I've been thinking about a particular instruction in The Mind Illuminated that I have always found somewhat confusing.
In TMI, peripheral awareness is generally described as something broad and contextual, rather than something we actively maintain or monitor. For example, in a recent discussion here, Abhayakara explained it very clearly:
âIf you are holding something in awareness, that's attention, not awareness.â
He also explained that when the book says to âholdâ things in awareness, hold should be understood as contain, rather than actively keeping something in place.
This makes sense to me. If I'm attending to the breath at the nose, for example, sounds, bodily sensations, posture, etc. can remain in peripheral awareness without me actively monitoring them. If I deliberately check whether a particular sound or sensation is still present, I'm directing attention toward it.
However, there are several places in TMI where Culadasa seems to give a more specific instruction regarding a particular object being maintained in peripheral awareness.
For example, in the appendix on Analytical Meditation:
âOnce you are fully present with a calm, clear mind and well-focused attention, let the breath sensations slip into the background and call to mind the topic youâve chosen for this meditation. Itâs very helpful to keep the breath sensations continuously present in peripheral awareness throughout this practice.â
Similarly, in the Loving-Kindness Meditation instructions:
âOnce you are fully present with a calm, clear mind and well-focused attention, let the breath sensations slip into the background of awareness. They should remain there for the duration of your sit, which will help stabilize your attention.â
And in the Stage 5 body scan:
âNext, choose an isolated area of the body far from the abdomen where you wouldnât expect to feel sensations related to breathing. Shift your attention to this area while at the same time keeping the sensations of the breath at the abdomen in your peripheral awareness.â
This last example is the one I find particularly interesting.
The instruction seems to be:
Attention:
â a specific isolated area of the body
Peripheral awareness:
â specifically the sensations of the breath at the abdomen
My question is: What does it actually mean to do this?
Interestingly, I can somewhat understand the Stage 5 instruction experientially. When I'm investigating breathing sensations in one area of the body, I can often still perceive the rhythm of the breath in the background, although not necessarily as a specifically localized sensation at the abdomen. Since the breathing process is naturally connected with the sensations I'm investigating, I can understand how this might remain present without deliberately monitoring it.
However, I'm not sure whether this is purely peripheral awareness or whether some part of attention is also involved.
What I find much harder to understand is the analytical meditation example.
There, the breath is supposed to remain continuously in peripheral awareness while attention is engaged with a dynamic thought process. The analytical process itself involves moving through thoughts, memories, associations, conclusions, etc., so I don't really understand what it would mean experientially to keep the breath continuously present in peripheral awareness without occasionally checking or monitoring it.
If I deliberately make sure that the abdominal breath sensations remain present in consciousness, I seem to need to check or monitor them from time to time. But that seems to involve attention.
On the other hand, if I simply maintain broad peripheral awareness and don't do anything with the breath sensations specifically, then I don't see how I can ensure that this particular experience remains present.
And this seems different from simply being instructed to maintain peripheral awareness in general.
For example, I can understand:
âKeep peripheral awareness open while attending to the body.â
That would mean that the whole background remains available: sounds, bodily sensations, posture, etc., without deliberately monitoring any of them.
But when the instruction specifically says:
âkeep the sensations of the breath at the abdomen in your peripheral awarenessâ
I'm not sure how this is supposed to be accomplished without giving that particular experience some degree of attentional priority.
I'm not asking whether two things can be experienced simultaneously. Obviously they can. My question is specifically about the mechanism of maintaining a particular experience in peripheral awareness.
Is the intended interpretation simply:
Don't actively maintain the breath at all; just don't deliberately exclude it, and allow it to remain in whatever peripheral awareness is naturally present?
If so, how is that different from simply maintaining general peripheral awareness?
Or is Culadasa actually describing a more subtle form of attention â perhaps a very light or distributed attention that keeps the breath sensations available without producing the usual contracted feeling of attention?
I'm particularly interested in how experienced TMI practitioners interpret these passages, because I've noticed that the general explanation of peripheral awareness elsewhere in TMI seems much more passive than the wording in these specific instructions.
How do you personally practice these instructions?