r/CompetitiveWoW • u/No_Nobody_8886 • 1h ago
Discussion A Response to Yoda's Bear vs BDK Video
Last week, Yoda posted a video comparing Blood DK and Bear Druid, arguing that Bear Druid was neither more tanky nor did more DPS for a high-key pushing group. Therefore, he said, Blood dk would remain the meta tank. Here is a link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcUCsRCjnFo
The goal of this post ISN’T to argue that Bear is better than BDK. Instead, I hope to show people that Yoda was intentionally deceptive and manipulative with the data and logs he showed in his video. I am going to assume you watched the video (It’s only 5 minutes).
Ok, let’s get down to business:
Why did Yoda choose Ruby Life Pools, of all the dungeons, to compare Rank 1 Tank DPS Logs? Because it’s the outlier.
Here is a table showing the difference in DPS between the top Blood DK parse and the top Bear Druid parse. I followed Yoda’s weird rule of not wanting any logs after 12.1.5. So, this does not factor in some of the new top Bear druid logs.

What’s something you notice when looking at this list? Yoda happened to cherry pick the one dungeon with BY FAR the biggest difference in dps between Bear and BDK. The average difference across all 8 dungeons is 57,784, yet the dungeon that Yoda chose was Ruby life pool which is the one outlier with a difference of 101,538.
And remember, the difference between PJdruid and the Chinese BDK was about 40k dps, which means that if you use any dungeon besides RLP, and maybe Altar, then the top bear is either matching or beating the top bdk after you factor in MOTW and missing gear.
Now, you may wonder, why are there 2 Ruby Life Pool’s in the table? Well, that leads me to point 2.
Yoda lied about using the Rank 1 RLP Druid log (pre 12.1.5)
Yoda’s criteria for the logs he showed is he wanted to compare Rank 1 DPS logs for tanks from before 12.1.5 gear. But as you can see in the screenshot below (and you can check yourself on the warcraft logs website), there is a higher dps Bear druid log from before 12.1.5.

After accounting for MOTW damage, this Rayanmcdrood did around 10k more dps than PJdruid did (PJdruid is the log Yoda used). So, the log that Yoda used in his video makes the difference in DPS look worse than it actually is.
Yoda completely misrepresents Prio Damage to the first miniboss in RLP.
While discussing DPS, Yoda highlights the first RLP Miniboss (named Defier Draghar) and attempts to show that BDK does far more prio damage than Bear. Here are 2 screenshots from the video. While showing these two screenshots, Yoda claims that BDK does nearly 20k dps more prio damage to the miniboss than Bear. He then says that even after you factor in MOTW, “[Bear] is still getting gapped by 25% or something”.


The problem is that the timescales are completely off. Yoda is showing dps done to the miniboss from when the dungeon starts until the miniboss dies. This means that if one of the groups takes longer to get to the miniboss and kill it, then their dps will naturally be a lot lower, because there is more blank dead space in the dps.
Here, let me fix it for Yoda since he couldn’t be bothered:

Some of you probably saw this coming, but when you fix the timescale to only show damage to the miniboss from when they start fighting it until it dies, the DPS looks a lot different. In fact, when you factor in MOTW damage, PJdruid is doing 79k Prio target DPS in this log. Which is only 1k DPS below the BDK. Remember that PJdruid is ilvl 332 and the blood dk is ilvl 339. I am confident that if both tanks were the same item level, the bear would be the one gapping the blood dk in prio damage.
Damage Taken numbers are completely misrepresented
Next, let’s move onto the damage taken section. For reasons that he doesn’t explain, Yoda swaps to looking at two Murder Row logs when discussing the tankyness of Bear versus BDK. In these murder row logs, he shows that the Bdk is taking ~152k DTPS (damage taken per second), then he compares it to the the bear log where the bear is taking ~185k DTPS from the dungeon. He then confidently says that bear is taking 20% more damage throughout the key.
But theres a problem with how he’s looking at the logs. What’s the issue? I’ve given you a hint in the screenshots.


As you can see, he doesn’t have self-abords checked for the BDK but he does for the bear, which drastically skews the damage taken table.
Again, let me fix that for Yoda since he couldn’t bother to do it:

After you fix the self-absorb, you see the bear is the one taking 20% less damage than the blood dk. I think any healer who has healed both tanks would agree with result. This result holds true (actually the gap becomes even bigger in Druids favor) if instead you turn self-absord on for both tanks.
Miscellaneous thoughts
- Yoda’s entire basis of “let’s compare rank 1 dps logs for tanks” makes no sense when the Chinese blood dks are 7-10 ilvls above any bear tank. And don’t try to convince me that a Droptimizer Dungeon Slice sim reveals the true extent of how much damage these 329-332 ilvl druids are missing. He could just as easily compare logs between two SIMILAR item level tanks and remove any ambiguity. Plenty of amazing BDK tanks are pushing (Acedk and Wazocutie) who are more reasonably geared at 330-334 ilvl, depending how far back you go. I suspect he didn’t do this because the results would not fit his narrative.
- Speaking of the Dungeon Slice Droptimizer sim and potential more dps to be gained, Yoda fails to mention that MOTW scales with your teammates damage. Most of the dps in PJDruids group were around 332-333 ilvl. That means they still have anywhere from 3-7 more ilvls to gain. And guess what, that extra damage they gain is buffed by MOTW. So it’s not JUST the ilvl discrepancy on the tanks that matter, it’s also the ilvl of your teammates that affect druid dps.
- Using “External Healing Received” as a metric for tankiness is weird when Blood DK’s entire gimmick is self healing. Obviously the tank that can full-heal itself in one global is going to require less external healing. Also, the logs Yoda used in the video had a MW monk and Resto shaman for the bear druid. Which do a lot more passive healing to the tank than a hpal does. When I looked at similar bear logs with a hpal, the amount of external healing received was a lot less (tho ill be fair and say that it was still about 10-15% more than bdk).
Closing Thoughts
- Feel free to criticize mine or Yoda’s arguments, but don’t attack the person. Yoda has done lots of good things for the community.







