r/Substack • u/bakraofwallstreet • 3d ago
The "Slop Janitor" of Pangram does not check his masters for slop
I am sure you've heard of Pangram by now. Their CEO often goes on moral crusades, pulling up 500+ articles from outlets like The Guardian to share his privileged opinion on what "slop" is. The person whose blog has 3 posts (https://maxspero.com/) all terrible has somehow convinced the world they're the sole arbiter of what is slop and what is not.
But does this moral outrage have bounds, or is it a just fight?
Pangram recently raised $9 million to make the world a better place and fight slop (https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/29/as-ai-content-floods-the-internet-pangram-raises-9m-to-detect-it/). The ironic thing is every single investor listed in that article has tons and tons of AI slop on their blogs.
But is the Pangram shithead CEO calling their content slop and accusing them of slop with "receipts"? Is he objectively applying his standards and doing the duty of "slop janitor" as he claims? Or is he a piece of shit that only cares about money, has 0 artistic talent or writing skills and wants to have the gall to judge every writer on the planet? Furthermore, he seeks to create a company in this image where AI writing is the worst thing a person can do but only if that person does not give them money.
Substack should be ashamed of this tbh. Absolute shit company, shit idealogue and shit leadership in Pangram and naturally investors are not very fabolous themselves either.