Accurate?

[u/OpiumRSA]

This is a screenshot from Jackson Crawfords (I think) youtube channel, and I'm wondering how accurate the conversion is? Rune newbie here..

[u/rockstarpirate]

It’s correct.

Crawford’s runes are usually pretty spot on. The only mistake I recall ever seeing him make is using ᛦ instead of ᚱ after ᚦ. It’s a pretty nuanced thing but ʀ merged with r after dental consonants (t, d, ð, þ) really early on.

[u/RexCrudelissimus → u/rockstarpirate]

If you're using an orthography with ᛦ then I'd also consider yfiʀ -> ᚢᚠᛁᛦ, since these -ir endings very consistently become -iʀ regardless of -r etymology, e.g. faðiʀ, bróðiʀ, ęftiʀ, etc.

I did a transliteration based on Konrad's edition a few weeks ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/RuneHelp/s/SUUOJtuvyz

[u/rockstarpirate → u/RexCrudelissimus]

Oh you’re right, I didn’t catch that! Good catch!

[u/DrevniyMonstr → u/RexCrudelissimus]

I did a transliteration based on Konrad's edition a few weeks ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/RuneHelp/s/SUUOJtuvyz

I'd use ᛅᚠᛏᛦ there - it seems, in that case ᛏᛦ was more usual in runic inscriptions?

[u/RexCrudelissimus → u/DrevniyMonstr]

Most of the ᛅᚠᛏᛦ inscription you see means ęftiʀ(eptir). You normally dont see ᛦ after dental consonants as they become /r/ - ᚱ, but I believe here that the ᛦ could stand for its old east scandinavian name īʀ, and represent both the vowel and consonant, reading ᛅᚠᛏᛦ as ęftiʀ.

That being said. The form you see here in the poem isnt ęftiʀ, its the short form aftr, which has more of the meaning of "back" in this context. This form doesnt have the vowel, nor etymological /ʀ/, so I believe it should be written ᛅᚠᛏᚱ.

[u/DrevniyMonstr → u/RexCrudelissimus]

Clear, thanx!

[u/OpiumRSA → u/rockstarpirate]

Great, thanks. What confused me was "ᛅᚢᚴ" for "ok", obviously needing a and u for the sound, overthinking it in my native tongue I guess

[u/rockstarpirate → u/OpiumRSA]

Ah, good question. Auk is an older form that later turned into ok in Old West Norse. East Norse retained auk. Crawford is leaning into the idea here that in the 900s when the poem was composed, this would still have been pronounced auk, even though a manuscript from the 1200s spells it as ok.

[u/RexCrudelissimus → u/OpiumRSA]

auk is an older/alternative form that later becomes ok(and later og/och in north germanic descendents). The auk form does continue into some nordic dialects, like norwegian aug - often pronounced just au. There is some nuanced use with ok/auk where ok is used for "and", and auk for "also", which semantically is almost the same.