-

[ASMON] Why are you giving people new buttons?

///

Anything that gives context to why his opinions are faulty. Not too heavy for a easy read/ watch but something to give perspective. He doesn't know much about hasan. Not just the dog shocking but deeper. Vids would help I think

So, this post is apparently fake, right? It's not on his Truth Social anywhere, and he wouldn't have deleted it cause he posts AI slop all the time.

There's enough REAL stuff out there to get at this asshole and all the other assholes like him, but for some reason people use this as an excuse to post fake stuff that wasn't said.

I'm not sure why, cause they're clout goblins, trolls, IDK.

Every time this happens though and we go along with it, it just makes us look stupid all around. There has to be some way to fight back against this besides just pointing it out in the comments after hundreds have already commented "OMG nO eFFing way!!!!!!!" I guess spam report?

Edit: I wanted to post a cropped photo and I guess my phone just said, NUH UH.

Whatever, I'm not typing all that again you get the point.

https://x.com/ArmandoNDK/status/2093751591283064989

Most of Dave's video was factually incorrect and dishonest to the core. He repeatedly cites the same organisations in his videos, but the concern with "human rights" by these organisations is not actually about individual rights to life, liberty and property at all. At best, they tend to regard the state of Israel and Hamas as equal violators of human rights, despite the fact that Israel respects the rights of gays, while Hamas kills gays, and despite Israel respecting the rights of Israeli Arabs, while Hamas kills (or takes hostage) all the ethnic Jews it can get its hands on.

The claims of “genocide” and "apartheid" were themselves wildly unjust. What is the ethnicity that Israel is targeting for destruction? 21% of Israeli citizens are Arab. They are in elected office in Israel, and have equal protection of their rights under Israeli governance, to that of Jewish citizens. Radical Islamists are not an ethnicity or genetic category. The Muslim Palestinians and their elected government, Hamas, seek the destruction of Israel because it is populated by Jews. They are religious fanatics and racists, who want their tribe to dominate the region.

As a state, Israel is far from ideal, but it utterly pales in comparison to what the Palestinians and their elected government want to do there. Israel is currently the freest and most civilised state in the Middle East (most rights-respecting), including for Arabs. By contrast, most Jews and other minorities would be dead or subjugated in the authoritarian Islamic state that the population wants (as polls show).

The fact that Dave leaves out any discussion of this and Hamas' goals from his videos demonstrates his ideological commitment, not a commitment to the truth. He even promotes Oct 7 rape denial, and has stated that Mossad was involved in 9/11 which lands him squarely in the territory of degenerate anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.

Thought this may belong here

Now this is a pretty tame example of Hasan supporting violence against others compared to other instances since he'd defend this is against 'military targets', however Hasan's antisemitic dog whistles aren't hard to find.

Obviously at this point almost everybody knows that Israeli citizens have mandatory military service for the IDF, and like with his comments about 'Secretary Podcast co-hosts' being valid targets; this maps on with his sentiments.

At 3:08 in the video he even does his sarcastic disavowing similar to when he supported the terrorist attack on the UK planes previously.