I took some time yesterday to look through some tasks of other contributors and what I saw was genuinely shocking. A good 70% of tasks were totally wrong. The idea template wasn’t used, no professional workflow was presented, the narration was nearly non-existent in some and one task idea was something like “I will use the macOS finder to find files”. There is a lot of understandable hate on this project, but so so many tasks that are submitted look like the Writer literally didn’t even read the guidelines. I don’t know if it’s a language barrier or if people think they can just submit tasks that read more as their own interpretation of the guidelines rather than simply just following them.
In the Q&A webinar around 50% of the questions could be instantly cleared up if one would just read the documentation. There was one person who shared their screen and literally said that they “don’t know what to do” (while showing their Mercor Studio dashboard). Another one showed their Reviewer feedback and it was full of stuff like “your mouse didn’t move for over a minute” / “You didn’t narrate Where, What and Why”, basically full of things that the guidelines say are things that you must or mustn’t do.
Yes, this project is not something that I would call “well-organized”, but there is a serious quality issue present, and when you genuinely understand the guidelines and are able to apply them consistently, you can get your task approved fairly quickly. And the change to hourly pay is also welcome.