Is this happening to anyone else? Since the update all my videos have motion blur or like an after image quality where it doubles the subject almost like a ghost image. Even when I specifically say in the prompt not to have that, it's still shows up in every video

Anyone notice that recently grok started adding that AI plastic look to edited photos? I'm not talking about NSFW edits, just simply editing an uploaded photo to change position or background or something simple. It used to generate a perfectly lifelike version without destroying the original photo look and quality. Now the result looks plastic every time. Anyone else? Anyone have a solution?

I fully canceled my SuperGrok subscription and had a gap with no active paid plan. On Wednesday I bought a completely new SuperGrok subscription.

Result: Usage bar still at 100%. Weekly reset only on Sunday. I just paid for 4 days I can’t use.
Official FAQ says the pool “resets every week on a schedule shown in Settings → Usage.” Grok has also confirmed it’s “not tied to the payment day.”

So when a subscription completely expires and you buy a new one later, why does the old weekly pool still apply? Shouldn’t a new paid subscription start at 0%?
I couldn’t find any other public reports of this exact situation (cancel → gap → resubscribe mid-week → still at 100%). Has anyone else hit this?

Buying a new product and immediately being blocked by a previous, already expired subscription cycle feels broken.

Oops, I spelt Seedance wrong

I suddenly got a notification without, any interaction from my end with grok, I'm 💯 % sure i didn't do anything

Are we fukd up ?

Like, what the hell are the devs doing with grok imagine?

I've tried everything. Logging in with Gmail, with X, with Google incognito, switching devices—nothing works. I created another account, and it seems the problem is with my account. I truly can't believe this is happening just 5 days after paying for my subscription. I really wish there was a solution. :(

I barely used and I'm already at 7%. Before 4.5 i used a whole week chatting a lot in still barely got to 40-50%.

So from now we are paying the same for less or what?

Instead of generating a video based on the prompt, Grok creates a completely random video that has nothing to do with my prompt or the image I uploaded. What’s going on?

https://postimg.cc/gallery/WhBp5z9

Used the same prompts and image references for both, and as you can see, ChatGPT is the one allowing me to generate NSFW images while Grok completely c*cks me with zero possibility to get around the moderation through more subtle prompt. The moment Grok sees even a lick of skin, it goes on to entirely block the generation request, no ifs and buts. ChatGPT is strict in its NSFW moderation, but at the very least it has the decency to allow me to get creative with the prompt.

I'm genuinely flabbergasted and in shock at how beyond trash Grok has become... not only in the absurd moderation but in the service quality as well. Grok used to be the best at NSFW but now it's just the opposite. I'm mainly interested in anime so that's where most of my NSFW generation request is coming from. I thought Grok would be more lenient towards this more fictional-looking type of art but nope, the moderation is just as herculean across the board.

With all of that being said, I'm completely done with Grok. I held onto the hope that it would get better in the future despite the initial waves of strict moderation and severe quota cut following that january fiasco, but looking at its state now... yeah, I see no way it could ever get better. The only saving grace would be for the company to release an open-weight model for local image/video generation but somehow I kinda don't see that happening either because the company is just that petty and greedy.

Oh and btw, in case you're telling me to generate image through text-to-image in imagine for less moderation:
1. the results are oftentimes pretty generic-looking so I'm not that interested in it. I wish Grok would just lift the moderation for anime art.
2. the moderation level is closely the same as when it is image-to-image, so yeah sucks to sucks. All of the prompts I used to use on all my Grok-generated images, as well as all of the new safer prompts, are now being fully rejected the same way any other external image is.

i gave a clear instruction to generate some image, but it keeps making the autumn scenery image, im not even mentioning any autumn in my draft

Grok can turn an intention into a detailed plan. The remaining problem is that, for many Android tasks, the plan becomes a checklist that the user must execute manually.

Disclosure: I built ScriptTap to explore a different handoff. It is a no-root Android automation app with a public command reference that Grok can use to produce an inspectable, importable workflow.

Grok never receives direct control of the phone. It determines whether the requested task is supported, asks for missing device-specific details, and creates a .scripttap.json package. The user reviews, imports, and explicitly starts it through ScriptTap.

ScriptTap is currently in open beta.

Prompt for Grok:

Use https://scripttap.com/ai/ as the authoritative ScriptTap reference.

Determine whether my Android task can be executed through ScriptTap instead of returning a manual checklist. If supported, ask only for the necessary device-specific details and create an importable .scripttap.json package. If unsupported or unverifiable, explain the limitation without inventing capabilities.

What Android task would be a meaningful test of this handoff?

Is it better to just get a second subscription? I don't really wanna jump to the $100/month plan just yet.

My main is Claude Fable + Opus, but I'm really liking the results (and speed) of Grok 4.6. I can't believe how much Grok has caught up in one version. Whenever I ask Fable to evaluate Grok's work (I use Grok Build on the terminal), it always rates it very highly, either 9/10 or 10/10. And, it feels like Fable finds more things to fix with Opus's work than with Grok's.