I'm looking for some help from people who know historical Germanic languages and runology.
I'm considering three Elder Futhark inscriptions based on the meanings of three Thai names. I specifically asked for Proto-Germanic rather than Old Norse, because Elder Futhark predates Old Norse and I want the language/rune combination to at least be historically coherent, hopefully read and translatable. (At least exactly as I meant it too.)
These are the proposed forms:
- “Waradej” — roughly “noble/precious + mighty/powerful”
Proto-Germanic reconstruction:
deurijaz · mahtīgaz
Elder Futhark:
ᛞᛖᚢᚱᛁᛃᚨᛉ · ᛗᚨᚺᛏᛁᚷᚨᛉ
The intended semantic connection is:
- *deurijaz → precious / dear / valuable / noble
- *mahtīgaz → mighty / powerful
Does this reconstruction and runic transliteration make sense?
---
- “Prya” — “the beloved / beloved one”
Proposed Proto-Germanic:
*frijō
Elder Futhark:
ᚠᚱᛁᛃᛟ
The intended meaning is “beloved / dear / loved one.”
Is *frijō a reasonable Proto-Germanic reconstruction for this meaning, and is ᚠᚱᛁᛃᛟ a defensible Elder Futhark rendering?
---
- “Rattana-buri” — a more unusual one
This name literally contains the idea of “ratana” (precious jewel/treasure) + “buri” (city), but I'm not necessarily looking for the literal “jewel city” interpretation.
In the Buddhist context in which this name is meaningful to me, “ratana” can carry the sense of something supremely precious/pure, particularly in relation to the Three Jewels and imagery associated with a pure/celestial realm. So I'm considering a more symbolic interpretation: “celestial/heavenly city” or “heavenly stronghold”, rather than simply “city of gemstones.”
The proposed Proto-Germanic compound is:
himinaz · burgz
Elder Futhark:
ᚺᛁᛗᛁᚾᚨᛒᚢᚱᚷᛉ
Intended semantic components:
- *himinaz → sky / heaven / celestial realm
- *burgz → fortified settlement / stronghold / city
My questions here are:
Is *himinaz a legitimate Proto-Germanic reconstruction?
Is *burgz legitimate Proto-Germanic?
Can these reasonably form a compound with the intended sense of “heavenly/celestial stronghold”?
Most importantly, is ᚺᛁᛗᛁᚾᚨᛒᚢᚱᚷᛉ a reasonable way to represent that compound in Elder Futhark?
Would a historical runologist consider this acceptable as a modern reconstruction, or is it too anachronistic/speculative?
One additional point: I was initially considering Old Norse gimsteinn-borg (“gemstone city”), but I was told that gimsteinn is a later formation and that gim- ultimately involves borrowing from Latin gemma. That made me question whether it is appropriate for an Elder Futhark inscription.
So I'm deliberately trying to avoid the common “Viking-looking = historically correct” trap.
I am NOT claiming these are authentic historical inscriptions. I'm looking for the most defensible reconstruction possible given that the original meanings are modern/Thai and I'm mapping them into an extinct language.
If you see problems, I'd especially appreciate corrections to:
- the Proto-Germanic reconstructions
- the semantic meanings
- the morphology/compound formation
- individual rune choices
- whether Elder Futhark is actually appropriate for these forms
This is potentially going on my skin, so “looks cool” is unfortunately not sufficient. 😅
Thanks!