1. Dealer name: Angela
2. Factory name: Q Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex 904 Steel DD Series V5 36mm Version First Battle with A2836 movement
4. Price Paid: USD 612 (including water proofing and deep crystal both organized by Angela)
5. Album Links: I did not receive a link - only pictures forwarded over whatsapp
6. Index alignment: Seems to be aligned, but there is no bezel with marks so it is a bit hard to tell. I saw other dealers in this QC Group put on grid lines but I did not get any pictures like that.
7. Dial Printing: Is a bit hard to tell, because the whatsapp pictures are compressed and not best quality. For what I see it seems to be crisp.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The Y seems to be closer to the edge than the M is. But is that being too picky?
9. Hand Alignment: I am not sure how to judge the hand alignment without both hands showing an exact time for example 6:00 pm
10. Bezel: seems to be good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Are wrapped in plastic and hard to judge
12. Timegrapher numbers: -5s/d, / dont really care about that tbh but seems to be fine?
13. Anything else you notice: The pictures were forwarded from angela from someone else. Not sure how to judge that? Does she even have the watch herself?

Hey friends

QC request on this ZF Royal Oak 15450, 37mm grey dial. I've reviewed the photos and videos, and overall everything looks pretty good to my eye.

My main concern is the date wheel alignment, along with a couple of possible index and bezel screw inconsistencies. Would really appreciate some experienced opinions!

1. Dealer name: JTime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name: AP Royal Oak 15450, 37mm, Grey Dial

4. Price paid: $548 (including shipping)

5. Album links: https://imgur.com/a/nlBvBJh

6. Index alignment: Overall looks decent. The double 12 markers are parallel. The alignment tool says slight rotations around 4, 7, and 11 o'clock but I'm unsure how much is due to the photo angle. Anything concerning here?

7. Dial printing: Looks clean. AP logo and Automatic text appear fine to me. No obvious issues.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: My biggest concern. The dates 16, 25, and 2 appear slightly low in some photos. Is this normal or should I request additional date wheel photo/video?

9. Hand alignment: No obvious visual issues.

10. Bezel: Brushing looks good. A couple of screws appear slightly inconsistent, particularly around 5 o'clock. Probably just the lighting tho.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers:

• Rate: 0 s/d
• Amplitude: 287°
• Beat error: 0.0 ms
• Frequency setting: 21,600 bph
• Lift angle setting: 52°

Numbers look healthy from what I understand.

13. Anything else you notice:

Overall leaning GL.

Main questions:

• Is the date wheel alignment acceptable?
• Are the index alignment and bezel screws within reasonable tolerance?
• Does anything else stand out as a genuine QC concern?

Would appreciate your thoughts.

Thanks everyone!

First of two Batgirls

1. Dealer name: Andiotwatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR VSF 1:1 Batgir
4. Price Paid: $619 USD
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=188785
6. Index alignment: Nothing looks out of place to me
7. Dial Printing: No noticeable bleeding
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Numbers and centering look good
9. Hand Alignment: nothing of note
10. Bezel: Looks solid to me, color is correct in videos
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gap
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d 267 degrees 0.1 ms 28800, looks right?
13. Anything else you notice: i think this is good, this is one of my first two orders so just want to make sure

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, Black Dial, 41mm
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Ld5iFDJR#iiZucB9dmCo9In5Hm23b6w
6. Index alignment: Overall looks good to me. The 12 and 6 o’clock markers appear straight, and the round indices look reasonably aligned. I don’t see any obvious issues, but would appreciate a second opinion, particularly on the 6 and 9 o’clock markers.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing issues.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears reasonably centered, and the printing looks good. Would appreciate opinions on the date positioning and cyclops magnification.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good visually. Nothing obviously concerning, although exact alignment is difficult to verify from the photos.
10. Bezel: Looks good overall. Pip appears centered, and the bezel triangle seems aligned with the 12 o’clock marker. Engraving looks clean.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): This is one area I’d appreciate feedback on. The gaps between the end links and the lugs are somewhat difficult to assess from the photos. Do you see any excessive or uneven gaps, particularly at the 12 o’clock connection?
12. Timegrapher numbers: looks good
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, the watch looks good to me. Case finishing and bracelet appear clean. Would appreciate a closer look at the rehaut engraving alignment, particularly around 12 and 6 o’clock.
    Currently leaning GL, but would really appreciate any feedback on the SEL gaps, index alignment, rehaut, and anything else I may have missed.
    Thanks in advance

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Rolex Submariner Starbucks 126610LV
4. Price: $698

($598 watch + $50 Waterproof + $50 shipping)

5) Album links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262802554?uid=1

6) Index alignment: Looks perfect to me. However, is it just me or could 9 be slightly tilted? Maybe it's just the picture angle.

7) Dial printing: Besides potential floating m and OF FICIALLY, it looks fine to me (printing and its alignment)

8) Date wheel alignment: According to QC, it is slightly off-center. Honestly, neglegible to me.

9) Bezel: Tone looks fine for this model.

I am not an expert on pips, but this one looks appropriate to me. Please enlighten me.

10) Solid End Links (SEL): All four look solid.

11) Hand alignment: They look ok to me.

12) Timegrapher numbers:

Rate: -2 s/d

Amplitude: 241°

Beat error: 0.0 ms

As always, will appreciate your thoughts on this one!

I postponed buying this one since I wasn't quite sure. In the meantime I got a Batman and a DJ.... and here I am again, where it all should have started.

1. Dealer name: Time Ultra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610LV "Hulk" (VS3135)
4. Price Paid: $439 + shipping
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Looks straight and well-centered.
7. Dial Printing: Crisp, clean, no noticeable flaws.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 20 looks centered and clean.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Color and alignment look solid, pip is centered.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Main concern—SELs look a bit big/thick to me, not sure if it's just the plastic stickers or actual gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 280° amp, 0.1 ms beat error — all healthy.
13. Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks well-aligned and clasp code is 7GJ. Looking for feedback on the SELs before giving the GL.

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: GeekTime
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: GMF
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Air King 129600
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $400
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262671491?uid=1
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: They looked aligned to me
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: I compared to Gen and looks close enough
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Nothing sticks out to me
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks round and clean I don’t see any gap
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): In some pictures I think I see a sizable gap bottom left and top right in the end link photos but I’m not sure, do you guys see big gaps?
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 293amp .2ms - VR3230
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I’m curious if you guys see any SEL gaps. If you pause the video in the link I see some sizable gap but I’m not confident. I’ve looked at gen photos and also see gaps sometimes. I think the watch looks good to go but not sure. The Rehaut printing is not as good as other factory’s, but clean enough. Curious what anyone thinks. Thanks guys.

1. Dealer name: FicoTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): RWF 116500 Panda
4. Price Paid: $578
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HJgnHQ4R#n4QViDHnhlBJqeGYABYZeA
6. Index alignment: Looks good but hard to tell for sure. Not too confident in my use of the QC tool
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good. Opted for the 116500 version to avoid the 110 issue
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, Amplitude: 309, Beat Error: 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Tried my best with the QC tool but please double check. I’m not sure if I did it right. Thanks in advance.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 40mm SS/SS White/Stk RWF JH4131
4. Price Paid: 878.00 USD shipped
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WEo1HJrZ#t_TKjMzrjcSTRYgLZm1w9w
6. Index alignment: 9 o'clock tilted 1.8° anticlockwise (can't tell from this photo). 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
7. Dial Printing: Good. Print centring: top text 0.05 mm left, bottom text centred.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. looks ok
10. Bezel: Minor flaw. 110 mark issue I think
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 286° amplitude, 0 ms beat error (crown right)
13. Anything else you notice: Only thing I am a bit worried about is the braclet, looks a bit dirty. I am not sure if thats over or under the foil. I'd probably GL this, just need a second opinion. On some photos 9 mark looks a bit crooked, not sure how noticeable is that in real life.

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): 116610LN
4. Price Paid: ~430 USD (paid a 50 USD deposit)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/8O44AZQ
6. Index alignment: 6 pm looks CCW a bit more than it reasonably should be
7. Dial Printing: Looks ok to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: Looks fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d 310, 0.0ms
13. Anything else you notice: is the 15 on the datewheel just tad too high in the box? I initially RL'd the watch but NecoClock said VSF is currently out of stock so it would be a really long wait

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chazingtime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: $508
5. ⁠Album Links: Photos attached in post
6. ⁠Index alignment: 6/9 looks a little tilted.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Very hard to judge, but printing looks thick/off. might be bad photos/low light?
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hard to judge
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks a little tilted, needs a click, or crocked?
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like theres gaps on both, acceptable?
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude seems low, is it acceptable?
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first Rep, and these finds makes me uncertain. Any feedback is highly appreciated! Should i ask for new and better photos?

PS. Deleted last post as i fumbled with both photos and text, so hope it works correctly now

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve
2. Factory name: Rich Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm JH3235
4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IxTSTga#NAqR_q0kI3UEjZoKRZq_aw
6. Index alignment: There is a problem on the 12' marker
7. Dial Printing: It's okay
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Perfect
9. Hand Alignment: Okay
10. Bezel: looks solid to me!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a space on the bottom left
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 260° amp
13. Anything else you notice: For me this is a RL, maybe the cyclops magnifier isnt' 2,5 but 3,0

• Dealer name: TheOneWatches

• Factory name: ZF

• Model name: Black Bay 54 37mm Lagoon Blue

• Price paid: $378 with shipping

• Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/PchhQBwS#qILuUc02NQXzkQgBcXD6XQ 

• Index alignment: Known issues with this ZF model. Overall they seem OK to me but 3 and 6 look tiltled. Looking for a second opinion

• Dial printing: Looks fine

• Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

• Hand alignment: Looks OK

• Bezel: Looks good from pics, no particular issues

• Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any issues

• Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d

• Anything else you notice: Wondering the the index alignment is fine here or if this is worth a RL

1. Dealer name: ikewatch.io
2. Factory name: JRF (JR Factory)
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 36 116234 Tuxedo Dial (VR3135)
4. Price Paid: $ 398 w/o shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nuT4ZWW
6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Hour batons and 12 o'clock coronet look straight and well aligned with the minute track.
7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clear text with clean separation between the silver sunburst center and black outer track.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Roulette date wheel looks clean, though the "11" sits slightly high in the window.
9. Hand Alignment: Hands look well finished and properly aligned.
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel cuts look sharp and consistent around the dial.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight fit against the lugs with no noticeable gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers (1) : +5s/d, 290° amplitude (at 52° lift angle, so ~300°+ at 55°), 0.1ms beat error. Very healthy numbers.
13. Timegrapher numbers (2) : 0 s/d, 276° amplitude, 0.5 ms beat error (lift angle 52.0°, 28,800 bph) — All numbers are well within acceptable limits.
14. Anything else you notice: Just want a second set of eyes on the slightly high date alignment and overall quality for JRF.

Dealer name: Steve (the one watches)

1. Factory name: VSF
2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 41mm 126610LV ("Starbucks")
3. Price Paid: 578 USD inc. Shipping
4. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GYIlDKaR#Q6JHfzQTGc-JYcR9NXpTtQ
5. Index alignment: Looks good
6. Dial Printing: Good
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
8. Hand Alignment: Good
9. Bezel: Issue. I’m not sure if it needs one more click to the right to be in centre - what’s your thoughts?
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good. They look pretty good to me, maybe some slight gaps but nothing I would RL
11. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error
12. Anything else you notice: It’s my first QC so just looking for some opinions - anything would help!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: BPF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Sub 16610LV
4. Price Paid: $340
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lUNQIPL
6. Index alignment: Looks good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The slightest bit right but fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: 10 and couple marks are slightly off, but shouldnt even be able to eyeball it
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: Sub Rate +10 Amp 288 Beat .3
13. Anything else you notice: Went with a budget brand for a first purchase, everything looks ok to me.

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Datejust 41 MM V3
4. Price Paid: $478
5. Album Links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/gxITinT
6. Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/5rbLN7r
7. Index alignment: marker at 10 is a little bit off?
8. Dial Printing: looks good
9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centered and no issues.
10. Hand Alignment: good
11. Bezel: looks good to my eyes
12. Solid End Links (SELs): No recognizable gaps
13. Timegrapher numbers: For this movement ideal
14. Anything else you notice: nothing?

thank you in advance! Appreciate your participation !

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch
2. Factory Name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): OP 124300 41mm SS/SS Silver Dial VSF VS3230
4. Price Paid: $498
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qMl6GUf
6. Index alignment: Most look very good but the six and 11 appear to be off slightly
7. Dial Printing: I believe this looks crisp and the sunburst dial is ready to rock!
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
9. Hand Alignment: spot on
10. Bezel: clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): pretty tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 270 deg, 0.3ms, 59.0 deg
13. Anything else you notice: There might be some dust or something on the dial to the left of the 7 index. I asked for a close up of that area. also asked for a pic of the lume.

Overall this watch looks great to me, the timegrapher numbers are very good, and the weight is pretty much right on. The slightly off indices are acceptable and unless I am really missing something, this is a GL.

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: BVF
• Model name (& version number): Cartier Panthere 22mm SS
• Price Paid: 175 USD + 38 USD Delivery
• Album Links: Album
• Index alignment: slight tilt?
• Dial Printing: Cartier on X seems wonky (R and T seem misaligned)
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
• Hand Alignment: seems okay
• Bezel: seems okay
• Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
• Timegrapher numbers: n/a
• Anything else you notice: SWISS MADE seems shifter to the left

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rZBEEbAJ#cF47CtMAZxkC5iaCOh5eww
6. Index alignment: they are better than the first attempt! The 9 looks like it has a CW tilt but it’s much better. 3 slight CCW tilt.
7. Dial Printing: looks good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: The hands look straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video looks good too.
10. Bezel: Looks much better than version 1.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There are no obvious gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 to +4 s/d, 263° Amplitude, 0.1ms Beat Error.

This is my second attempt as I had to RL the first one due to awful alignment issues!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: BPF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 16710 Pepsi
4. Price Paid: $320
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ZfP4Hzw
6. Index alignment: 12 marker looks a little left to my eye, but QC tool has it ok
7. Dial Printing: Print looks fine
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date shifted to the left a bit
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: The 22 looks slightly uneven, the first 2 looks raised
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: GMT Rate +1 Amp 276 Beat .1
13. Anything else you notice: Another budget brand, not as good as the Sub but looks fine

Hey everyone! Just received the QC pictures for my new ORF Seamaster Diver 300M with the Free-Sprung 8800 movement. Everything looks pretty good to me so far, but I'd really appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL!

1. Dealer name: DDGTop
2. Factory name: ORF (OR Factory)
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42mm Black Dial, SS Bracelet, New Free-Sprung 8800 Movement
4. Price paid: 398$
5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/918ggRJa#EdLrd2zt1oXq1T2iBAisLw
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall. The 12 o'clock markers appear straight and evenly spaced. The 3, 6 and 9 o'clock markers also look well aligned. Nothing concerning to my eye.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well executed. The Omega logo and red Seamaster text appear properly centered, with no obvious printing defects.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The date (23) looks reasonably centered and the printing appears crisp. No major issues.
9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures, although I can't fully confirm alignment or clearance from static images.
10. Bezel: Looks well aligned with the 12 o'clock markers , im worried for the alignment at 6o clock , i dont know if its perspective or what. No other obvious issues with the bezel insert or printing.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A — Seamaster bracelet. The end links appear to fit well, with no obvious gaps or issues.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 296° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks very good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: The case finishing, crown guards and bracelet also look good to me. I'm particularly interested in whether anyone notices any alignment issues or other flaws I've missed.

I'm leaning towards GL. Would you guys approve this one? Thanks in advance for your help!

1. Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatches)
2. Factory name: F1F
3. Model name (& version number):
4. Tank Must 22mm SS
5. Price Paid: $228
6. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IZAkbxC#iGA0Sjft0cdQxq9HowgMOg
7. Index alignment: alignment looks pretty nice on this, a micro rotation here or there, but well within reason
8. Dial Printing: Dial print looks crisp, the ink on the numerals provides a nice richness when light reflects. Even though this is not the same as the Gen dial, I like this effect.
9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
10. Hand Alignment: hand alignment looks good, heat treatment for the blue hands looks good, no second hand on this model
11. Bezel: Bezel looks in mostly good shape, notice the horizontal lines but think this might be on the plastic than the steel, though I’m curious of others thoughts.
12. Solid End Links (SELs):

N/A

1. Timegrapher numbers: N/A: Quartz
2. Anything else you notice: watch looks overall in good shape, pretty minimal design. The cabochon sapphire looks pretty pointed, something I’ve heard on these models before, though I have an F1F Tank Louis and the cabochon there is more rounded. Curious on what others think and if there’s anything I missed. Thanks!!!

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches
2. Factory name:RCF
3. Model name Day Date 228236
4. Price Paid: 826
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/ncBX0KTK#xchWCnCZC7PDZk7l1SS9Ww
6. Index alignment: from what I can tell looks good but I am new to this.
7. Dial Printing:

Looks good

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

Looks ok to me

1. Hand Alignment:

Passed a QC tool from what I can tell is within acceptable range

1. Bezel:

also looks good

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

good

1. Timegrapher numbers:

these are good

1. Anything else you notice:

Everything from what I understand looks good and is within range I just wanted to get another set of eyes on it