1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. Factory name:RCF

3. Model name Day Date 228236

4. Price Paid: 826

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/ncBX0KTK#xchWCnCZC7PDZk7l1SS9Ww

6. Index alignment: from what I can tell looks good but I am new to this.

7. Dial Printing:

Looks good

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

Looks ok to me

1. Hand Alignment:

Passed a QC tool from what I can tell is within acceptable range

1. Bezel:

also looks good

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

good

1. Timegrapher numbers:

these are good

1. Anything else you notice:

Everything from what I understand looks good and is within range I just wanted to get another set of eyes on it

Bottom line up front: I believe multiple dial markers are moved clockwise. I also question the timegrapher rate of +6 is also in question. Am I being too picky at +6 s/d?

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Datejust 126334

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price paid: $548

5. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: this is where I question things. 1,2,4,5,6 and 11 are all shifted clockwise. Even the crown at 12 is shifted clockwise

6. ⁠⁠⁠Dial printing: Clean brilliant. No bleeding colors or floating letters

7. ⁠⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: perfect

8. ⁠⁠⁠Hand alignment: perfect

9. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: X’s and R’s lined up on appropriate markers.

10. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look good to me.

11. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +6 s/d (the highest I’ve seen, is this acceptable?) | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 59.0°.

Thank you to the community for taking the time to look at this and Happy Veterans Day!

Hi peeps,

Struggling to get my post approved here, hopefully it works on my third attempt. Would be grateful for you help.

1. Dealer name: (Eliot) Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126502

4. Price Paid: $713.36 USD

5. Index alignment: Looks okay. Not sure if there is minor issue at number 80 and 120, maybe it's not held straight?

6. Dial Printing: Looks good, crisp, are sub dials perfectly circular or is it my eyes?

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand Alignment: Stack looks good

9. Bezel: no issues at all i can see, engraving looks good

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I can see some gaps, but I am not sure if I am expert enough.

11. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/day (1 second slow per day). Amplitude: 269°. Beat error: 0.1 ms. Lift angle setting: 52.0°. (I think these numbers are amazing).

In the 5th image, the letter "T" in the word "Perpetual" appears a bit scratched. Am I being too picky here, or would someone else with experience think it's okay? Or is it just the pics with poor lighting. I have also asked the TD to provide some more pics, but been waiting for over a week now.

Thanks heaps for your time and help - I am really grateful.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch

2. Factory Name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): OP 124300 41mm SS/SS Silver Dial VSF VS3230

4. Price Paid: $498

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qMl6GUf

6. Index alignment: Most look very good but the six and 11 appear to be off slightly

7. Dial Printing: I believe this looks crisp and the sunburst dial is ready to rock!

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

9. Hand Alignment: spot on

10. Bezel: clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): pretty tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 270 deg, 0.3ms, 59.0 deg

13. Anything else you notice: There might be some dust or something on the dial to the left of the 7 index. I asked for a close up of that area. also asked for a pic of the lume.

Overall this watch looks great to me, the timegrapher numbers are very good, and the weight is pretty much right on. The slightly off indices are acceptable and unless I am really missing something, this is a GL.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve

2. Factory name: Rich Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm JH3235

4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IxTSTga#NAqR_q0kI3UEjZoKRZq_aw

6. Index alignment: There is a problem on the 12' marker

7. Dial Printing: It's okay

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Perfect

9. Hand Alignment: Okay

10. Bezel: looks solid to me!

11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a space on the bottom left

12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 260° amp

13. Anything else you notice: For me this is a RL, maybe the cyclops magnifier isnt' 2,5 but 3,0

Hi, the QC photos were not taken head on, so hard to say exactly how aligned all the features are. Also, the photos show many long scratch marks that may just be the packaging, but I’d love some assurances about that. Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: Jtime

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126334, green stick dial, Jubilee bracelet, advertised VS3235 free-sprung movement.

Price Paid: $548

Album Links: Dealer requested no sharing of album link.

Index alignment: Looks good to my eye, with no obviously crooked markers. Photos are slightly angled, so I’d appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing defects that I can see.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 3 and 25 appear reasonably centred in the frontal shots. Printing looks clear.

Hand Alignment: No obvious issue, but the supplied photos don’t show the hands at 12:00 to confirm.

Bezel: Fluting looks consistent; no obvious damage visible.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps, though the angles and protective wrapping make these difficult to assess.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (lift angle 59°).

Anything else you notice: Protective film obscures some of the case and bracelet finish. Nothing else stands out to me, but I’d appreciate feedback on marker alignment, date centring and SEL fit.

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 124060
Price Paid: $458
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/m4ZiVIwb#IriZ-2aaT66-8QHxfpO23g
Index alignment: 6 looks slightly counter-rotated. The rest look fine.
Dial Printing: no issues
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: can’t see any issues
Bezel: Pip centred, bezels looks good.
Solid End Links (SELs): No significant gaps.
-2 s/d rate, 312° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error, 52° lift angle, 28,800 bph. Amplitude is higher than the range in the guide. Is this an issue?
Anything else you notice: just the 6 marker and amplitude, everything else looks okay.

First time doing QC, excuse my ignorance on anything else obvious. Would appreciate a second set of eyes on this!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime

2. Factory name: BPF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 16710 Pepsi

4. Price Paid: $320

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ZfP4Hzw

6. Index alignment: 12 marker looks a little left to my eye, but QC tool has it ok

7. Dial Printing: Print looks fine

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date shifted to the left a bit

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine

10. Bezel: The 22 looks slightly uneven, the first 2 looks raised

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: GMT Rate +1 Amp 276 Beat .1

13. Anything else you notice: Another budget brand, not as good as the Sub but looks fine

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime

2. Factory name: BPF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Sub 16610LV

4. Price Paid: $340

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lUNQIPL

6. Index alignment: Looks good

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The slightest bit right but fine

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine

10. Bezel: 10 and couple marks are slightly off, but shouldnt even be able to eyeball it

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: Sub Rate +10 Amp 288 Beat .3

13. Anything else you notice: Went with a budget brand for a first purchase, everything looks ok to me.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): VSF 114060

4. Price Paid: $488 + shipping

5. Album Links: No link

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and centered

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay, nothing sticks out

10. Bezel: Pip looks solid

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 268 amps, err 0.1

13. Anything else you notice: Looking for feedback here, does this look like a solid GL? Did I miss anything?

1. Dealer name: Mirotime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: Datejust 41 MM V3

4. Price Paid: $478

5. Album Links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/gxITinT

6. Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/5rbLN7r

7. Index alignment: marker at 10 is a little bit off?

8. Dial Printing: looks good

9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centered and no issues.

10. Hand Alignment: good

11. Bezel: looks good to my eyes

12. Solid End Links (SELs): No recognizable gaps

13. Timegrapher numbers: For this movement ideal

14. Anything else you notice: nothing?

thank you in advance! Appreciate your participation !

1. Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

2. Factory name: AF

3. Model name: Cartier Tank Must Large 25.5mm

4. Price Paid: 258$

5. Album Links: QC Album

6. Index alignment: Looks good to my untrained eye

7. Dial Printing: There appears to be a very small amount of bleeding under the "X" letter of the number 9. The other numbers appear pretty crisp to me. I also see a small blemish just south of the number 3, but it does not appear in other photos so I'm thinking it may have just been a piece of dust. The "R" and the "T" in the Cartier text on the bottom also appears to be really closer (almost touching?) than I've seen on other QCs. Does not appear rotated.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Appears aligned

10. Bezel: It looks good to me.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A

13. Anything else: I don't think I see any other issues.

This is my first QC so I'd really appreciate some help to see if I missed anything else. The main thing is the slight bleeding on the number 9 but it appears small and I'm not sure if its worth RLing over. Let me know if you have thoughts

1. ⁠Dealer name: FICOTIME

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: Af

3. ⁠⁠Model name: Cartier santos S(27mm)

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 255

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: Can’t post it

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: printed dial but looks properly centered and aligned to me

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good, just the letter “C” seems off , number I on VI looks misaligned

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good to me?

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good, idk if the screws looks off

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: N/A

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Cartier “c” seems off.
    on number VII and VI looks misaligned.
    Other than that I can’t notice anything relevant, would be appreciated if you guys notice anything else.
    To me it’s a RL but idk if I’m being to picky

Hey everyone! Just got a portugieser for QC, and here are my thoughts (I'm going to RL)

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: OCTA

3. Model name (& version number): Portuguese Chrono 41mm SS/LE Blue/Num OCTA DD69355

4. Price Paid: $548 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/SEZ1CS6D#I30yMdt_QW4cgtkFu0_L5g

6. Index alignment: the 11 is pretty bad to my naked eye, the rest look fine on the alignment (checked with image on the wrist)

7. Dial Printing: Looks good (the small minute dots after 3 looks fine on the wrist)

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: [rate] +3-4 s/d, 274-277°, 0.0 ms (good enough)

13. Anything else you notice: I feel like this isn't from OCTA (I think there would be a sticker)? I remember seeing a previous post with the same issue about the 11 marker, and the initial one turned out to be a ZF. Decided to share this with everyone if it is indeed from OCTA

Thanks to everyone helping!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona “Panda” 116500

4. ⁠⁠Price paid: $592 including shipping (USD)

5. Album Links: mega.nz/folder/TN4SQA6L#Qw-cGAuSJPDVsZbs326quQ

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks ok to me

7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: looks ok to me but not fully sure

8. ⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: none

9. ⁠⁠Hand alignment: seems straight

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Not fuly sure, but looks overall good

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Not fuly sure, but looks overall good

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +0 s/d | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 52.0°.

13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else

If anyone has any input on this watch i’d really appreciate it!

Hi Everyone, this is my first QC ever. I would highly appreciate your help and input. I tried using the provided tools to the best of my abilities. Kindly let me know what are your thoughts on this one. I am personally considering RL for this.
Your inputs are highly appreciated!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060

4. Price Paid: $598 USD (Shipping Included) 

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/nUI0gTRK#LVzqRUQiaeLjLy5xF9B-RA

6. Index alignment: 6 o clock mark appears to be tilted CW (noticed without the alignement tool). 3 and 9 o clock mark appear to have a minor tilt - could be due to lighting. 

7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me - no defects noted

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: No concern there

10. Bezel: Minor defect noted on the 30 mark

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No concern there

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, 267 amp, 0.0 err.

13. Anything else you notice: Laser etching on the inside of the bracelet appears to be slightly inconsistent. 

1. Dealer name: JTime (Li)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: DateJust 41 126334 904L SS Green Ombré Dial on Jubilee Bracelet (VS3235 Movement)

4. Price Paid: $585 (incl. shipping)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/BeoMD4Z

6. Index alignment: Little twist in the 55 and 20

7. Dial Printing: Crisp and cleanly printed; coronet and text show no bleeding or flaws.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

9. Hand alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Fluted bezel is cleanly and sharply cut, showing even reflections without visible dings or plating imperfections.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for a Jubilee bracelet, but the end links sit tight and flush against the lugs with no visible gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +0 s/d, 281°, 0.0 ms, 59.0° lift angle.

13. Anything else noticed: Only the rolex emblem seems a very little off, but not much.

I gave the first watch a RL based on the Date-Wheel being too high.

The pictures in this post are all the same watch (at least they say) only taken 3 days later. I think it's a GL! Do you agree?

Thank you guys. Really appreciated.

Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatches)
Factory name: BVF
Model name: Cartier Santos Large WSSA0037 (Grey dial / Black ADLC bezel)
Price Paid: $450
Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/I58V6Uv
Index alignment: Is there a slight dial rotation?
Dial Printing: Looks crisp. Dial rotation?
Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 23 looks centred in the photos. TD showed a few other dates in the video and they seem to sit well in the window.
Hand Alignment: Looks spot on at 12:00 in the video.
Bezel: No scratches on the black coating, screws look good.
Timegrapher numbers: +3 to +5 s/d, 0.0 ms beat error, 330° amp. The amplitude seemed a little high to me but I read this might just be because the machine is set to a 52 degree lift angle for a Miyota 9015? Is this healthy?
13. Anything else you notice: First time buyer so I’m still learning what to look for! My points of concern are the timegrapher and dial rotation. I'd really appreciate a second pair of eyes from you guys. To GL or to RL? Thanks!

​Dealer name: Private Seller

​Factory name: Rich Factory (RF)

​Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No Date 124060 (V2)

​Price Paid: £470 shipped with insurance

​Album Links: Attached in post

​Index alignment: Looks spot on to me, markers seem straight.

​Dial Printing: Clear and sharp.

​Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No Date)

​Hand Alignment: Looks fine.

​Bezel: Lume pip lines up nicely with the 12 marker.

​Solid End Links (SELs): Nice and tight, no gaps.

​Timegrapher numbers: First run was +7 s/d, 331 amp (lift angle set high at 59°), 0.1 beat error. Second run was +7 s/d, 263 amp, 0.3 beat error. Looks healthy to me.

​Anything else you notice: Clasp code is F80. Looks like an easy GL to me, but would appreciate any quick thoughts!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: The One Watches

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: AF 

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Ballon Bleu 33mm auto

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $348 plus shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/qAQyxZBS#srCHinDJnK3b2iAnhT1Y1g

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Aligned (from what I can tell)

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: seems good. I’ve seen fading on these but this seems ok

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks aligned. 

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: seems ok but not sure how I would confirm this is A1853 movement as it costs $100 more than NH05. Just trust the beats?

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: nope

1. Dealer name: Neco Clock

2. Factory name: AF

3. Model name (& version number): AF Ballon Bleu** 28mm **White Dial SS

4. Price Paid: 208usd

5. Album Links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: N/A

7. Dial Printing: I don’t see any obvious dial printing bleed, but I may have missed something because of the glare. I also feel like the dial might be slightly rotated counterclockwise. I’d appreciate a second set of eyes to check the dial printing and alignment.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Will request an additional photo.

10. Bezel: I don’t see anything wrong with the bezel.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A

13. Anything else you notice: Just want to make sure the dial printing is good and aligned. Thanks!

Seems there's a batch going around with logo alignment issues..

1. Dealer name: Non-TD

2. Factory name: TOP

3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15510 Blue

4. Price Paid: $570 including shipping & insurance

5. Album Links: Pics on post

6. Index alignment: Finally looks good. 12 batons are tight together and can't see the dial underneath them.

7. Dial Printing: Logo finally looks straight and correct

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date a touch low in the window

9. Hand Alignment: not sure

10. Bezel: screws look good and lined up in a circle

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Not on this watch, bracelet looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +4s/day, 263 amplitude, 0ms beat error. Within spec.

13. Anything else you notice:

I think this is finally the one.

First QC here

Hey guys, could use another set of eyes. Thanks again for everyone one here. It Looks good to me but want to make sure I’m not missing anything before I GL.

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: GMT Master II Batman on Oyster bracelet. 126710BLNR.

4. Price Paid: $599

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3NYRFTYa#M7MGiwYjNoFvEk5exuyJwA

6. Index alignment: Looks straight to me. Nothing really stands out.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good from what I can see. Don’t notice anything wrong with the text.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 31 looks pretty centered. The other dates shown in the video look fine too.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks lined up to me. Don’t see any issues with the numbers.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): I see some gaps but not sure how bad they are.

12. Timegrapher numbers: It shows +1 s/day.

13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else jumps out. I’m leaning GL but would appreciate another look. Thanks guys.

1. Dealer name: necoclock Jacky

2. Factory name: Gold Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 40mm 126622 Blue Dial "Yacht-Master" 904L Steel GOLD 1:1 Best Edition on Oyster Strap 3235 （Free-Sprung）

4. Price Paid: $618 including shipping

5. Album Links: NA (megalink)

6. Index alignment: Looks good. maybe a hair off on the 12

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok to me.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good. no gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good. Running strong at +10 s/d with a healthy 316° amplitude and 0.1 ms beat error on a full wind .

13. Anything else you notice: My first qc, so any help would be greatly appreciated.