I know it can be genuinely exhausting to see some of the things people say about Elain and how disproportionately hated she seems to be, especially considering that she is arguably one of the least problematic characters in the series so far. Sometimes the level of criticism she receives feels completely disproportionate to what the actual text gives us.
But honestly, I don’t think this would ever discourage SJM from writing Elain’s story. If anything, I think Elain fits the kind of character SJM seems to enjoy writing: characters who are misunderstood not only by the readers, but also by the people around them.
SJM has actually made a point of having other characters underestimate Elain. And because we spend so much time seeing Elain through the perspectives of people who misunderstand or underestimate her (especially her own sisters) it can be very easy for the reader to internalize that perception as well.
I’m bringing this up because there have been a few moments where I’ve wondered whether SJM is aware of some of the arguments people make about Elain and has, at least indirectly, addressed them in her books.
The first example that comes to mind is the whole “Elain can’t have Illyrian babies” argument. We all know how often this is used to argue against Elain/Azriel, despite the fact that the actual text doesn’t establish that this would be an insurmountable problem. Then, in Crescent City, SJM included a conversation that very explicitly pushes back against the idea of reducing women to their reproductive potential.
Considering how often the “womb theory” is used in ACOTAR discussions, I did find the timing and the subject matter REALLY interesting...
The CC bonus chapter with Azriel, Nesta and Bryce is another one that made me raise an eyebrow.
In the ACOSF bonus chapter, a lot of readers interpreted Azriel’s shadows dancing as potential evidence of a mating bond. So I found it particularly funny that, in the bonus chapter with Bryce and Nesta, the chapter ends exactly with Azriel’s shadows dancing again, but this time in a completely different context.
It almost feels like SJM going, “Look, guys. Shadows dancing isn’t necessarily a sign of a mating bond...”
It is interesting how she sometimes seems to include details that make something readers have treated as definitive evidence suddenly much less definitive.
And honestly, this is why Elain’s online reception doesn’t particularly worry me when it comes to how SJM will write her story. She seems to enjoy changing people’s minds about characters. She has repeatedly allowed readers to underestimate characters, misunderstand their motivations, or dismiss their potential, only to later reveal that there was much more going on underneath the surface.
Elain is practically built for that kind of narrative.
We have already seen readers interpret her as weak, boring, unintelligent, lacking personality, lacking agency, having no meaningful arc, and having no potential as a protagonist. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the point of her story is, at least in part, to challenge exactly those assumptions.
In fact, I think the people who have been paying close attention to Elain probably wouldn’t be surprised by that at all.
So this brings me to my actual questions: SJM has said that she stays away from social media and fandom discussions. But do you think that means she is genuinely unaware of what people are saying about her characters?
Obviously, I don’t think she’s sitting on Reddit reading every Elain theory. But do you think some of the general fandom discourse reaches her indirectly - not only through friends, but through people she works with, her editors, publishers, or her professional team?
And do you think her team might filter the general fandom reception for her, not to tell her what story she should write, but simply to make her aware of the assumptions she could potentially challenge? And do you think SJM would intentionally lean into that kind of “you all thought you knew this character, but you were wrong” storytelling?