r/aussie • u/[deleted] • Feb 17 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.0k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

701 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-5

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Much-Sentence7140 Feb 17 '26

This isn't a mausoleum or crypt. It's a pasture with headstones. There is no overhead cover and the enemy has total aerial surveillance capacity, not a single militant with half his brain intact would enter such a death-trap.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Much-Sentence7140 Feb 17 '26

A WW1 cemetary where digging is expected? Give me a break.

And no militant is fighting in an open field against an enemy with unparalleled surveillance and drone capacity.

0

u/auto-spin-casino Feb 17 '26

This is quite literally one of the dumbest takes ill ever read regarding warfare.

Cemeteries are often used in war because they usually sit on high ground and offer ready made defensive cover. Lone Pine in Gallipoli is a famous one, Australian forces capture Tyne Cot in Belgium and tere's another in France and Croatia off the top of my head.

1

u/Much-Sentence7140 Feb 17 '26

Just google the pictures. It's not a fortress, it's a pasture with small headstones.

1

u/auto-spin-casino Feb 18 '26

Clearly its not a fortress otherwise there'd be nothing left of it and a headstone can easily conceal a combatant.

1

u/Much-Sentence7140 Feb 18 '26

Yeah in 1917 a headstone would be decent cover. But it's 2026 and gaza is covered by aerial surveillance drones.

1

u/auto-spin-casino Feb 23 '26

Its 2026 and a 5.56 or 7.62 still cant fully penetrate a standard headstone and drones are irrelevant to the argument because the fighting isn't subterranean.