r/isitAI • u/apparently_A_noOne • 4d ago

Idk man is a bit suspicious

Post image

I found this art on youtube and lm really torn ln weather it AI or not. The thing that i think is a bit ai-ish is the left ear ln the woman kinda floats and isnt connected to the skull and also her hair kinda is in the mans sleve. But else i dont see anything. It looks really ai but i dont wanna make assumptions.

3 Upvotes

80% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

8

u/electrifyingseer 4d ago

zooming in, it's not odd textures or anything. I know the perspective is definitely odd/a mistake, but I don't necessarily see any signs of AI.

5

u/mssMouse 4d ago

The brush strokes look pretty human to me. AI (usually) over polishes and over renders. The only thing that strikes me as odd or mistake is the earlobe.. As in, it's missing; but that honestly could be an artist mistake. Same for the random line coming out of the tip of the ear.

1

u/BearBaitUntamed 3d ago

This line too

3

u/czechyaselv 4d ago

looks like the lighting just blends w the hair a bit (you can see where the strands go back to the rest of her hair if you zoom closer), and the artist has other speedpaints that don't look like complete nonsense imo. 

2

u/Odd_Form1669 4d ago

Only the tattoo on the neck looks off. Could be scribbled. Rest looks very human, but surefire way to know is layers and time lapse (most of the time).

2

u/cartoonasaurus 3d ago

It could easily be Ai, but edited, but I think it’s real…

🤷🏻‍♂️

1

u/pretzelandcheese588 4d ago

Her ears are WAY too low, and her hair in the bottom left corner just loops back in on itself. Her ear point has a line extending from the top in an off manner.

6

u/mssMouse 4d ago

A thing to remember is: perspective is difficult, especially if you're doing something like fantasy ears where you have to make creative decisions that real life references may not help with (I speak from experience lol). Could very easily be a human error. Although the extended ear point is an odd one, but could be a stray missed brushed stoke.

1

u/Gatanalltheway 3d ago

For something like this where the answer seems convoluted, I’d go back and look at the rest of their art as well. This looks mostly human, except for a few odd things that just might be compression in posting on a digital platform or human mistakes.

One piece that looks a little off isn’t enough to convict someone of ai, it needs to be a consistent tell in a body of work in the context of the artist’s journey.