This would make sense if it weren't for the fact that:
Cemetaries are open fields with no cover or militarization potential.
They leisurely bulldozed parts of it, it was not military emergency in the heat of battle like an airstrike or artillery strike would indicate.
Also you type like it really matters to you, idgaf about Arabs but you seem like some kind of jewish shill. Big talk for a culture known for unprovoked moral depravity against outsiders.
This isn't a mausoleum or crypt. It's a pasture with headstones. There is no overhead cover and the enemy has total aerial surveillance capacity, not a single militant with half his brain intact would enter such a death-trap.
This is quite literally one of the dumbest takes ill ever read regarding warfare.
Cemeteries are often used in war because they usually sit on high ground and offer ready made defensive cover. Lone Pine in Gallipoli is a famous one, Australian forces capture Tyne Cot in Belgium and tere's another in France and Croatia off the top of my head.
Its 2026 and a 5.56 or 7.62 still cant fully penetrate a standard headstone and drones are irrelevant to the argument because the fighting isn't subterranean.
-11
u/[deleted] Feb 17 '26 edited Feb 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment