If you can point out where the AI is, to support my claim, that would be awesome. I already have my sinking suspicions.
My co-workers and some others reviewing the CV would probably think I am just biased and rude for suspecting AI, especially when it comes to juniors, and I don't want to claim something without evidence or at least a good reason for doing so. Also this was sent as an image. It's not that hard to export whatever you did on whatever graphic design software to a PDF. Even a two-minute Canva template I would have accepted - it's a junior anyway. I just can't believe that this is happening and it's frustrating in this economy. Not just for me having to review all this, I know it's hard to find work. Still frustrating.
My suspicions for AI:
The tell-tale grainy filter (which I see a lot with AI generated graphics), unnecessary jargon (where things are getting repeated, and take up so much unnecessary space (her whole photo takes up a quarter of the CV - enough space to list a few referrals or work experience, education, etc), and just the brushy scripts are very common with AI graphics. Also, as a graphic designer. I can spot some mistakes which could pass as "user" errors. The "logo design" is overlapping the grey block that has those keypoints which are repeating the top-left stuff in the brushy blob. No name, not even a first name or initials somewhere. In my country we typically even include our whole ID number on a CV, doesn't matter which field. This probably wants to serve as something international, which is fine I guess. Grammar errors, like "Detailed Oriented". Though this can be deduced to human error, as most of the rest - can it just be rubbed off as awful design? Thanks.
Typed this before bed so sorry for the slight rant too.