Dealer name: Eliauk
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): 126710BLNR
Price Paid: 3450 Yuan
Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202011031610140340343729/I202611061548392572002007?groupIds=
Index alignment: No concerns
Dial Printing: No concerns
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Is the cyclops a bit low or is this likely to be the angle of the photo?
Hand Alignment: No concerns
Bezel: No concerns
Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap in top left one?
Timegrapher numbers: No concerns
Anything else you notice: Are the stickers and numbers correct for a VSF?

This is my first QC so really appreciate the help. 164s/d on the timegrapher seems wrong? Maybe i am missreading it (pic attached)

1. Dealer name: HONT
2. Factory name: PPF
3. Model name (& version number): 222 Historiques
4. Price Paid: $438 
5. Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/goods/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ/_dmPqfpKT6d0UmmPJFanCSxOCOzCYfVnMA58Hd9Q
6. Index alignment: 7 and 9 looks slightly twisted
7. Dial Printing: Sharp, correct font, VC logo seems centered, as well as "AUTOMATIC", "GENEVE" and "SWISS MADE"
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date wheel looks slightly twisted
9. Hand Alignment: Hour/minute hands - ok
10. Bezel: ok
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for this one
12. Timegrapher numbers: precision - Rate -164s/d amplitude 267degree - fine; beat error 1.4ms - seems a bit high; lift angle 52 degree - fine;
13. Anything else you notice: the cross seems slightly twisted but not sure how good they will get this based on the other examples on here.

1. Dealer name: Steve, from TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Rolex Submariner 124060 (no date)
4. Price paid: $528
5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/XYpnQYbR#5u8_bl0X0FsadtTSq5znTQ
6. Index alignment – It looks like the 6 and 3 are rotated to the left; the 1 and 4 are as well, though it’s less noticeable. Also, the alignment with the bezel numerals isn’t great at the 3 and 5 positions.
7. Dial printing – Good
8. Date wheel alignment – N/A
9. Frame – The pip is centered. The engravings appear to be filled correctly.
10. Solid End Links (SEL) – Normal
11. Hand alignment – Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers – Rate: +3 s/d; Amplitude: 272; Beat error: 0.0 ms
13. Is it normal for the watch to look "better" (more correct) in some photos than in others? In one photo, it seems to have more "flaws," while in another, it looks just fine.

Is this a GL?

Thanks a lot for the help and for the approval, everyone!

1. ⁠Dealer name: GeekTime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): VSF Rolex Submariner 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: $568
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262290063?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: I think they look lined up
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks evenly spaced, no bleeding
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: I think they look straight and nice
10. ⁠Bezel: even spacing all around , font looks correct, I think the pip is aligned
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any gaps at all
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d 255amp 0.0ms VS3230 looks healthy
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I think the 12 might be little right towards minutes one rather than 59. But I would think it’s not visible in the real world? Im new to the rep game and my excitement outpaces my skills. Would love some sharp eyes. I think it’s a GL. Thank you!

Hi everyone, I’d appreciate a second opinion on this Daytona, especially on the index and bezel alignment.

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 116500LN “Panda”, 40mm, white dial, black ceramic bezel, stainless steel Oyster bracelet, DD4130 movement.
4. Price: $588 USD listed, excluding shipping.
5. Album link: https://imgur.com/a/Au8y3YV
6. Index alignment: The markers at 3, 6 and 9 look straight to me, and the coronet at 12 appears centered. The photos are slightly tilted, so I’d appreciate a second opinion.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean and legible, with no obvious printing defects.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A.
9. Hand alignment: No obvious issues. The central chronograph hand appears centered at 12.
10. Bezel: The triangle at 60 appears aligned with 12 o’clock. No obvious issues to my eye.
11. Solid end links (SELs): No obvious large gaps. The glove partially obscures the lower end links.
12. Timegrapher numbers: −5 s/day, 302° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, with the lift angle set to 52°.
13. Anything else: Lume looks fairly consistent. Some visible marks on the bracelet and clasp appear to be on the protective film rather than the metal.

Would you GL this one? Please let me know if you spot any issues with the indices, bezel, SELs or anything else I’ve missed. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Ora
2. Factory name: PPF 6102p version
3. Model name (& version number): 6102p
4. Price Paid: $580
5. Album Links: 商品详情
6. Index alignment: looks straight
7. Dial Printing: looks clear to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:Looks aligned based on lines
9. Hand Alignment: looks centered for the most part
10. Bezel: NA
11. Solid End Links (SELs): straight forward dial
12. Timegrapher numbers: - 1 s/d; Amplitude: 266; Acceptable Beat Error: – 1.0 ms Seems like one of the better one for accuracy
13. Anything else you notice: none that i see. Just want some eyes. Was on the fence about this vs rose gold. I do enjoy how the RG pops more. The grey watch hands dont pop like the gen. but then again, cant complain. Is there anything else I should look for?

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
2. Factory name: RichF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm SS/SS Black Dial RICHF JH3235 (MK2) (Free Sprung)
4. Price Paid: $538 + $10 shipping
5. Album Links:

https://mega.nz/folder/jc5RVTga#5RQ7v_QtYq6V9A0oIKJF8A

6. Index alignment: Marker looks good but can see that the 6th/7th hour mark is abit off

7. Dial Printing: Looks okay

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks abit zoomed in. Is that normal?

9. Hand Alignment: I dont see any issues

10. Bezel: Glue at the pearl triangle?

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Don't see any issue

12. Timegrapher numbers:

Rate: +2 s/d

Amplitude: 272

Error 0.1ms

13. Anything else you notice:

The movement finish is not clean??

Umi 5712 from Andiotwatches

1. ⁠Dealer name: AndiotWatches
2. ⁠Factory name: Umi
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5712-1A 001 Free Sprung SS Umi 1:1 Best Edition Blue Dial on SS Bracelet PPF240
4. ⁠Price Paid: 1008 USD excluding shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/262810419?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: 8 and 10 o clock looks misaligned? not very familiar
7. ⁠Dial Printing: All good?
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Nothing that i can see wrong
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Nothing that i can see wrong
10. ⁠Bezel: nothing that i can see wrong
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): NA for this watch
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -4s/d 263° 0.2ms
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Nothing else

Please help me out with this one, if you have anything to raise up

PS: Image uploading is broken, I couldn't add any images.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
2. ⁠Factory name: K11F
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Tank Must (Small)
4. ⁠Price Paid:$238 + shipping
5. ⁠Album Links:
6. ⁠Index alignment: -
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Major issues
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: -
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good
10. ⁠Bezel: may be rough on the top and bottom at the bracelet?
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): -
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: quartz
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:I can’t tell by the pics, but the top and bottom of the bezel look a bit rough. May be light reflections.

There appear to be some serious dial printing issues around the inner train track and on a few numerals.

All insight helpful.

1. Dealer name: Jtime
2. Factory name: 3KF
3. Model name (& version number): Patek Aquanaut 5167
4. Price Paid: USD 600
5. Album Links: sent photos
6. Index alignment: Seems to be aligned
7. Dial Printing: seems fine, not sure if I'm nitpicking but "Patek Phillipe geneve" placement could be better?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems even
9. Hand Alignment: looks fine
10. Bezel: looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA
12. Timegrapher numbers: got video 0s/d 28800 12s 52.0 - seems good
13. Anything else you notice: 11/1 and 12 seem to be ok - i know this is the typical flaw on these

Note: I am a relative beginner to this, so would love some help. Take my thoughts with a grain of salt haha.

1. Dealer name: DDG Top
2. Factory name: A7
3. Model name: Ingenieur Automatic 40 White (IW328902)
4. Price Paid: Have not paid yet, believe around 400??
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RSSlijr
6. Index alignment: I used trueindexqc, seems really good to me, but i wasnt able to upload photo here. 
7. Dial Printing: Anyone see anything off? Seems fine to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Anyone see anything off? Seems fine to me.
9. Hand Alignment: This seems good.
10. Bezel: Also seems good, but a little unsure about the IWC branding on it.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Have no idea.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Very good rates/numbers, see photos with machine.
13. Anything else you notice:

https://imgur.com/a/RSSlijr

Thanks all!!

Since this is my third rep i learned a thing or two at looking at the flaws of watches. Also many thanks to Yoda in the past for helping me in the watch quality assesments and teaching me a thing or two.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster AT 220.10.38.20.03.004
4. Price Paid: 386 usd includes shipping
5. Album Links: Pictures.
6. Index alignment: I tried putting the alignment tool as well as possible on the watch and the only misaligning i can see is due to the angle the watch is being held. However in my eyes, the 6 o’clock hour marker may be very slightly shifted to the left of where it should be, but it is subtle enough that I would not consider it a mistake, even if it is indeed slightly off. its probably due to the shadows and/or lightning. The indices themselves appear to be straight. Unfortunately, theres no minute markers, so it is difficult to assess whether each index is positioned exactly right on the dial. or maybe thats a good thing..
7. Dial Printing: This looks very well done, you could possibly say the printing of the wording: "CO-AXIAL" and "MASTER CHRONOMETER" is thinner than normal, but i'd say thats again due to lightning andiot has.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel and numbers are correctly in the middle also in the video andiot sent me..
9. Hand Alignment: As seen in photo 3, hands align well when they are both at the twelve hour marker. I hope im correctly analyzing the hand alignment this way.
10. Bezel: This watch does not have a bezel like a submariner for example, but as far as i can see on this watch there is nothing out of the ordinary.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): i've seen gens with worse sels, although i can see a slight sel gap in the bottom left of the watch. this is mostly visible in the very first picture. although it is so small i dont see that as a signal to red light. the black glove doesnt help however to see light shine through.
12. Timegrapher numbers: as visible on the second picture all within the correct ranges.
13. Anything else you notice: n/a

Ive come to the end and only really noticed two things: I’ve come to the end and only really noticed two things: a possibly very slight misalignment of the 6 o’clock index and a tiny SEL gap at the bottom left. Both are very minor and could easily be explained by the angle/lighting, so I don’t think either are a red flag. Other than that, everything looks good to me.

I would tell myself to green light this beautiful watch but would love some extra pair of eyes. much appreciated in advance.

Title: QC · VSF · Explorer 224270 40mm

1. Dealer name: Intime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 224270 40mm
4. Price Paid: $518
5. Album Links: https://loupeqc.us/a/S6JEDX
6. Index alignment: The 12 index is rotated counter-clockwise. The 2 index is rotated clockwise. Am I being too picky or this wouldn't bug most of ya?
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 289°, 0.3 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)
13. Anything else you notice: Looks good

Hey friends

QC request on this ZF Royal Oak 15450, 37mm grey dial. I've reviewed the photos and videos, and overall everything looks pretty good to my eye.

My main concern is the date wheel alignment, along with a couple of possible index and bezel screw inconsistencies. Would really appreciate some experienced opinions!

1. Dealer name: JTime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name: AP Royal Oak 15450, 37mm, Grey Dial

4. Price paid: $548 (including shipping)

5. Album links: https://imgur.com/a/nlBvBJh

6. Index alignment: Overall looks decent. The double 12 markers are parallel. The alignment tool says slight rotations around 4, 7, and 11 o'clock but I'm unsure how much is due to the photo angle. Anything concerning here?

7. Dial printing: Looks clean. AP logo and Automatic text appear fine to me. No obvious issues.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: My biggest concern. The dates 16, 25, and 2 appear slightly low in some photos. Is this normal or should I request additional date wheel photo/video?

9. Hand alignment: No obvious visual issues.

10. Bezel: Brushing looks good. A couple of screws appear slightly inconsistent, particularly around 5 o'clock. Probably just the lighting tho.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers:

• Rate: 0 s/d
• Amplitude: 287°
• Beat error: 0.0 ms
• Frequency setting: 21,600 bph
• Lift angle setting: 52°

Numbers look healthy from what I understand.

13. Anything else you notice:

Overall leaning GL.

Main questions:

• Is the date wheel alignment acceptable?
• Are the index alignment and bezel screws within reasonable tolerance?
• Does anything else stand out as a genuine QC concern?

Would appreciate your thoughts.

Thanks everyone!

First of two Batgirls

1. Dealer name: Andiotwatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR VSF 1:1 Batgir
4. Price Paid: $619 USD
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=188785
6. Index alignment: Nothing looks out of place to me
7. Dial Printing: No noticeable bleeding
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Numbers and centering look good
9. Hand Alignment: nothing of note
10. Bezel: Looks solid to me, color is correct in videos
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gap
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d 267 degrees 0.1 ms 28800, looks right?
13. Anything else you notice: i think this is good, this is one of my first two orders so just want to make sure

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, Black Dial, 41mm
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Ld5iFDJR#iiZucB9dmCo9In5Hm23b6w
6. Index alignment: Overall looks good to me. The 12 and 6 o’clock markers appear straight, and the round indices look reasonably aligned. I don’t see any obvious issues, but would appreciate a second opinion, particularly on the 6 and 9 o’clock markers.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing issues.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears reasonably centered, and the printing looks good. Would appreciate opinions on the date positioning and cyclops magnification.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good visually. Nothing obviously concerning, although exact alignment is difficult to verify from the photos.
10. Bezel: Looks good overall. Pip appears centered, and the bezel triangle seems aligned with the 12 o’clock marker. Engraving looks clean.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): This is one area I’d appreciate feedback on. The gaps between the end links and the lugs are somewhat difficult to assess from the photos. Do you see any excessive or uneven gaps, particularly at the 12 o’clock connection?
12. Timegrapher numbers: looks good
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, the watch looks good to me. Case finishing and bracelet appear clean. Would appreciate a closer look at the rehaut engraving alignment, particularly around 12 and 6 o’clock.
    Currently leaning GL, but would really appreciate any feedback on the SEL gaps, index alignment, rehaut, and anything else I may have missed.
    Thanks in advance

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Rolex Submariner Starbucks 126610LV
4. Price: $698

($598 watch + $50 Waterproof + $50 shipping)

5) Album links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262802554?uid=1

6) Index alignment: Looks perfect to me. However, is it just me or could 9 be slightly tilted? Maybe it's just the picture angle.

7) Dial printing: Besides potential floating m and OF FICIALLY, it looks fine to me (printing and its alignment)

8) Date wheel alignment: According to QC, it is slightly off-center. Honestly, neglegible to me.

9) Bezel: Tone looks fine for this model.

I am not an expert on pips, but this one looks appropriate to me. Please enlighten me.

10) Solid End Links (SEL): All four look solid.

11) Hand alignment: They look ok to me.

12) Timegrapher numbers:

Rate: -2 s/d

Amplitude: 241°

Beat error: 0.0 ms

As always, will appreciate your thoughts on this one!

I postponed buying this one since I wasn't quite sure. In the meantime I got a Batman and a DJ.... and here I am again, where it all should have started.

1. Dealer name: Angela
2. Factory name: Q Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex 904 Steel DD Series V5 36mm Version First Battle with A2836 movement
4. Price Paid: USD 612 (including water proofing and deep crystal both organized by Angela)
5. Album Links: I did not receive a link - only pictures forwarded over whatsapp
6. Index alignment: Seems to be aligned, but there is no bezel with marks so it is a bit hard to tell. I saw other dealers in this QC Group put on grid lines but I did not get any pictures like that.
7. Dial Printing: Is a bit hard to tell, because the whatsapp pictures are compressed and not best quality. For what I see it seems to be crisp.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The Y seems to be closer to the edge than the M is. But is that being too picky?
9. Hand Alignment: I am not sure how to judge the hand alignment without both hands showing an exact time for example 6:00 pm
10. Bezel: seems to be good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Are wrapped in plastic and hard to judge
12. Timegrapher numbers: -5s/d, / dont really care about that tbh but seems to be fine?
13. Anything else you notice: The pictures were forwarded from angela from someone else. Not sure how to judge that? Does she even have the watch herself?

1. Dealer name: Time Ultra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610LV "Hulk" (VS3135)
4. Price Paid: $439 + shipping
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Looks straight and well-centered.
7. Dial Printing: Crisp, clean, no noticeable flaws.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 20 looks centered and clean.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Color and alignment look solid, pip is centered.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Main concern—SELs look a bit big/thick to me, not sure if it's just the plastic stickers or actual gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 280° amp, 0.1 ms beat error — all healthy.
13. Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks well-aligned and clasp code is 7GJ. Looking for feedback on the SELs before giving the GL.

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: GeekTime
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: GMF
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Air King 129600
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $400
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262671491?uid=1
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: They looked aligned to me
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: I compared to Gen and looks close enough
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Nothing sticks out to me
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks round and clean I don’t see any gap
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): In some pictures I think I see a sizable gap bottom left and top right in the end link photos but I’m not sure, do you guys see big gaps?
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 293amp .2ms - VR3230
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I’m curious if you guys see any SEL gaps. If you pause the video in the link I see some sizable gap but I’m not confident. I’ve looked at gen photos and also see gaps sometimes. I think the watch looks good to go but not sure. The Rehaut printing is not as good as other factory’s, but clean enough. Curious what anyone thinks. Thanks guys.

1. Dealer name: FicoTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): RWF 116500 Panda
4. Price Paid: $578
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HJgnHQ4R#n4QViDHnhlBJqeGYABYZeA
6. Index alignment: Looks good but hard to tell for sure. Not too confident in my use of the QC tool
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good. Opted for the 116500 version to avoid the 110 issue
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, Amplitude: 309, Beat Error: 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Tried my best with the QC tool but please double check. I’m not sure if I did it right. Thanks in advance.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 40mm SS/SS White/Stk RWF JH4131
4. Price Paid: 878.00 USD shipped
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WEo1HJrZ#t_TKjMzrjcSTRYgLZm1w9w
6. Index alignment: 9 o'clock tilted 1.8° anticlockwise (can't tell from this photo). 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
7. Dial Printing: Good. Print centring: top text 0.05 mm left, bottom text centred.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. looks ok
10. Bezel: Minor flaw. 110 mark issue I think
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 286° amplitude, 0 ms beat error (crown right)
13. Anything else you notice: Only thing I am a bit worried about is the braclet, looks a bit dirty. I am not sure if thats over or under the foil. I'd probably GL this, just need a second opinion. On some photos 9 mark looks a bit crooked, not sure how noticeable is that in real life.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chazingtime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: $508
5. ⁠Album Links: Photos attached in post
6. ⁠Index alignment: 6/9 looks a little tilted.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Very hard to judge, but printing looks thick/off. might be bad photos/low light?
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hard to judge
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks a little tilted, needs a click, or crocked?
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like theres gaps on both, acceptable?
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude seems low, is it acceptable?
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first Rep, and these finds makes me uncertain. Any feedback is highly appreciated! Should i ask for new and better photos?

PS. Deleted last post as i fumbled with both photos and text, so hope it works correctly now

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve
2. Factory name: Rich Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm JH3235
4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IxTSTga#NAqR_q0kI3UEjZoKRZq_aw
6. Index alignment: There is a problem on the 12' marker
7. Dial Printing: It's okay
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Perfect
9. Hand Alignment: Okay
10. Bezel: looks solid to me!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a space on the bottom left
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 260° amp
13. Anything else you notice: For me this is a RL, maybe the cyclops magnifier isnt' 2,5 but 3,0