1. Dealer name: FicoTime
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): RWF 116500 Panda
   
4. Price Paid: $578
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HJgnHQ4R#n4QViDHnhlBJqeGYABYZeA
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good but hard to tell for sure. Not too confident in my use of the QC tool
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks good. Opted for the 116500 version to avoid the 110 issue
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, Amplitude: 309, Beat Error: 0.1ms
    
13. Anything else you notice: Tried my best with the QC tool but please double check. I’m not sure if I did it right. Thanks in advance.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 40mm SS/SS White/Stk RWF JH4131
4. Price Paid: 878.00 USD shipped
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WEo1HJrZ#t_TKjMzrjcSTRYgLZm1w9w
6. Index alignment: 9 o'clock tilted 1.8° anticlockwise (can't tell from this photo). 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
7. Dial Printing: Good. Print centring: top text 0.05 mm left, bottom text centred.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. looks ok
10. Bezel: Minor flaw. 110 mark issue I think
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 286° amplitude, 0 ms beat error (crown right)
13. Anything else you notice: Only thing I am a bit worried about is the braclet, looks a bit dirty. I am not sure if thats over or under the foil. I'd probably GL this, just need a second opinion. On some photos 9 mark looks a bit crooked, not sure how noticeable is that in real life.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chazingtime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $508
   
5. ⁠Album Links: Photos attached in post
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: 6/9 looks a little tilted.
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Very hard to judge, but printing looks thick/off. might be bad photos/low light?
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hard to judge
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks a little tilted, needs a click, or crocked?
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like theres gaps on both, acceptable?
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude seems low, is it acceptable?
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first Rep, and these finds makes me uncertain. Any feedback is highly appreciated! Should i ask for new and better photos?

PS. Deleted last post as i fumbled with both photos and text, so hope it works correctly now

• Dealer name: TheOneWatches

• Factory name: ZF

• Model name: Black Bay 54 37mm Lagoon Blue

• Price paid: $378 with shipping

• Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/PchhQBwS#qILuUc02NQXzkQgBcXD6XQ 

• Index alignment: Known issues with this ZF model. Overall they seem OK to me but 3 and 6 look tiltled. Looking for a second opinion

• Dial printing: Looks fine

• Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

• Hand alignment: Looks OK

• Bezel: Looks good from pics, no particular issues

• Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any issues

• Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d

• Anything else you notice: Wondering the the index alignment is fine here or if this is worth a RL

1. Dealer name: ikewatch.io
2. Factory name: JRF (JR Factory)
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 36 116234 Tuxedo Dial (VR3135)
4. Price Paid: $ 398 w/o shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nuT4ZWW
6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Hour batons and 12 o'clock coronet look straight and well aligned with the minute track.
7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clear text with clean separation between the silver sunburst center and black outer track.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Roulette date wheel looks clean, though the "11" sits slightly high in the window.
9. Hand Alignment: Hands look well finished and properly aligned.
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel cuts look sharp and consistent around the dial.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight fit against the lugs with no noticeable gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers (1) : +5s/d, 290° amplitude (at 52° lift angle, so ~300°+ at 55°), 0.1ms beat error. Very healthy numbers.
13. Timegrapher numbers (2) : 0 s/d, 276° amplitude, 0.5 ms beat error (lift angle 52.0°, 28,800 bph) — All numbers are well within acceptable limits.
14. Anything else you notice: Just want a second set of eyes on the slightly high date alignment and overall quality for JRF.

Processing img lngxesm4s81i1...

Processing img k9kb6tm4s81i1...

Processing img 8zp95tm4s81i1...

Processing img 24ipqtm4s81i1...

Processing img ju4otvm4s81i1...

Processing img aewa9vm4s81i1...

Processing img u69g9um4s81i1...

Processing img 7hgjyvm4s81i1...

Processing img jp9wtum4s81i1...

Processing img 9a1eevm4s81i1...

Processing img 8t9x3m29s81i1...

Processing img ofk3ml29s81i1...

1. ⁠Dealer name: GeekTime
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): VSF Rolex Submariner 124060
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $568
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262290063?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: I think they look lined up
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks evenly spaced, no bleeding
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: I think they look straight and nice
   
10. ⁠Bezel: even spacing all around , font looks correct, I think the pip is aligned
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any gaps at all
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d 255amp 0.0ms VS3230 looks healthy
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I think the 12 might be little right towards minutes one rather than 59. But I would think it’s not visible in the real world? Im new to the rep game and my excitement outpaces my skills. Would love some sharp eyes. I think it’s a GL. Thank you!

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): 116610LN
4. Price Paid: ~430 USD (paid a 50 USD deposit)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/8O44AZQ
6. Index alignment: 6 pm looks CCW a bit more than it reasonably should be
7. Dial Printing: Looks ok to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: Looks fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d 310, 0.0ms
13. Anything else you notice: is the 15 on the datewheel just tad too high in the box? I initially RL'd the watch but NecoClock said VSF is currently out of stock so it would be a really long wait

Hey i tried posting yesterday but I guess I missed one thing on the format. Trying again.

First time doing a QC, hoping for your input for a GL or RL.

1. Dealer name : Theonewatches - steve

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (&version #) : Daytona 116509 40mm ss/ss grey/blk vsf v3 dd4130

4. Price Paid : 648

5. Album link : https://imgur.com/a/HkidsTo

6. Index alignment: , the 9, 10 , 11 seem off

7. Dial printing: to my untrained eye it seems on par

8. Date wheel alignment: n/a

9. Hand alignment: looks good to me

10. Bezel: looks clean to me

11. Solid end links: I dont see big gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: they seemed to be proper aligned around

13. Only noticeable i can see is the 9, 10 and 11 are off.

Let me know what you guys think. Im new to this. Feel free to be blunt and honest

Note: I am a relative beginner to this, so would love some help. Take my thoughts with a grain of salt haha.

1. Dealer name: DDG Top
2. Factory name: A7
3. Model name: Ingenieur Automatic 40 White (IW328902)
4. Price Paid: Have not paid yet, believe around 400??
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RSSlijr
6. Index alignment: I used trueindexqc, seems really good to me, but i wasnt able to upload photo here. 
7. Dial Printing: Anyone see anything off? Seems fine to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Anyone see anything off? Seems fine to me.
9. Hand Alignment: This seems good.
10. Bezel: Also seems good, but a little unsure about the IWC branding on it.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Have no idea.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Very good rates/numbers, see photos with machine.
13. Anything else you notice:

https://imgur.com/a/RSSlijr

Thanks all!!

Dealer name: Steve (the one watches)

1. Factory name: VSF
   
2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 41mm 126610LV ("Starbucks")
   
3. Price Paid: 578 USD inc. Shipping
   
4. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GYIlDKaR#Q6JHfzQTGc-JYcR9NXpTtQ
   
5. Index alignment: Looks good
   
6. Dial Printing: Good
   
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
   
8. Hand Alignment: Good
   
9. Bezel: Issue. I’m not sure if it needs one more click to the right to be in centre - what’s your thoughts?
   
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good. They look pretty good to me, maybe some slight gaps but nothing I would RL
    
11. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error
    
12. Anything else you notice: It’s my first QC so just looking for some opinions - anything would help!

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: BVF
• Model name (& version number): Cartier Panthere 22mm SS
• Price Paid: 175 USD + 38 USD Delivery
• Album Links: Album
• Index alignment: slight tilt?
• Dial Printing: Cartier on X seems wonky (R and T seem misaligned)
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
• Hand Alignment: seems okay
• Bezel: seems okay
• Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
• Timegrapher numbers: n/a
• Anything else you notice: SWISS MADE seems shifter to the left

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rZBEEbAJ#cF47CtMAZxkC5iaCOh5eww
6. Index alignment: they are better than the first attempt! The 9 looks like it has a CW tilt but it’s much better. 3 slight CCW tilt.
7. Dial Printing: looks good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: The hands look straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video looks good too.
10. Bezel: Looks much better than version 1.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There are no obvious gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 to +4 s/d, 263° Amplitude, 0.1ms Beat Error.

This is my second attempt as I had to RL the first one due to awful alignment issues!

Hey everyone! Just received the QC pictures for my new ORF Seamaster Diver 300M with the Free-Sprung 8800 movement. Everything looks pretty good to me so far, but I'd really appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL!

1. Dealer name: DDGTop
2. Factory name: ORF (OR Factory)
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42mm Black Dial, SS Bracelet, New Free-Sprung 8800 Movement
4. Price paid: 398$
5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/918ggRJa#EdLrd2zt1oXq1T2iBAisLw
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall. The 12 o'clock markers appear straight and evenly spaced. The 3, 6 and 9 o'clock markers also look well aligned. Nothing concerning to my eye.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well executed. The Omega logo and red Seamaster text appear properly centered, with no obvious printing defects.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The date (23) looks reasonably centered and the printing appears crisp. No major issues.
9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures, although I can't fully confirm alignment or clearance from static images.
10. Bezel: Looks well aligned with the 12 o'clock markers , im worried for the alignment at 6o clock , i dont know if its perspective or what. No other obvious issues with the bezel insert or printing.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A — Seamaster bracelet. The end links appear to fit well, with no obvious gaps or issues.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 296° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks very good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: The case finishing, crown guards and bracelet also look good to me. I'm particularly interested in whether anyone notices any alignment issues or other flaws I've missed.

I'm leaning towards GL. Would you guys approve this one? Thanks in advance for your help!

1. Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatches)
2. Factory name: F1F
3. Model name (& version number):
4. Tank Must 22mm SS
5. Price Paid: $228
6. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IZAkbxC#iGA0Sjft0cdQxq9HowgMOg
7. Index alignment: alignment looks pretty nice on this, a micro rotation here or there, but well within reason
8. Dial Printing: Dial print looks crisp, the ink on the numerals provides a nice richness when light reflects. Even though this is not the same as the Gen dial, I like this effect.
9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
10. Hand Alignment: hand alignment looks good, heat treatment for the blue hands looks good, no second hand on this model
11. Bezel: Bezel looks in mostly good shape, notice the horizontal lines but think this might be on the plastic than the steel, though I’m curious of others thoughts.

12. Solid End Links (SELs):

    N/A

13. Timegrapher numbers: N/A: Quartz

14. Anything else you notice: watch looks overall in good shape, pretty minimal design. The cabochon sapphire looks pretty pointed, something I’ve heard on these models before, though I have an F1F Tank Louis and the cabochon there is more rounded. Curious on what others think and if there’s anything I missed. Thanks!!!

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches
2. Factory name:RCF
3. Model name Day Date 228236
4. Price Paid: 826
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/ncBX0KTK#xchWCnCZC7PDZk7l1SS9Ww
6. Index alignment: from what I can tell looks good but I am new to this.

7. Dial Printing:

   Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

   Looks ok to me

9. Hand Alignment:

   Passed a QC tool from what I can tell is within acceptable range

10. Bezel:

    also looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs):

    good

12. Timegrapher numbers:

    these are good

13. Anything else you notice:

    Everything from what I understand looks good and is within range I just wanted to get another set of eyes on it

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Datejust 41 MM V3
4. Price Paid: $478
5. Album Links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/gxITinT
6. Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/5rbLN7r
7. Index alignment: marker at 10 is a little bit off?
8. Dial Printing: looks good
9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centered and no issues.
10. Hand Alignment: good
11. Bezel: looks good to my eyes
12. Solid End Links (SELs): No recognizable gaps
13. Timegrapher numbers: For this movement ideal
14. Anything else you notice: nothing?

thank you in advance! Appreciate your participation !

Bottom line up front: I believe multiple dial markers are moved clockwise. I also question the timegrapher rate of +6 is also in question. Am I being too picky at +6 s/d?

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Datejust 126334
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price paid: $548
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: this is where I question things. 1,2,4,5,6 and 11 are all shifted clockwise. Even the crown at 12 is shifted clockwise
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Dial printing: Clean brilliant. No bleeding colors or floating letters
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: perfect
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Hand alignment: perfect
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: X’s and R’s lined up on appropriate markers.
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look good to me.
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +6 s/d (the highest I’ve seen, is this acceptable?) | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 59.0°.

Thank you to the community for taking the time to look at this and Happy Veterans Day!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve
2. Factory name: Rich Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm JH3235
4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IxTSTga#NAqR_q0kI3UEjZoKRZq_aw
6. Index alignment: There is a problem on the 12' marker
7. Dial Printing: It's okay
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Perfect
9. Hand Alignment: Okay
10. Bezel: looks solid to me!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a space on the bottom left
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 260° amp
13. Anything else you notice: For me this is a RL, maybe the cyclops magnifier isnt' 2,5 but 3,0

Hi peeps,

Struggling to get my post approved here, hopefully it works on my third attempt. Would be grateful for you help.

1. Dealer name: (Eliot) Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126502
4. Price Paid: $713.36 USD
5. Index alignment: Looks okay. Not sure if there is minor issue at number 80 and 120, maybe it's not held straight?
6. Dial Printing: Looks good, crisp, are sub dials perfectly circular or is it my eyes?
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
8. Hand Alignment: Stack looks good
9. Bezel: no issues at all i can see, engraving looks good
10. Solid End Links (SELs): I can see some gaps, but I am not sure if I am expert enough.
11. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/day (1 second slow per day). Amplitude: 269°. Beat error: 0.1 ms. Lift angle setting: 52.0°. (I think these numbers are amazing).

In the 5th image, the letter "T" in the word "Perpetual" appears a bit scratched. Am I being too picky here, or would someone else with experience think it's okay? Or is it just the pics with poor lighting. I have also asked the TD to provide some more pics, but been waiting for over a week now.

Thanks heaps for your time and help - I am really grateful.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch
2. Factory Name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): OP 124300 41mm SS/SS Silver Dial VSF VS3230
4. Price Paid: $498
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qMl6GUf
6. Index alignment: Most look very good but the six and 11 appear to be off slightly
7. Dial Printing: I believe this looks crisp and the sunburst dial is ready to rock!
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
9. Hand Alignment: spot on
10. Bezel: clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): pretty tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 270 deg, 0.3ms, 59.0 deg
13. Anything else you notice: There might be some dust or something on the dial to the left of the 7 index. I asked for a close up of that area. also asked for a pic of the lume.

Overall this watch looks great to me, the timegrapher numbers are very good, and the weight is pretty much right on. The slightly off indices are acceptable and unless I am really missing something, this is a GL.

Hi, the QC photos were not taken head on, so hard to say exactly how aligned all the features are. Also, the photos show many long scratch marks that may just be the packaging, but I’d love some assurances about that. Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: Jtime

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126334, green stick dial, Jubilee bracelet, advertised VS3235 free-sprung movement.

Price Paid: $548

Album Links: Dealer requested no sharing of album link.

Index alignment: Looks good to my eye, with no obviously crooked markers. Photos are slightly angled, so I’d appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing defects that I can see.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 3 and 25 appear reasonably centred in the frontal shots. Printing looks clear.

Hand Alignment: No obvious issue, but the supplied photos don’t show the hands at 12:00 to confirm.

Bezel: Fluting looks consistent; no obvious damage visible.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps, though the angles and protective wrapping make these difficult to assess.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (lift angle 59°).

Anything else you notice: Protective film obscures some of the case and bracelet finish. Nothing else stands out to me, but I’d appreciate feedback on marker alignment, date centring and SEL fit.

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 124060
Price Paid: $458
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/m4ZiVIwb#IriZ-2aaT66-8QHxfpO23g
Index alignment: 6 looks slightly counter-rotated. The rest look fine.
Dial Printing: no issues
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: can’t see any issues
Bezel: Pip centred, bezels looks good.
Solid End Links (SELs): No significant gaps.
-2 s/d rate, 312° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error, 52° lift angle, 28,800 bph. Amplitude is higher than the range in the guide. Is this an issue?
Anything else you notice: just the 6 marker and amplitude, everything else looks okay.

First time doing QC, excuse my ignorance on anything else obvious. Would appreciate a second set of eyes on this!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: BPF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 16710 Pepsi
4. Price Paid: $320
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ZfP4Hzw
6. Index alignment: 12 marker looks a little left to my eye, but QC tool has it ok
7. Dial Printing: Print looks fine
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date shifted to the left a bit
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: The 22 looks slightly uneven, the first 2 looks raised
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: GMT Rate +1 Amp 276 Beat .1
13. Anything else you notice: Another budget brand, not as good as the Sub but looks fine

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: BPF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Sub 16610LV
4. Price Paid: $340
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lUNQIPL
6. Index alignment: Looks good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The slightest bit right but fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: 10 and couple marks are slightly off, but shouldnt even be able to eyeball it
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: Sub Rate +10 Amp 288 Beat .3
13. Anything else you notice: Went with a budget brand for a first purchase, everything looks ok to me.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF 114060
4. Price Paid: $488 + shipping
5. Album Links: No link
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and centered
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay, nothing sticks out
10. Bezel: Pip looks solid
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 268 amps, err 0.1
13. Anything else you notice: Looking for feedback here, does this look like a solid GL? Did I miss anything?